Laboratory evaluation of an optimised internet-based speech-in-noise test for occupational high-frequency hearing loss screening: Occupational Earcheck

References

• Albrecht J., Elewout L.V., Verhage L. & Verweij C. 2005. Oorcheck: De validering van een interactief screeningsinstrument. Internal report (in Dutch). Internal report, LUMC, Leiden.
   Google Scholar
• Bosman A.J. 1989. Speech perception by the hearing impaired [thesis] (in Dutch). Utrecht, the Netherlands: University of Utrecht.
   Google Scholar
• Brookhouser P.E. 1994. Prevention of noise-induced hearing loss. Prev Med, 23, 665–669.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Culling J.F., Zhao F. & Stephens D. 2005. The viability of speech-in-noise audiometric screening using domestic audio equipment. Int J Audiol, 44, 691–700.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis N., Kuijpers M., van der Pijl S. & Verbiest E. 2006. Ontwikkeling van een gehoorscreening voor het bedrijfsleven. Internal report (in Dutch), LUMC Leiden.
   Google Scholar
• Flamme G.A., Stephenson M.R., Deiters K.K., Hessenauer A., Van Gessel D.K., et al. 2014. Short-term variability of pure-tone thresholds obtained with TDH-39P earphones. Int J Audiol, 53, S5–S15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu T., Wu C., Chang J., Lee S. & Hsu C. 2013. Determinants of bilateral audiometric notches in noise-induced hearing loss. Laryngoscope, 123, 1005–1010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansen S., Luts H., Dejonckere P., van Wieringen A. & Wouters J. 2014. Exploring the sensitivity of speech-in-noise tests for noise-induced hearing loss. Int J Audiol, 53, 199–205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansen S., Luts H., Wagener K.C., Frachet B. & Wouters J. 2010. The French digit triplet test: A hearing screening tool for speech intelligibility in noise. Int J Audiol, 49, 378–387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer S.E., Kapteyn T.S. & Festen J.M. 1998. The self-reported handicapping effect of hearing disabilities. Audiology, 37, 302–312.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leensen M.C., de Laat J.A. & Dreschler W.A. 2011a. Speech-in-noise screening tests by internet, part 1: Test evaluation for noise-induced hearing loss identification. Int J Audiol, 50, 823–834.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leensen M.C., de Laat J.A., Snik A.F. & Dreschler W.A. 2011b. Speech-in-noise screening tests by internet, part 2: Improving test sensitivity for noise-induced hearing loss. Int J Audiol, 50, 835–848.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leensen M.C. & Dreschler W.A. 2013a. The applicability of a speech-in-noise screening test in occupational hearing conservation. Int J Audiol, 52, 455–465.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leensen M.C. & Dreschler W.A. 2013b. Speech-in-noise screening tests by internet, part 3: Test sensitivity for uncontrolled parameters in domestic usage. Int J Audiol, 52, 658–669.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May J. 2000. Occupational hearing loss. Am J Ind Med, 37, 112–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molander P., Nordqvist P., Öberg M., Lunner T., Lyxell B., et al. 2013. Internet-based hearing screening using speech-in-noise: Validation and comparisons of self-reported hearing problems, quality of life and phonological representation. BMJ, 3, e003223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paglialonga A., Tognola A. & Grandori F. 2014. A user-operated test of supra-treshold acuity in noise for adult hearing screening: The SUN (Speech Understanding in Noise) test. Comput Biol Med, 52, 66–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plomp R. 1986. A signal-to-noise ratio model for the speech-reception threshold of the hearing impaired. J Speech Hear Res, 29, 146–154.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smits C., Goverts T. & Festen J.M. 2013. The digits-in-noise test: Assessing auditory speech recognition abilities in noise. J Acoust Soc Am, 133, 1693–1706.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smits C., Kapteyn T.S. & Houtgast T. 2004. Development and validation of an automatic speech-in-noise screening test by telephone. Int J Audiol, 43, 15–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smits C., Merkus P. & Houtgast T. 2006. How we do it: The Dutch functional hearing-screening tests by telephone and internet. Clin Otolaryngol, 31, 436–440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smoorenburg G.F. 1992. Speech reception in quiet and in noisy conditions by individuals with noise-induced hearing loss in relation to their tone audiogram. J Acoust Soc Am, 91, 421–437.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stenfelt S., Janssen T., Schirkonyer V. & Grandori F. 2011. E-health technologies for adult hearing screening. Audiol Res, 1, 55–57.
   Google Scholar
• van der Molen H., Kuijer P., de Groene G., Bakker J., Sorgdrager B., et al. 2014. Beroepsziekten in cijfers 2014 (in Dutch). Amsterdam, Nederlands Centrum voor Beroepsziekten, Coronel Instituut voor Arbeid en Gezondheid, AMC, UvA.
   Google Scholar
• Vlaming M.S.M.G., MacKinnon R.C., Jansen M. & Moore D. 2014. Automated screening for high-frequency hearing loss. Ear Hear, 35, 667–679.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagener K.C. & Brand T. 2005. Sentence intelligibility in noise for listeners with normal hearing and hearing impairment: Influence of measurement procedure and masking parameters. Int J Audiol, 44, 144–156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson C.S., Kidd G.R., Smits C. & Humes L.E. 2012. Telephone screening tests for functionally impaired hearing: Current use in seven countries and development of a US version. J Am Acad Audiol, 23, 757–767.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams-Sanchez V., McArdle R.A., Wilson R.H., Kidd G.R., Watson C.S., et al. 2014. Validation of a screening test of auditory function using the telephone. J Am Acad Audiol, 25, 937–951.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar