The Finnish simplified matrix sentence test for the assessment of speech intelligibility in the elderly

References

• Bagatto, M. P., S. T. Moodie, R. C. Seewald, D. J. Bartlett, and S. D. Scollie. 2011. “A Critical Review of Audiological Outcome Measures for Infants and Children.” Trends in Amplification 15 (1): 23–33. doi:10.1177/1084713811412056.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brand, T., and B. Kollmeier. 2002. “Efficient Adaptive Procedures for Threshold and Concurrent Slope Estimates for Psychophysics and Speech Intelligibility Tests.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 111 (6): 2801–2810. doi:10.1121/1.1479152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buschermöhle, M., K. C. Wagener, and B. Kollmeier. 2016. “Sprachaudiometrische Messungen mit dem Verkürzten Oldenburger Satztest OLKISA bei Erwachsenen [Speech Audiometric Measurements with the Simplifies Oldenburg Sentence Test OLKISA with Adults].” Zeitschrift Für Audiologie 55 (1): 6–13.
   Google Scholar
• Buss, E., S. E. Hodge, L. Calandruccio, L. J. Leibold, and J. H. Grose. 2019. “Masked Sentence Recognition in Children, Young Adults, and Older Adults: Age-Dependent Effects of Semantic Context and Masker Type.” Ear and Hearing 40 (5): 1117–1126. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000692.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbin, N. E., A. Y. Bonino, E. Buss, and L. J. Leibold. 2016. “Development of Open-Set Word Recognition in Children: Speech-Shaped Noise and Two-Talker Speech Maskers.” Ear and Hearing 37 (1): 55–63. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cupples, L., T. Y. C. Ching, L. Button, M. Seeto, V. Zhang, J. Whitfield, M. Gunnourie, L. Martin, and V. Marnane. 2018. “Spoken Language and Everyday Functioning in 5-Year-Old Children Using Hearing Aids or Cochlear Implants.” International Journal of Audiology 57 (sup2): S55–S69. doi:10.1080/14992027.2017.1370140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietz, A., M. Buschermöhle, V. Sivonen, T. Willberg, A. A. Aarnisalo, T. Lenarz, and B. Kollmeier. 2015. “Characteristics and International Comparability of the Finnish Matrix Sentence Test in Cochlear Implant Recipients.” International Journal of Audiology 54 (sup2): 80–87. doi:10.3109/14992027.2015.1070309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietz, A., M. Buschermöhle, A. A. Aarnisalo, A. Vanhanen, T. Hyyrynen, O. Aaltonen, H. Löppönen, M. A. Zokoll, and B. Kollmeier. 2014. “The Development and Evaluation of the Finnish Matrix Sentence Test for Speech Intelligibility Assessment.” Acta Oto-Laryngologica 134 (7): 728–737. doi:10.3109/00016489.2014.898185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubno, J. R. 2015. “Speech Recognition Across the Lifespan: Longitudinal Changes from Middle Age to Older Adults.” American Journal of Audiology 24 (2): 84–87. doi:10.1044/2015_AJA-14-0052.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubno, J. R., D. D. Dirks, and D. E. Morgan. 1984. “Effects of Age and Mild Hearing Loss on Speech Recognition in Noise.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 76 (1): 87–96. doi:10.1121/1.391011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebner, K., S. Steffens, and J. Hellbrück. 2008. “Sprachverstehen in Ruhe und im Störgeräusch und Lerneffekte bei Normalhörenden sowie Unilateral und Sequentiell Bilateral Cochlea-Implantierten Kindern (Speech Recognition in Quiet and Noise and Learning Effects in Both Normal-Hearing Children and Children with Unilateral and Sequential Bilateral Cochlear Implants.”) Zeitschrift Für Audiologie 47 (3): 100–110.
   Google Scholar
• Füllgrabe, C., B. C. Moore, and M. A. Stone. 2015. “Age-Group Differences in Speech Identification despite Matched Audiometrically Normal Hearing: contributions from Auditory Temporal Processing and Cognition.” Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience 13 (6): 347. doi:10.3389/fnagi.2014.00347.
