References
- Balkany T., Hodges A., Menapace C., Hazard L., Driscoll C., et al. Nucleus Freedom North American clinical trial. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007; 136: 757–762
- Cochlear Ltd.2007. Selecting stimulation rate with the Nucleus freedom system. White paper prepared by Cochlear Ltd.
- Dreschler W.A., Verschuure H., Ludvigsen C., Westermann S. ICRA noises: Artificial noise signals with speech-like spectral and temporal properties for hearing instrument assessment. International Collegium for Rehabilitative Audiology. Audiology 2001; 40: 148–57
- Dynes S.B., Delgutte B. Phase-locking of auditory-nerve discharges to sinusoidal electric stimulation of the cochlea. Hear Res 1992; 58: 79–90
- Friesen L.M., Shannon R.V., Cruz R.J. Effects of stimulation rate on speech recognition with cochlear implants. Audiol Neurootol 2005; 10: 169–84
- Henshall K.R., McKay C.M. Optimizing electrode and filter selection in cochlear implant speech processor maps. J Am Acad Audiol 2001; 12: 478–89
- Holden L.K., Skinner M.W., Holden T.A., Demorest M.E. Effects of stimulation rate with the Nucleus 24 ACE speech coding strategy. Ear Hear 2002; 23: 463–76
- Kiefer J., von Ilberg C., Rupprecht V., Hubner-Egner J., Knecht R. Optimized speech understanding with the continuous interleaved sampling speech coding strategy in patients with cochlear implants: Effect of variations in stimulation rate and number of channels. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2000; 109: 1009–20
- Loizou P.C., Poroy O., Dorman M. The effect of parametric variations of cochlear implant processors on speech understanding. J Acoust Soc Am 2000; 108: 790–802
- Magner, M.E. 1972. A speech intelligibility test for deaf children. Clark School for the Deaf, Northhampton, MA, USA.
- McKay C.M., McDermott H.J., Clark G.M. Pitch percepts associated with amplitude-modulated current pulse trains in cochlear implantees. J Acoust Soc Am 1994; 96: 2664–73
- Nie K., Barco A., Zeng F.G. Spectral and temporal cues in cochlear implant speech perception. Ear Hear 2006; 27: 208–17
- Parkins C.W. Temporal response patterns of auditory nerve fibers to electrical stimulation in deafened squirrel monkeys. Hear Res 1989; 41: 137–68
- Peterson G.E., Lehiste I. Revised CNC lists for auditory tests. J Speech Hear Disord 1962; 27: 62–70
- Plant K., Holden L., Skinner M., Arcaroli J., Whitford L., et al. Clinical evaluation of higher stimulation rates in the Nucleus research platform 8 system. Ear Hear 2007; 28: 381–93
- Plant K.L., Whitford L.A., Psarros C.E., Vandali A.E. Parameter selection and programming recommendations for the ACE and CIS speech-processing strategies in the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant system. Cochlear Implants International 2002; 3: 104–25
- Vandali A.E., Whitford L.A., Plant K.L., Clark G.M. Speech perception as a function of electrical stimulation rate: Using the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant system. Ear Hear 2000; 21: 608–24
- Verschuur C.A. Effect of stimulation rate on speech perception in adult users of the Med-El CIS speech processing strategy. Int J Audiol 2005; 44: 58–63
- Weber B.P., Lai W.K., Dillier N., von Wallenberg E.L., Killian M.J., et al. Performance and preference for ACE stimulation rates obtained with Nucleus RP 8 and freedom system. Ear Hear 2007; 28: 46S–48S