Relation between hearing abilities and preferred playback settings for speech perception in complex listening conditions

References

• Brand, T., and V. Hohmann. 2001. “Effects of Hearing Loss, Centre Frequency, and Bandwidth on the Shape of Loudness Functions in Categorical Loudness Scaling.” International Journal of Audiology 40 (2): 92–103. doi:10.3109/00206090109073104.
   Google Scholar
• Brons, I., R. Houben, and W. A. Dreschler. 2012. “Perceptual Effects of Noise Reduction by Time-Frequency Masking of Noisy Speech.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 132 (4): 2690–2699. doi:10.1121/1.4747006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brons, I., R. Houben, and W. A. Dreschler. 2013. “Perceptual Effects of Noise Reduction with Respect to Personal Preference, Speech Intelligibility, and Listening Effort.” Ear and Hearing 34 (1): 29–41. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e31825f299f
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brons, I., R. Houben, and W. A. Dreschler. 2014. “Effects of Noise Reduction on Speech Intelligibility, Perceived Listening Effort, and Personal Preference in Hearing-Impaired Listeners.” Trends in Hearing 18: 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson, P., H. Dillon, and J. Battaglia. 1990. “Output Limiting Compression for the Severe-Profoundly Deaf.” Australian Journal of Audiology 13: 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins, D., and S. Naidoo. 1993. “Comparison of Sound Quality and Clarity with Asymmetrical Peak Clipping and Output Limiting Compression.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 4: 221–228.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hochmuth, S., T. Jürgens, T. Brand, and B. Kollmeier. 2015. “Talker- and Language-Specific Effects on Speech Intelligibility in Noise Assessed with Bilingual Talkers: Which Language is More Robust against Noise and Reverberation?” International Journal of Audiology 54 (Suppl 2): 23–34. doi:10.3109/14992027.2015.1088174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kayser, H., S. Ewert, J. Anemüller, T. Rohdenburg, V. Hohmann, and B. Kollmeier. 2009. “Database of Multichannel in-Ear and behind-the-Ear Head-Related and Binaural Room Impulse Responses.” EURASIP J Adv Signal Process 2009: 298605. doi:10.1155/2009/298605
   Google Scholar
• Keidser, G., H. Dillon, M. Flax, T. Ching, and S. Brewer. 2011. “The NAL-NL2 Prescription Procedure.” Audiology Research 11 (1): e24–e90.
   Google Scholar
• Kiessling, J., M. Schubert, and A. Archut. 1996. “Adaptive Fitting of Hearing Instruments by Category Loudness Scaling (ScalAdapt).” Scandinavian Audiology 25 (3): 153–160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kollmeier, B., and M. Wesselkamp. 1997. “Development and Evaluation of a German Sentence Test for Objective and Subjective Speech Intelligibility Assessment.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 102 (4): 2412–2421. doi:10.1121/1.419624
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueger, M., M. Schulte, M. A. Zokoll, K. C. Wagener, M. Meis, T. Brand, and I. Holube. 2017. “Relation between Listening Effort and Speech Intelligibility in Noise.” American Journal of Audiology 26 (3S): 378–392. doi:10.1044/2017_AJA-16-0136.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kubiak, A. M., J. Rennies, S. D. Ewert, and B. Kollmeier. 2020. “Prediction of Individual Speech Recognition Performance in Complex Listening Conditions.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 147 (3): 1379–1391. doi:10.1121/10.0000759.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luts, H., K. Eneman, J. Wouters, M. Schulte, M. Vormann, M. Buechler, N. Dillier, et al. 2010. “Multicenter Evaluation of Signal Enhancement Algorithms for Hearing Aids.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 127 (3): 1491–1505. doi:10.1121/1.3299168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martini, A. 1996. European Working Group on genetics of hearing impairment, European Commission Directorate, Biomedical and Health Research Programme (HEAR) Infoletter 2.
   Google Scholar
• Marzinzik, M. 2000. Noise Reduction Schemes for Digital Hearing Aids and Their Use for the Hearing Impaired. Oldenburg: Shaker-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, B., J. Johnson, T. Clark, and V. Pluvinage. 1992. “Evaluation of a Dual-Channel Full Dynamic Range Compression System for People with Sensorineural Hearing Loss.” Ear and Hearing 13 (5): 349–370. doi:10.1097/00003446-199210000-00012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neher, T. 2014. “Relating Hearing Loss and Executive Functions to Hearing Aid Users' Preference for, and Speech Recognition with, Different Combinations of Binaural Noise Reduction and Microphone directionality.” Frontiers in Neuroscience 8: 391. doi:10.3389/fnins.2014.00391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neher, T., G. Grimm, and V. Hohmann. 2014. “Perceptual Consequences of Different Signal Changes Due to Binaural Noise Reduction: do Hearing Loss and Working Memory Capacity Play a Role?” Ear and Hearing 20 (10): 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Neher, T., and K. Wagener. 2016. “Investigating Differences in Preferred Noise Reduction Strength among Hearing Aid Users.” Trends in Hearing 20: 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neher, T., K. Wagener, and R. Fischer. 2016. “Directional Processing and Noise Reduction in Hearing Aids. Individual and Situational Influences on Preferred Setting.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 27 (8): 628–646.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oetting, D., T. Brand, and S. Ewert. 2014. “Optimized Loudness-Function Estimation for Categorical Loudness Scaling Data.” Hearing Research 316: 16–27. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2014.07.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pittman, A., L., and P. G. Stelmachowicz. 2003. “Hearing Loss in Children and Adults: Audiometric Configuration, Asymmetry, and Progression.” Ear and Hearing 24 (3): 198–205. doi:10.1097/01.AUD.0000069226.22983.80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rennies, Jan, and Gerald Kidd. 2018. “Benefit of Binaural Listening as Revealed by Speech Intelligibility and Listening Effort.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 144 (4): 2147–2159. doi:10.1121/1.5057114
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rennies, J., A. Kubiak, and S. Doclo. 2014. Personalization of audio playback using intuitive self-fitting interfaces. The 48th Annual Conference of the German Society of Biomedical Engineering. Hannover, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Schepker, H., K. Haeder, J. Rennies, and I. Holube. 2016. “Perceived Listening Effort and Speech Intelligibility in Reverberation and Noise for Hearing Impaired Listeners.” International Journal of Audiology 55 (12): 738–747. doi:10.1080/14992027.2016.1219774
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stelmachowicz, P. G., D. E. Lewis, B. Hoover, and D. H. Keefe. 1999. “Subjective Effects of Peak Clipping and Compression Limiting in Normal and Hearing-Impaired Children and Adults.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 105 (1): 412–422. doi:10.1121/1.424629.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Völker, C., S. Ernst, and B. Kollmeier. 2018. “Hearing Aid Fitting and Fine-Tuning Based on Estimated Individual Traits.” International Journal of Audiology 57 (sup3): S139–S145. doi:10.1080/14992027.2016.1257163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagener, K., V. Kühnel, and B. Kollmeier. 1999. “Entwicklung Und Evaluation Eines Satztests in Deutscher Sprache I: Design Des Oldenburger Satztests.” Zeitschrift Fur Audiologie 38: 4–15.
   Google Scholar
• Zokoll, M., K. Wagener, T. Brand, M. Buschermöhle, and B. Kollmeier. 2012. “Internationally Comparable Screening Tests for Listening in Noise in Several European Languages: The German Digit Triplet Test as an Optimization Propotype.” International Journal of Audiology 51 (9): 697–707. doi:10.3109/14992027.2012.690078.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar