SII and fit-to-target analysis of compression system performance as a function of number of compression channels

References

• ASHA Ad Hoc Committee on Hearing Aid Selection and Fitting 1998. Guidelines for hearing aid fitting for adults. Am J Audiol, 7, 5–13
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• ANSI S3.22-2003 2003. Specification of Hearing Aid Characteristics. American National Standards Institute, New York.
   Google Scholar
• ANSI S3.5-1997 1997. Methods for Calculation of the Speech Intelligibility Index. American National Standards Institute, New York.
   Google Scholar
• ANSI S3.6-1996 1996. Specification for Audiometers. American National Standards Institute, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Bentler R.A., Pavlovic C.V. Transfer functions and correction factors used in hearing aid evaluation and research. Ear Hear 1989; 10: 58–63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne D., Dillon H., Tran K., Arlinger S., Wilbraham K., et al. An international comparison of long-term average speech spectra. J Acoust Soc Am 1994; 96: 2108–2120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ching T.Y.-C., Dillon H., Byrne D. Speech recognition of hearing-impaired listeners: Predictions from audibility and the limited role of high-frequency amplification. J Acoust Soc Am 1998; 103: 1128–1140
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crain T.R., Yund E.W. The effect of multichannel compression on vowel and stop-consonant discrimination in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects. Ear Hear 1995; 16: 529–543
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ewert S.D., Dau T. External and internal limitations in amplitude-modulation processing. J Acoust Soc Am 2004; 116: 478–490
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hansen M. Effects of multi-channel compression time constants on subjectively perceived sound quality and speech intelligibility. Ear Hear 2002; 23: 369–380
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan H., Gladstone V.S., Lloyd L.L. Audiometric Interpretation2^nd ed. Allyn and Bacon, Boston 1993
   Google Scholar
• Keidser G., Grant F. The preferred number of channels (one, two, or four) in NAL-NL1 prescribed wide dynamic range compression (WDRC) devices. Ear Hear 2001; 22: 516–527
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J. How much do we gain by gain control in hearing aids?. Acta Otolaryngol, Suppl. 1990; 469: 250–256
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moore B.C.J., Glasberg B.R., Stone M.A. Use of a loudness model for hearing aid fitting. III. A general method for deriving initial fittings for hearing aids with multi-channel compression. Br J Audiol 1999a; 33: 241–258
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J., Peters R.W., Stone M.A. Benefits of linear amplification and multichannel compression for speech comprehension in backgrounds with spectral and temporal dips. J Acoust Soc Am 1999b; 105: 400–411
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuman A.C., Bakke M.H., Hellman S., Levitt H. Effect of compression ratio in a slow-acting compression hearing aid: Paired-comparison judgments of quality. J Acoust Soc Am 1994; 96: 1471–1478
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plomp R. The negative effect of amplitude compression in multichannel hearing aids in the light of the modulation-transfer function. J Acoust Soc Am 1988; 83: 2322–2327
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plomp R. Reply to Comments on ‘The negative effect of amplitude compression in multichannel hearing aids in the light of the modulation-transfer function’ [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 83, 2322–2327 (1988)]’ [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 86, 425–427 (1989)]. J Acoust Soc Am 1989; 83: 2322–2327
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plomp R. Noise, amplification, and compression: Considerations of three main issues in hearing aid design. Ear Hear 1994; 15: 2–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Punch J.L., Beck L.B. Relative effects of low-frequency amplification on syllable recognition and speech quality. Ear Hear 1986; 7: 57–62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rankovic C.M. An application of the articulation index to hearing aid fitting. J Speech Hear Res 1991; 34: 391–402
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rankovic C.M. Derivation of frequency-gain characteristics for maximizing speech reception in noise. J Speech Hear Res 1995; 38: 913–929
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rankovic C.M., Freyman R.L., Zurek P.M. Potential benefits of adaptive frequency-gain characteristics for speech reception in noise. J Acoust Soc Am 1992; 91: 354–362
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seewald R.C., Cornelisse L.E., Ramji K.V., Sinclair S.T., Moodie K.S. , et al 1996. DSL® v4.1 for Windows®. University of Western Ontario.
   Google Scholar
• Sherbecoe R.L., Studebaker G.A. Regression equations for the transfer functions of ANSI S3.5-1969. J Acoust Soc Am 1990; 88: 2482–2483
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner M.W. Speech intelligibility in noise in noise-induced hearing loss: Effects of high-frequency compensation. J Acoust Soc Am 1980; 67: 306–317
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souza P.E., Turner C.W. Quantifying the contribution of audibility to recognition of compression-amplified speech. Ear Hear 1999; 20: 12–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stelmachowicz P., Lewis D., Kalberer A., Creutz T. Situational hearing-aid response profile users manual (SHARP v. 2.0). Boys Town National Research Hospital, Omaha, NE 1994
   Google Scholar
• Stone M.A., Moore B.C.J. Syllabic compression: Effective compression ratios for signals modulated at different rates. Br J Audiol 1992; 26: 351–361
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trine T.D., van Tasell D.J. Digital hearing aid design: Fact vs. fantasy. The Hearing Journal 2002; 55: 1–6
   Google Scholar
• van Dijkhuizen J.N., Festen J.M., Plomp R. The effect of frequency-selective attenuation on the speech-reception threshold of sentences in conditions of low-frequency noise. J Acoust Soc Am 1991; 90: 885–894
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villchur E. Signal processing to improve speech intelligibility in perceptive deafness. J Acoust Soc Am 1973; 53: 1646–1657
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villchur E. Comments on ‘The negative effect of amplitude compression in multichannel hearing aids in the light of the modulation transfer function’ [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 83, 2322–2327 (1988)]. J Acoust Soc Am 1989; 86: 425–421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods W., Frush R. & Van Tasell D. 1999. ‘Preference Space’ for parameters of two-channel speech compression. Proc. IEEE Workshop on Applications of Signal Processing to Audio and Acoustics, 235–238.
   Google Scholar
• Yund E., Buckles K. Multichannel compression hearing aids: Effect of number of channels on speech discrimination in noise. J Acoust Soc Am 1995; 97: 1206–1223
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar