405
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

The use of cochlear's SCAN and wireless microphones to improve speech understanding in noise with the Nucleus6® CP900 processor

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, & ORCID Icon
Pages 837-843 | Received 27 Nov 2016, Accepted 18 Jun 2017, Published online: 11 Jul 2017

References

  • Battmer, R.D., Borel, S., Brendel, M., Buchner, A., Cooper, H., et al. 2014. Assessment of ‘Fitting to Outcomes Expert’ FOX with new cochlear implant users in a multi-centre study. Cochlear Implants Intl, 16, 100–109.
  • Buechner, A., Vaerenberg, B., Gazibegovic, D., Brendel, M., De Ceulaer, G., et al. 2014. Evaluation of the ‘Fitting to Outcomes eXpert’ (FOX®) with established cochlear implant users. Cochlear Implants Int, 16, 39–46.
  • De Ceulaer, G., Swinnen, F., Pascoal, D., Philips, B., Killian, M., et al. 2015. Conversion of adult Nucleus® 5 cochlear implant users to the Nucleus® 6 system. Cochlear Implants Intl, 16, 222–232.
  • Fu, Q.J., Shannon, R.V. & Wang, X. 1998. Effects of noise and spectral resolution on vowel and consonant recognition: Acoustic and electric hearing. J Acoust Soc Am, 104, 3586–3596.
  • Govaerts, P., Daemers, K., Yperman, M., De Beukelaer, C., De Saegher, G., et al. 2006. Auditory speech sounds evaluation (A§E®): a new test to assess detection, discrimination and identification in hearing impairment. Cochlear Implants Intl, 7, 92–106.
  • Govaerts, P., Vaerenberg, B., De Ceulaer, G., Daemers, K. & Schauwers, K. 2010. Development of a software tool using deterministic logic for the optimization of cochlear implant processor programming. Otol Neurotol, 31(6), 908–918.
  • Hoffmann, J., Andersson, J., Agat, T., Hedin, A. & Flynn, M. 2014. Hearing benefits of the Cochlear Wireless Mini Microphone for Cochear Baha 4 Sound Processor. Mölnlycke, Sweden. White paper E83101, Cochlear Bone Anchored Solutions.
  • Jespersen, C.T. & Kirkwood, B. 2016. Benefit of the ReSound Multi Mic. Ballerup, Denmark: Whitepaper GN ReSound A/S.
  • Jespersen, C.T. & Laureyns, M. 2011. ReSound Unite™ Mini Microphone: Minimizing noise for maximum understanding. Ballerup, Denmark: Whitepaper GN ReSound A/S.
  • Krempaska, S., Koval, J., Schmid, C., Pfiffner, F., Kurz, A., et al. 2014. Influence of directionality and maximal power output on speech understanding with bone anchored hearing implants in single sided deafness. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 271, 1395–1400.
  • Mauger, S.J., Warren, C.D., Knight, M.R., Goorevich, M. & Nel, E. 2014. Clinical evaluation of the Nucleus®6 cochlear implant system: Performance improvements with SmartSound iQ. Int J Audiol, 53, 564–576.
  • Nabelek, A. & Nabelek, I. 1994. Room acoustics and speech perception. In: Katz J, ed. Handbook of Clinical Audiology. Fourth Edition. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, pp. 624–636.
  • Nabelek, A. & Pickett, J. 1974. Monaural and binaural speech perception through hearing aids under noise and reverberation with normal and hearing-impaired listeners. J Speech Hear Res, 17, 724–739.
  • Nelson, P.B., Jin, S.H., Carney, A.E. & Nelson D.A. 2003. Understanding speech in modulated interference: cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners. J Acoust Soc Am, 113, 961–968.
  • REW v5 software. Free room acoustics analysis software. [Internet] Mulcahy J. Available from: http://www.roomeqwizard.com/Copyright 2004-2015.
  • Signal Processing Information Base (SPIB), Noise : Speech Babble. 1990. [Internet] Institute for Perception-TNO, Soesterberg, the Netherlands. Retrieved June 25, 2015: http://spib.linse.ufsc.br/noise.html
  • Spahr, A.J., Dorman, M.F., Litvak, L.M., Van Wie, S., Gifford, R.H., et al. 2012. Development and validation of the AzBio sentence lists. Ear Hear, 33, 112–117.
  • Tukey, J.W. 1977. Exploratory data analysis. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley.
  • Van Wieringen, A., & Wouters J. 2008. LIST and LINT: Sentences and numbers for quantifying speech understanding in severely impaired listeners for Flanders and the Netherlands. Int J Audiol, 47, 348–355.
  • Walden, B.E., Surr, R.K. & Cordt, M.T. 2003. Real-world performance of directional microphone hearing aids. Hear Jour, 56, 40–47.
  • Wolfe, J., Morais, M. & Schafer, E. 2015b. Improving hearing performance for cochlear implant recipients with use of a digital, wireless, remote-microphone, audio-streaming accessory. J Am Acad Audiol, 26, 532–539.
  • Wolfe, J., Neumann, S., Marsh, M., Schafer, E., Lianos L., et al. 2015a. Benefits of adaptive signal processing in a commercially available cochlear implant sound processor. Otol Neurotol, 36, 1181–1190.
  • Wolfe, J., Parkinson, A., Schafer, E., Gilden, J., Rehwinkel, K., et al. 2012. Benefit of a commercially available cochlear implant processor with dual-microphone beamforming: a multi-center study. Otol Neurotol, 33, 553–560.
  • Wolfe, J., Duke, M.M., Schafer, E., Jones, C., Mülder H., et al. 2015c. Evaluation of performance with an adaptive digital remote microphone system and a digital remote microphone audio-streaming accessory system. Am J Audiol, 24, 440–450.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.