Speech-ABRs in cochlear implant recipients: feasibility study

References

• Anderson, S., A. Parbery-Clark, T. White-Schwoch, and N. Kraus. 2013. “Auditory Brainstem Response to Complex Sounds Predicts Self-Reported Speech-in-Noise Performance.” Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 56 (1): 31–43. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2012/12-0043).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, S., A. Parbery-Clark, H. G. Yi, and N. Kraus. 2011. “A Neural Basis of Speech-in-Noise Perception in Older Adults.” Ear and Hearing 32 (6): 750–757. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e31822229d3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakhos, D., S. Roux, A. Robier, F. Bonnet-Brilhault, E. Lescanne, and N. Bruneau. 2012. “Minimization of Cochlear Implant Artifact in Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials in Children.” International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology 76 (11): 1627–1632. doi:10.1016/j.ijporl.2012.07.034.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banai, K., J. Hornickel, E. Skoe, T. Nicol, S. Zecker, and N. Kraus. 2009. “Reading and Subcortical Auditory Function.” Cerebral Cortex 19 (11): 2699–2707. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhp024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bench, J., A. Kowal, and J. Bamford. 1979. “The BKB (Bamford-Kowal-Bench) Sentence Lists for Partially-Hearing Children.” British Journal of Audiology 13 (3): 108–112. doi:10.3109/03005367909078884.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• BinKhamis, G., A. Léger, S. L. Bell, G. Prendergast, M. O’Driscoll, and K. Kluk. 2019. “Speech Auditory Brainstem Responses: Effects of Background, Stimulus Duration, Consonant–Vowel, and Number of Epochs.” Ear and Hearing 40(3): 659–670. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000648.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boothroyd, A. 1968. “Developments in Speech Audiometry.” British Journal of Audiology 2 (1): 3–10. doi:10.3109/00381796809075436.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, C. J., M. L. Hughes, B. Luk, P. J. Abbas, A. Wolaver, and J. Gervais. 2000. “The Relationship between EAP and EABR Thresholds and Levels Used to Program the Nucleus 24 Speech Processor: Data from Adults.” Ear and Hearing 21 (2): 151–163. doi:10.1097/00003446-200004000-00009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandrasekaran, B., and N. Kraus. 2010. “The Scalp-Recorded Brainstem Response to Speech: Neural Origins and Plasticity.” Psychophysiology 47 (2): 236–246. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00928.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, G. M. 1969. “Responses of Cells in the Superior Olivary Complex of the Cat to Electrical Stimulation of the Auditory Nerve.” Experimental Neurology 24 (1): 124–136. doi:10.1016/0014-4886(69)90010-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deprez, H., R. Gransier, M. Hofmann, A. van Wieringen, J. Wouters, and M. Moonen. 2017a. “Characterization of Cochlear Implant Artifacts in Electrically Evoked Auditory Steady-State Responses.” Biomedical Signal Processing and Control 31:127–138. doi:10.1016/j.bspc.2016.07.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deprez, H., R. Gransier, M. Hofmann, A. van Wieringen, J. Wouters, and M. Moonen. 2017b. “Template Subtraction to Remove CI Stimulation Artifacts in Auditory Steady-State Responses in CI Subjects.” IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering 25 (8): 1322–1331. doi:10.1109/TNSRE.2016.2622979.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deprez, H., R. Gransier, M. Hofmann, A. van Wieringen, J. Wouters, and M. Moonen. 2018. “Independent Component Analysis for Cochlear Implant Artifacts Attenuation from Electrically Evoked Auditory Steady-State Response Measurements.” Journal of Neural Engineering 15 (016006): 1–17. doi:10.1088/1741-2552/aa87ce.
   Google Scholar
• Firszt, J. B., R. D. Chambers, and N. Kraus. 2002a. “Neurophysiology of Cochlear Implant Users II: Comparison among Speech Perception, Dynamic Range, and Physiological Measures.” Ear and Hearing 23 (6): 516–531. doi:10.1097/00003446-200212000-00003.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Firszt, J. B., R. D. Chambers, N. Kraus, and R. M. Reeder. 2002b. “Neurophysiology of Cochlear Implant Users I: Effects of Stimulus Current Level and Electrode Site on the Electrical ABR, MLR, and N1-P2 Response.” Ear and Hearing 23 (6): 502–515. doi:10.1097/00003446-200212000-00002.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Friesen, L. M., and T. W. Picton. 2010. “A Method for Removing Cochlear Implant Artifact.” Hearing Research 259 (1–2): 95–106. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2009.10.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamgebeli, Z., I. Kevanishvili, Z. Kevanishvili, M. Hey, and H. von Specht. 2010. “Electrically Evoked Auditory Brainstem Response in Cochlear Implant Users: Waveform, Parameter Peculiarities, Stimulus Intensity Dependence, Gender, Age Variances.” Cochlear Implants International 11 (1): 416–420. doi:10.1179/146701010X12671177204228.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gilley, P. M., A. Sharma, M. Dorman, C. C. Finley, A. S. Panch, and K. Martin. 2006. “Minimization of Cochlear Implant Stimulus Artifact in Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials.” Clinical Neurophysiology 117 (8): 1772–1782. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2006.04.018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, K. A., D. D. E. Wong, and B. C. Papsin. 2013. “Bilateral Input Protects the Cortex from Unilaterally-Driven Reorganization in Children Who Are Deaf.” Brain 136 (5): 1609–1625. doi:10.1093/brain/awt052.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gransier, R., H. Deprez, M. Hofmann, M. Moonen, A. van Wieringen, and J. Wouters. 2016. “Auditory Steady-State Responses in Cochlear Implant Users: Effect of Modulation Frequency and Stimulation Artifacts.” Hearing Research 335 (C): 149–160. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2016.03.006.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hall, J. W. III. 2015. eHanbook of Auditory Evoked Responses. edited by M. Hall (Kindle Edition). London, England: Pearson Education Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Hartmann, R., G. Topp, and R. Klinke. 1984. “Discharge Patterns of Cat Primary Auditory Fibers with Electrical Stimulation of the Cochlea.” Hearing Research 13 (1): 47–62. doi:10.1016/0378-5955(84)90094-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heywood, R. L., D. A. Vickers, F. Pinto, G. Fereos, and A. Shaida. 2016. “Assessment and Outcome in Non-Traditional Cochlear Implant Candidates.” Audiology and Neurotology 21 (6): 383–390. doi:10.1159/000454914.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornickel, J., E. Knowles, and N. Kraus. 2012. “Test-Retest Consistency of Speech-Evoked Auditory Brainstem Responses in Typically-Developing Children.” Hearing Research 284 (1–2): 52–58. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2011.12.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, K. L., T. G. Nicol, and N. Kraus. 2005. “Brain Stem Response to Speech: A Biological Marker of Auditory Processing.” Ear and Hearing 26 (5): 424–434. doi:10.1097/01.aud.0000179687.71662.6e.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraus, N., and T. Nicol. 2005. “Brainstem Origins for Cortical ‘What’ and ‘Where’ Pathways in the Auditory System.” Trends in Neurosciences 28 (4): 176–181. doi:10.1016/j.tins.2005.02.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraus, N., E. Skoe, A. Parbery-Clark, and R. Ashley. 2009. “Experience-Induced Malleability in Neural Encoding of Pitch, Timbre, and Timing.” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1169 (1): 543–557. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04549.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, X., K. Nie, F. Karp, K. L. Tremblay, and J. T. Rubinstein. 2010. “Characteristics of Stimulus Artifacts in EEG Recordings Induced by Electrical Stimulation of Cochlear Implants.” Presented at the 2010 3rd International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Informatics (BMEI), IEEE. 799–803. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Makhdoum, M. J., P. A. P. Groenen, A. F. M. Snik, and P. V. D. Broek. 1998. “Intra- and Interindividual Correlations between Auditory Evoked Potentials and Speech Perception in Cochlear Implant Users.” Scandinavian Audiology 27 (1): 13–20. doi:10.1080/010503998419650.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, M., A. L. Valdes, R. B. Reilly, and F. G. Zeng. 2013. “Cochlear Implant Artifact Attenuation in Late Auditory Evoked Potentials: A Single Channel Approach.” Hearing Research 302: 84–95. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2013.05.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Middlebrooks, J. C., and R. L. Snyder. 2010. “Selective Electrical Stimulation of the Auditory Nerve Activates a Pathway Specialized for High Temporal Acuity.” Journal of Neuroscience 30 (5): 1937–1946. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4949-09.2010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, S., and Y. Zhang. 2014. “Validation of the Cochlear Implant Artifact Correction Tool for Auditory Electrophysiology.” Neuroscience Letters 577: 51–55. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2014.06.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson, M., S. D. Soli, and J. A. Sullivan. 1994. “Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for the Measurement of Speech Reception Thresholds in Quiet and in Noise.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 95 (2): 1085–1099. doi:10.1121/1.408469.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parbery-Clark, A., D. L. Strait, and N. Kraus. 2011. “Context-Dependent Encoding in the Auditory Brainstem Subserves Enhanced Speech-in-Noise Perception in Musicians.” Neuropsychologia 49 (12): 3338–3345. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.08.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picton, T. W., M. S. John, D. W. Purcell, and G. Plourde. 2003. “Human Auditory Steady-State Responses: The Effects of Recording Technique and State of Arousal.” Anesthesia & Analgesia 97: 1396–1402. doi:10.1213/01.ANE.0000082994.22466.DD.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandmann, P., K. Plotz, N. Hauthal, M. de Vos, R. Schönfeld, and S. Debener. 2015. “Rapid Bilateral Improvement in Auditory Cortex Activity in Postlingually Deafened Adults following Cochlear Implantation.” Clinical Neurophysiology 126 (3): 594–607. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2014.06.029.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, A., M. F. Dorman, and A. J. Spahr. 2002. “A Sensitive Period for the Development of the Central Auditory System in Children with Cochlear Implants: Implications for Age of Implantation.” Ear and Hearing 23 (6): 532–539. doi:10.1097/00003446-200212000-00004.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Skoe, E., and N. Kraus. 2010. “Auditory Brain Stem Response to Complex Sounds: A Tutorial.” Ear and Hearing 31 (3): 302–324. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181cdb272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skoe, E., J. Krizman, S. Anderson, and N. Kraus. 2015. “Stability and Plasticity of Auditory Brainstem Function across the Lifespan.” Cerebral Cortex 25 (6): 1415–1426. doi:10.1093/cercor/bht311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, J. H., T. Nicol, and N. Kraus. 2011a. “Test Retest Reliability of the Speech-Evoked Auditory Brainstem Response.” Clinical Neurophysiology 122 (2): 346–355. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2010.07.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, J. H., E. Skoe, K. Banai, and N. Kraus. 2011b. “Perception of Speech in Noise: Neural Correlates.” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 23 (9): 2268–2279. doi:10.1162/jocn.2010.21556.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stickney, G. S., P. F. Assmann, J. Chang, and F. G. Zeng. 2007. “Effects of Cochlear Implant Processing and Fundamental Frequency on the Intelligibility of Competing Sentences.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 122 (2): 1069–1078. doi:10.1121/1.2750159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Honert, C., and P. H. Stypulkowski. 1984. “Physiological Properties of the Electrically Stimulated Auditory Nerve II: Single Fiber Recordings.” Hearing Research 14 (3): 225–243. doi:10.1016/0378-5955(84)90052-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Honert, C., and P. H. Stypulkowski. 1986. “Characterization of the Electrically Evoked Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR) in Cats and Humans.” Hearing Research 21 (2): 109–126. doi:10.1016/0378-5955(86)90033-X.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vickers, D., J. Eyles, J. Brinton, B. Glasberg, and J. Graham. 2009. “Conversion of Scores between Bamford, Kowal and Bench (BKB) Sentences and Arthur Boothroyd (AB) Words in Quiet for Cochlear Implant Patients.” Cochlear Implants International 10 (3): 142–149. doi:10.1179/cim.2009.10.3.142.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Viola, F. C., J. D. Thorne, S. Bleeck, J. Eyles, and S. Debener. 2011. “Uncovering Auditory Evoked Potentials from Cochlear Implant Users with Independent Component Analysis.” Psychophysiology 48 (11): 1470–1480. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2011.01224.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visram, A. S., H. Innes-Brown, W. El-Deredy, and C. M. McKay. 2015. “Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials as an Objective Measure of Behavioral Thresholds in Cochlear Implant Users.” Hearing Research 327 (C): 35–42. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2015.04.012.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wagner, L., N. Maurits, B. Maat, D. Baskent, and A. E. Wagner. 2018. The cochlear implant EEG artifact recorded from an artificial brain for complex acoustic stimuli. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering 26:392–399. doi:10.1109/TNSRE.2018.2789780.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, F., J. Anderson, R. Samy, and L. Houston. 2010. “The Adaptive Pattern of the Late Auditory Evoked Potential Elicited by Repeated Stimuli in Cochlear Implant Users.” International Journal of Audiology 49 (4): 277–285. doi:10.3109/14992020903321759.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar