Spoken narrative comprehension for young adult listeners: effects of competing voices and noise

References

• Arbogast, T. L., C. R. Mason, and G. Kidd. Jr. 2005. “The Effect of Spatial Separation on Informational Masking of Speech in Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 117 (4 Pt 1): 2169–2180. doi:10.1121/1.1861598.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best, V., G. Keidser, K. Freeston, and J. M. Buchholz. 2016. “A Dynamic Speech Comprehension Test for Assessing Real-World Listening Ability.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 27 (7): 515–526. doi:10.3766/jaaa.15089.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boersma, P., and D. Weenink. 2017. Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer [computer program]. http://praat.org/
   Google Scholar
• Bohay, M., D. P. Blakely, A. K. Tamplin, and G. A. Radvansky. 2011. “Note-Taking, Review, Memory and Comprehension.” American Journal of Psychology 124: 63–73. doi:10.5406/amerjpsyc.124.1.0063.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradlow, A. R., G. M. Torretta, and D. B. Pisoni. 1996. “Intelligibility of Normal Speech I: Global and Fine-Grained Acoustic-Phonetic Talker Characteristics.” Speech Communication 20 (3): 255–272. doi:10.1016/S0167-6393(96)00063-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradlow, A. R., L. C. Nygaard, and D. B. Pisoni. 1999. “Effect of Talker, Rate, and Amplitude Variation on Recognition Memory for Spoken Words.” Perception & Psychophysics 61 (2): 206–219. doi:10.3758/BF03206883.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bregman, A. S. 1990. Auditory Scene Analysis: The Perceptual Organization of Sound. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carhart, R., T. W. Tillman, and E. S. Greetis. 1969. “Release from Multiple Maskers: Effects of Interaural Time Disparities.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 45 (2): 411–418. doi:10.1121/1.1911389.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daneman, M., and P. Carpenter. 1980. “Individual Differences in Working Memory and Reading.” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 19 (4): 450–466. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(80)90312-6.
   Google Scholar
• Dubno, J. R., J. B. Ahlstrom, and A. R. Horwitz. 2000. “Use of Context by Young and Aged Adults with Normal Hearing.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 107 (1): 538–546. doi:10.1121/1.428322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durlach, N. I., C. R. Mason, G. Kidd, Jr., T. Arbogast, H. S. Colburn, and B. G. Shinn-Cunningham. 2003. “Note on Informational Masking (L).” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 113 (6): 2984–2987. doi:10.1121/1.1570435.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, B. 2016. “A Model of Auditory-Cognitive Processing and Relevance to Clinical Applicability.” Ear and Hearing 37 (S1): 85S–91S. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ezzatian, P., L. Li, M. K. Pichora-Fuller, and B. A. Schneider. 2012. “The Effect of Energetic and Informational Masking on the Time-Course of Stream Segregation: Evidence That Streaming Depends on Vocal Fine Structure Cues.” Language and Cognitive Processes 27 (7-8): 1056–1088. doi:10.1080/01690965.2011.591934.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, J. S., and G. A. Radvansky. 2018. “Patterns of Forgetting.” Journal of Memory and Language 102: 130–141. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2018.05.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher, C. R., and S. T. Chrysler. 1990. “Surface Forms, Textbases, and Situation Models: Recognition Memory for Three Types of Textual Information.” Discourse Processes 13 (2): 175–190. doi:10.1080/01638539009544752.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freyman, R. L., U. Balakrishnan, and K. S. Helfer. 2008. “Spatial Release from Masking with Noise-Vocoded Speech.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 124 (3): 1627–1637. doi:10.1121/1.2951964.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Füllgrabe, C., and S. Rosen. 2016. “On the (un)Importance of Working Memory in Speech-in-Noise Processing for Listeners with Normal Hearing Thresholds.” Frontiers in Psychology 07: 1–8. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Füllgrabe, C., B. C. J. Moore, and M. A. Stone. 2015. “Age-Group Differences in Speech Identification Despite Matched Audiometrically Normal Hearing: Contributions from Auditory Temporal Processing and Cognition.” Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience 6: 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, X., B. R. Levinthal, and E. A. Stine-Morrow. 2012. “The Effects of Ageing and Visual Noise on Conceptual Integration During Sentence Reading.” Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006) 65 (9): 1833–1847. doi:10.1080/17470218.2012.674146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, X., E. A. Stine-Morrow, S. R. Noh, and R. T. Eskew, Jr. 2011. “Visual Noise Disrupts Conceptual Integration in Reading.” Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 18 (1): 83–88. doi:10.3758/s13423-010-0014-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, M. S., M. Daneman, and B. A. Schneider. 2009. “Comprehension of Speeded Discourse by Younger and Older Listeners.” Experimental Aging Research 35 (3): 277–296. doi:10.1080/03610730902769262.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin, A. M., S. F. Poissant, and R. L. Freyman. 2020. “Auditory Comprehension in School-Aged Children with Normal Hearing and with Unilateral Hearing Loss.” Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools 51 (1): 29–41. doi:10.1044/2019_LSHSS-OCHL-19-0020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hautus, M. J. 1995. “Corrections for Extreme Proportions and Their Biasing Effects on Estimated Values of d.” Behavioral Research Methods 27 (1): 46–51. doi:10.3758/BF03203619.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinrich, A., B. A. Schneider, and F. Craik. 2008. “Investigating the Influence of Continuous Babble on Auditory Short-Term Memory Performance.” Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 61 (5): 735–751. doi:10.1080/17470210701402372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heldner, M., and J. Edlund. 2010. “Pauses, Gaps and Overlaps in Conversations.” Journal of Phonetics 38 (4): 555–568. doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2010.08.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyer, N., D. S. Brungart, and B. D. Simpson. 2010. “Effects of Target-Masker Contextual Similarity on the Multimasker Penalty in a Three-Talker Diotic Listening Task.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 128 (5): 2998–3010. doi:10.1121/1.3479547.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalikow, D. N., K. N. Stevens, and L. L. Elliott. 1977. “Development of a Test of Speech Intelligibility in Noise Using Sentence Material with Controlled Word Predictability.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 61 (5): 1337–1351. doi:10.1121/1.381436.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kidd, G., Jr., and H. S. Colburn. 2017. “Informational Masking in Speech Recognition.” In The Auditory System at the Cocktail Party, edited by J. Middlebrooks, J. Simon, A. Popper, R. Fay, 75–109. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W. 1988. “The Role of Knowledge in Discourse Comprehension: A Construction-Integration Model.” Psychological Review 95 (2): 163–182. doi:10.1037/0033-295x.95.2.163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W., D. Welsch, F. Schmalhofer, and S. Zimny. 1990. “Sentence Memory: A Theoretical Analysis.” Journal of Memory and Language 29 (2): 133–159. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(90)90069-C.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kjellberg, A., R. Ljung, and D. Hallman. 2008. “Recall of Words Heard in Noise.” Applied Cognitive Psychology 22 (8): 1088–1098. doi:10.1002/acp.1422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klaus, J., and H. Schriefers. 2016. Measuring Working Memory Capacity: A Reading Span Task for Laboratory and Web-Based Use. Unpublished manuscript submitted for publication. https://osf.io/nj48x
   Google Scholar
• Koeritzer, M. A., C. S. Rogers, K. J. Van Engen, and J. E. Peelle. 2018. “The Impact of Age, Background Noise, Semantic Ambiguity, and Hearing Loss on Recognition Memory for Spoken Sentences.” Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research : JSLHR 61 (3): 740–751. doi:10.1044/2017_JSLHR-H-17-0077.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kryter, K. D. 1962. “Methods of Calculation and Use of the Articulation Index.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 34 (11): 1689–1697. doi:10.1121/1.1909094.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ljung, R., K. Israelsson, and S. Hygge. 2013. “Speech Intelligibility and Recall of Spoken Material Heard at Different Signal-to-Noise Ratios and the Role Played by Working Memory Capacity.” Applied Cognitive Psychology 27 (2): 198–203. doi:10.1002/acp.2896.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, C. S., J. W. Mullennix, D. B. Pisoni, and W. V. Summers. 1989. “Effects of Talker Variability on Recall of Spoken Word Lists.” Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition 15 (4): 676–684. doi:10.1037//0278-7393.15.4.676.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattys, S. L., M. H. Davis, A. R. Bradlow, and S. K. Scott. 2012. “Speech Recognition in Adverse Conditions: A Review.” Language and Cognitive Processes 27 (7-8): 953–978. doi:10.1080/01690965.2012.705006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCabe, D. P., H. L. Roediger, M. A. McDaniel, D. A. Balota, and D. Z. Hambrick. 2010. “The Relationship Between Working Memory Capacity and Executive Functioning: Evidence for a Common Executive Attention Construct.” Neuropsychology 24 (2): 222–243. doi:10.1037/a0017619.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCoy, S. L., P. A. Tun, L. C. Cox, M. Colangelo, R. A. Stewart, and A. Wingfield. 2005. “Hearing Loss and Perceptual Effort: Downstream Effects on Older Adults' Memory for Speech.” The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A 58 (1): 22–33. doi:10.1080/02724980443000151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, B. 2013. An Introduction to the Psychology of Hearing. Boston, MA: Koninklijke Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Morton, J. R., M. S. Sommers, and S. M. Lulich. 2015. “The Effect of Exposure to a Single Vowel on Talker Normalization for Vowels.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 137 (3): 1443–1451. doi:10.1121/1.4913456.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, D., F. Craik, Z. H. Karen, and B. Schneider. 2000. “Comparing the Effects of Aging and Background Noise on Short-Term Memory Performance.” Psychology and Aging 15 (2): 323–334. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.15.2.323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narvaez, D., G. A. Radvansky, N. A. Lynchard, and D. E. Copeland. 2011. “Are Older Adults More Attuned to Morally-Charged Information?” Experimental Aging Research 37 (4): 398–434. doi:10.1080/0361073X.2011.590756.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peelle, J. E. 2018. “Listening Effort: How the Cognitive Consequences of Acoustic Challenge Are Reflected in Brain and Behavior.” Ear and Hearing 39 (2): 204–214. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000494.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pichora-Fuller, M. K. 2008. “Use of Supportive Context by Younger and Older Adult Listeners: Balancing Bottom-up and Top-Down Information Processing.” International Journal of Audiology 47 (S2): S72–S82. doi:10.1080/14992020802307404
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pichora-Fuller, M. K., B. Schneider, and M. Daneman. 1995. “How Young and Old Adults Listen to and Remember Speech in Noise.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 97: 593–608. doi:10.1121/1.412282
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pichora-Fuller, M. K., S. E. Kramer, M. A. Eckert, B. Edwards, B. Hornsby, L. E. Humes, U. Lemke, et al. 2016. “Hearing Impairment and Cognitive Energy: The Framework for Understanding Effortful Listening (FUEL).” Ear and Hearing 37 (S1): 5S–27S. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piquado, T., J. I. Benichov, H. Brownell, and A. Wingfield. 2012. “The Hidden Effect of Hearing Acuity on Speech Recall, and Compensatory Effects of Self-Paced Listening.” International Journal of Audiology 51 (8): 576–583. doi:10.3109/14992027.2012.684403.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabbit, P. M. 1968. “Channel-Capacity, Intelligibility and Immediate Memory.” Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 20: 241–248. doi:10.1080/14640746808400158
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabbit, P. M. 1991. “Mild Hearing Loss Can Cause Apparent Memory Failures Which Increase with Age and Reduce with IQ.” Acta Otolaryngolica 476: 167–176.
   Google Scholar
• Radvansky, G. A., and D. E. Copeland. 2004. “Working Memory Span and Situation Model Processing.” The American Journal of Psychology 117 (2): 191–213. doi:10.2307/4149022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radvansky, G. A., and J. M. Zacks. 2014. Event Cognition. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Radvansky, G. A., D. E. Copeland, and R. A. Zwaan. 2003. “Aging and Functional Spatial Relations in Comprehension and Memory.” Psychology and Aging 18 (1): 161–165. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.18.1.161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radvansky, G. A., D. E. Copeland, and W. von Hippel. 2010. “Stereotype Activation, Inhibition, and Aging.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 46 (1): 51–60. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.09.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radvansky, G. A., R. A. Zwaan, J. M. Curiel, and D. E. Copeland. 2001. “Situation Models and Aging.” Psychology and Aging 16 (1): 145–160. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.16.1.145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rönnberg, J., T. Lunner, A. Zekveld, P. Sörqvist, H. Danielsson, B. Lyxell, O. Dahlström, et al. 2013. “The Ease of Language Understanding (ELU) Model: Theoretical, Empirical, and Clinical Advances.” Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience 7: 31.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sachs, J. S. 1967. “Recognition Memory for Syntactic and Semantic Aspects of Connected Discourse.” Perception & Psychophysics 2 (9): 437–442. doi:10.3758/BF03208784.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmalhofer, F., and D. Glavanov. 1986. “Three Components of Understanding a Programmer's Manual: Verbatim, Propositional, and Situational Representations.” Journal of Memory and Language 25 (3): 279–294. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(86)90002-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, B. A., M. Daneman, D. R. Murphy, and S. K. See. 2000. “Listening to Discourse in Distracting Settings: The Effects of Aging.” Psychology and Aging 15 (1): 110–125. doi:10.1037//0882-7974.15.1.110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shannon, R. V., F. G. Zeng, V. Kamath, J. Wygonski, and M. Ekelid. 1995. “Speech Recognition with Primarily Temporal Cues.” Science (New York, N.Y.) 270 (5234): 303–304. doi:10.1126/science.270.5234.303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shinn-Cunningham, B., and V. Best. 2015. “Auditory Selective Attention.” In The Handbook of Attention, edited by J. M. Fawcett, E. F. Risko, & A. Kingstone, 99–117. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smeds, K., F. Wolters, and M. Rung. 2015. “Estimation of Signal-to-Noise Ratios in Realistic Sound Scenarios.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 26 (2): 183–196. doi:10.3766/jaaa.26.2.7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sommers, M. S., and S. M. Danielson. 1999. “Inhibitory Processes and Spoken Word Recognition in Young and Older Adults: The Interaction of Lexical Competition and Semantic Context.” Psychology and Aging 14 (3): 458–472. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.14.3.458.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sörqvist, P., and J. Rönnberg. 2012. “Episodic Long-Term Memory of Spoken Discourse Masked by Speech: What Is the Role for Working Memory Capacity?” Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research : JSLHR 55 (1): 210–218. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2011/10-0353).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spahr, A. J., M. F. Dorman, L. M. Litvak, S. Van Wie, R. H. Gifford, P. C. Loizou, L. M. Loiselle, T. Oakes, and S. Cook. 2012. “Development and Validation of the AzBio Sentence Lists.” Ear and Hearing 33 (1): 112–117. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e31822c2549.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanislaw, H., and N. Todorov. 1999. “Calculation of Signal Detection Theory Measures.” Behavioral Research Methods 31 (1): 137–149. doi:10.3758/BF03207704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stine-Morrow, E. A. L., L. M. S. Miller, and C. Hertzog. 2006. “Aging and Self-Regulated Language Processing.” Psychological Bulletin 132 (4): 582–606. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.4.582.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, M. A., C. Fullgrabe, and B. C. J. Moore. 2012. “Notionally Steady Background Noise Acts Primarily as a Modulation Masker of Speech.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 132 (1): 317–326. doi:10.1121/1.4725766.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Surprenant, A. M. 1999. “The Effect of Noise on Memory for Spoken Syllables.” International Journal of Psychology 34 (5-6): 328–333. doi:10.1080/002075999399648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tulving, Endel, and Donald M. Thomson. 1973. “Encoding Specificity and Retrieval Processes in Episodic Memory.” Psychological Review 80 (5): 352–373. doi:10.1037/h0020071.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tye-Murray, N., M. S. Sommers, B. Spehar, J. Myerson, S. Hale, and N. Rose. 2008. “Auditory-Visual Discourse Comprehension by Older and Younger Adults in Favorable and Unfavorable Conditions.” International Journal of Audiology 47 (sup2): S31–S37. doi:10.1080/14992020802301662.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dijk, T. A., and W. Kintsch. 1983. Strategies in Discourse Comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, C. M., C. S. Rogers, K. J. Van Engen, and J. E. Peelle. 2016. “Effects of Age, Acoustic Challenge, and Verbal Working Memory on Recall of Narrative Speech.” Experimental Aging Research 42 (1): 97–144. doi:10.1080/0361073X.2016.1108785.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, C. S. 2005. “Some Comments on Informational Masking.” Acta Acustica United with Acustica 91: 502–512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weisser, A., and J. M. Buchholz. 2019. “Conversational Speech Levels and Signal-to-Noise Ratios in Realistic Acoustic Conditions.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 145 (1): 349–360. doi:10.1121/1.5087567.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wingfield, A. 2016. “Evolution of Models of Working Memory and Cognitive Resources.” Ear and Hearing 37 (S1): 35S–43S. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wingfield, A., P. A. Tun, C. K. Koh, and M. J. Rosen. 1999. “Regaining Lost Time: Adult Aging and the Effect of Time Restoration on Recall of Time-Compressed Speech.” Psychology and Aging 14 (3): 380–389. doi:10.1037//0882-7974.14.3.380.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winn, M. B. 2016. “Rapid Release from Listening Effort Resulting from Semantic Context, and the Effects of Spectral Degradation and Cochlear Implants.” Trends in Hearing 20: 233121651666972–233121651666917. doi:10.1177/2331216516669723.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yost, W. A. 2013. Fundamentals of Hearing, an Introduction. 5th ed. Lieden, The Netherlands: Brill Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Zwaan, R. A. 1994. “Effect of Genre Expectations on Text Comprehension.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 20 (4): 920–933. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.20.4.920.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwaan, R. A. 1999. “Situation Models: The Mental Leap into Imagined Worlds.” Current Directions in Psychological Science 8 (1): 15–18. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.00004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwaan, R. A., and G. A. Radvansky. 1998. “Situation Models in Language Comprehension and Memory.” Psychological Bulletin 123 (2): 162–185. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.123.2.162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar