Dynamic current focusing for loudness encoding in cochlear implants: a take-home trial

References

• Advanced Bionics. 2012. “HiResTM Optima Clinical Results.” Advanced Bionics White Paper Sylmar, California 1–2.
   Google Scholar
• Arenberg, J. G., W. S. Parkinson, L. Litvak, C. Chen, H. A. Kreft., A. J. Oxenham. 2018. “A Dynamically Focusing Cochlear Implant Strategy Can Improve Vowel Identification in Noise.” Ear and Hearing, 39 (6):1136–1145.
   Google Scholar
• Aronoff, J. M., and D. M. Landsberger. 2013. “The Development of a Modified Spectral Ripple Test.” The Journal of Acoustical Society of America 134 (2):217–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bierer, J. A. 2007. “Threshold and Channel Interaction in Cochlear Implant Users: Evaluation of the Tripolar Electrode Configuration.” The Journal of Acoustical Society of America 121 (3):1642–1653. doi:10.1121/1.2436712.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bierer, J. A. 2010. “Probing the Electrode-Neuron Interface with Focused Cochlear Implant Stimulation.” Trends in Amplification 14 (2):84–95. doi:10.1177/1084713810375249
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bonham, B. H., and L. M. Litvak. 2008. “Current Focusing and Steering: modeling, Physiology, and Psychophysics.” Hearing Research 242 (1–2):141–153. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2008.03.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Büchner, A., T. Lenarz, P.-P. Boermans, J. H. M. Frijns, P. Mancini, R. Filipo, C. Fielden., et al. 2012. “Benefits of the HiRes 120 Coding Strategy Combined with the Harmony Processor in an Adult European Multicentre Study.” Acta Otolaryngologica 132 (2):179–187. doi:10.3109/00016489.2011.630015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Jong, M. A. M., J. J. Briaire, and J. H. M. Frijns. 2017. “Learning Effects in Psychophysical Tests of Spectral and Temporal Resolution.” Ear and Hearing 39 (3):475–481. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Jong, M. A. M., J. J. Briaire, and J. H. M. Frijns. 2018. “Dynamic Current Focusing: A Novel Approach to Loudness Coding in Cochlear Implants.” Ear and Hearing., epub ahead of print.
   Google Scholar
• DiNino, M., and J. G. Arenberg. 2018. ‘Age-Related Performance on Vowel Identification and the Spectral-temporally Modulated Ripple Test in Children With Normal Hearing and With Cochlear Implants.’ Trends in Hearing epub ahead of print. doi:10.1177/2331216518770959
   Google Scholar
• Drennan, W. R., J. K. Longnion, C. Ruffin, and J. T. Rubinstein. 2008. “Discrimination of Schroeder-Phase Harmonic Complexes by Normal-Hearing and Cochlear-Implant Listeners.” Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 9 (1):138–149. doi:10.1007/s10162-007-0107-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drennan, W., J. Won, K. Nie, E. Jameyson, and J. T. Rubinstein. 2010. “Sensitivity of Psychophysical Measures to Signal Processor Modifications in Cochlear Implant Users.” Hearing Research 262 (1–2):1–8. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2010.02.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Firszt, J. B. 2003. “HiResolution TM Sound Processing.” Advanced Bionics White Paper Sylmar, California 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Firszt, J. B., L. K. Holden, M. W. Skinner, E. A. Tobey, A. Peterson, W. Gaggl, C. L. Runge-Samuelson., et al. 2004. “Recognition of Speech Presented at Soft to Loud Levels by Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients of Three Cochlear Implant Systems.” Ear and Hearing 25 (4):375–387. doi:10.1097/01.AUD.0000134552.22205.EE.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francart, T., A. van Wieringen, and J. Wouters. 2008. “APEX 3: A Multi-Purpose Test Platform for Auditory Psychophysical Experiments.” Journal of Neuroscience Methods 172 (2):283–293. doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2008.04.020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frijns, J. H. M., D. M. T. Dekker, and J. J. Briaire. 2011. “Neural Excitation Patterns Induced by Phased-Array Stimulation in the Implanted Human Cochlea.” Acta Otolaryngologica 131 (4):362–370. doi:10.3109/00016489.2010.541939.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu, Q. J. 2002. “Temporal Processing and Speech Recognition in Cochlear Implant Users.” Neuroreport 13 (13):1635–1639. doi:10.1097/00001756-200209160-00013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatehouse, S., and W. Noble. 2004. “The Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ).” International Journal of Audiology 43 (2):85–99. doi:10.1080/14992020400050014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holden, L. K., J. B. Firszt, R. M. Reeder, R. M. Uchanski, N. Y. Dwyer, and T. A. Holden. 2016. “Factors Affecting Outcomes in Cochlear Implant Recipients Implanted with a Perimodiolar Electrode Array Located in Scala Tympani.” Otology and Neurotology 37 (10):1662–1668. doi:10.1097/MAO.0000000000001241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, R. S., and J. T. Rubinstein. 2003. “High-Rate Conditioning Pulse Trains in Cochlear Implants: dynamic Range Measures with Sinusoidal Stimuli.” The Journal of Acoustical Society of America 114 (6):3327–3342. doi:10.1121/1.1623785.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houben, R., J. Koopman, H. Luts, K. C. Wagener, A. van Wieringen, H. Verschuure, W. A. Dreschler., et al. 2014. “Development of a Dutch Matrix Sentence Test to Assess Speech Intelligibility in Noise.” International Journal of Audiology 53 (10):760–763. doi:10.3109/14992027.2014.920111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irvine, D. R. F. 2018. “Auditory Perceptual Learning and Changes in the Conceptualization of Auditory Cortex.” Hearing Research (366):3–16. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2018.03.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, G. L., J. Ho Won, W. R. Drennan, and J. T. Rubinstein. 2013. “Relationship between Channel Interaction and Spectral-Ripple Discrimination in Cochlear Implant Users.” The Journal of Acoustical Society of America 133 (1):425–433. doi:10.1121/1.4768881.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalkman, R. K., J. J. Briaire, and J. H. M. Frijns. 2015. “Current Focussing in Cochlear Implants: An Analysis of Neural Recruitment in a Computational Model.” Hearing and Research 322:89–98. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2014.12.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kollmeier, B., A. Warzybok, S. Hochmuth, M. A. Zokoll, V. Uslar, T. Brand, and K. C. Wagener. 2015. “The Multilingual Matrix Test: Principles, Applications, and Comparison across Languages: A Review.” International Journal of Audiology 54 (2):3–16. doi:10.3109/14992027.2015.1020971.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Landsberger, D. M., M. Padilla, and A. G. Srinivasan. 2012. “Reducing Current Spread Using Current Focusing in Cochlear Implant Users.” Hearing Research 284 (1–2):16–24. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2011.12.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawler, M., J. Yu, and J. M. Aronoff. 2017. “Comparison of the Spectral-Temporally Modulated Ripple Test with the Arizona Biomedical Institute Sentence Test in Cochlear Implant Users.” Ear and Hearing 38 (6):760–766. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000496.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liberman, M. C. 1978. “Auditory-Nerve Response from Cats Raised in a Low-Noise Chamber.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 63 (2):442–455. doi:10.1121/1.381736
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litvak, L. M., A. J. Spahr, and G. Emadi. 2007. “Loudness Growth Observed under Partially Tripolar Stimulation: model and Data from Cochlear Implant Listeners.” The Journal of Acoustical Society of America 122 (2):967–981. doi:10.1121/1.2749414.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Z., and D. Weinshall. 2000. “Mechanisms of Generalization in Perceptual Learning.” Vision Research 40 (1):97–109. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(99)00140-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsuoka, A. J., P. J. Abbas, J. T. Rubinstein, and C. A. Miller. 2000. “The Neuronal Response to Electrical Constant-Amplitude Pulse Train Stimulation: Additive Gaussian Noise.” Hearing Research 149 (1–2):129–137. doi:10.1016/S0378-5955(00)00173-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Padilla, M., and D. M. Landsberger. 2016. “Reduction in Spread of Excitation from Current Focusing at Multiple Cochlear Locations in Cochlear Implant Users.” Hearing Research 333:98–107. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2016.01.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potts, L. G., M. W. Skinner, B. D. Gotter, M. J. Strube, and C. A. Brenner. 2007. “Relation between Neural Response Telemetry Thresholds, T- and C-Levels, and Loudness Judgments in 12 Adult Nucleus 24 Cochlear Implant Recipients.” Ear and Hearing 28 (4):495–511. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e31806dc16e.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubinstein, J. T., and R. Hong. 2003. “Signal Coding in Cochlear Implants: exploiting Stochastic Effects of Electrical Stimulation.” Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology 191:14–19. doi:10.1177/00034894031120S904.
   Google Scholar
• Shannon, R. V., Q. J. Fu, and J. Galvin. 2004. “The Number of Spectral Channels Required for Speech Recognition Depends on the Difficulty of the Listening Situation.” Acta Otolaryngologica 124 (0):50–54. doi:10.1080/03655230410017562.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Z. M., W. S. Parkinson, and C. J. Long. 2013. “Multipolar Current Focusing Increases Spectral Resolution in Cochlear Implants.” Conference Proceedings. Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biological Society 2013:2796–2799.
   Google Scholar
• Srinivasan, A. G., D. M. Landsberger, and R. V. Shannon. 2010. “Current Focusing Sharpens Local Peaks of Excitation in Cochlear Implant Stimulation.” Hearing Research 270 (1–2):89–100. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2010.09.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srinivasan, A. G., M. Padilla, R. V. Shannon, and D. M. Landsberger. 2013. “Improving Speech Perception in Noise with Current Focusing in Cochlear Implant Users.” Hearing Research 299:29–36. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2013.02.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Honert, C., and D. C. Kelsall. 2007. “Focused Intracochlear Electric Stimulation with Phased Array Channels.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 121 (6):3703–3716. doi:10.1121/1.2722047.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Jagt, M. A., J. J. Briaire, B. M. Verbist, and J. H. M. Frijns. 2016. “Comparison of the HiFocus Mid-Scala and HiFocus 1J Electrode Array: Angular Insertion Depths and Speech Perception Outcomes.” Audiology and Neurotology 21 (5):316–325. doi:10.1159/000448581.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vellinga, D., J. J. Briaire, D. M. van Meenen, and J. H. M. Frijns. 2017a. “Comparison of Multipole Stimulus Configurations with respect to Loudness and Spread of Excitation.” Ear and Hearing 38 (4):487–496. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000416.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vellinga, D., S. Bruijn, J. J. Briaire, R. K. Kalkman, and J. H. M. Frijns. 2017b. “Reducing Interaction in Simultaneous Paired Stimulation with CI.” PLoS One 12 (2):1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Won, J. H., G. L. Jones, W. R. Drennan, E. M. Jameyson, and J. T. Rubinstein. 2013. “Evidence of across-Channel Processing for Spectral-Ripple Discrimination in Cochlear Implant Listeners.” The Journal of Acoustical Society of America 130 (4):2088–2097. doi:10.1121/1.3624820.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Won, J. H., W. R. Drennan, and J. T. Rubinstein. 2007. “Spectral-Ripple Resolution Correlates with Speech Reception in Noise in Cochlear Implant Users.” Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 8 (3):384–392. doi:10.1007/s10162-007-0085-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Won, J. H., W. R. Drennan, K. Nie, E. M. Jameyson, and J. T. Rubinstein. 2011. “Acoustic Temporal Modulation Detection and Speech Perception in Cochlear Implant Listeners.” The Journal of. Acoustical Society of America 130 (1):376–388. doi:10.1121/1.3592521.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, N. 2017. “Deactivating Stimulation Sites Based on Low-Rate Thresholds Improves Spectral Ripple and Speech Reception Thresholds in Cochlear Implant Users.” The Journal of Acoustical Society of America 141 (3):243–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, Z.,. Q. Tang, F.-G. Zeng, T. Guan, and D. Ye. 2012. “Cochlear-Implant Spatial Selectivity with Monopolar, Bipolar and Tripolar Stimulation.” Hearing Research 283 (1–2):45–58. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2011.11.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar