The clinical use of Arthur Boothroyd (AB) word lists in Australia: exploring evidence-based practice

References

• American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. 2005. Evidence-based practice in communication disorders [Position Statement]: www.asha.org/policy
   Google Scholar
• Audiology Australia. 2010. Hearing the Need: Audiology and Primary Ear Health Care Reform. Forest Hill, VIC: Audiology Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Hearing. 2001. Manual of Speech Perception. Chatswood, NSW: Australian Hearing.
   Google Scholar
• Bench, J. 1997. Speech audiometry in Australia. In: Martin M. (ed.) Speech Audiometry (2nd ed.). San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Boothroyd, A. 1968a. Developments in speech audiometry. Br J Audiol (Sound), 2, 3–10.
   Google Scholar
• Boothroyd, A. 1968b. Statistical theory of the speech discrimination score. J Acoust Soc Am, 43, 362–367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boothroyd, A. 2008. The performance/intensity function: An underused resource. Ear Hear, 29, 479–491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer, C.C. & Resnick, D.M. 1983. A review of tests of speech discrimination. Semin Hear, 4, 205–219.
   Google Scholar
• Carney, E. & Schlauch, R.S. 2007. Critical difference table for word recognition testing derived using computer simulation. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 50, 1203–1209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, F. & Palethorpe, S. 2007. Illustrations of the IPA: Australian English. J Int Phonetic Assoc, 37, 341–350.
   Google Scholar
• Dollaghan, C.A. 2004. Evidence-based practice in communication disorders: What do we know, and when do we know it? J Commun Disord, 37, 391–400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, P.I.P. 1987. Speech audiometry for differential diagnosis. In: Martin, M. (ed.) Speech Audiometry. London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Garlock, V.M., Walley, A.C. & Metsala, J.L. 2001. Age-of-acquisition, word frequency, and neighbourhood density effects on spoken word recognition by children and adults. J Mem Lang, 45, 468–492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelfand, S.A. 1998. Optimizing the reliability of speech recognition scores. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 41, 1088–1102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greville, K.A. 1984. Standardisation of NAC-AB speech discrimination materials. Audiology Centre Report (Vol. 2). Auckland: National Audiology Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Harrington, J., Cox, F. & Evans Z. 1997. An acoustic phonetic study of broad, general, and cultivated Australian English vowels. Aust J Ling, 17, 155–184.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, J.D. & Poole, J.P. 1980. Influence of the speaker and other factors affecting speech intelligibility. Audiology, 19, 434–455.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, C.J., Bowsher, J.M. & Simpson, P.J. 1991. Speech audiometry: Digitization effects and the non-equivalence of isophonemic word lists. Br J Audiol, 25, 111–121.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Killion, M.C. & Gudmundsen, G.I. 2005. Fitting hearing aids using clinical prefitting speech measures: An evidence-based review. J Amer Acad Audiol, 16, 439–447.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kirk, K.I., Pisoni, D.B. & Miyamoto, R.C. 1997. Effects of stimulus variability on speech perception in listeners with hearing impairment. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 40, 1395–1405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luce, P.A. & Pisoni, D.B. 1998. Recognising spoken words: The neighbourhood activation model. Ear Hear, 19, 1–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackersie, C.L. 2002. Tests of speech perception abilities. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 10, 392–397.
   Google Scholar
• Mackie, K. & Dermody, P. 1982. Word intelligibility tests in audiology for the assessment of communication adequacy. NAL Report (Vol. 89). Sydney: National Acoustic Laboratories.
   Google Scholar
• MacPherson, A. & Akeroyd, M.A. 2014. Variations in the slope of the psychometric functions for speech intelligibility: A systematic survey. Trends Hear, 18, 1–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markides, A. 1978. Speech discrimination functions for normal-hearing subjects with AB isophonemic word lists. Scand Audiol, 7, 239–245.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Martin, F.N., Champlin, C.A. & Perez, D.D. 2000. The question of phonetic balance in word recognition testing. J Am Acad Audiol, 11, 489–493.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McCreery, R., Ito, R., Spratford, M., Lewis, D., Hoover, B., et al. 2010. Performance-intensity functions for normal-hearing adults and children using computer-aided speech assessment. Ear Hear, 31, 95–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palethorpe, S. & Cox, F. 2003. Vowel modification in pre-lateral environments. Paper presented at the VIth International Seminar on Speech Production, Manly, NSW, 7–10 December 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Purdy, S.C., Arlington, B. & Johnstone, C. 2000. Normative data for the New Zealand recording of the CVC (revised AB) word lists. NZ Audiol Soc Bull, 10, 20–29.
   Google Scholar
• Roeser, R.J. & Clark, J.L. 2008. Live voice speech recognition audiometry: Stop the madness! Audiol Today, 20, 32–33.
   Google Scholar
• Stevenson, P.W. 1975a. Response possibilities to the Boothroyd (AB) word lists. Br J Audiol, 9, 85–89.
   Google Scholar
• Stevenson, P.W. 1975b. Responses to speech audiometry and phonemic discrimination patterns in the elderly. Audiology, 14, 185–231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton, A.R. & Raffin, M.J.M. 1978. Speech-discrimination scores modeled as a binomial variable. J Speech Hear Res, 21, 507–518.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Travers, A. 1990. AB Word Lists: NAL Protocols. Victoria: National Acoustic Laboratories.
   Google Scholar
• Vitkovic, J. 2017. Treasurer’s report. Audiol Now, 66, 6.
   Google Scholar
• Wiley, T.L., Stoppenbach, D.T., Feldhake, L.J., Moss, K.A. & Thordardottir, E.T. 1995. Audiological practices: What is popular versus what is supported by evidence. Amer J Audiol, 4, 26–34.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, W.J., Jones, B. & Fridjhon, P. 1998. Use of the NAL-AB wordlists as a South African English speech discrimination test. S Afr J Commun Disord, 45, 77–86.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wong, L. & Hickson, L. 2012. Evidence-based practice in audiology. In: Wong, L. & Hickson, L. (eds.) Evidence-based Practice in Audiology. San Diego, CA: Plural Publishing.
   Google Scholar