Rising-frequency chirps and earphones with an extended high-frequency response enhance the post-auricular muscle response

References

• Arnold B., Schorn K., Stecker M. Screening program for selection of hearing loss in newborn infants instituted by the European Community. Laryngorhinootologie 1995; 74: 172–178
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bickford R.G., Jacobson J.L., Galbraith R.F. A new audio motor system in man. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 1963; 15: 921–925
   Google Scholar
• Buffin J.T., Connell J.A., Stamp J.M. The post-auricular muscle response in children. J Laryngol Otol 1977; 91: 1047–1062
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dau T., Wegner O., Mellert V., Kollmeier B. Auditory brainstem responses with optimised chirp signals compensating basilar-membrane dispersion. J Acoust Soc Am 2000; 107: 1530–1540
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimitrijevic A., John M.S., Van Roon P., Purcell D.W., Adamonis J., et al. Estimating the audiogram using multiple auditory steady-state responses. J Am Acad Audiol 2002; 13: 205–224
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eggermont J.J., Salamy A. Development of ABR parameters in a preterm and a term born population. Ear Hear 1988; 9: 283–289
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folsom R.C., Aurich C.D. Auditory brainstem responses from human adults and infants: influence of stimulus onset. Audiology 1987; 26: 117–122
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank T. ANSI update: maximum permissible ambient noise levels for audiometric test rooms. Am J Audiol 2000; 9: 3–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Funasaka S., Ito S. Stimulus duration and waves of auditory brainstem response. Audiology 1986; 25: 176–183
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gibson W.P.R. Essentials of Clinical Electric response Audiometry. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh 1978
   Google Scholar
• Gorga M.P., Beauchaine K.A., Reiland J.K., Worthington D.W., Javel E. The effects of stimulus duration on ABR and behavioural thresholds. J Acoust Soc Am 1984; 76: 616–619
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorga M.P., Thornton A.R. The choice of stimuli for ABR measurements. Ear Hear 1989; 10: 217–230
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwood D.D. A cochlear frequency position function for several species-29 years later. J Acoust Soc Am 1990; 87: 2592–2605
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall J.W.I. Handbook of Auditory Evoked Responses. Allyn and Bacon, Needham Heights, MA 1992
   Google Scholar
• Jacobson J.L., Cody D.T., Lambert E.H., Bickford R.G. Physiological properties of the post-auricular responses (sonomotor) in man. The Physiologist 1964; 7: 167
   Google Scholar
• Neely S.T., Norton S.J., Gorga M.P., Jesteadt W. Latency of auditory brain-stem responses and otoacoustic emissions using toneburst stimuli. J Acoust Soc Am 1988; 83: 652–656
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neumann J., Uppencamp S., Kollmeier B. Chirp evoked otoacoustic emissions. Hear Res 1994; 79: 17–25
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novak G.P., Kurtzberg D., Kreuzer J.A., Vaughan H.G.J. Cortical responses to speech sounds and their formants in normal infants: maturational sequence and spatiotemporal analysis. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 1989; 73: 295–305
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• O'Beirne G.A., Patuzzi R.B. Basic properties of the sound-evoked post-auricular muscle response (PAMR). Hear Res 1999; 138: 115–132
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oates P.A., Stapells D.R. Auditory brainstem response estimates of the pure tone audiogram: current status. Semin Hear 1998; 19: 61–85
   Google Scholar
• Özdamar, Ö., Hekimoglu, Y., & Delgado, R. E. 2001. Human auditory steady state responses (ASSR) to chirps and clicks: comparisons at different repetition rates. IERASG, Vancouver.
   Google Scholar
• Parmigiani F., Buratti C. Utilizzo del potenziale del muscolo retroauricolare (PAMr) nello studio della funzionalità del nervo facciale. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 1998; 18: 1–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Patuzzi R.B., O'Beirne G.A. Effects of eye rotation on the sound-evoked post-auricular muscle response (PAMR). Hear Res 1999; 138: 133–146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patuzzi R.B., Thomson S.M. Auditory evoked response test strategies to reduce cost and increase efficiency: the postauricular muscle response revisited. Audiol Neurootol 2000; 5: 322–332
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purdy, S.C., Agung, K.B., Hartley, D., Patuzzi, R.B., & O'Beirne, G.A. 2005. The post-auricular muscle response: an objective electrophysiological method for evaluating hearing sensitivity. I J Audiol, 44, 625–630.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purdy S.C., Kelly A.S., Thorne P.R. Auditory evoked potentials as measures of plasticity in humans. Audiol Neurootol 2001; 6: 211–215
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riedel H., Kollmeier B. Comparison of binaural auditory brainstem responses and the binaural difference potential evoked by chirps and clicks. Hear Res 2002; 169: 85–96
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe S.J. An evaluation of ABR audiometry for the screening and detection of hearing loss in ex-SCBU infants. Br J Audiol 1991; 25: 259–274
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rupp A., Uppencamp S., Gutschalk A., Beucker R., Patterson R.D., et al. The representation of peripheral neural activity in the middle-latency evoked field of primary auditory cortex in humans (1). Hear Res 2002; 174: 19–31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shore S.E., Nuttall A.L. High-synchrony cochlear compound action potentials evoked by rising frequency-swept tone bursts. J Acoust Soc Am 1985; 78: 1286–1295
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stapells D.R., Oates P. Estimation of the pure-tone audiogram by the auditory brainstem response: a review. Audiol Neurootol 1997; 2: 257–280
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valente M., Valente M., Goebel J. High-frequency thresholds: circumaural earphone versus insert earphone. J Am Acad Audiol 1992; 3: 410–418
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van der Drift J.F.C., Brocaar M.P., van Zanten G.A. Brainstem response audiometry. I. Its use in distinguishing between conductive and cochlear hearing loss. Audiology 1988a; 27: 260–270
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van der Drift J.F.C., Brocaar M.P., van Zanten G.A. Brainstem response audiometry. II. Classification of hearing loss by discriminant analysis. Audiology 1988b; 27: 271–278
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vaughan H.G., Ritter W. The sources of auditory evoked responses recorded from the human scalp. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1970; 28: 360–367
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wegner O., Dau T. Frequency specificity of chirp-evoked auditory brainstem responses. J Acoust Soc Am 2002; 111: 1318–1329
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshie N., Okudaira T. Myogenic evoked potential responses to clicks in man. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 1969; 252: 89–103
   PubMedGoogle Scholar