Dimensions of self-reported listening effort and fatigue on a digits-in-noise task, and association with baseline pupil size and performance accuracy

References

• Alhanbali, S., P. Dawes, S. Lloyd, and K. J. Munro. 2017. “Self-Reported Listening-Related Effort and Fatigue in Hearing-Impaired Adults.” Ear Hear 38: e39–e48. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000000361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alhanbali, S., P. Dawes, R. E. Millman, and K. J. Munro. 2019. “Measures of Listening Effort Are Multidimensional.” Ear Hear 4: 1–14.doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000000697.
   Google Scholar
• Aston-Jones, G., and J. D. Cohen. 2005. “An Integrative Theory of Locus Coeruleus-Norepinephrine Function: Adaptive Gain and Optimal Performance.” Annual Review of Neuroscience 28: 403–450. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.28.061604.135709.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowerman, B. L., and R. T. O’Connell. 1990. Linear Statistical Models: An Applied Approach, 2nd ed. Belmont, CA: Duxvury Press.
   Google Scholar
• British Society of Audiology. 2018. Pure tone air and bone conduction threshold audiometry with and without masking [Online]. Accessed 20 November 2020. https://www.thebsa.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Recommended-Procedure-Pure-Tone-Audiometry-August-2018-FINAL.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Field, A. 2009. Discovering Statistics Using SPSS. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Gilzenrat, M. S., S. Nieuwenhuis, M. Jepma, and J. D. Cohen. 2010. “Pupil Diameter Tracks Changes in Control State Predicted by the Adaptive Gain Theory of Locus Coeruleus Function.” Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience 10 (2): 252–269. doi:https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.10.2.252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, S. G., and L. E. Staveland. 1988. “Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research.” Adv Psychol 52: 139–183. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62386-9.
   Google Scholar
• Hockey, R. 2013. The Psychology of Fatigue: Work, Effort and Control. Cambridge: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hopstaken, J., D. van der Linden, A. Bakker, and M. Kompier. 2015. “A Multifaceted Investigation of the Link between Mental Fatigue and Task Disengagement.” Psychophysiology 52 (3): 305–315. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12339.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornsby, B. W. Y., and A. M. Kipp, 2016. "Subjective Ratings of Fatigue and Vigor in Adults with Hearing Loss are Driven by Perceived Hearing Difficulties not Degree of Hearing Loss." Ear Hear 37: 1–10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hornsby, B. W. Y. 2013. “The Effects of Hearing Aid Use on Listening Effort and Mental Fatigue Associated with Sustained Speech Processing Demands.” Ear and Hearing 34 (5): 523–534. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31828003d8. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0b013e31828003d8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornsby, B. W. Y., G. Naylor, and F. H. Bess. 2016. “A Taxonomy of Fatigue Concepts and Their Relation to Hearing Loss.” Ear Hear 37: 136S–144S.   doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000000289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koelewijn, T., B. G. Shinn-Cunningham, A. A. Zekveld, and S. E. Kramer. 2014. “The Pupil Response is Sensitive to Divided Attention during Speech Processing.” Hearing Research 312: 114–120. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2014.03.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koelewijn, T., A. A. Zekveld, J. M. Festen, and S. E. Kramer. 2012. “Pupil Dilation Uncovers Extra Listening Effort in the Presence of a Single-Talker Masker.” Ear Hear 32: 291–300. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/2331216518777174.
   Google Scholar
• Koelewijn, T., A. A. Zekveld, T. Lunner, and S. E. Kramer. 2018. “The Effect of Reward on Listening Effort as Reflected by the Pupil Dilation Response.” Hearing Research 367: 106–112. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2018.07.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer, S. E., C. E. Teunissen, and A. A. Zekveld. 2016. “Cortisol, Chromogranin A, and Pupillary Responses Evoked by Speech Recognition Tasks in Normally Hearing and Hard-of-Hearing Listeners: A Pilot Study.” Ear and Hearing 37 (suppl 1): 126S–135S. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000000311.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• LaChapelle, D., and M. Finlayson. 1998. “An Evaluation of Subjective and Objective Measures of Fatigue in Patients with Brain Injury and Healthy Controls.” Brain Injury 12 (8): 649–659. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/026990598122214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, K. A., G. Hicks, and G. Nino-Murcia. 1991. “Validity and Reliability of a Scale to Assess Fatigue.” Psychiatry Research 36 (3): 291–298. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1781(91)90027-m.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGarrigle, R., P. Dawes, A. Stewart, S. Kuchinsky, and K. Munro. 2017. “Pupillometry Reveals Changes in Physiological Arousal during a Sustained Listening Task.” Psychophysiology 54 (2): 193–203. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12772.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGarrigle, Ronan, Kevin J. Munro, Piers Dawes, Andrew J. Stewart, David R. Moore, Johanna G. Barry, Sygal Amitay, et al. 2014. “Listening Effort and Fatigue: What Exactly Are we Measuring? A British Society of Audiology Cognition in Hearing Special Interest Group ‘White Paper’.” International Journal of Audiology 53 (7): 433–440. doi:https://doi.org/10.3109/14992027.2014.890296.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McShefferty, D., W. M. Whitmer, I. R. C. Swan, and M. Akeroyd. 2013. “The Effect of Experience on the Sensitivity and Specificity of the Whispered Voice Test: A Diagnostic Accuracy Study.” BMJ Open 3 (4): e002394–9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002394.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, K., C. McMahon, I. Boisvert, R. Ibrahim, et al. 2017. “Objective Assessment of Listening Effort: coregistration of Pupillometry and EEG.” Trends Hear 21: 1–13. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/2331216517706396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obleser, Jonas, Malte Wöstmann, Nele Hellbernd, Anna Wilsch, and Burkhard Maess. 2012. “Adverse Listening Conditions and Memory Load Drive a Common α Oscillatory Network.” The Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience 32 (36): 12376–12383. doi:https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4908-11.2012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohlenforst, B., A. A. Zekveld, T. Lunner, D. Wendt, G. Naylor, Y. Wang, N. J. Versfeld, et al. 2017. “Impact of Stimulus-Related Factors and Hearing Impairment on Listening Effort as Indicated by Pupil Dilation.” Hear Res 351: 68–79. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2017.05.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen, E. B., M. Wöstmann, J. Obleser, S. Stenfelt, et al. 2015. “Hearing Loss Impacts Neural Alpha Oscillations under Adverse Listening Conditions.” Frontiers in Psychology. 6: 1–11. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pichora-Fuller, M. Kathleen, Sophia E. Kramer, Mark A. Eckert, Brent Edwards, Benjamin W. Y. Hornsby, Larry E. Humes, Ulrike Lemke, et al. 2016. “Hearing Impairment and Cognitive Energy: The Framework for Understanding Effortful Listening (FUEL).” Ear and Hearing 37: 5S–27S. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000000312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piquado, T., D. Isaacowitz, and A. Wingfield. 2010. “Pupillometry as a Measure of Cognitive Effort in Younger and Older Adults.” Psychophysiology 47 (3): 560–569. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00947.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternberg, S. 1966. “High-Speed Scanning in Human Memory.” Science 153 (3736): 652–654. doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.153.3736.652.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strand, Julia F., Violet A. Brown, Madeleine B. Merchant, Hunter E. Brown, and Julia Smith. 2018. “Measuring Listening Effort: Convergent Validity, Sensitivity, and Links with Cognitive and Personality Measures.” Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research: JSLHR 61 (6): 1463–1486. doi:https://doi.org/10.1044/2018_JSLHR-H-17-0257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Studebaker, G. 1985. “A ‘Rationalized’ Arcsine Transform.” Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 28 (3): 455–462. doi:https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.2803.455.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van der Meer, Elke, Reinhard Beyer, Judith Horn, Manja Foth, Boris Bornemann, Jan Ries, Juerg Kramer, et al. 2010. “Resource Allocation and Fluid Intelligence: Insights from Pupillometry.” Psychophysiology 47 (1): 158–169. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00884.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Veldhoven, M., and S. Broersen. 2003. “Measurement Quality and Validity of the “Need for Recovery Scale.” Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 60 (suppl): i3–9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.60.suppl_1.i3.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vercoulen, J. H., C. M. Swanink, J. F. Fennis, J. M. Galama, J. W. van der Meer, and G. Bleijenberg. 1994. “Dimensional Assessment of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome.” Journal of Psychosomatic Research 38 (5): 383–392. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3999(94)90099-X.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Yang, Graham Naylor, Sophia E. Kramer, Adriana A. Zekveld, Dorothea Wendt, Barbara Ohlenforst, Thomas Lunner, et al. 2018. “Relations between Self-Reported Daily-Life Fatigue, Hearing Status, and Pupil Dilation during a Speech Perception in Noise Task.” Ear and Hearing 39 (3): 573–582. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000000512.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wendt, D., T. Dau, and J. Hjortkjar. 2016. “Impact of Background Noise and Sentence Complexity on Processing Demands during Sentence Comprehension.” Frontiers in Psychology. 7: 1–12. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zekveld, A., T. Koelewijn, and S. Kramer. 2018. “The Pupil Dilation Response to Auditory Stimuli: Current State of Knowledge.” Trends Hear 22: 1–25. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/2331216518777174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zekveld, A. A., S. E. Kramer, and J. M. Festen. 2010. “Pupil Response as an Indication of Effortful Listening: The Influence of Sentence Intelligibility.” Ear and Hearing 31 (4): 480–490. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181d4f251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zekveld, A. A., S. E. Kramer, and J. M. Festen. 2011. “Cognitive Load during Speech Perception in Noise: The Influence of Age, Hearing Loss, and Cognition on the Pupil Response.” Ear and Hearing 32 (4): 498–510. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0b013e31820512bb.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, S., G. Bury, A. Milne, and M. Chait. 2019. “Pupillometry as an Objective Measure of Sustained Attention in Young and Older Listeners.” Trends in Hearing 23: 233121651988781.doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/2331216519887815.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar