Equivalent threshold sound pressure levels for click and CE-Chirp^® stimuli delivered by the SnapPROBE™

References

• ANSI S3.5. 1997. Methods for Calculation of the Speech Intelligibility Index. New York, NY: American National Standards Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Dau, T., O. Wegner, V. Mellert, and B. Kollmeier. 2000. “Auditory Brainstem Responses with Optimized Chirp Signals Compensating Basilar-Membrane Dispersion.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 107 (3): 1530–1540. doi:https://doi.org/10.1121/1.428438.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, H., S. K. Hirsh, G. R. Popelka, and C. Formby. 1984. “Frequency Selectivity and Thresholds of Brief Stimuli Suitable for Electric Response Audiometry.” Audiology: Official Organ of the International Society of Audiology 23 (1): 59–74. doi:https://doi.org/10.3109/00206098409072822.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Elberling, C., M. Cebulla, and E. Stürzebecher. 2007. “Simultaneous Multiple Stimulation of the ASSR.” 1st International Symposium on Auditory and Audiological Research (ISAAR): Auditory Signal Processing in Hearing-Impaired Listeners, edited by T. Dau, J. M. Buchholz, J. M. Harte, T. U. Christensen, 201–209. Centertryk A/S, Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• Elberling, C., and M. Don. 2008. “Auditory Brainstem Responses to a Chirp Stimulus Designed from Derived-Band Latencies in Normal-Hearing Subjects.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 124 (5): 3022–3037. doi:https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2990709.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elberling, C., and M. Don. 2010. “A Direct Approach for the Design of Chirp Stimuli Used for the Recording of Auditory Brainstem Responses.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 128 (5): 2955–2964. doi:https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3489111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elberling, C., M. Don, M. Cebulla, and E. Stürzebecher. 2007. “Auditory Steady-State Responses to Chirp Stimuli Based on Cochlear Traveling Wave Delay.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 122 (5): 2772–2785. doi:https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2783985.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elberling, C., and L. C. Esmann. 2017. “Calibration of Brief Stimuli for the Recording of Evoked Responses from the Human Auditory Pathway.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 141 (1): 466–474. doi:https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4974145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fedtke, T., and U. Richter. 2007. “Reference Zero for the Calibration of Air-Conduction Audiometric Equipment Using 'Tone Bursts' as Test Signals”. International Journal of Audiology 46 (1): 1–10. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14992020601050361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fortnum, H. 2003. “Epidemiology of Permanent Childhood Hearing Impairment: Implications for Neonatal Hearing Screening.” Audiological Medicine 1 (3): 155–164. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/16513860310001997.
   Google Scholar
• Fortnum, H. M., A. Q. Summerfield, D. H. Marshall, A. C. Davis, J. M. Bamford, A. Davis, C. Yoshinaga-Itano, and S. Hind. 2001. “Prevalence of Permanent Childhood Hearing Impairment in the United Kingdom and Implications for Universal Neonatal Hearing Screening: Questionnaire Based Ascertainment Study.” BMJ (Clinical Research ed.) 323 (7312): 536–536. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.323.7312.536.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gøtsche-Rasmussen, K., T. Poulsen, and C. Elberling. 2012. “Reference Hearing Threshold Levels for Chirp Signals Delivered by an ER-3A Insert Earphone.” International Journal of Audiology 51 (11): 794–799. doi:https://doi.org/10.3109/14992027.2012.705901.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IEC 60318-4. 2010. Electroacoustics – Simulators of Human Head and Ear – part 4: Occluded-Ear Simulator for the Measurement of Earphones Coupled to the Ear by Means of Ear Inserts. Charlottenlund, Denmark: IEC International Standard.
   Google Scholar
• IEC 60645-3. 2020. Electroacoustics—Audiometric Equipment—Part 3: Test Signals of Short Duration. Geneva, Switzerland: IEC International Standard.
   Google Scholar
• Interacoustics A/S. 2020. Instructions for use Titan. www.interacoustics.com/tympanometry/clinical-diagnostic/titan
   Google Scholar
• ISO 389-6. 2007. Acoustics—Reference Zero for the Calibration of Audiometric Equipment—Part 6: Reference Threshold of Hearing for Test Signals of Short Duration. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO European Standard.
   Google Scholar
• ISO 389-9. 2009. Acoustics—Reference Zero for the Calibration of Audiometric Equipment—Part 9: Preferred Test Conditions for the Determination of Reference Hearing Threshold Levels. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO European Standard.
   Google Scholar
• ISO 8253-1. 2010. Acoustics—Audiometric Test Methods—Part 1: Pure Tone Air and Bone Conduction Audiometry. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO European Standard.
   Google Scholar
• ISO 8253-3. 2012. Acoustics Audiometric Test Methods—Part 3: Speech Audiometry. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO European Standard.
   Google Scholar
• Picton, T. W., D. L. Woods, J. Baribeau-Braun, and T. M. Healy. 1977. “Evoked Potential Audiometry.” J Otolaryngol 6 (2): 90–119.
   Google Scholar
• Poulsen, T., and S. V. Legarth. 2008. “Reference Hearing Threshold Levels for Short Duration Signals.” International Journal of Audiology 47 (10): 665–674. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14992020802203330.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richter, U., and T. Fedtke. 2005. “Reference Zero for the Calibration of Audiometric Equipment Using 'Clicks' as Test Signals.” International Journal of Audiology 44 (8): 478–487. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14992020500060230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serpanos, Y. C., H. O'Malley, and J. S. Gravel. 1997. “The Relationship between Loudness Intensity Functions and the Click-ABR Wave V Latency.” Ear and Hearing 18 (5): 409–419. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/00003446-199710000-00006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sininger, Y. S., A. Grimes, and E. Christensen. 2010. “Auditory Development in Early Amplified Children: Factors Influencing Auditory-Based Communication Outcomes in Children with Hearing Loss.” Ear and Hearing 31 (2): 166–185. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181c8e7b6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stapells, D. R., T. W. Picton, and A. D. Smith. 1982. “Normal Hearing Thresholds for Clicks.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 72 (1): 74–79. doi:https://doi.org/10.1121/1.388026.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watkin, P., and M. Baldwin. 2012. “The Longitudinal Follow up of a Universal Neonatal Hearing Screen: The Implications for Confirming Deafness in Childhood.” International Journal of Audiology 51 (7): 519–528. doi:https://doi.org/10.3109/14992027.2012.673237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, S. A., G. J. Sutton, and A. C. Davis. 2015. “Performance and Characteristics of the Newborn Hearing Screening Programme in England: The First Seven Years.” International Journal of Audiology 54 (6): 353–358. doi:https://doi.org/10.3109/14992027.2014.989548.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. 2010. Newborn and Infant Hearing Screening, Geneva, Switzerland.
   Google Scholar