Psychometrically equivalent bisyllabic words for speech recognition threshold testing in Vietnamese

References

• Adobe Audition. 2005. 2.0 ed. Adobe Systems Incorporated.
   Google Scholar
• Aleksandrovsky, I.V., McCullough, J.K. & Wilson, R.H. 1998. Development of suprathreshold word recognition test for Russian-speaking patients. J Am Acad Audiol, 9, 417–425.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• American National Standards Institute. 1999. Maximum Permissible Ambient Noise Levels for Audiometric Test Rooms, ANSI S3.1-1999. New York: ANSI.
   Google Scholar
• American National Standards Institute. 2010. Specification for Audiometers, ANSI S3.6-2010. New York: ANSI.
   Google Scholar
• ASHA 1988. Guidelines for determining threshold level for speech. ASHA, 30, 85–89.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• ASHA 1990. Guidelines for screening for hearing impairments and middle-ear disorders. ASHA, 32, 17–24.
   Google Scholar
• Ashoor, A.A. & Prochazka, T. 1985. Saudi Arabic speech audiometry for children. Br J Audiol, 19, 229–238.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beattie, R.C., Forrester, P.W. & Ruby, B.K. 1977. Reliability of the Tillman-Olsen procedure for determination of spondee threshold using recorded and live voice presentations. J Am Audiol Soc, 2, 159–162.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brunelle, M. 2009. Tone perception in Northern and Southern Vietnamese. J Phon, 37, 79–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, L.K. 1995. Performance intensity functions for digitally recorded Spanish speech audiometry. Unpublished master’s thesis. Provo, UT: Brigham Young University.
   Google Scholar
• General Statistics Office of Vietnam 2016. Area, population and population density in 2011 by province [Online]. Retrieved April 25, 2016: http://www.gso.gov.vn/default_en.aspx?tabid=467&idmid=3&ItemID=14459.
   Google Scholar
• Greer, L.F. 1997. Performance intensity functions for digitally recorded Italian speech audiometry materials. Unpublished master's thesis. Provo, UT: Brigham Young University.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, R.W., Goffi, M.V.S., Pedalini, M.E.B., Merrill, A. & Gygi, M.A. 2001. Psychometrically equivalent Brazilian Portugu^se bisyllabic word recognition materials spoken by male and female talkers. Pro-Fono Revista De Atualizacao Cientifica, 13, 249–262.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, R.W., Kim, E. & Eggett, D.L. 2003. Psychometrically equivalent Korean bisyllabic words spoken by male and female talkers. Korean J Commun Disorder, 8, 244–270.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, R.W., McPherson, D.L. & Bird, R. 2016a. wavPlayer Speech Audiometry Software. Provo, UT: Brigham Young University.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, R.W., McPherson, D.L. & Hansen, C.M. 2016b. Brigham Young University Vietnamese Speech Audiometry Materials. Provo, UT: Brigham Young University.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, R.W., Nielson, W.S., McPherson, D.L., Skarzynski, H. & Eggett, D.L. 2004. Psychometrically equivalent Polish bisyllabic words spoken by male and female talkers. Audiofonologia, 25, 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, R.W., Nissen, S.L., Pola, M.G., McPherson, D.L., Tavartkiladze, G.A., et al. 2007. Psychometrically equivalent Russian speech audiometry materials by male and female talkers. Int J Audiol, 46, 47–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirsh, I.J., Davis, H., Silverman, S.R., Reynolds, E.G., Eldert, E., et al. 1952. Development of materials for speech audiometry. J Speech Hear Disord, 17, 321–337.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hudgins, C.V., Hawkins, J.E., Karlin, J.E. & Stevens, S.S. 1947. The development of recorded auditory tests for measuring hearing loss for speech. Laryngoscope, 57, 57–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwa-Froelich, D., Hodson, B.W. & Edwards, H.T. 2002. Characteristics of Vietnamese phonology. Am J Speech Lang Pathol, 11, 264–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mangum, T.C. 2005. Performance intensity functions for digitally recorded Japanese speech audiometry materials. M.S. Master of Science, Brigham Young University.
   Google Scholar
• McArdle, R.A. & Wilson, R.H. 2006. Homogeneity of the 18 QuickSIN lists. J Am Acad Audiol, 17, 157–167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ngo, N.B. 1999. Elementary Vietnamese, Boston, MA: Tuttle Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, D.H. 1997. Vietnamese, Amsterdam: Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, D.H., Romary, L., Nguyen, T.M.H. & Vu, X.L. 2004. Lexical descriptions for Vietnamese language processing. 1st International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing – Workshop on Asian Language Resources. Sanya, Hainan Island, China.
   Google Scholar
• Nissen, S.L., Harris, R.W., Jennings, L., Eggett, D.L. & Buck, H. 2005. Psychometrically equivalent Mandarin bisyllabic speech discrimination materials spoken by male and female talkers. Int J Audiol, 44, 379–390.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham, G., Kohnert, K. & Carney, E. 2008. Corpora of Vietnamese texts: lexical effects of intended audience and publication place. Behav Res Methods, 40, 154–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramkissoon, I. 2001. Speech recognition thresholds for multilingual populations. Commun Disord Q, 22, 158–162.
   Google Scholar
• Ramkissoon, I., Proctor, A., Lansing, C.R. & Bilger, R.C. 2002. Digit speech recognition thresholds (SRT) for non-native speakers of English. Am J Audiol, 11, 23–28.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roup, C.M., Wiley, T.L., Safady, S.H. & Stoppenbach, D.T. 1998. Tympanometric screening norms for adults. Am J Audiol, 7, 55–60.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ryan, C. 2013. Language use in the United States: 2011 [Online]. U.S. Census Bureau. Retrieved April 25, 2016: http://www.census.gov/prod/2013pubs/acs-22.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Sadie. 2007. SADiE Disk Editor Software. 5.6 ed. Cambridgeshire, UK: Prism Media Products Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Scannell, K.P. 2007. The Crubadan Project: Corpus building for under-resourced languages. Cahiers Du Central, 5, 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Tang, G.M. 2007. Cross-linguistic analysis of Vietnamese and English wtih implications for Vietnamese language acquisition and maintenance in the United States. J Southeast Asian Am Educ Adv, 2, 1.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations 2016. Department of Economic and Social Affairs: Population Division [Online]. Retrieved April 27, 2016: http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/.
   Google Scholar
• Vuong, T.D. & Moore, J.M. 1994. Colloquial Vietnamese: A Complete Language Course. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Weisleder, P. & Hodgson, W.R. 1989. Evaluation of four Spanish word-recognition-ability lists. Ear Hear, 10, 387–392.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, R.H. & Strouse, A. 1999. Psychometrically equivalent spondaic words spoken by a female speaker. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 42, 1336–1346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, R.H. & Strouse, A. 2002. Northwestern University Auditory Test No. 6 in multi-talker babble: a preliminary report. J Rehab Res Develop, 39, 105–113.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, W.J. & Moodley, S. 2000. Use of the CID W22 as a South African English speech discrimination test. South Afr J Commun Disord, 47, 57–62.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Young, L.L., Dudley, B. & Gunter, M.B. 1982. Thresholds and psychometric functions of the individual spondaic words. J Speech Hear Res, 25, 586–593.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar