An exploratory investigation of speech recognition thresholds in noise with auralisations of two reverberant rooms

References

• Ahrens, Axel, Marton Marschall, and Torsten Dau. 2019. “Measuring and Modeling Speech Intelligibility in Real and Loudspeaker-Based Virtual Sound Environments.” Hearing Research 377: 307–317. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2019.02.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al Osman, Rida, Hilmi Dajani, and Christian Giguère. 2017. “Self-Masking and Overlap-Masking from Reverberation Using the Speech-Evoked Auditory Brainstem Response.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 142 (6): EL555–EL560. doi:10.1121/1.5017522.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Algazi, Ralph, Richard Duda, Dennis Thompson, and Carlos Avendano. 2001. “The cipic hrtf database.” Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE Workshop on the Applications of Signal Processing To Audio and Acoustics (Cat. No. 01TH8575), 99–102. IEEE. doi:10.1109/ASPAA.2001.969552.
   Google Scholar
• Arweiler, Iris, and Jörg Buchholz. 2011. “The Influence of Spectral Characteristics of Early Reflections on Speech Intelligibility.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 130 (2): 996–1005. doi:10.1121/1.3609258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arweiler, Iris, Jörg Buchholz, and Torsten Dau. 2009. “Speech Intelligibility Enhancement by Early Reflections.” Proceedings of the International Symposium on Auditory and Audiological Research.” Vol. 2, 289–298.
   Google Scholar
• Baguley, Thomas. 2012. “Serious Stats: A Guide to Advanced Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences.” London, UK: Macmillan International Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Beeston, Amy, Guy Brown, and Anthony Watkins. 2014. “Perceptual Compensation for the Effects of Reverberation on Consonant Identification: Evidence from Studies with Monaural Stimuli.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 136 (6): 3072–3084. doi:10.1121/1.4900596.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentler, Ruth, Diane Niebuhr, Janet Getta, and Charles Anderson. 1993. “Longitudinal Study of Hearing Aid Effectiveness. II: Subjective Measures.” Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 36 (4): 820–831. doi:10.1044/jshr.3604.820.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beutelmann, Rainer, and Thomas Brand. 2006. “Prediction of Speech Intelligibility in Spatial Noise and Reverberation for Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 120 (1): 331–342. doi:10.1121/1.2202888.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosman, A. J., and G. F. Smoorenburg. 1995. “Intelligibility of Dutch CVC Syllables and Sentences for Listeners with Normal Hearing and with Three Types of Hearing Impairment.” Audiology : official Organ of the International Society of Audiology 34 (5): 260–284. doi:10.3109/00206099509071918.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bradley, John, Rebecc Reich, and Scott Norcross. 1999. “On the Combined Effects of Signal-to-Noise Ratio and Room Acoustics on Speech Intelligibility.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 106 (4 Pt 1): 1820–1828. doi:10.1121/1.427932.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley, John, Hiroshi Sato, and Michel Picard. 2003. “On the Importance of Early Reflections for Speech in Rooms.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 113 (6): 3233–3244. doi:10.1121/1.1570439.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brand, Thomas, and Birger Kollmeier. 2002. “Efficient Adaptive Procedures for Threshold and Concurrent Slope Estimates for Psychophysics and Speech Intelligibility Tests.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 111 (6): 2801–2810. doi:10.1121/1.1479152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandewie, Eugene, and Pavel Zahorik. 2013. “Time Course of a Perceptual Enhancement Effect for Noise-Masked Speech in Reverberant Environments.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 134 (2): EL265–EL270. doi:10.1121/1.4816263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bronkhorst, Adelbert, and Reinier Plomp. 1990. “A Clinical Test for the Assessment of Binaural Speech Perception in Noise.” Audiology 29 (5): 275–285. doi:10.3109/00206099009072858.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cabrera, Densil, Daniel Jimenez, and William Martens. 2014a. “Audio and Acoustical Response Analysis Environment (AARAE): a tool to support education and research in acoustics.” INTER-NOISE and NOISE-CON Congress and Conference Proceedings, 1667–1676. Institute of Noise Control Engineering.
   Google Scholar
• Cabrera, Densil, Doheon Lee, Glenn Leembruggen, and Daniel Jimenez. 2014b. “Increasing Robustness in the Calculation of the Speech Transmission Index from Impulse Responses.” Building Acoustics 21 (3): 181–198. doi:10.1260/1351-010X.21.3.181.
   Google Scholar
• Compton-Conley, Cynthia, Arlene Neuman, Mead Killion, and Harry Levitt. 2004. “Performance of Directional Microphones for Hearing Aids: Real-World versus Simulation.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 15 (6): 440–445. doi:10.3766/jaaa.15.6.5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cubick, Jens, and Torsten Dau. 2016. “Validation of a Virtual Sound Environment System for Testing Hearing Aids.” Acta Acustica United with Acustica 102 (3): 547–557. doi:10.3813/AAA.918972.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietz, Aarno, Michael Buschermöhle, Antti A. Aarnisalo, Annukka Vanhanen, Taneli Hyyrynen, Olli Aaltonen, Heikki Löppönen, Melanie A. Zokoll, and Birger Kollmeier. 2014. “The Development and Evaluation of the Finnish Matrix Sentence Test for Speech Intelligibility Assessment.” Acta Oto-Laryngologica 134 (7): 728–737. doi:10.3109/00016489.2014.898185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubno, Judy, Donald Dirks, and Donald Morgan. 1984. “Effects of Age and Mild Hearing Loss on Speech Recognition in Noise.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 76 (1): 87–96. doi:10.1121/1.391011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duquesnoy, A. J., and Reinier Plomp. 1980. “Effect of Reverberation and Noise on the Intelligibility of Sentences in Cases of Presbyacusis.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 68 (2): 537–544. doi:10.1121/1.384767.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durlach, Nathaniel. 1963. “Equalization and Cancellation Theory of Binaural Masking-Level Differences.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 35 (8): 1206–1218. doi:10.1121/1.1918675.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farina, Angelo. 2000. “Simultaneous measurement of impulse response and distortion with a swept-sine technique.” In Audio Engineering Society Convention 108, Paris, France, Feb. 19–22, Audio Engineering Society. http://www.aes.org/e-lib/browse.cfm?elib=10211
   Google Scholar
• Favrot, Sylvain, and Jörg Buchholz. 2010. “LoRA: A Loudspeaker-Based Room Auralization System.” Acta Acustica United with Acustica 96 (2): 364–375. doi:10.3813/AAA.918285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, Erwin, Theo Goverts, Joost Festen, and Tammo Houtgast. 2010. “Measuring the Effects of Reverberation and Noise on Sentence Intelligibility for Hearing-Impaired Listeners.” Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 53 (6): 1429–1439. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2010/09-0197). doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2010/09-0197).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• gGmbH, HörTech. 2018. Finnish Matrix Test - Manual of audio CD for research & development.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon-Salant, Sandra, and Stacey Samuels Cole. 2016. “Effects of Age and Working Memory Capacity on Speech Recognition Performance in Noise among Listeners with Normal Hearing.” Ear and Hearing 37 (5): 593–602. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000316.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimm, Giso, Birger Kollmeier, and Volker Hohmann. 2016. “Spatial Acoustic Scenarios in Multichannel Loudspeaker Systems for Hearing Aid Evaluation.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 27 (7): 557–566. doi:10.3766/jaaa.15095.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagerman, Björn. 1982. “Sentences for Testing Speech Intelligibility in Noise.” Scandinavian Audiology 11 (2): 79–87. doi:10.3109/01050398209076203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helfer, Karen, and Laura Wilber. 1990. “Hearing Loss, Aging, and Speech Perception in Reverberation and Noise.” Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 33 (1): 149–155. doi:10.1044/jshr.3301.149.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hougaard, Søren, and Stefan Ruf. 2011. “EuroTrak I: A Consumer Survey about Hearing Aids in Germany, France and the UK.” Hearing Review 18 (2): 12–28.
   Google Scholar
• Houtgast, Tammo, and Herman Steeneken. 1985. “A Review of the MTF Concept in Room Acoustics and Its Use for Estimating Speech Intelligibility in Auditoria.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 77 (3): 1069–1077. doi:10.1121/1.392224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pätynen Jukka, Tervo Sakari, and Lokki Tapio. 2014. Amplitude Panning Decreases Spectral Brightness with Concert Hall Auralizations.” in Audio Engineering Society Conference: 55th International Conference: Spatial Audio, Aug. http://www.aes.org/e-lib/browse.cfm?elib=17373.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplanis, Neofytos, Søren Bech, Tapio Lokki, Toon van Waterschoot, and Søren Holdt Jensen. 2019. “Perception and Preference of Reverberation in Small Listening Rooms for Multi-Loudspeaker Reproduction.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 146 (5): 3562–3576. doi:10.1121/1.5135582.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplanis, Neofytos, Søren Bech, Sakari Tervo, Jukka Pätynen, Tapio Lokki, Toon van Waterschoot, and Søren Holdt Jensen. 2017. “Perceptual Aspects of Reproduced Sound in Car Cabin Acoustics.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 141 (3): 1459–1469. doi:10.1121/1.4976816.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klatte, Maria, Thomas Lachmann, and Markus Meis. 2010. “Effects of Noise and Reverberation on Speech Perception and Listening Comprehension of Children and Adults in a Classroom-like Setting.” Noise & Health 12 (49): 270–282. doi:10.4103/1463-1741.70506.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koehnke, Janet, and Joan Besing. 1996. “A Procedure for Testing Speech Intelligibility in a Virtual Listening Environment.” Ear and Hearing 17 (3): 211–217. doi:10.1097/00003446-199606000-00004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kollmeier, Birger, Anna Warzybok, Sabine Hochmuth, Melanie Zokoll, Verena Uslar, Thomas Brand, and Kirsten Wagener. 2015. “The Multilingual Matrix Test: Principles, Applications, and Comparison across Languages: A Review.” International Journal of Audiology 54 (sup2): 3–16. doi:10.3109/14992027.2015.1020971.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kollmeier, Birger, and Matthias Wesselkamp. 1997. “Development and Evaluation of a German Sentence Test for Objective and Subjective Speech Intelligibility Assessment.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 102 (4): 2412–2421. doi:10.1121/1.419624.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koski, Teemu, Ville Sivonen, and Ville Pulkki. 2013. “Measuring Speech Intelligibility in Noisy Environments Reproduced with Parametric Spatial Audio.” Audio Engineering Society Convention 135: Paper 8952.
   Google Scholar
• Kuusinen, Antti, and Tapio Lokki. 2015. “Investigation of Auditory Distance Perception and Preferences in Concert Halls by Using Virtual Acoustics.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 138 (5): 3148–3159. doi:10.1121/1.4935388.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavandier, Mathieu, and John F. Culling. 2008. “Speech Segregation in Rooms: Monaural, Binaural, and Interacting Effects of Reverberation on Target and Interferer.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 123 (4): 2237–2248. doi:10.1121/1.2871943.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liberman, A. M., F. S. Cooper, D. P. Shankweiler, and M. Studdert-Kennedy. 1967. “Perception of the Speech Code.” Psychological Review 74 (6): 431–461. doi:10.1037/h0020279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liberman, Charles, Michael Epstein, Sandra Cleveland, Haobing Wang, and Stéphane Maison. 2016. “Toward a Differential Diagnosis of Hidden Hearing Loss in Humans.” Plos ONE 11 (9): e0162726. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0162726.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litovsky, Ruth, Steven Colburn, William Yost, and Sandra Guzman. 1999. “The Precedence Effect.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 106 (4 Pt 1): 1633–1654. doi:10.1121/1.427914.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lochner, J. P. A., and J. F. Burger. 1961. “The Intelligibility of Speech under Reverberant Conditions.” Acta Acustica United with Acustica 11 (4): 195–200.
   Google Scholar
• Mepani, Anita M., Sarah A. Kirk, Kenneth E. Hancock, Kara Bennett, Victor de Gruttola, M. Charles Liberman, and Stéphane F. Maison. 2020. “Middle Ear Muscle Reflex and Word Recognition in “Normal-Hearing” Adults: Evidence for Cochlear Synaptopathy??” Ear and Hearing 41 (1): 25–38. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000804.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Middelweerd, M. J., J. M. Festen, and R. Plomp. 1990. “Difficulties with speech intelligibility in Noise in Spite of a Normal Pure-Tone Audiogram.” Audiology 29 (1): 1–7. doi:10.3109/00206099009081640.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Minnaar, Pauli, Sylvain Favrot, and Jörg Buchholz. 2010. “Improving Hearing Aids through Listening Tests in a Virtual Sound Environment.” The Hearing Journal 63 (10): 40–42. doi:10.1097/01.HJ.0000389926.64797.3e.
   Google Scholar
• Minnaar, Pauli, Signe Frølund Albeck, Christian Stender Simonsen, Boris Søndersted, Sebastian Alex Dalgas Oakley, and Jesper Bennedbaek. 2013. “Reproducing Real-Life Listening Situations in the Laboratory for Testing Hearing Aids.” Audio Engineering Society Convention. http://www.aes.org/e-lib/browse.cfm?elib=17001.
   Google Scholar
• Mueller, Martin, Andrea Kegel, Steven Schimmel, Norbert Dillier, and Markus Hofbauer. 2012. “Localization of Virtual Sound Sources with Bilateral Hearing Aids in Realistic Acoustical Scenes.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 131 (6): 4732–4742. doi:10.1121/1.4705292.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nábĕlek, A. K., and P. A. Dagenais. 1986. “Vowel Errors in Noise and in Reverberation by Hearing-Impaired Listeners.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 80 (3): 741–748. doi:10.1121/1.393948.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nábĕlek, A. K., T. R. Letowski, and F. M. Tucker. 1989. “Reverberant overlap- and self-masking in consonant identification.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 86 (4): 1259–1265. doi:10.1121/1.398740.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nábĕlek, A. K., and P. K. Robinson. 1982. “Monaural and Binaural Speech Perception in Reverberation for Listeners of Various Ages.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 71 (5): 1242–1248. doi:10.1121/1.387773.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nabelek, Anna. 1988. “Identification of Vowels in Quiet, Noise, and Reverberation: Relationships with Age and Hearing Loss.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 84 (2): 476–484. doi:10.1121/1.396880.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nabelek, Anna, and David Mason. 1981. “Effect of Noise and Reverberation on Binaural and Monaural Word Identification by Subjects with Various Audiograms.” Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 24 (3): 375–383. doi:10.1044/jshr.2403.375.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Neuman, Arlene, Marcin Wroblewski, Joshua Hajicek, and Adrienne Rubinstein. 2010. “Combined Effects of Noise and Reverberation on Speech Recognition Performance of Normal-Hearing Children and Adults.” Ear and Hearing 31 (3): 336–344. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181d3d514.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noffsinger, Douglas, Richard Wilson, and Frank Musiek. 1994. “Department of Veterans Affairs Compact Disc Recording for Auditory Perceptual Assessment: Background and Introduction.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 5 (4): 231–235.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ojansivu, Tuukka. 2017. “Realistinen ¨äaniymp¨aris¨o kuulontutkimuksiin (engl. A realistic listening environment for audiometry).” Bachelor Thesis, Metropolia University of Applied Sciences https://www.theseus.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/125480/Ojansivu.Tuukka.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Payton, Karen, Rosalie Uchanski, and Louis Braida. 1994. “Intelligibility of Conversational and Clear Speech in Noise and Reverberation for Listeners with Normal and Impaired Hearing.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 95 (3): 1581–1592. doi:10.1121/1.408545.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peutz, Victor. 1971. “Articulation Loss of Consonants as a Criterion for Speech Transmission in a Room.” Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 19 (11): 915–919.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plomp, Reinier, and A. M. Mimpen. 1979. “Improving the Reliability of Testing the Speech Reception Threshold for Sentences.” Audiology 18 (1): 43–52. doi:10.3109/00206097909072618.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rennies, Jan, Henning Schepker, Inga Holube, and Birger Kollmeier. 2014a. “Listening Effort and Speech Intelligibility in Listening Situations Affected by Noise and Reverberation.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 136 (5): 2642–2653. doi:10.1121/1.4897398.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rennies, Jan, Anna Warzybok, Thomas Brand, and Birger Kollmeier. 2014b. “Modeling the Effects of a Single Reflection on Binaural Speech Intelligibility.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 135 (3): 1556–1567. doi:10.1121/1.4863197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouch, Jérémy, and Étienne Parizet. 2018. “The Influence of an Early Reflection upon Speech Intelligibility in the Presence of a Background Noise.” Acta Acustica United with Acustica 104 (4): 668–630. doi:10.3813/AAA.919206.
   Google Scholar
• Smits, Cas, Theo Kapteyn, and Tammo Houtgast. 2004. “Development and Validation of an Automatic Speech-in-Noise Screening Test by Telephone.” International Journal of Audiology 43 (1): 15–28. doi:10.1080/14992020400050004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soulodre, G. A., N. Popplewell, and J. S. Bradley. 1989. “Combined Effects of Early Reflections and Background Noise on Speech Intelligibility.” Journal of Sound and Vibration 135 (1): 123–133. doi:10.1016/0022-460X. (89)90759-1 doi:10.1016/0022-460X(89)90759-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinberg, John. 1929. “Effects of Distortion upon the Recognition of Speech Sounds.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1 (1): 121–137. doi:10.1121/1.1901878.
   Google Scholar
• Tervo, Sakari, Perttu Laukkanen, Jukka Pätynen, and Tapio Lokki. 2014. “Preferences of Critical Listening Environments among Sound Engineers.” Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 62 (5): 300–314. doi:10.17743/jaes.2014.0022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tervo, Sakari, Jukka Pätynen, Antti Kuusinen, and Tapio Lokki. 2013. “Spatial decomposition method for room impulse responses.” Journal of the Audio Engineering Society, 61 (1/2): 17–28.
   Google Scholar
• Traer, James, and Josh McDermott. 2016. “Statistics of Natural Reverberation Enable Perceptual Separation of Sound and Space.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 113 (48): E7856–E7865. doi:10.1073/pnas.1612524113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Versfeld, Niek, Laura Daalder, Joost Festen, and Tammo Houtgast. 2000. “Method for the Selection of Sentence Materials for Efficient Measurement of the Speech Reception Threshold.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 107 (3): 1671–1684. doi:10.1121/1.428451.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walden, Brian, Rauna Surr, Mary Cord, Brent Edwards, and Laurel Olson. 2000. “Comparison of Benefits Provided by Different Hearing Aid Technologies.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 11 (10): 540–560.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Warzybok, Anna, Jan Rennies, Thomas Brand, Simon Doclo, and Birger Kollmeier. 2013. “Effects of Spatial and Temporal Integration of a Single Early Reflection on Speech Intelligibility.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 133 (1): 269–282. doi:10.1121/1.4768880.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, Yu-Hsiang. 2010. “Effect of Age on Directional Microphone Hearing Aid Benefit and Preference.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 21 (2): 78–89. doi:10.3766/jaaa.21.2.3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, Yu-Hsiang, Elizabeth Stangl, Octav Chipara, Syed Shabih Hasan, Anne Welhaven, and Jacob Oleson. 2018. “Characteristics of Real-World Signal to Noise Ratios and Speech Listening Situations of Older Adults with Mild to Moderate Hearing Loss.” Ear and Hearing 39 (2): 293–304. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000486.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahorik, Pavel. 2009. “Perceptually Relevant Parameters for Virtual Listening Simulation of Small Room Acoustics.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 126 (2): 776–791. doi:10.1121/1.3167842.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahorik, Pavel, and Eugene Brandewie. 2016. “Speech Intelligibility in Rooms: Effect of Prior Listening Exposure Interacts with Room Acoustics.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 140 (1): 74–86. doi:10.1121/1.4954723.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar