2,159
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Relationships between behavioural and self-report measures in speech recognition in noise

ORCID Icon, , & ORCID Icon
Pages 101-109 | Received 24 Apr 2020, Accepted 16 Feb 2022, Published online: 21 Mar 2022

References

  • Akeroyd, A. M., H. F. Guy, L. D. Harrison, and L. S. Suller. 2014. “A Factor Analysis of the SSQ (Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale).” International Journal of Audiology 53 (2): 101–114. doi:10.3109/14992027.2013.824115.
  • Banh, J., G. Singh, and M. K. Pichora-Fuller. 2012. “Age Affects Responses on the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) by Adults with Minimal Audiometric Loss.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 23 (2): 81–91. doi:10.3766/jaaa.23.2.2.
  • Brand, T. 2000. Analysis and Optimization of Psychophysical Procedures in Audiology. Oldenburg: Bibliotheks- und Informationssystem der Universität Oldenburg.
  • Capretta, N. R., and A. C. Moberly. 2016. “Does Quality of Life Depend on Speech Recognition Performance for Adult Cochlear Implant Users?” The Laryngoscope 126 (3): 699–706. doi:10.1002/lary.25525.
  • Cohen, J. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Committee on Hearing, and Bioacoustics and Biomechanics (CHABA). 1988. “Speech under-Standing and Aging.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 83: 859–895. doi:10.1121/1.395965.
  • Demeester, K., V. Topsakal, J.-J. Hendrickx, E. Fransen, L. van Laer, G. Van Camp, P. Van de Heyning, et al. 2012. “Hearing Disability Measured by the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale in Clinically Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Middle-Aged Persons, and Disability Screening by Means of a Reduced SSQ (the SSQ5).” Ear and Hearing 33 (5): 615–616. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e31824e0ba7.
  • Gaeta, L., and C. R. Brydges. 2020. “An Examination of Effect Sizes and Statistical Power in Speech, Language, and Hearing Research.” Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research : JSLHR 63 (5): 1572–1580. doi:10.1044/2020_JSLHR-19-00299.
  • Gatehouse, S., and W. Noble. 2004. “The Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ).” International Journal of Audiology 43 (2): 85–99. 00050014. doi:10.1080/149920204.
  • Hagerman, B. 1982. “Sentences for Testing Speech Intelligibility in Noise.” Scandinavian Audiology 11 (2): 79–87. doi:10.3109/01050398209076203.
  • Hagerman, B., and C. Kinnefors. 1995. “Efficient Adaptive Methods for Measuring Speech Reception Threshold in Quiet and in Noise.” Scandinavian Audiology 24 (1): 71–77. doi:10.3109/01050399509042213.
  • Heinrich, A., T. M. Mikkola, H. Polku, T. Törmäkangas, and A. Viljanen. 2019. “Hearing in Real-Life Environments (HERE): Structure and Reliability of a Questionnaire on Perceived Hearing for Older Adults.” Ear & Hearing 40 (2): 368–380. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000622.
  • Heinrich, A., and A. B. Schneider. 2011. “Elucidating the Effects of Ageing on Remembering Perceptually Distorted Word Pairs.” Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006) 64 (1): 186–205. doi:10.1080/17470218.2010.492621.
  • Heo, J.-H., J.-H. Lee, and W.-S. Lee. 2013. “Bimodal Benefits on Objective and Subjective Outcomes for Adult Cochlear Implant Users.” Korean Journal of Audiology 17 (2): 65–73. doi:10.7874/kja.2013.17.2.65.
  • Holm, S. 1979. “A Simple Sequentially Rejective Multiple Test Procedure.” Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 6 (2): 65–70.
  • Humes, L. E., and J. R. Dubno. 2010. “Factors Affecting Speech Understanding in Older Adults.” In The Aging Auditory System, edited by Gordon-Salant, S, Frisina, R, Popper, A, Fay, R. Springer Handbook of Auditory Research, vol 34. Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-0993-0_8
  • Humes, L., R. J. Dubno, S.Gordon-Salant, J. J. Lister, T. A.Cacace, J. K.Cruickshanks, A. G. Gates, H. R.Wilson, and A. Wingfield. 2012. “Central Presbycusis: A Review and Evaluation of the Evidence.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 23 (8): 635–666. doi:10.3766/jaaa.23.8.5.
  • Humes, L. E., G. R. Kidd, and J. J. Lentz. 2013. “Auditory and Cognitive Factors Underlying Individual Differences in Aided Speech-Understanding among Older Adults.” Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience 7 (55): 1–16. doi:10.3389/fnsys.2013.00055.
  • Hällgren, M., B. Larsby, B. Lyxell, and S. Arlinger. 2005. “Speech Understanding in Quiet and Noise, With and Without Hearing Aids.” International Journal of Audiology 44 (10): 574–583. doi:10.1080/14992020500190011.
  • Hällgren, M., B. Larsby, and S. Arlinger. 2006. “A Swedish Version of the Hearing in Noise Test (HINT) for Measurement of Speech Recognition.” International Journal of Audiology 45 (4): 227–237. doi:10.1080/14992020500429583.
  • Jansen, S., H. Luts, K. C. Wagener, B. Kollmeier, M. Del Rio, R. Dauman, C. James, et al. 2012. “Comparison of Three Types of French Speech-in-Noise Tests: A Multi-Center Study.” International Journal of Audiology 51 (3): 164–173. doi:10.3109/14992027.2011.633568.
  • Kiessling, J., L. Grugel, H. Meister, and M. Meis. 2011. “Ubertragung Der Fragebogen SADL, ECHO Und SSQ Ins Deutsche Und Deren Evaluation. German Translations of Questionnaires SADL, ECHO, and SSQ and Their Evaluation.” Zeitschrift Für Audiologie 50: 19.
  • Kim, S. 2015. Ppcor: Partial and Semi-Partial (Part) Correlation. Available from: https://cran.r-project.org/package=ppcor
  • Larsby, B., M. Hällgren, and B. Lyxell. 2012. “Working Memory Capacity and Lexical Access in Speech-Recognition-In-Noise.” Proceedings of ISAAR 2011: Speech Perception and Auditory Disorders. 3rd International Symposium on Auditory and Audiological Research, August.
  • Lunner, T., R. K. Hietkamp, M. R. Andersen, K. Hopkins, and B. C. Moore. 2012. “Effect of Speech Material on the Benefit of Temporal Fine Structure Information in Speech for Young Normal-Hearing and Older Hearing-Impaired Participants.” Ear and Hearing 33 (3): 377–388. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e3182387a8c.
  • McRackan, T. R., M. Bauschard, J. L. Hatch, E. Franko-Tobin, H. R. Droghini, C. A. Velozo, S. A. Nguyen, and J. R. Dubno. 2018. “Meta-Analysis of Cochlear Implantation Outcomes Evaluated with General Health-Related Patient-Reported Outcome Measures.” Otology & Neurotology 39 (1): 29–36. doi:10.1097/MAO.0000000000001620.
  • Moulin, A., and C. Richard. 2016. “Sources of Variability of Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) Scores in Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Populations.” International Journal of Audiology 55 (2): 101–109. doi:10.3109/14992027.2015.1104734.
  • Moulin, A., J. Vergne, S. Gallego, and C. Micheyl. 2019. “A New Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale Short-Form: Factor, Cluster, and Comparative Analyses.” Ear and Hearing 40 (4): 938–950. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000675.
  • Ng Ning Hoi, E., M. Rudner, T. Lunner, and J. Rönnberg. 2013. “Relationships between Self-Report and Cognitive Measures of Hearing Aid Outcome.” Speech, Language and Hearing (London, England) 16 (4): 197–207. doi:10.1179/205057113X13782848890774.
  • Noble, W., N. S. Jensen, G. Naylor, N. Bhullar, and M. A. Akeroyd. 2013. “A Short Form of the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale Suitable for Clinical Use: The SSQ12.” International Journal of Audiology 52 (6): 409–412. doi:10.3109/14992027.2013.781278.
  • Olsen, S. O., L. H. Hernvig, and L. H. Nielsen. 2012. “Self-Reported Hearing Performance among Subjects with Unilateral Sensorineural Hearing Loss.” Audiological Medicine 10 (2): 83–92. doi:10.3109/1651386X.2012.673755.
  • R Core Team. 2019. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. https://www.r-project.org/
  • Rajan, R., and K. E. Cainer. 2008. “Ageing without Hearing Loss or Cognitive Impairment Causes a Decrease in Speech Intelligibility only in Informational Maskers.” Neuroscience 154 (2): 784–795. . [Database] doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.03.067.
  • Ramakers, G. G. J., Y. E. Smulders, A. Van Zon, G. A. Van Zanten, W. Grolman, and I. Stegeman. 2017. “Correlation between Subjective and Objective Hearing Tests after Unilateral and Bilateral Cochlear Implantation.” BMC Ear, Nose, and Throat Disorders 17: 10–18. doi:10.1186/s12901-017-0043-y.
  • Rönnberg, J., T. Lunner, A. Zekveld, P. Sörqvist, H. Danielsson, B. Lyxell, Ö. Dahlström, et al. 2013. “The Ease of Language Understanding (ELU) Model: Theoretical, Empirical, and Clinical Advances.” Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience 7 (31): 31–17. doi:10.3389/fnsys.2013.00031.
  • Rönnberg, J., T. Lunner, E. Ng Ning Hoi, B. Lidestam, A. A. Zekveld, P. Sörqvist, B. Lyxell, et al. 2016. “Hearing Impairment, Cognition and Speech Understanding: Exploratory Factor Analyses of a Comprehensive Test Battery for a Group of Hearing Aid Users, the n200 Study.” International Journal of Audiology 55 (11): 623–642. doi:10.1080/14992027.2016.1219775.
  • Schneider, B. A., K. Pichora-Fuller, M. Daneman, et al. 2010. “Effects of Senescent Changes in Audition and Cognition on Spoken Language Comprehension.” In The Aging Auditory System, edited by Gordon-Salant, S, 167–210. New York, NY: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-0993-0_7.
  • Taylor, B. 2007. Predicting real world hearing-aid benefit with speech audiometry: An evidence-based review. Audiology Online, URL (consulted January, 2022). https://www.audiologyonline.com/articles/predicting-real-world-hearing-aid-946
  • Tun, P. A., G. ÓKane, and A. Wingfield. 2002. “Distraction by Competing Speech in Young and Older Adult Listeners.” Psychology and Aging 17 (3): 453–467. doi:10.1037//0882-7974.17.3.453.
  • Vannson, N., C. James, B. Fraysse, K. Strelnikov, P. Barone, O. Deguine, and M. Marx. 2015. “Quality of Life and Auditory Performance in Adults with Asymmetric Hearing Loss.” Audiology and Neurotology 20 (Suppl 1): 38–43. doi:10.1159/000380746.
  • WHO. 2015. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/deafness-and-hearing-loss
  • von Gablenz, P., F. Otto-Sobotka, and I. Holube. 2018. “Adjusting Expectations: Hearing Abilities in a Population-Based Sample Using an SSQ Short Form.” Trends in Hearing 22: 1–20. doi:10.1177/2331216518784837.
  • Wickham, H. 2016. Ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. New York, NY: Springer International Publishing.