   Google Scholar
• Goossens, T., C. Vercammen, J. Wouters, and A. van Wieringen. 2017. “Masked Speech Perception across the Adult Lifespan: Impact of Age and Hearing Impairment.” Hearing Research 344: 109–124. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2016.11.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagerman, B. 1982. “Sentences for Testing Speech Intelligibility in Noise.” Scandinavian Audiology 11 (2): 79–87. doi:10.3109/01050398209076203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernvig, L. H., and S. Ø. Olsen. 2005. “Learning Effect When Using the Danish Hagerman Sentences (Dantale II) to Determine Speech Reception Threshold.” International Journal of Audiology 44 (9): 509–512. doi:10.1080/14992020500189997.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hey, M., T. Hocke, J. Hedderich, and J. Müller-Deile. 2014. “Investigation of a Matrix Sentence Test in Noise: Reproducibility and Discrimination Function in Cochlear Implant Patients.” International Journal of Audiology 53 (12): 895–902. doi:10.3109/14992027.2014.938368.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochmuth, S., T. Brand, M. A. Zokoll, F. Z. Castro, N. Wardenga, and B. Kollmeier. 2012. “A Spanish Matrix Sentence Test for Assessing Speech Perception Thresholds in Noise.” International Journal of Audiology 51 (7): 536–544. doi:10.3109/14992027.2012.670731.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holder, J. T., S. W. Sheffield, and R. H. Gifford. 2016. “Speech Understanding in Children with Normal Hearing: Sound Field Normative Data for BabyBio, BKB-SIN, and QuickSIN.” Otology and Neurotology 37 (2): e50–e55. doi:10.1097/MAO.0000000000000907.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houben, R., J. Koopman, H. Luts, K. C. Wagener, A. van Wieringen, H. Verschuure, and W. A. Dreschler. 2014. “Development of a Dutch Matrix Sentence Test to Assess Speech Intelligibility in Noise.” International Journal of Audiology 53 (10): 760–763. doi:10.3109/14992027.2014.920111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansen, Sofie, Heleen Luts, Kirsten Carola Wagener, Birger Kollmeier, Matthieu Del Rio, René Dauman, Chris James, et al. 2012. “Comparison of Three Types of French Speech-in-Noise Tests: A Multi-Center Study.” International Journal of Audiology 51 (3): 164–173. doi:10.3109/14992027.2011.633568.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kollmeier, B., A. Warzybok, S. Hochmuth, M. A. Zokoll, V. Uslar, T. Brand, and K. C. Wagener. 2015. “The Multilingual Matrix Test: Principles, Applications, and Comparison across Languages: A Review.” International Journal of Audiology 54 (sup2): 3–16. doi:10.3109/14992027.2015.1020971.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leibold, L. J., and E. Buss. 2019. “Masked Speech Recognition in School-Age Children.” Frontiers in Psychology 10: 1981. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01981
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neumann, K., N. Baumeister, U. Baumann, U. Sick, H. A. Euler, and T. Weißgerber. 2012. “Speech Audiometry in Quiet with the Oldenburg Sentence Test for Children.” International Journal of Audiology 51 (3): 157–163. doi:10.3109/14992027.2011.633935.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• New Minimum Speech Test Battery for Adult Cochlear Implant Users 2011. User Manual. [Internet] [Cited 2018 Jun 17]. http://www.auditorypotential.com/MSTBfiles/MSTBManual2011-06-20%20.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson, M. J., S. D. Soli, and D. J. Gelnett. 1996. “Development and Norming of a Hearing In Noise Test for Children.” House Ear Institute (US).
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson, M., S. D. Soli, and J. A. Sullivan. 1994. “Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for the Measurement of Speech Reception Thresholds in Quiet and in Noise.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 95 (2): 1085–1099. doi:10.1121/1.408469.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Percy-Smith, L., M. Hallstrøm, J. L. Josvassen, J. H. Mikkelsen, L. Nissen, E. Dieleman, and P. Cayé-Thomasen. 2018. “Differences and Similarities in Early Vocabulary Development between Children with Hearing Aids and Children with Cochlear Implant Enrolled in 3-Year Auditory Verbal Intervention.” International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology 108: 67–72. doi:10.1016/j.ijporl.2018.02.030.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pichora-Fuller, K. M., B. A. Schneider, and M. Daneman. 1995. “How Young and Old Adults Listen to and Remember Speech in Noise.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 97 (1): 593–608. doi:10.1121/1.412282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plomp, R., and A. M. Mimpen. 1979. “Improving the Reliability of Testing the Speech Reception Threshold for Sentences.” International Journal of Audiology 1979 (18): 43–52. doi:10.3109/00206097909072618.
   Google Scholar
• Schlueter, A., U. Lemke, B. Kollmeier, and I. Holube. 2016. “Normal and Time-Compressed Speech: How Does Learning Affect Speech Recognition Thresholds in Noise?” Trends in Hearing 20: 233121651666988–233121651666913. doi:10.1177/2331216516669889.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spahr, A. J., M. F. Dorman, L. M. Litvak, S. Cook, L. M. Loiselle, M. D. DeJong, A. Hedley-Williams, et al. 2014. “Development and Validation of the Pediatric AzBio Sentence Lists.” Ear and Hearing 35 (4): 418–422. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spahr, A. J., M. F. Dorman, L. M. Litvak, S. Van Wie, R. H. Gifford, P. C. Loizou, L. M. Loiselle, et al. 2012. “Development and Validation of the AzBio Sentence Lists.” Ear and Hearing 33 (1): 112–117. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e31822c2549.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuart, A. 2005. “Development of Auditory Temporal Resolution in School-Age Children Revealed by Word Recognition in Continuous and Interrupted Noise.” Ear and Hearing 26 (1): 78–88. doi:10.1097/00003446-200502000-00007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomblin, J. B., M. Harrison, S. E. Ambrose, E. A. Walker, J. J. Oleson, and M. P. Moeller. 2015. “Language Outcomes in Young Children with Mild to Severe Hearing Loss.” Ear and Hearing 36: 76S–91S. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000219.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Uhler, K. A., Warner-Czyz, R., Gifford, R. 2017. “Pediatric Minimum Speech Test Battery.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 28 (3): 232–247. doi:10.3766/jaaa.15123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vainio, M. 1996. “Phoneme Frequencies in Finnish Text and Speech.” In Studies in Logopedics and Phonetics Vol 6, Series B, edited by A. Iivonen and A. Klippi, 181–194. Helsinki: Department of Phonetics, University of Helsinki.
   Google Scholar
• Wagener, K. C., B. Kollmeier. 2005. “Evaluation des Oldenburger Satztests mit Kindern und Oldenburger Kinder-Satztest (Evaluation of the Oldenburg Sentence Test with Children and the Oldenburg Children’s Sentence Test).” Zeitschrift Für Audiologie 44: 134–143.
   Google Scholar
• Wagener, K., T. Brand, and B. Kollmeier. 1999a. “Entwicklung und Evaluation eines Satztests für die Deutsche Sprache Teil II: Optimierung des Oldenburger Satztests. (Development and Evaluation of a German Sentence Test Part II: Optimization of the Oldenburg Sentence Test).” Zeitschrift Für Audiologie 38: 44–56.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wagener, K., T. Brand, and B. Kollmeier. 1999b. “Entwicklung und Evaluation eines Satztests für die Deutsche Sprache Teil III: Evaluation des Oldenburger Satztests. (Development and Evaluation of a German Sentence Test Part III: Evaluation of the Oldenburg Sentence Test).” Zeitschrift Für Audiologie 38: 86–95.
   Google Scholar
• Wagener, K., V. Kühnel, and B. Kollmeier. 1999. “Entwicklung und Evaluation eines Satztests für die Deutsche Sprache. Design, Optimierung, Evaluation des Oldenburger Satztests (Teil 1). [Development and Evaluation of a German Sentence Test (Part I)].” Zeitschrift Für Audiologie 38: 4–15.
   Google Scholar
• Wagener, K. C., and T. Brand. 2005. “Sentence Intelligibility in Noise for Listeners with Normal Hearing and Hearing Impairment: Influence of Measurement Procedure and Masking Parameters.” International Journal of Audiology 44 (3): 144–156. doi:10.1080/14992020500057517.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagener, K. C., J. L. Josvassen, and R. Ardenkjaer. 2003. “Design, Optimization and Evaluation of a Danish Sentence Test in Noise.” International Journal of Audiology 42 (1): 10–17. doi:10.3109/14992020309056080.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, E. A., L. Holte, R. W. McCreery, M. Spratford, T. Page, and M. P. Moeller. 2015. “The Influence of Hearing Aid Use on Outcomes of Children with Mild Hearing Loss.” Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 58 (5): 1611–1625. doi:10.1044/2015_JSLHR-H-15-0043.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warzybok, A., M. Zokoll, N. Wardenga, E. Ozimek, M. Boboshko, and B. Kollmeier. 2015. “Development of the Russian Matrix Sentence Test.” International Journal of Audiology 54 (sup2): 35–43. doi:10.3109/14992027.2015.1020969.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weißgerber, T., U. Baumann, T. Brand, and K. Neumann. 2012. “German Oldenburg Sentence Test for Children: A Useful Speech Audiometry Tool for Hearing-Impaired Children at Kindergarten and School Age.” Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica 64 (5): 227–233. doi:10.1159/000342414.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zokoll, M. A., D. Fidan, D. Türkyilmaz, S. Hochmuth, İ. Ergenç, G. Sennaroğlu, and B. Kollmeier. 2015. “Development and Evaluation of the Turkish Matrix Sentence Test.” International Journal of Audiology 54 (sup2): 51–61. doi:10.3109/14992027.2015.1074735.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar