Fitting strategies and candidature criteria for unilateral and bilateral hearing aid fittings

References

• Allen J.B., Hall J.L., Jeng P.S. Loudness growth in 1/2-octave bands (LGOB)-a procedure for the assessment of loudness. J Acoust Soc Am 1990; 88(2)745–753
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks D.N. Counselling and its effect on hearing aid use. Scand Audiol 1979; 8(2)101–107
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brooks D.N. Binaural benefit–when and how much?. Scand Audiol 1984; 13(4)237–241
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks D.N. The effect of attitude on benefit obtained from hearing aids. Br J Audiol 1989; 23(1)3–11
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brooks D.N., Bulmer D. Survey of binaural hearing aid users. Ear Hear 1981; 2(5)220–224
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne D., Dillon H., Ching T., Katsch R., Keidser G. NAL-NL1 procedure for fitting nonlinear hearing aids: characteristics and comparisons with other procedures. J Am Acad Audiol 2001; 12(1)37–51
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carter A.S., Noe C.M., Wilson R.H. Listeners who prefer monaural to binaural hearing aids. J Am Acad Audiol 2001; 12(5)261–272
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cornelisse L.E., Seewald R.C., Jamieson D.G. The input/output formula: a theoretical approach to the fitting of personal amplification devices. J Acoust Soc Am 1995; 97(3)1854–1864
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox R. Using loudness data for hearing aid selection: The IHAFF approach. The Hear J 1995; 48(10)39–44
   Google Scholar
• Davis A. Population study of the ability to benefit from amplification and the provision of a hearing aid in 55–74-year-old first-time hearing aid users. Int J Audiol 2003; 42 Suppl 2: 2S39–2S52
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Day G.A., Browning G.G., Gatehouse S. Benefit from binaural hearing aids in individuals with a severe hearing impairment. Br J Audiol 1988; 22(4)273–277
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dillon H. Hearing aids. Thieme, New York Stuttgart. 2001
   Google Scholar
• Franck, B.A. 2004. Hearing aid fitting in interaction-On optimal combinations of multiple acoustic signal-processing strategies. Thesis, University of Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Franck B.A., Dreschler W.A., Lyzenga J. Methodological aspects of an adaptive multidirectional pattern search to optimize speech perception using three hearing-aid algorithms. J Acoust Soc Am 2004; 116(6)3620–3628
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grimm, G., Herzke, T., Berg, D. & Hohmann, V. 2006. The master hearing aid-a PC-based platform for algorithm development and evaluation. (in press) Acta Acustica united with Acustica.
   Google Scholar
• Hall J.W., Harvey A.D. Diotic loudness summation in normal and impaired hearing. J Speech Hear Res 1985; 28(3)445–448
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hawkins D.B., Prosek R.A., Walden B.E., Montgomery A.A. Binaural loudness summation in the hearing impaired. J Speech Hear Res 1987; 30(1)37–43
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kiessling J. Scaling methods for the selection, fitting and evaluation of hearing aids. Psychoacoustics, speech and hearing aids, B. Kollmeier. Word Scientific Publishing, Singapore New Jersey London Hong Kong 1996; 297–306
   Google Scholar
• Kiessling J., Pastoors A.D. ‘Hearing aid fitting in non-linear hearing instruments with and without loudness scaling’. Auditory models and non-linear instruments 18th Danavox Symposium, A.N. Rasmussen, P.A. Osterhammel, T. Andersen, T. Poulsen. Danavox Foundation, Kolding. 1999; 235–250
   Google Scholar
• Kiessling J., Schubert M., Archut A. Adaptive fitting of hearing instruments by category loudness scaling (ScalAdapt). Scand Audiol 1996; 25(3)153–160
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Killion M.C., Fikret-Pasa S. The 3 types of sensorineural hearing loss: loudness and intelligibility considerations. The Hear J 1993; 46(11)31–36
   Google Scholar
• Latzel, M. & Kiessling, J. 1999. Insitu ScalAdapt-ein lautheitsbasiertes Anpassverfahren im Vergleich mit einem herkömmlichen Prozedere. Z Audiol, Suppl.II, 55–57.
   Google Scholar
• Launer, S. 1995. Loudness perception in listeners with sensorineural hearing loss. Thesis, Universty of Oldenburg.
   Google Scholar
• Levitt, H. 1978a. Adaptive testing in audiology. Scand Audiol, Suppl(6), 241–291.
   Google Scholar
• Levitt, H. 1978b. Methods for the evaluation of hearing aids. Scand Audiol, Suppl(6), 199–240.
   Google Scholar
• Moore B.C., Alcantara J.I., Glasberg B.R. Development and evaluation of a procedure for fitting multi-channel compression hearing aids. Br J Audiol 1998; 32(3)177–195
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C., Marriage J., Alcantara J., Glasberg B.R. Comparison of two adaptive procedures for fitting a multi-channel compression hearing aid. Int J Audiol 2005; 44(6)345–357
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuman A.C., Levitt H., Mills R., Schwander T. An evaluation of three adaptive hearing aid selection strategies. J Acoust Soc Am 1987; 82(6)1967–1976
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pastoors A.D., Gebhart T.M., Kiessling J. A fitting strategy for digital hearing aids based on loudness and sound quality. Scand Audiol Suppl 2001; 52: 60–64
   Google Scholar
• Stone M.A., Moore B.C., Alcantara J.I., Glasberg B.R. Comparison of different forms of compression using wearable digital hearing aids. J Acoust Soc Am 1999; 106(6)3603–3619
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Swan I.R., Browning G.G., Gatehouse S. A cross-over study of side of hearing aid provision. Clin Otolaryngol 1986; 11(3)205–208
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Swan I.R., Browning G.G., Gatehouse S. Optimum side for fitting a monaural hearing aid. 1. Patients’ preference. Br J Audiol 1987; 21(1)59–65
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Swan I.R., Gatehouse S. Optimum side for fitting a monaural hearing aid. 2. Measured benefit. Br J Audiol 1987a; 21(1)67–71
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Swan I.R., Gatehouse S. Optimum side for fitting a monaural hearing aid. 3. Preference and benefit. Br J Audiol 1987b; 21(3)205–208
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Valente M., Van Vliet D. The independent hearing aid fitting forum (IHAFF) protocol. Trend in Amplification 1997; 2(1)6–35
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Walden T.C., Walden B.E. Unilateral versus bilateral amplification for adults with impaired hearing. J Am Acad Audiol 2005; 16(8)574–584
   PubMedGoogle Scholar