Development and evaluation of the British English coordinate response measure speech-in-noise test as an occupational hearing assessment tool

References

• Akeroyd, M.A. 2008. Are individual differences in speech reception related to individual differences in cognitive ability? A survey of twenty experimental studies with normal and hearing-impaired adults. Int J Audiol, 47, S53–S71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anastasi, A. 1988. Psychological Testing. 6th ed. New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bench, J., Kowal, A. & Bamford, J. 1979. The BKB (Bamford-Kowal-Bench) sentence lists for partially-hearing children. Br J Audiol Suppl, 13, 108–112.
   Google Scholar
• Bevis, Z.B., Semeraro, H.S., Rowan, D., van Besouw, R. & Allsopp, A. 2014. Fit for the frontline? A focus group exploration of auditory tasks carried out by infantry and combat support personnel. Noise Health, 16, 127–135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bland, M. 2000. An Introduction to Medical Statistics. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bolia, R.S., Nelson, W.T., Ericson, M.A. & Simpson, B.D. 2000. A speech corpus for multitalker communications research. J Acoust Soc Am, 107, 1065–1066.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brungart, D.S. 2001a. Evaluation of speech intelligibility with the coordinate response measure. J Acoust Soc Am, 109, 2276–2279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brungart, D.S. 2001b. Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of two simultaneous talkers. J Acoust Soc Am, 110, 2527–2538.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brungart, D.S. & Sheffield, B. 2013. Development of auditory fitness for duty standard for military operations. NATO Science and Technology Organisation, Human Factors and Medicine Panel Symposium; Milan, Italy; 2013 April 15–17.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc. Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Cowan, N. 2001. The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behav Brain Sci, 24, 87–114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eddins, D.A. & Liu, C. 2012. Psychometric properties of the coordinate response measure corpus with various types of background interference. J Acoust Soc Am, 131, 177–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Endsley, M. 1995. Towards a theory of situational awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors, 37, 32–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Füllgrabe, C., Moore, B.C.J. & Stone, M.A. 2014. Age-group differences in speech identification despite matched audiometrically normal hearing: contributions from auditory temporal processing and cognition. Front Aging Neurosci, 6, 1–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giguère, C., Laroche, C., Soli, S.D. & Vaillancourt, V. 2008. Functionally-based screening criteria for hearing-critical jobs based on the Hearing in Noise Test. Int J Audiol, 47, 319–328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulme, C., Roodenrys, S., Brown, G. & Mercer, R. 1995. The role of long-term memory mechanisms in memory span. Br J Psychol, 86, 527–536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingdom, F. & Prins, N. 2010. Psychophysics: A Practical Introduction. 1st ed. London: Elsevier Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Kinson, T. 2012. The tech behind the check, Action on Hearing Loss Blog. Retreived June 8, 2016: http://www.actiononhearingloss.org.uk/community/blogs/our-guest-blog/the-tech-behind-the-check.aspx/
   Google Scholar
• Kitterick, P.T., Bailey, P.J. & Summerfield, A.Q. 2010. Benefits of knowing who, where, and when in multi-talker listening. J Acoust Soc Am, 127, 2498–2508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kujawa, S.G. & Liberman, M.C. 2015. Synaptopathy in the noise-exposed and aging cochlea: Primary neural degeneration in acquired sensorineural hearing loss. Hear Res, 330, 191–199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leek, M.R. 2001. Adaptive procedures in psychophysical research. Percept Psychophys, 63, 1279–1292.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leensen, M.C.J. 2013. Noise induced hearing loss: Screening with pure-tone audiometry and speech-in-noise testing. Ph.D. University of Amsterdam. Retreived June 8, 2016: http://dare.uva.nl/record/1/394362
   Google Scholar
• Leensen, M.C.J., de Laat, J.A.PM. & Dreschler, W.A. 2011a. Speech-in-noise screening tests by internet, part 1: test evaluation for noise-induced hearing loss identification. Int J Audiol, 50, 823–834.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leensen, M.C.J., de Laat, J.A.P.M., Snik, A.F.M. & Dreschler, W.A. 2011b. Speech-in-noise screening tests by internet, Part 2: Improving test sensitivity for noise-induced hearing loss. Int J Audiol, 50, 835–848.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitt, H. 1971. Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. J Acoust Soc Am, 49, 467–477.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lutman, M.E., Hall, S.J. & Athalye, S. 2006. Development of a telephone hearing test. Proc Inst Acoust, 28, 240–243.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson, M., Soli, S.D. & Sullivan, J.A. 1994. Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. J Acoust Soc Am, 95, 1081–1099.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozimek, E., Kutzner, D., Sęk, A. & Wicher, A. 2009. Development and evaluation of the Polish Triplet Test. Speech Commun, 51, 307–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, R.W., Moore, B.C.J. & Baer, T. 1998. Speech reception threshold in noise with and without spectral and temporal dips for hearing-impaired and normally hearing people. J Acoust Soc Am, 103, 577–587.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plack, C.J., Barker, D. & Prendergast, G. 2014. Perceptual consequences of “hidden” hearing loss. Trends Hear, 18, 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plomp, R. 1978. Auditory handicap of hearing impairment and the limited benefit of hearing aids. J Acoust Soc Am, 63, 533–549.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semeraro, H.D., Bevis, Z.L., Rowan, D., van Besouw, R.M. & Allsopp, A.J. 2015. Fit for the frontline? Identification of mission-critical auditory tasks (MCATs) carried out by infantry and combat-support personnel. Noise Health, 17, 98–107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shinn-Cunningham, B., Bharadwaj, H., Choi, I., Goldberg, H., Masud, S., et al. 2014. Quantifying supra-threshold sensory deficits in listeners with normal hearing thresholds. J Acoust Soc Am, 136, 2258–2258.
   Google Scholar
• Smits, C., Kapteyn, T.S. & Houtgast, T. 2004. Development and validation of an automatic speech-in-noise screening test by telephone. Int J Audiol, 43, 15–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smoorenburg, G.F. 1992. Speech reception in quiet and in noisy conditions by individuals with noise-induced hearing loss in relation to their tone audiogram. J Acoust Soc Am, 91, 421–437.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Summerfield, Q., Palmer, A.R., Foster, J.R., Marshall, D.H. & Twomey, R. 1994. Clinical evaluation and test-retest reliability of the IHR-McCormick Automated Toy Discrimination Test. Br J Audiol, 28, 165–179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, B. 2003. Speech-in-noise tests: How and why to include them in your basic test battery. The Hearing J, 56, 40–44.
   Google Scholar
• The British Library. 2015. Received pronunciation. British Library Language and Literature. Retrieved August 25, 2015: http://www.bl.uk/learning/langlit/sounds/case-studies/received-pronunciation/
   Google Scholar
• Tufts, J.B., Vasil, K.A. & Briggs, S. 2009. Auditory fitness for duty: A review. J Am Acad Audiol, 20, 539–557.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, R.H. & Cates, W.B. 2008. A comparison of two word-recognition tasks in multitalker babble: speech Recognition in Noise Test (SPRINT) and Words-in-Noise Test (WIN). J Am Acad Audiol, 19, 548–556.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization (WHO). 2016. Screening for various cancers. Retreived May 27, 2016: http://who.int/cancer/detection/variouscancer/en/
   Google Scholar