Fast method for psychophysical tuning curve measurement in school-age children

References

• Abdala C., Folsom R. The development of frequency resolution in humans as revealed by the auditory brain-stem response recorded with notched-noise masking. J Acoust Soc Am 1995; 98: 921–930
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baer T., Moore B.C.J., Kluk K. Effects of lowpass filtering on the intelligibility of speech in noise for people with and without dead regions at high frequencies. J Acoust Soc Am 2002; 112: 1133–1144
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonding P. Frequency selectivity and speech discrimination in sensorineural hearing loss. Scand Audiol 1979; 8: 205–215
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• British Society of Audiology. Recommended procedure for pure-tone air and bone conduction threshold audiometry with and without masking and determination of uncomfortable loudness levels. March 2004. British Society of Audiology.
   Google Scholar
• Chistovich L.A. Frequency characteristics of masking effect. Biofizika 1957; 2: 743–755
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher H. Auditory patterns. Rev Mod Phys 1940; 12: 47–65
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Florentine M., Buus S., Scharf B., Zwicker E. Frequency selectivity in normally-hearing and hearing-impaired observers. J Speech Hear Res 1980; 23: 643–669
   Google Scholar
• Garland, R. 2007. Comparison of standard and fast psychophysical tuning curve measurements in normal-hearing adults. MSc thesis, University of Manchester (unpublished).
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein R., Karlovich R.S., Tweed T.S., Kile J.E. Psychoacoustic tuning curves and averaged electroencephalic responses in a patient with low-frequency sensory-neutral hearing loss. J Speech Hear Disord 1983; 48: 70–75
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kauramäki, J., Jääskeläinen, I.P. & Sams, M. 2007. Selective attention increases both gain and feature selectivity of the human auditory cortex. PLoS ONE, 2(9): e909. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000909
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kiang, N.Y.S., Watanabe, T., Thomas, E.C. & Clark, L.F. 1965. Discharge patterns of single fibers in the cat's auditory nerve. Research Monograph 35. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kluk K., Moore B.C.J. Factors affecting psychophysical tuning curves for normally-hearing subjects. Hear Res 2004; 194: 118–134
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kluk K., Moore B.C.J. Detecting dead regions using psychophysical tuning curves: A comparison of simultaneous and forward masking. Int J Audiol 2006; 45: 463–476
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leshowitz B., Wightman F.L. On-frequency masking with continuous sinusoids. J Acoust Soc Am 1971; 49: 1180–1190
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J. Dead regions in the cochlea: Diagnosis, perceptual consequences, and implications for the fitting of hearing aids. Trends Amplif 2001; 5: 1–34
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moore B.C.J. Dead regions in the cochlea: Conceptual foundations, diagnosis and clinical applications. Ear Hear 2004; 25: 98–116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J., Alcantara J.I. The use of psychophysical tuning curves to explore dead regions in the cochlea. Ear Hear 2001; 22: 268–278
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J., Glasberg B.R., Stone M.A. New version of the TEN test with calibration in dB HL. Ear Hear 2004; 25: 478–487
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsho L.W. Infant auditory perception: Tonal masking. Infant Behav Devel 1985; 8: 371–384
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson R.D. Auditory filter shapes derived with noise stimuli. J Acoust Soc Am 1976; 59: 640–654
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson R.D., Nimmo-Smith I. Off-frequency listening and auditory-filter asymmetry. J Acoust Soc Am 1980; 67: 229–245
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickles J. An introduction to the physiology of hearing. Academic Press, London 1982
   Google Scholar
• Sek A., Alcantara J., Moore B.C.J., Kluk K., Wicher A. Development of a fast method for determining psychophysical tuning curves. Int J Audiol 2005; 44: 408–420
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Small A.M. Pure-tone masking. J Acoust Soc Am 1959; 31: 1619–1625
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spetner N.B., Olsho L.W. Auditory frequency resolution in human infancy. Child Devel 1990; 61: 632–652
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stelmachowicz P.G., Jesteadt W. Psychophysical tuning curves in normal-hearing listeners: Test reliability and probe level effects. J Speech Hear Res 1984; 27: 396–402
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stelmachowicz P.G., Jesteadt W., Gorga M.P., Mott J. Speech perception ability and psychophysical tuning curves in hearing-impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 1985; 77: 620–627
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Summers V., de Boer E., Nuttall A.L. Basilar-membrane responses to multicomponent (Schroeder-phase) signals: Understanding intensity effects. J Acoust Soc Am 2003; 114: 294–306
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thornton A.R., Abbas P.J. Low-frequency hearing loss: Perception of filtered speech, psychophysical tuning curves, and masking. J Acoust Soc Am 1980; 67: 638–643
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vickers D.A., Moore B.C.J., Baer T. Effects of lowpass filtering on the intelligibility of speech in quiet for people with and without dead regions at high frequencies. J Acoust Soc Am 2001; 110: 1164–1175
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinay, & Moore, B.C.J. 2007. Speech recognition as a function of high-pass filter cutoff frequency for people with and without low-frequency cochlear dead regions. J Acoust Soc Am, 122, 542–553.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinay Baer T., Moore B.C.J. Speech recognition in noise as a function of high-pass filter cutoff frequency for people with and without low-frequency cochlear dead regions (L). J Acoust Soc Am 2008; 123: 606–609
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwicker E. On the psychophysical equivalent of tuning curves. Facts and Models in Hearing, E. Zwicker, E. Terhardt. Springer-Verlag, Berlin 1974; 132–140
   Google Scholar