Comparison of multiple auditory steady-state responses (80 versus 40 Hz) and slow cortical potentials for threshold estimation in hearing-impaired adults

References

• Adelman, S. & Van Maanen, A. July 2001. Use of SVP for threshold estimation in WCB claimants. Poster presented at the 17th meeting of the International Evoked Response Audiometry Study Group Symposium, VancouverCanada.
   Google Scholar
• Alberti P., Hyde M., Riko K. Exaggerated hearing loss in compensation claimants. J Otolaryngol 1987; 16: 362–366
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aoyagi M., Kiren T., Furuse H., Fuse T., Suzuki Y., et al. Pure-tone threshold prediction by 80 Hz amplitude-modulation following response. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 1994; 511: 7–14
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aoyagi M., Kiren T., Kim Y., Suzuki Y., Fuse T., et al. Optimal modulation frequency for amplitude-modulation following response in young children during sleep. Hear Res 1993; 65: 253–261
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aoyagi M., Suzuki Y., Yokota M., Furuse H., Watanabe T., et al. Reliability of 80 Hz amplitude modulation-following response detected by phase coherence. Audiol Neurootol 1999; 4: 28–37
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonvier R. Slow auditory evoked potentials: The end of malingering in audiology. Int Tinnitus J 2002; 8: 58–61
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Coles R. R. A., Mason S. M. The results of cortical electric response audiometry in medico-legal investigations. Br J Audiol 1984; 18: 71–78
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dimitrijevic A., John M. S., Van Roon P., Purcell D. W., Adamonis J., et al. Estimating the audiogram using the multiple auditory steady-state responses. J Am Acad Audiol 2002; 13: 205–224
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Galambos R., Makeig S., Talmachoff P. J. A 40 Hz auditory potential recorded from the human scalp. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1981; 78: 2643–2647
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herdman A. H., Stapells D. R. Thresholds determined using the monotic and dichotic multiple auditory steady-state response technique in normal-hearing subjects. Scand Audiol 2001; 30: 41–49
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herdman A. H., Stapells D. R. Auditory steady-state response thresholds of adults with sensorineural hearing impairments. Int J Audiol 2003; 42: 237–248
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyde M. L. The slow vertex potential: Properties and clinical applications. Principles and Applications in Auditory Evoked Potentials, J. T. Jacobson. Allyn and Bacon, Boston 1994; 179–218
   Google Scholar
• Jerger J., Chmiel R., Frost J. D., Coker N. Effect of sleep on the auditory steady-state potential. Ear Hear 1986; 7: 240–245
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John M. S., Dimitrijevic A., Picton T. W. Auditory steady-state responses to exponential modulation envelopes. Ear Hear 2002; 23: 106–117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John M. S., Lins O., Boucher B., Picton T. W. Multiple auditory steady-state responses (MASTER): Stimulus and recording parameters. Audiology 1998; 37: 59–82
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• John M. S., Picton T. W. MASTER: a windows program for recording multiple auditory steady state responses. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2000; 61: 125–150
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John M. S., Purcell D. W., Dimitrijevic A., Picton T. W. Advantages and caveats when recording steady-state responses to multiple simultaneous stimuli. J Am Acad Audiol 2002; 13: 246–259
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Levi E. C., Folsom R. C., Dobie R. A. Amplitude-modulation following response (AMFR): Effects of modulation rate, carrier frequency, age, and state. Hear Res 1993; 68: 42–52
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linden R. D., Campbell K. B., Hamel G., Picton T. W. Human auditory steady-state potentials during sleep. Ear Hear 1985; 6: 167–174
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lins O. G., Picton T. W. Auditory steady-state responses to multiple simultaneous stimuli. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1995; 96: 420–432
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lins O. G., Picton T. W., Boucher B. L., Durieux-Smith A., Champagne S. C., et al. Frequency-specific audiometry using steady-state responses. Ear Hear 1996; 17: 81–96
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luts H., Wouters J. Hearing assessment by recording multiple auditory steady-state responses: the influence of test duration. Int J Audiol 2004; 43: 471–478
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oates P., Stapells D. R. Auditory brainstem response estimates of the audiogram: current status. Semin Hear 1998; 19: 61–84
   Google Scholar
• Pethe J., von Specht H., Muhler R., Hocke T. Amplitude modulation following responses in awake and sleeping humans: A comparison for 40 Hz and 80 Hz modulation frequency. Scand Audiol Suppl 2001; 52: 152–155
   Google Scholar
• Perez-Abalo M., Savio G., Torres A., Martin V., Rodriguéz E., et al. Steady state responses to multiple amplitude-modulated tones: an optimized method to test frequency-specific thresholds in hearing-impaired children and normal-hearing subjects. Ear Hear 2001; 22: 200–211
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picton T. W. Clinical usefulness of auditory evoked potentials: A critical evaluation. J Speech-Lang Path Audiol 1991; 15: 3–16
   Google Scholar
• Picton T. W., Dimitrijevic A., John M. S. Multiple auditory steady-state responses. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 2002; 111: 16–21
   Google Scholar
• Picton, T. W., Dimitrijevic, A., Perez-Ablo, M., & Van Roon, P. ( 2005). Estimating audiometric thresholds using auditory steady-state responses. J Am Acad Audiol.
   Google Scholar
• Picton T. W., Durieux-Smith A., Champagne S. C., Whittingham J., Moran, et al. Objective evaluation of aided thresholds using auditory steady state responses. J Am Acad Audiol 1998; 9: 315–331
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Picton T. W., John M. S., Dimitrijevic A., Purcell D. Human auditory steady-state responses. Int J Audiol 2003; 42: 177–219
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picton T. W., Skinner C. R., Champagne S. C., Kellet A. J. C., Maiste A. C. Potentials evoked by the sinusoidal modulation of the amplitude or frequency of a tone. J Acoust Soc Am 1987; 82: 165–178
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picton T. W., Vajsar J., Rodrigeuz R., Campbell K. B. Reliability estimates for steady-state evoked potentials. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1987; 68: 119–131
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Plourde G., Stapells D. R., Picton T. W. The human auditory steady-state evoked potentials. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 1991; 491: 153–160
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rance G., Rickards F., Cohen L., De Vidi S., Clark G. The automated prediction of hearing thresholds in sleeping infants using auditory steady-state evoked potentials. Ear Hear 1995; 16: 499–507
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rance G., Rickards F. Prediction of hearing threshold in infants using auditory steady-state potentials. J Am Acad Audiol 2002; 13: 236–245
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Small, S. & Stapells, D. R. ( 2005). Multiple auditory steady-state responses to bone conduction stimuli in adults with normal hearing. J Am Acad Audiol.
   Google Scholar
• Stach B. A., Jerger J. F., Penn T. O. Principles and Applications in Auditory Evoked Potentials, J. T. Jacobson. Allyn and Bacon, Boston 1994; 541–560
   Google Scholar
• Stapells D. R. Frequency-specific evoked potential audiometry in infants. A Sound Foundation Through Early Amplification, R. C. Seewald. Phonak AG, Basel 2000a; 13–31
   Google Scholar
• Stapells D. R. Threshold estimation by the tone-evoked auditory brainstem response: A literature meta-analysis. J Speech-Lang Path Audiol 2000b; 224: 74–83
   Google Scholar
• Stapells D. R. Cortical event-related potentials to auditory stimuli. Handbook of Clinical Audiology, J. Katz. Lippingcott, Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore 2002; 378–406
   Google Scholar
• Stapells D. R., Galambos R., Costello J. A., Makeig S. Inconsistency of auditory middle latency and steady-state responses in infants. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1988; 71: 289–295
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stapells D. R., Gravel J. S., Martin B. A. Thresholds for auditory brain stem responses to tones in notched noise from infants and young children with normal-hearing or sensorineural hearing loss. Ear Hear 1995; 16: 361–371
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stapells D. R., Linden D., Suffield J. B., Hamel G., Picton T. W. Human auditory steady-state potentials. Ear Hear 1984; 5: 105–113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stapells D. R., Picton T. W., Durieux-Smith A., Edwards C., Moran L. Thresholds for short-latency auditory-evoked potentials to tones in notched noise in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects. Audiology 1990; 29: 262–274
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Suzuki T., Kobayashi K. An evaluation of 0.040 kHz event-related potentials in young children. Audiology 1984; 23: 599–604
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tsui B., Wong L., Wong E. Accuracy of the cortical evoked response audiometry in the identification of non-organic hearing loss. Int J Audiol 2002; 41: 330–333
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vander Werff K. R., Brown C. J., Gienapp B. A., Schmidt Clay K. M. Comparisons of auditory steady-state response and auditory brainstem response thresholds in children. J Am Acad Audiol 2002; 13: 227–235
   PubMedGoogle Scholar