Recognising foreign-accented speech of varying intelligibility and linguistic complexity: insights from older listeners with or without hearing loss

References

• Adams, C., and R. R. Munro. 1978. “In Search of the Acoustic Correlates of Stress: Fundamental Frequency, Amplitude, and Duration in the Connected Utterance of Some Native and Non-Native Speakers of English.” Phonetica 35 (3): 125–156. doi:10.1159/000259926.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akeroyd, M. A. 2008. “Are Individual Differences in Speech Reception Related to Individual Differences in Cognitive Ability? A Survey of Twenty Experimental Studies with Normal and Hearing-Impaired Adults.” International Journal of Audiology 47 (Sup 2): S53–S71. doi:10.1080/14992020802301142.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Anderson-Hsieh, J., R. Johnson, and K. Koehler. 1992. “The Relationship between Native Speaker Judgments of Non-Native Pronunciation and Deviance in Segmentals, Prosody and Syllable Structure.” Language Learning 42 (4): 529–555. doi:10.1111/j.1467-1770.1992.tb01043.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arehart, K. H., P. Souza, R. Baca, and J. M. Kates. 2013a. “Working Memory, Age, and Hearing Loss: Susceptibility to Hearing Aid Distortion.” Ear and Hearing 34 (3): 251–260. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e318271aa5e.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arehart, K., P. Souza, J. Kates, T. Lunner, and M. S. Pedersen. 2015. “Relationship among Signal Fidelity, Hearing Loss, and Working Memory for Digital Noise Suppression.” Ear and Hearing 36 (5): 505–516. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arlinger, S., T. Lunner, B. Lyxell, and M. K. Pichora-Fuller. 2009. “The Emergence of Cognitive Hearing Science.” Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 50 (5): 371–384. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9450.2009.00753.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H., D. J. Davidson, and D. M. Bates. 2008. “Mixed-Effects Modelling with Crossed Random Effects for Subjects and Items.” Journal of Memory and Language 59 (4): 390–412. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baddeley, A. 2000. “The Episodic Buffer: A New Component of Working Memory?” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4 (11): 417–423. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01538-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baddeley, A. 2012. “Working Memory: Theories, Models, and Controversies.” Annual Review of Psychology 63: 1–29. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100422.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benichov, J., L. C. Cox, P. A. Tun, and A. Wingfield. 2012. “Word Recognition within a Linguistic Context: Effects of Age, Hearing Acuity, Verbal Ability and Cognitive Function.” Ear and Hearing 33 (2): 250–256. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e31822f680f.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besser, J., T. Koelewijn, A. A. Zekveld, S. E. Kramer, and J. M. Festen. 2013. “How Linguistic Closure and Verbal Working Memory Relate to Speech Recognition in Noise – A Review.” Trends in Amplification 17 (2): 75–93. doi:10.1177/1084713813495459.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Buelow, J. R., and F. A. Fee. 2000. “Perceptions of Care and Satisfaction in Assisted Living Facilities.” Health Marketing Quarterly 17 (3): 13–24. doi:10.1300/J026v17n03_02.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bever, T. G., J. R. Lackner, and R. Kir. 1969. “The Underlying Structures of Sentences Are the Primary Units of Immediate Speech Processing.” Perception & Psychophysics 5 (4): 225–234. doi:10.3758/BF03210545.
   Google Scholar
• Blackwell, D. L., J. W. Lucas, and T. C. Clarke. 2014. “Summary Health Statistics for U.S. Adults: National Health Interview Survey, 2012.” National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Statistics 10 (260): 1–171.
   Google Scholar
• Bolker, B. M., M. E. Brooks, C. J. Clark, S. W. Geange, J. R. Poulsen, M. H. Stevens, and J. S. White. 2009. “Generalized Linear Mixed Models: A Practical Guide for Ecology and Evolution.” Trends in Ecology & Evolution 24 (3): 127–135. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2008.10.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonhage, C. E., C. J. Fiebach, J. Bahlmann, and J. L. Mueller. 2014. “Brain Signature of Working Memory for Sentence Structure: Enriched Encoding and Facilitated Maintenance.” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 26 (8): 1654–1671. doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00566.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradlow, A. R. n.d. ALLSSTAR: Archive of L1 and L2 Scripted and Spontaneous Transcripts And Recordings. Retrieved from https://speechbox.linguistics.northwestern.edu/ALLSSTARcentral/#!/recordings (last viewed on 16 May, 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Bradlow, A. R., and T. Bent. 2008. “Perceptual Adaptation to Non-Native Speech.” Cognition 106 (2): 707–729. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.04.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradlow, A. R., M. Blasingame, and K. Lee. 2018. “Language-Independent Talker-Specificity in Bilingual Speech Intelligibility: Individual Traits Persist across First-Language and Second-Language Speech.” Laboratory Phonology: Journal of the Association for Laboratory Phonology 9 (1)17:1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Bradlow, A. R., M. Kim, and M. Blasingame. 2017. “Language-Independent Talker-Specificity in First-Language and Second-Language Speech Production by Bilingual Talkers: L1 Speaking Rate Predicts L2 Speaking Rate.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 141 (2): 886–889. doi:10.1121/1.4976044.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks, M. E., K. Kristensen, K. J. van Benthem, A. Magnusson, C. W. Berg, A. Nielsen, H. J. Skaug, M. Maechler, and B. M. Bolker. 2017. “glmmTMB Balances Speed and Flexibility among Packages for Zero-Inflated Generalized Linear Mixed Modeling.” The R Journal 9 (2): 378–400. doi:10.32614/RJ-2017-066.
   Google Scholar
• Burda, A. N., and C. F. Hageman. 2005. “Perception of Accented Speech by Residents in Assisted-Living Facilities.” Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology 13 (1): 7–14.
   Google Scholar
• Burda, A. N., J. A. Scherz, C. F. Hageman, and H. T. Edwards. 2003. “Age and Understanding Speakers with Spanish or Taiwanese Accents.” Perceptual and Motor Skills 97 (1): 11–20. doi:10.2466/PMS.97.5.11-20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowder, M. J. 1978. “Beta-Binomial Anova for Proportions.” Applied Statistics 27 (1): 34–37. doi:10.2307/2346223.
   Google Scholar
• Daneman, M., and P. A. Carpenter. 1980. “Individual Differences in Working Memory and Reading.” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 19 (4): 450–466. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(80)90312-6.
   Google Scholar
• DeCaro, R., J. E. Peelle, M. Grossman, and A. Wingfield. 2016. “The Two Sides of Sensory-Cognitive Interactions: Effects of Age, Hearing Acuity, and Working Memory Span on Sentence Comprehension.” Frontiers in Psychology 7: 236. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00236.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubno, J. R., J. B. Ahlstrom, and A. R. Horwitz. 2000. “Use of Context by Young and Aged Adults with Normal Hearing.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 107 (1): 538–546. doi:10.1121/1.428322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein, W. 1961. “The Influence of Syntactical Structure on Learning.” The American Journal of Psychology 74 (1): 80–86. doi:10.2307/1419827.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, S. H., A. Jongman, J. A. Sereno, and K. A. Keum. 2010. “Intelligibility of Foreign-Accented Speech for Older Adults with and Without Hearing Loss.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 21 (3): 153–162. doi:10.3766/jaaa.21.3.3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flege, J. E. 1995. “Second-Language Speech Learning: Theory, Findings, and Problems.” In Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Theoretical and Methodological Issues in Cross-Language Speech Research, edited by W. Strange, 233–277. Timonium, MD: York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flege, J. E., and W. Eefting. 1988. “Imitation of a VOT Continuum by Native Speakers of English and Spanish: Evidence for Phonetic Category Formation.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 83 (2): 729–740. doi:10.1121/1.396115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flege, J., and W. Eefting. 1987. “The Production and Perception of English Stops by Spanish Speakers of English.” Journal of Phonetics 15 (1): 67–83. doi:10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30538-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, R. A., J. E. Flege, and J. Munro. 1995. “The Perception of English and Spanish Vowels by Native English and Spanish Listeners: A Multidimensional Scaling Analysis.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 97 (4): 2540–2551. doi:10.1121/1.411974.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, J. L., T. N. Tamati, and D. B. Pisoni. 2013. “Development, Reliability, and Validity of PRESTO: A New High-Variability Sentence Recognition Test.” Journal of American Academy of Audiology 24: 26–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goman, A. M., and F. R. Lin. 2016. “Prevalence of Hearing Loss by Severity in the United States.” American Journal of Public Health 106 (10): 1820–1822. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2016.303299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon-Salant, S., and S. S. Cole. 2016. “Effects of Age and Working Memory Capacity on Speech Recognition Performance in Noise among Listeners with Normal Hearing.” Ear and Hearing 37 (5): 593–602. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000316.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon-Salant, S., G. H. Yeni-Komshian, and P. J. Fitzgibbons. 2010a. “Recognition of Accented English in Quiet by Younger Normal-Hearing Listeners and Older Listeners with Normal-Hearing and Hearing Loss.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 128 (1): 444–455. doi:10.1121/1.3397409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon-Salant, S., G. H. Yeni-Komshian, and P. J. Fitzgibbons. 2010b. “Recognition of Accented English in Quiet and Noise by Younger and Older Listeners.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 128 (5): 3152–3160. doi:10.1121/1.3495940.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon-Salant, S., G. H. Yeni-Komshian, P. J. Fitzgibbons, and J. I. Cohen. 2015. “Effects of Age and Hearing Loss on Recognition of Unaccented and Accented Multisyllabic Words.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 137 (2): 884–897. doi:10.1121/1.4906270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon-Salant, S., G. H. Yeni-Komshian, P. J. Fitzgibbons, J. I. Cohen, and C. Waldroup. 2013. “Recognition of Accented and Unaccented Speech in Different Maskers by Younger and Older Listeners.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 134 (1): 618–627. doi:10.1121/1.4807817.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goy, H., M. Pelletier, M. Coletta, and K. M. Pichora-Fuller. 2013. “The Effects of Semantic Context and the Type and Amount of Acoustic Distortion on Lexical Decision by Younger and Older Adults.” Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research : Jslhr 56 (6): 1715–1732. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2013/12-0053).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilbe, J. M. 2013. “Beta binomial regression,” in The Selected Works of Joseph Hilbe (bepress electronic repository), retrieved from http://works.bepress.com/joseph_hilbe/43/ (last viewed on 29 April, 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Jaeger, T. F. 2008. “Categorical Data Analysis: Away from ANOVAs (Transformation or Not) and towards Logit Mixed Models.” Journal of Memory and Language 59 (4): 434–446. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarvella, R. J., and S. J. Herman. 1972. “Clause Structure of Sentences and Speech Processing.” Perception & Psychophysics 11 (5): 381–384. doi:10.3758/BF03206272.
   Google Scholar
• Just, M. A., and P. A. Carpenter. 1992. “A Capacity Theory of Comprehension: Individual Differences in Working Memory.” Psychological Review 99 (1): 122–149. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.99.1.122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. 1973. Attention and Effort. EnglewoodCliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Killion, M. C., P. A. Niquette, G. I. Gudmundsen, L. J. Revit, and S. Banerjee. 2004. “Development of a Quick Speech-in-Noise Test for Measuring Signal-to-Noise Ratio Loss in Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 116 (4): 2395–2405. doi:10.1121/1.1784440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J.-Y., D. W. Lee, S.-J. Cho, D. L. Na, H. J. Jeon, S.-K. Kim, … M. J. Cho. 2008. “Brief Screening for Mild Cognitive Impairment in Elderly Outpatient Clinic: Validation of the Korean Version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment.” Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology 21: 104–110. doi:10.1177/0891988708316855.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenth, R. 2019. “emmeans: Estimated Marginal Means, aka Least-Squares Means,” R package version 1.3.5.1. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans (last viewed on 21 April 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Luis, C. A., A. P. Keegan, and M. Mullan. 2009. “Cross Validation of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment in Community Dwelling Older Adults Residing in the Southeastern US.” International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 24 (2): 197–201. doi:10.1002/gps.2101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKay, I. R. A., J. E. Flege, and T. Piske. 2000. “Persistent Errors in the Perception and Production of Word-Initial English Stop Consonants by Native Speakers of Italian (a).” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 107 (5): 2802–2802. doi:10.1121/1.429022.
   Google Scholar
• Marks, L. E., and G. A. Miller. 1964. “The Role of Semantic and Syntactic Constraints in the Memorization of English Sentences.” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 3 (1): 1–5. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(64)80052-9.
   Google Scholar
• MATLAB and Statistics Toolbox Release. 2018b. The MathWorks, Inc., Natick, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Mattys, S. L., M. H. Davis, A. R. Bradlow, and S. K. Scott. 2012. “Speech Recognition in Adverse Conditions: A Review.” Language and Cognitive Processes 27 (7–8): 953–978. doi:10.1080/01690965.2012.705006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, G. A., and S. Isard. 1963. “Some Perceptual Consequences of Linguistic Rules.” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 2 (3): 217–228. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(63)80087-0.
   Google Scholar
• Miyake, A., and P. Shah. 1999. Models of Working Memory. New York, NY: Cambridge University.
   Google Scholar
• Muniz-Terrera, G., A. van den Hout, R. A. Rigby, and D. M. Stasinopoulos. 2016. “Analysing Cognitive Test Data: Distributions and Non-parametric Random Effects.” Statistical Methods in Medical Research 25 (2): 741–753. doi:10.1177/0962280212465500.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munro, M., and T. Derwing. 1995. “Foreign Accent, Comprehensibility and Intelligibility in the Speech of Second Language Learners.” Language Learning 45 (1): 73–97. doi:10.1111/j.1467-1770.1995.tb00963.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nasreddine, Ziad S., Natalie A. Phillips, Valérie Bédirian, Simon Charbonneau, Victor Whitehead, Isabelle Collin, Jeffrey L. Cummings, and Howard Chertkow. 2005. “The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: A Brief Screening Tool for Mild Cognitive Impairment.” Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 53 (4): 695–699. doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neher, T. 2014. “Relating Hearing Loss and Executive Functions to Hearing Aid Users' Preference for, and Speech Recognition with, Different Combinations of Binaural Noise Reduction and Microphone Directionality.” Frontiers in Neuroscience 8: 391. doi:10.3389/fnins.2014.00391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neher, T., G. Grimm, V. Hohmann, and B. Kollmeier. 2014b. “Do Hearing Loss and Cognitive Function Modulate Benefit from Different Binaural Noise-Reduction Settings??” Ear and Hearing 35 (3): e52–e62. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng, E. H., M. Rudner, T. Lunner, M. S. Pedersen, and J. Rönnberg. 2013. “Effects of Noise and Working Memory Capacity on Memory Processing of Speech for Hearing-Aid Users.” International Journal of Audiology 52 (7): 433–441. doi:10.3109/14992027.2013.776181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson, M., S. D. Soli, and J. A. Sullivan. 1994. “Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for the Measurement of Speech Reception Thresholds in Quiet and in Noise.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 95 (2): 1085–1099. doi:10.1121/1.408469.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, A. R., and A. Wingfield. 1994. “Contextual Encoding by Young and Elderly Adults as Revealed by Cued and Free Recall.” Aging and Cognition 1 (2): 120–139. doi:10.1080/09289919408251454.
   Google Scholar
• Pichora-Fuller, M. K., B. A. Schneider, and M. Daneman. 1995. “How Young and Old Adults Listen to and Remember Speech in Noise.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 97 (1): 593–608. doi:10.1121/1.412282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potter, M. C., and L. Lombardi. 1998. “Syntactic Priming in Immediate Recall of Sentences.” Journal of Memory and Language 38 (3): 265–282. doi:10.1006/jmla.1997.2546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2019. “R: A language and environment for statistical computing,” R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.R-project.org/ (last viewed on 10 June, 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Rönnberg, J., S. Arlinger, B. Lyxell, and C. Kinnefors. 1989. “Visual Evoked Potentials: Relation to Adult Speechreading and Cognitive Function.” Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 32 (4): 725–735. doi:10.1044/jshr.3204.725.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rönnberg, Jerker, Thomas Lunner, Adriana Zekveld, Patrik Sörqvist, Henrik Danielsson, Björn Lyxell, Örjan Dahlström, et al. 2013. “The Ease of Language Understanding (ELU) Model: Theoretical, Empirical, and Clinical Advances.” Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience 7: 31. doi:10.3389/fnsys.2013.00031.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rönnberg, J., M. Rudner, C. Foo, and T. Lunner. 2008. “Cognition Counts: A Working Memory System for Ease of Language Understanding (ELU).” International Journal of Audiology 47 (sup2): S99–S105. doi:10.1080/14992020802301167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smeds, K., F. Wolters, and M. Rung. 2015. “Estimation of Signal-to-Noise Ratios in Realistic Sound Scenarios.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 26 (2): 183–196. doi:10.3766/jaaa.26.2.7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souza, P., and K. H. Arehart. 2015. “Robust Relationship between Reading Span and Speech Recognition in Noise.” International Journal of Audiology 54 (10): 705–713. doi:10.3109/14992027.2015.1043062.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souza, P., and L. Sirow. 2014. “Relating Working Memory to Compression Parameters in Clinically Fit Hearing Aids.” American Journal of Audiology 23 (4): 394–401. doi:10.1044/2014_AJA-14-0006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souza, P., K. H. Arehart, J. Shen, M. Anderson, and J. M. Kates. 2015. “Working Memory and Intelligibility of Hearing-Aid Processed Speech.” Frontiers in Psychology 6: 526. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souza, P., K. Arehart, T. Schoof, M. Anderson, D. Strori, and L. Balmert. 2019. “Understanding Variability in Individual Response to Hearing Aid Signal Processing in Wearable Hearing Aid.” Ear and Hearing 40 (6): 1280–1292. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000717
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souza, P., K. H. Arehart, and T. Neher. 2015. “Working Memory and Hearing Aid Processing: Literature Findings, Future Directions, and Clinical Applications.” Frontiers in Psychology 6: 1894. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01894.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strori, D., A. R. Bradlow, and P. E. Souza. 2020. “Recognition of Foreign-Accented Speech in Noise: The Interplay between Talker Intelligibility and Linguistic Structure.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 147 (6): 3765–3782. doi:10.1121/10.0001194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tillman, T. W., and R. Carhart. 1966. An Expanded Test for Speech Discrimination Utilizing CNC Monosyllabic Words: Northwestern University Auditory Test No. 6. Evanston, IL: Auditory Research Lab, Northwestern University.
   Google Scholar
• United States Census Bureau. 2017. “Selected characteristics of the total and native populations in the Unites States 2017 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates,” [Data file]. Retrieved from https://factfinder.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?pid=ACS_17_1YR_S0601&prodType=table.
   Google Scholar
• Waters, G. S., and D. Caplan. 2001. “Age, Working Memory, and On-line Syntactic Processing in Sentence Comprehension.” Psychology and Aging 16 (1): 128–144. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.16.1.128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wingfield, A., J. S. Aberdeen, and E. A. L. Stine. 1991. “Word Onset Gating and Linguistic Context in Spoken Word Recognition by Young and Elderly Adults.” Journal of Gerontology 46 (3): P127–P129. doi:10.1093/geronj/46.3.P127.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wingfield, A., S. L. McCoy, J. E. Peelle, P. A. Tun, and L. C. Cox. 2006. “Effects of Adult Aging and Hearing Loss on Comprehension of Rapid Speech Varying in Syntactic Complexity.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 17 (07): 487–497. doi:10.3766/jaaa.17.7.4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wingfield, A., J. E. Peelle, and M. Grossman. 2003. “Speech Rate and Syntactic Complexity as Multiplicative Factors in Speech Comprehension by Young and Older Adults.” Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition 10 (4): 310–322. doi:10.1076/anec.10.4.310.28974.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, Y. H., E. Stangl, O. Chipara, S. S. Hasan, A. Welhaven, and J. Oleson. 2018. “Characteristics of Real-World Signal to Noise Ratios and Speech Listening Situations of Older Adults with Mild to Moderate Hearing Loss.” Ear and Hearing 39: 293–304. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000486
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zekveld, A. A., M. Rudner, I. S. Johnsrude, and J. Rönnberg. 2013. “The Effects of Working Memory Capacity and Semantic Cues on the Intelligibility of Speech in Noise.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 134 (3): 2225–2234. doi:10.1121/1.4817926.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar