References
- Baird J.C., Noma E. Fundamentals of scaling and psychophysics. Wiley Interscience, New York 1978
- Baird J.C. Medical psychophysics. Proc Annu Int Soc Psychophysics, E. Sommerfeld, R. Kompass, T. Lachmann. Pabst Science Publishers, Zagreb 2001; 18–25
- Baird J.C., Chawarski M.C. Context constrained judgment of the perceived risk of HIV/AIDS. J Appl Soc Psychol 2005; 35: 29–60
- Cienkowski K.M., Saunders G.H. Client-attitude questionnaire provides data that can help shape counseling strategies. Hear J 2000; 53: 42–48
- Cox R.M. Administration and application of the APHAB. Hear J 1997; 50: 32–48
- Cox R.M. Assessment of subjective outcome of hearing aid fitting: Getting the client's point of view. Int J Audiol 2003; 42: S90–S96
- Cox R.M., Alexander G.C. The abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit. Ear Hear 1995; 16: 176–186
- Cox R.M., Alexander G.C. Measuring satisfaction with amplification in daily life: The SADL scale. Ear Hear 1999; 20: 306–320
- Demorest M.E., Erdman S.A. Development of the communication profile for the hearing impaired. J Speech Lang Hear Dis 1987; 52: 129–143
- Fanciullo G.J., Jamison R.N., Chawarski M.C., Baird J.C. Reliability and validity of an interactive computer method for rating quality of life. Pain Med 2003; 4: 257–268
- Gabrielsson A., Rosenberg U., Sjogern H. Judgments and dimension analyses of perceived sound quality of sound-reproducing systems. J Acoust Soc Am 1974; 55: 854–861
- Gabrielsson A., Sjogern H. Perceived sound quality of hearing aids. Scand Audiol 1979; 8: 159–69
- Gatehouse S., Noble W. The speech hearing, spatial hearing and qualities of hearing (SSQ). Int J Audiol 2004; 43: 85–99
- Granqvist S. The visual sort and rate method for perceptual evaluation in listening tests. Logoped Phoniatr Vocol 2003; 28: 109–116
- Heft M., Parker S.R. An experimental basis for revising the graphic rating scale for pain. Pain 1984; 19: 153–161
- Jamison R.N., Fanciullo G.J., Baird J.C. Computerized dynamic assessment of pain: Comparison of chronic pain patients and healthy controls. Pain Med 2004; 5: 168–177
- McGraw K.O., Wong S.P. Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psychol Methods 1996; 1: 30–46
- Monras P., Gralla R.J., Burke M.T., et al. Development of specific instruments for subjective evaluation of patients with lung cancer: Comparison of observer assessment with patient generated visual analogue scales (VAS). Proc Am Soc of Clin Oncology 1985; 4: 251
- Nunnally J.C. Psychometric Theory. McGraw Hill, New York 1978
- Saunders G.H., Cienkowski K.M. Refinement and psychometric evaluation of the attitudes toward loss of hearing questionnaire. Ear Hear 1996; 17: 505–517
- Stevens S.S. Psychophysics: Introduction to its perceptual, neural, and social prospects. John Wiley & Sons, New York 1975
- Streiner D.L., Norman G.R. Health measurement scales: A practical guide to their development and use2nd edition. Oxford University Press, Oxford 1995
- Ventry I.M., Weinstein B.E. The hearing handicap inventory for the elderly: A new tool. Ear Hear 1982; 3: 128–134
- Weinstein B., Ventry I. Audiometric correlates of the hearing handicap inventory for the Elderly. J Speech Hear Dis 1983; 48: 379–384
- Wewers M.E., Lowe N.K. A critical review of visual analogue scaling. Res Nurs Health 1990; 13: 227–236