Modernising speech audiometry: using a smartphone application to test word recognition

References

• Beattie, R., and M. Raffin. 1985. “Reliability of Threshold, Slope, and PB Max for Monosyllabic Words.” The Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 50 (2): 166–178. doi:10.1044/jshd.5002.166.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boersma, P., and D. Weenink. 2016. “Praat: doing phonetics by computer [Computer program].” Version 6.0.21. Accessed 25 September 2016. http://www.praat.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Brandy, W. 2002. “Speech Audiometry.” In Handbook of Clinical Audiology: Fifth edition, edited by J. Katz, 96–110. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
   Google Scholar
• Brandy, W.T. 1966. “Reliability of Voice Tests of Speech Discrimination.” Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 9 (3): 461–465. doi:10.1044/jshr.0903.461.
   Google Scholar
• Bullon, S., and G. Leech. 2007. “Longman Communication 3000 and the Longman Defining Vocabulary.” In: Longman Communication 3000, 1–7. Harlow: Pearson Longman. Accessed 4 November 2016. http://www.lextutor.ca/freq/lists_download/longman_3000_list.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Durankaya, S. M., B. Serbetcioglu, G. Dalkilic, S. Gurkan, and G. Kirkim. 2014. “Development of a Turkish Monosyllabic Word Recognition Test for Adults.” The Journal of International Advanced Otology 10 (2): 172–180. doi:10.5152/iao.2014.118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flores, L., and K. Aoyama. 2008. “A Comparison of Psychometric Performance on Four Modified Spanish Word Recognition Tests.” Texas Department of State Health Services, Speech-Language 31: 64–70.
   Google Scholar
• Garadat, S. N., K. J. Abdulbaqi, and M. A. Haj-Tas. 2017. “The Development of the University of Jordan Word Recognition Test.” International Journal of Audiology 56 (6): 424–430. doi:10.1080/14992027.2017.1303200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, D., S. Wang, H. Zhang, J. Chen, W. Jiang, R. Mannell, P. Newall, and L. Zhang. 2009. “Development of Mandarin Monosyllabic Speech Test Materials in China.” International Journal of Audiology 48 (5): 300–311. doi:10.1080/14992020802607456.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanekom, T. H. 2014. “Comparison of the South African Spondaic Wordlist and the CID W-1 for Measuring Speech Recognition Threshold.” Unpublished M Communication Pathology (Audiology) dissertation, University of Pretoria.
   Google Scholar
• Heckendorf, A. L., T. L. Wiley, and R. H. Wilson. 1997. “Performance Norms for the VA Compact Disc Versions of CID W-22 (Hirsh) and PB-50 (Rush Hughes) Word Lists.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 8 (3): 163–172.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hood, J. D., and J. P. Poole. 1980. “Influence of the Speaker and Other Factors Affecting Speech Intelligibility.” International Journal of Audiology 19 (5): 434–455. doi:10.3109/00206098009070077.
   Google Scholar
• Hirsh, I. J., Davis H., Silverman S. R., Reynolds E. G., Eldert E., and Benson R. W. 1952. “Development of Materials for Speech Audiometry.” The Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 17 (3): 321–337. doi:10.1044/jshd.1703.321.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kumar, S. B. R., and Mohanty P. 2012. “Speech Recognition Performance of Adults: A Proposal for a Battery for Telugu.” Theory Practice Lang Studies 2 (2): 193–204. doi:10.4304/tpls.2.2.193-204.
   Google Scholar
• Mahomed-Asmail, F., D. Swanepoel, R. H. Eikelboom, H. C. Myburgh, and J. Hall 3rd. 2016. “Clinical Validity of Hearscreen™ Smartphone Hearing Screening for School Children.” Ear and Hearing 37 (1): e11–e17. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, F. N., Champlin C. A., and Chambers J. A. 1998. “Seventh Survey of Audiometric Practices in the United States.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 9 (2): 95–104.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McArdle, R., and T. Hnath-Chisolm. 2015. “Speech Audiometry.” In: Handbook of Clinical Audiology, edited by J. Katz, 61–75. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Mendel, L. L., and S. R. Owen. 2011. “A Study of Recorded Versus Live Voice Word Recognition.” International Journal of Audiology 50 (10): 688–693. doi:10.3109/14992027.2011.588964.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikolai, T., and A. C. Mroz. 2010. “Modern speech audiometry with integrated recorded speech materials. The Hearing Review.” Accessed 2 June 2017. www.hearingreview.com/2010/11/modern-speech-audiometry-with-integrated-recorded-speech-materials/.
   Google Scholar
• Mullennix, J. W., D. B. Pisoni, and C. S. Martin. 1989. “Some Effects of Talker Variability on Spoken Word Recognition.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 85 (1): 365–378. doi:10.1121/1.397688.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostergard, C. A. 1983. “Factors Influencing the Validity and Reliability of Speech Audiometry.” Seminars Hearing 4 (3): 221–239. doi:10.1055/s-0028-1091427.
   Google Scholar
• Penrod, J. P. 1979. “Talker Effects on Word-Discrimination Scores of Adults with Sensorineural hearing Impairment.” The Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 44 (3): 340–349. doi:10.1044/jshd.4403.340.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Potgieter, J., D. Swanepoel, H. C. Myburgh, T. C. Hopper, and C. Smits. 2016. “Development and Validation of a Smartphone-Based Digits-in-Noise Hearing Test in South African English.” International Journal of Audiology 55 (7): 405–411. doi:10.3109/14992027.2016.1172269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preece, J. P., and C. G. Fowler. 1992. “Relationship of Pure-Tone Averages to Speech Reception Threshold for Male and Female Speakers.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 3 (3): 221–224.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roeser, R. J., and J. L. Clark. 2008. “Live Voice Speech Recognition Audiometry: Stop the Madness!” Audiology Today 20 (1): 32–33.
   Google Scholar
• Roets, R. 2006. “Spraakoudiometrie in Suid-Afrika: Ideale Kriteria Teenoor Kliniese Praktyk.” Unpublished MCommunication Pathology dissertation, University of Pretoria.
   Google Scholar
• Sandström, J., D. Swanepoel, H. C. Myburgh, and C. Laurent. 2016. “Smartphone Threshold Audiometry in Underserved Primary Health-Care Contexts.” International Journal of Audiology 55 (4): 232–238. doi:10.3109/14992027.2015.1124294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statistics South Africa. 2011. “Census 2011 key Results.” Pretoria: Statistics South Africa. http://www.statssa.gov.za/census/census_2011/census_products/Census_2011_Key_results.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Swanepoel, D. 2006. “Audiology in South Africa.” International Journal of Audiology 45 (5): 262–266. doi:10.1080/14992020500485650.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swanepoel, D., H. C. Myburgh, D. M. Howe, F. Mahomed, and R. H. Eikelboom. 2014. “Smartphone Hearing Screening with Integrated Quality Control and Data Management.” International Journal of Audiology 53 (12): 841–849. doi:10.3109/14992027.2014.920965.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Economist. 2015. “Telecoms and society: The truly personal computer.” February 28. Accessed October 2016. http://www.economist.com/news/briefing/21645131-smartphone-defining-technology-age-truly-personal-computer.
   Google Scholar
• Theunissen, M., J. J. Hanekom, and D. Swanepoel. 2011. “The Development of an Afrikaans Test for Sentence Recognition Thresholds in Noise.” International Journal of Audiology 50 (2): 77–85. doi:10.3109/14992027.2010.532511.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theunissen, M., D. Swanepoel, and J. Hanekom. 2009. “Sentence Recognition in Noise: Variables in Compilation and Interpretation of Tests.” International Journal of Audiology 48 (11): 743–757. doi:10.3109/14992020903082088.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton, A. R., and M. J. Raffin. 1978. “Speech-Discrimination Scores Modeled as a Binomial Variable.” Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 21 (3): 507–518. doi:10.1044/jshr.2103.507.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tillman, T. W., and R. Carhart. 1966. An expanded test for speech discrimination utilizing CNC monosyllabic words: Northwestern University auditory test no. 6. Technical report number SAM-TR-66-55. US Air Force School of Aerospace Medicine, Aerospace Medical Division, Brooks AFB.
   Google Scholar
• Uhler, K., A. Biever, and R. H. Gifford. 2016. “Method of Speech Stimulus Presentation Impacts Pediatric Speech Recognition: Monitored Live Voice Versus Recorded Speech.” Otology and Neurotology 37 (2): e70–e74. doi:10.1097/MAO.0000000000000911.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Heerden, R. 1999. “Die voorkomsfrekwensie van die spraakklanke van Afrikaans met die oog op fonetiese balansering van oudiologie woordelyste.” B Communication Pathology dissertation, thesis, Department of Communication Pathology, University of Pretoria.
   Google Scholar
• Versfeld, N. J., and S. T. Goverts. 2013. “The Effect of a Carrier Phrase on Hearing Aid Amplification of Single Words in Quiet.” International Journal of Audiology 52 (3): 189–193. doi:10.3109/14992027.2012.736031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, R. H., and A. S. Carter. 2001. “Relation Between Slopes of Word Recognition Psychometric Functions and Homogeneity of the Stimulus Materials.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 12 (1): 7–14.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wu, W., H. Zhang, J. Chen, J. Chen and C. Lin. 2011. “Development and Evaluation of a Computerized Mandarin Speech Test System in China.” Computers in Biology and Medicine 41 (3): 131–138. doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2011.01.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yousuf-Hussein, S., D. Swanepoel, L. Biagio de Jager, H. C. Myburgh, R. H. Eikelboom, and J. Hugo. 2016. “Smartphone Hearing Screening in mHealth Assisted Community-Based Primary Care.” Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 22 (7): 405–412. doi:10.1177/1357633X15610721.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar