Functionally-based screening criteria for hearing-critical jobs based on the Hearing in Noise Test

References

• American National Standards Institute. 1997. Methods for calculation of the speech intelligibility index. ANSI S3.5-1997. New York: American National Standards Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Begines T. Fitness and risk evaluation. Spectrum 1995; 12: 8–11
   Google Scholar
• Berger E.H. Hearing protection devices. The Noise Manual, Fifth Edition, E.H. Berger, L.H. Royster, J.D. Royster, D.P. Driscoll, M. Layne. American Industrial Hygiene Association, Fairfax 2000; 379–454
   Google Scholar
• Bhérer L., Deshaies P., Fortier P., Laroche C., Tremblay V., Turcotte F. Medical examination of heairng required by Quebec regulations: A relevance analysis Canadian Acoustics 2005; 33(1)27–35
   Google Scholar
• Brungart D.S., Simpson B.D., Ericson M.A., Scott K.R. Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of multiple simultaneous talkers. J Acoust Soc Am 2001; 110: 2538
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark J.E., Dermody P., Palethorpe S. Cue enhancement by stimulus repetition: Natural and synthetic speech comparisons. J Acoust Soc Am 1985; 78: 458–462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coles R.R.A., Sinclair A. Hearing. Fitness for work. The Medical Aspects, F.C. Edwards, R.I. McCallum, P.J. Taylor. Oxford University Press, Oxford 1998; 67–89
   Google Scholar
• Cox R.M., Gilmore C. Development of the profile of hearing aid performance. J Speech Hear Res 1990; 33: 343–357
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Festen J.M., Plomp R. Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech-reception threshold in impaired and hearing. J Acoust Soc Am 1990; 88: 1725–1736
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forshaw S., Hamilton K. Assessment of occupational hearing requirements. Canadian Acoustics 1997; 25(1)3–9
   Google Scholar
• Haggard M. Selectivity versus summation in multiple observation tasks: Evidence with spectrum parameter noise in speech. Acta Psychol 1973; 37: 285–299
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hétu R. Capacités auditives, critères d'embauche et droits de la personne. Canadian Acoustics 1993; 21(2)3–14
   Google Scholar
• Kramer S.E., Kapteyn T.S., Festen J.M. The self-reported handicapping effect of hearing disabilities. Audiology 1998; 37: 302–312
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Junqua J-C. The influence of acoustics on speech production: A noise-induced stress phenomenon known as the Lombard reflex. Speech Communication 1996; 20: 13–22
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Killion M., Niquette P.A. What can be pure-tone audiogram tell us about patient's SNR Loss?. The Hearing Journal 2000; 43: 46–53
   Google Scholar
• Lane H., Tranel B. The Lombard sign and the role of hearing in speech. J Speech Hear Res 1971; 14: 677–709
   Google Scholar
• Laroche C. Cases of possible job discrimination based on hearing loss. Canadian Acoustics 1994; 22(3)89–90
   Google Scholar
• Laroche C., Giguère C., Soli S., Lagacé J., Vaillancourt V. An approach to the development of hearing standards for hearing-critical jobs. Noise & Health 2003; 6(21)17–37
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Laroche, C., Giguère, C., Vaillancourt, V. & Soli, S. 2005. Development and validation of hearing standards for Canadian Coast Guard seagoing personnel and C&P and land-based personnel. Phase II, Final report to Department of Fisheries and Oceans under contract no. F7053-000009.
   Google Scholar
• MacLean S. Employment criteria in hearing-critical jobs. Spectrum 1995; 12: 20–23
   Google Scholar
• Mercille, I., Larose, R., Giguère, C. & Laroche, C. 2006. Quantifying the benefits of sentence repetition on the intelligibility of speech in continuous and fluctuating noises. Submitted to the 4th Joint Meeting of the Acoustical Society of America and Acoustical Society of Japan. Hawaii. 28 Nov.–2 Dec.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson M., Soli S.D., Sullivan J.A. Development of the hearing in noise test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. J Acoust Soc Am 1994; 95: 1085–99
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearsons, K.S. & Bennett, R.L. 1977. Speech levels in various noise environments. EPA, Office of Health and Ecological Effects, Washington.
   Google Scholar
• Philippon, B. 2004. Objective predictions of the performance intelligibility function for speech perception in different noise environments using the SII index. Technical report, Hearing Research Laboratory, University of Ottawa. 65 p.
   Google Scholar
• Rhebergen K.S., Versfeld N.J. A speech intelligibility index-based approach to predict the speech reception threshold for sentences in fluctuating noise for normal-hearing listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 2005; 117: 2181–2192
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider B.A. From acoustics to cognition: some surprising results. Canadian Acoustics 2004; 32(3)14–15
   Google Scholar
• Smoorenburg G.F. Speech reception in quiet and in noisy conditions by individuals with noise-induced hearing loss in relation to their tone audiogram. J Acoust Soc Am 1992; 91: 421–437
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soli, S.D. & Vermiglio, A. 1999. Assessment of functional hearing abilities for hearing-critical jobs in law enforcement. Report for the California Peace Officers Standards and Training Commission, 29 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Soli S., Laroche C., Giguère C., Vaillancourt V. A statistical model of prediction of functional hearing abilities in real-world noise environments. Joint meeting of the Acoustical Society of America and Canadian Acoustical Association, Vancouver, 16–20 May. J Acoust Soc Am 2005; 117: 2604
   Google Scholar
• Soli, S.D. 2008. Introduction to the special issue on assessment of speech communication handicap. Int J Audiol 47.
   Google Scholar
• Studebaker G.A., Taylor R., Sherbecoe R.L. The effect of noise spectrum on speech recognition performance-intensity functions. J Speech Hear Res 1994; 37: 439–448
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Summers W.V., Pisoni D.B., Bernacki R.H., Pedlow R.I., Stokes M.A. Effects of noise on speech production: Acoustic and perceptual analyses. J Acoust Soc Am 1988; 84: 917–928
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thwing E.J. Effect of repetition on articulation scores for PB words. J Acoust Soc Am 1956; 28: 302–303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tufts J.B., Frank T. Speech production in noise with and without hearing protection. J Acoust Soc Am 2003; 114: 1069–1080
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaillancourt V., Laroche C., Mayer C., Basque C., Nali M., et al. Adaptation of the HINT (hearing in noise test) for adult Canadian Francophone populations. Int J Audiology 2005; 44: 358–369
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar