References
- Bacon S.P., Opie J.M., Montoya D.Y. The effects of hearing loss and noise masking on the masking release for speech in temporally complex background. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1998; 41: 549–563
- Baer T., Moore B.C., Kluk K. Effects of low pass filtering on the intelligibility of speech in noise for people with and without dead regions at high frequencies. J Acoust Soc Am 2002; 112: 1133–1144
- Dubno J.R., Horwitz A.R., Ahlstrom J.B. Benefit of modulated maskers for speech recognition by younger and older adults with normal hearing. J Acoust Soc Am 2002; 111: 2897–2907
- Eisenberg L.S., Dirks D.D., Bell T.S. Speech recognition in amplitude-modulated noise of listeners with normal and listeners with impaired hearing. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1995; 38: 222–233
- Festen J., Plomp R. Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech reception threshold for impaired and normal hearing. J Acoust Soc Am 1990; 88: 1725–1736
- Füllgrabe C., Berthommier F., Lorenzi C. Masking release for consonant features in temporally fluctuating background noise. Hear Res 2006; 211: 74–84
- Goodman A. Reference zero levels for pure-tone audiometers. ASHA 1965; 7: 262–263
- Gustafsson H.A., Arlinger S.D. Masking of speech by amplitude-modulated noise. J Acoust Soc Am 1994; 95: 518–529
- Howard-Jones P.A., Rosen S. The perception of speech in fluctuating noise. Acustica 1993a; 78: 258–272
- Howard-Jones P.A., Rosen S. Uncomodulated glimpsing in ‘checkerboard’ noise. J Acoust Soc Am 1993b; 93: 2915–2922
- Loi Huriet-Serusclat. 2004. Journal Officiel, 185, 11 août, 14277.
- Martin P. Éléments de phonétique, avec application au français. Les Presses de l'Université Laval, Sainte-Foy 1996
- Miller G.A., Licklider J.C.R. The intelligibility of interrupted speech. J Acoust Soc Am 1950; 22: 167–173
- Miller G.A., Nicely P.E. Analysis of perceptual confusions among some english consonants. J Acoust Soc Am 1955; 27: 338–352
- Moore B.C.J., Shailer M.J., Schooneveldt G.P. Temporal modulation transfer functions for band-limited noise in subjects with cochlear hearing loss. Brit J Audiol 1992; 26: 229–237
- Nelson P.B., Jin S-H., Carney A.E., Nelson D.A. Understanding speech in modulated interference: Cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 2003; 113: 961–968
- Peters R.W., Moore B.C.J., Baer T. Speech reception thresholds in noise, with and without spectral and temporal dips for hearing-impaired and normally hearing people. J Acoust Soc Am 1998; 103: 577–587
- Qin M.K., Oxenham A.J. Effects of simulated cochlear-implant processing on speech reception in fluctuating maskers. J Acoust Soc Am 2003; 114: 446–454
- Summers V., Molis M.R. Speech recognition in fluctuating and continuous maskers: Effects of hearing loss and presentation level. J Speech lang Hear Res 2004; 47: 245–256
- Takahashi G.A., Bacon S.P. Modulation detection, modulation masking, and speech understanding in noise in the elderly. J Speech Hear Res 1992; 35: 1410–1421
- Zeng F-G., Nie K., Stickney G.S., Kong Y-Y., Vongphoe M., et al. Speech recognition with amplitude and frequency modulations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005; 102: 2293–2298