The effects of adaptive directional microphone on auditory evoked cortical P300 response and speech performance in cochlear implant users

References

• Androulidakis, A. G., and S. J. Jones. 2006. “Detection of Signals in Modulated and Unmodulated Noise Observed Using Auditory Evoked Potentials.” Clinical Neurophysiology 117 (8): 1783–1793. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2006.04.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beynon, A. J., A. F. M. Snik, and P. van den Broek. 2002. “Evaluation of Cochlear Implant Benefit with Auditory Cortical Evoked Potentials.” International Journal of Audiology 41 (7): 429–435. doi:10.3109/14992020209090420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billings, C. J., K. L. Tremblay, G. C. Stecker, and W. M. Tolin. 2009. “Human Evoked Cortical Activity to Signal-to-Noise Ratio and Absolute Signal Level.” Hearing Research 254 (1–2): 15–24. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2009.04.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brockmeyer, A. M., and L. G. Potts. 2011. “Evaluation of Different Signal Processing Options in Unilateral and Bilateral Cochlear Freedom Implant Recipients Using r-space™ Background Noise.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 22 (2): 65–80. doi:10.3766/jaaa.22.2.2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, J. E., I. J. Moon, E. Y. Kim, H.-S. Park, B. K. Kim, W.-H. Chung, Y.-S. Cho, C. J. Brown, and S. H. Hong. 2017. “Sound Localization and Speech Perception in Noise of Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients: Bimodal Fitting versus Bilateral Cochlear Implants.” Ear and Hearing 38 (4): 426–440. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson, L. S., M. W. Skinner, B. A. Holstad, B. T. Fears, M. K. Richter, M. Matusofsky, and C. Brenner. 2009. “The Effect of Instantaneous Input Dynamic Range Setting on the Speech Perception of Children with the Nucleus 24 Implant.” Ear and Hearing 30 (3): 340–349. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e31819ec93a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, H. 1965. “Slow Cortical Responses Evoked by Acoustic Stimuli.” Acta Oto-Laryngologica 59 (2–6): 179–185. doi:10.3109/00016486509124551.
   Google Scholar
• Erdogan, A., and F. Akdas. 2013. “The Effects of an Adaptive Directional BEAM Microphone on the Mismatch Negativity Responses of Cochlear Implant Users in Noise.” Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences 43: 174–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finke, M., A. Büchner, E. Ruigendijk, M. Meyer, and P. Sandmann. 2016. “On the Relationship between Auditory Cognition and Speech Intelligibility in Cochlear Implant Users: An ERP Study.” Neuropsychologia 87: 169–181. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.05.019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu, Q.-J., and G. Nogaki. 2005. “Noise Susceptibility of Cochlear Implant Users: The Role of Spectral Resolution and Smearing.” Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 6 (1): 19–27. doi:10.1007/s10162-004-5024-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geißler, G., I. Arweiler, P. Hehrmann, T. Lenarz, V. Hamacher, and A. Büchner. 2015. “Speech Reception Threshold Benefits in Cochlear Implant Users with an Adaptive Beamformer in Real Life Situations.” Cochlear Implants International 16 (2): 69–76. doi:10.1179/1754762814Y.0000000088.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gifford, R. H., and L. J. Revit. 2010. “Speech Perception for Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients in a Realistic Background Noise: Effectiveness of Preprocessing Strategies and External Options for Improving Speech Recognition in Noise.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 21 (7): 441–451. doi:10.3766/jaaa.21.7.3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groenen, P. A. P., A. J. Beynon, A. F. M. Snik, and P. V. D. Broek. 2001. “Speech-Evoked Cortical Potentials Recognition in Cochlear Implant Users and Speech.” Scandinavian Audiology 30 (1): 31–40. doi:10.1080/010503901750069554.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, J. W. I. I. 1992. Handbook of Auditory Evoked Responses. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Hersbach, A. A., S. J. Mauger, D. B. Grayden, J. B. Fallon, and H. J. McDermott. 2013. “Algorithms to Improve Listening in Noise for Cochlear Implant Users.” Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), IEEE International Conference, 428–432.
   Google Scholar
• Holden, L. K., C. Brenner, R. M. Reeder, and J. B. Firszt. 2013. “Postlingual Adult Performance in Noise with HiRes 120 and ClearVoice Low, Medium, and High.” Cochlear Implants International 14 (5): 276–286. doi:10.1179/1754762813Y.0000000034.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kelly, A. S., S. C. Purdy, and P. R. Thorne. 2005. “Electrophysiological and Speech Perception Measures of Auditory Processing in Experienced Adult Cochlear Implant Users.” Clinical Neurophysiology 116 (6): 1235–1246. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2005.02.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kileny, P. R. 1991. “Use of Electrophysiologic Measures in the Management of Children with Cochlear Implants: Brainstem, Middle Latency and Cognitive (P300) Responses.” The American Journal of Otology 12: 37–42.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kozou, H., T. Kujala, Y. Shtyrov, E. Toppila, J. Starck, P. Alku, and R. Näätänen. 2005. “The Effect of Different Noise Types on the Speech and Non-Speech Elicited Mismatch Negativity.” Hearing Research 199 (1–2): 31–39. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2004.07.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraus, N., T. McGee, T. D. Carrell, and A. Sharma. 1995. “Neurophysiologic Bases of Speech Discrimination.” Ear and Hearing 16 (1): 19–37. doi:10.1097/00003446-199502000-00003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kubo, T., K. Yamamoto, T. Iwaki, M. Matsukawa, K. Doi, and M. Tamura. 2001. “Significance of auditory evoked responses (EABR and P300) in cochlear implant subjects.” Acta oto-laryngologica 121 (2): 257–261. doi:10.1080/000164801300043749.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litovsky, R. Y., A. Parkinson, and J. Arcaroli. 2009. “Spatial Hearing and Speech Intelligibility in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users.” Ear and Hearing 30 (4): 419–431. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181a165be.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, B. A., D. Kurtzberg, and D. R. Stapells. 1999. “The Effects of Decreased Audibility Produced by High-Pass Noise Masking on N1 and the Mismatch Negativity to Speech Sounds/ba/and/da/.” Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 42 (2): 271–286. doi:10.1044/jslhr.4202.271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Micco, A. G., N. Kraus, D. B. Koch, T. J. McGee, T. D. Carrell, A. Sharma, T. Nicol, and R. J. Wiet. 1995. “Speech-Evoked Cognitive P300 Potentials in Cochlear Implant Recipients.” The American Journal of Otology 16 (4): 514–520.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mosnier, I., N. Mathias, J. Flament, D. Amar, A. Liagre-Callies, S. Borel, E. Ambert-Dahan, O. Sterkers, and D. Bernardeschi. 2017. “Benefit of the UltraZoom Beamforming Technology in Noise in Cochlear Implant Users.” European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 274 (9): 3335–3342. doi:10.1007/s00405-017-4651-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, J., F. Schon, and J. Helms. 2002. “Speech Understanding in Quiet and Noise in Bilateral Users of the MED-EL COMBI 40/40+ Cochlear Implant System.” Ear and Hearing 23 (3): 198–206. doi:10.1097/00003446-200206000-00004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nie, K., G. Stickney, and F.-G. Zeng. 2005. “Encoding Frequency Modulation to Improve Cochlear Implant Performance in Noise.” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 52 (1): 64–73. doi:10.1109/TBME.2004.839799.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oates, P. A., D. Kurtzberg, and D. R. Stapells. 2002. “Effects of Sensorineural Hearing Loss on Cortical Event-Related Potential and Behavioral Measures of Speech-Sound Processing.” Ear and Hearing 23 (5): 399–415. doi:10.1097/00003446-200210000-00002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, R. W., B. C. J. Moore, and T. Baer. 1998. “Speech Reception Thresholds in Noise with and without Spectral and Temporal Dips for Hearing-Impaired and Normally Hearing People.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 103 (1): 577–587. doi:10.1121/1.421128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plomp, R., and A. M. Mimpen. 1979. “Speech Reception Threshold for Sentences as a Function of Age and Noise Level.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 66 (5): 1333–1342. doi:10.1121/1.383554.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polich, J. 1988. “Bifurcated P300 Peaks: P3a and P3b Revisited?” Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology: Official Publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society 5 (3): 287–294. doi:10.1097/00004691-198807000-00004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schön, F., J. Müller, and J. Helms. 2002. “Speech Reception Thresholds Obtained in a Symmetrical Four-Loudspeaker Arrangement from Bilateral Users of MED-EL Cochlear Implants.” Otology and Neurotology 23 (5): 710–714. doi:10.1097/00129492-200209000-00018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shytrov, Y., T. Kujula, J. Ahveninen, M. Tervaniemi, P. Alku, and R. J. Ilmoniemi. 1998. “Background Acoustic Noise and the Hemispheric Lateralization of Speech Processing in the Human Brain: Magnetic Mismatch Negativity Study.” Neuroscience Letters 251 (2): 141–144. doi:10.1016/S0304-3940(98)00529-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soshi, T., S. Hisanaga, N. Kodama, Y. Kanekama, Y. Samejima, E. Yumoto, and K. Sekiyama. 2014. “Event-Related Potentials for Better Speech Perception in Noise by Cochlear Implant Users.” Hearing Research 316: 110–121. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2014.08.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spriet, A., L. Van Deun, K. Eftaxiadis, J. Laneau, M. Moonen, B. van Dijk, A. van Wieringen, and J. Wouters. 2007. “Speech Understanding in Background Noise with the Two-Microphone Adaptive Beamformer BEAM in the Nucleus Freedom Cochlear Implant System.” Ear and Hearing 28 (1): 62–72. doi:10.1097/01.aud.0000252470.54246.54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Squires, N. K., K. C. Squires, and S. A. Hillyard. 1975. “Two Varieties of Long-Latency Positive Waves Evoked by Unpredictable Auditory Stimuli in Man.” Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 38 (4): 387–401. doi:10.1016/0013-4694(75)90263-1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sussman, E., M. Steinschneider, V. Gumenyuk, J. Grushko, and K. Lawson. 2008. “The Maturation of Human Evoked Brain Potentials to Sounds Presented at Different Stimulus Rates.” Hearing Research 236 (1–2): 61–79. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2007.12.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutton, S., M. Braren, J. Zubin, and E. R. John. 1965. “Evoked-Potential Correlates of Stimulus Uncertainty.” Science 150 (3700): 1187–1188. doi:10.1126/science.150.3700.1187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Hoesel, R. J. M., and G. M. Clark. 1995. “Evaluation of a Portable Two‐Microphone Adaptive Beamforming Speech Processor with Cochlear Implant Patients.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 97 (4): 2498–2503. doi:10.1121/1.411970.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Hoesel, R., R. Ramsden, and M. O’Driscoll. 2002. “Sound-Direction Identification, Interaural Time Delay Discrimination, and Speech Intelligibility Advantages in Noise for a Bilateral Cochlear Implant User.” Ear and Hearing 23 (2): 137–149. doi:10.1097/00003446-200204000-00006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Versfeld, N. J., L. Daalder, J. M. Festen, and T. Houtgast. 2000. “Method for the Selection of Sentence Materials for Efficient Measurements of the Reception Threshold.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 107 (3): 1671–1684. doi:10.1121/1.428451.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Won, J. H., W. R. Drennan, and J. T. Rubinstein. 2007. “Spectral-Ripple Resolution Correlates with Speech Reception in Noise in Cochlear Implant Users.” Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 8 (3): 384–392. doi:10.1007/s10162-007-0085-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wouters, J., and J. Vanden Berghe. 2001. “Speech Recognition in Noise for Cochlear Implantees with a Two-Microphone Monaural Adaptive Noise Reduction System.” Ear and Hearing 22 (5): 420–430. doi:10.1097/00003446-200110000-00006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar