Can real-ear insertion gain deviations from generic fitting prescriptions predict self-reported outcomes?

References

• Aazh, H., B. C. J. Moore, and D. Prasher. 2012. “The Accuracy of Matching Target Insertion Gains with Open-Fit Hearing Aids.” American Journal of Audiology 21 (2): 175–180. doi:10.1044/1059-0889(2012/11-0008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abrams, H. B., T. H. Chisolm, M. McManus, and R. McArdle. 2012. “Initial-Fit Approach versus Verified Prescription: Comparing Self-Perceived Hearing Aid Benefit.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 23 (10): 768–778. doi:10.3766/jaaa.23.10.3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, K. W., E. N. Hagberg, and R. L. Rane. 1980. “A Reexamination of the One-Half Gain Rule.” Ear and Hearing 1 (4): 223–225. doi:10.1097/00003446-198007000-00009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• British Society of Audiology 2018., Practice Guidelines: Verification of hearing devices using probe microphone measurements. British Society of Audiology (May). Available at: http://www.thebsa.org.uk/resources/.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, D., and H. Dillon. 1986. “The National Acoustic Laboratories’ (NAL) New Procedure for Selecting the Gain and Frequency Response of a Hearing Aid.” Ear and Hearing 7 (4), 257–265. doi:10.1097/00003446-198608000-00007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne, D., H. Dillon, T. Ching, R. Katsch, and G. Keidser. 2001. “NAL-NL1 Procedure for Fitting Nonlinear Hearing Aids: Characteristics and Comparisons with Other Procedures.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 12 (1): 37–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne, D., A. Parkinson, and P. Newall. 1990. “Hearing Aid Gain and Frequency Response Requirements for the Severely/Profoundly Hearing Impaired.” Ear and Hearing 11 (1): 40–49. doi:10.1097/00003446-199002000-00009
   Google Scholar
• Charrad, M., N. Ghazzali, V. Boiteau, and A. Niknafs. 2014. “Nbclust: An R Package for Determining the Relevant Number of Clusters in a Data Set.” Journal of Statistical Software 61 (6): 1–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, J. G. 2010. “The Geometry of Patient Motivation: Circles, Lines, and Boxes.” Audiology Today 22 (4): 32.
   Google Scholar
• Cornelisse, L. E., R. C. Seewald, and D. G. Jamieson. 1995. “The Input/Output Formula: A Theoretical Approach to the Fitting of Personal Amplification Devices.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 97(3):1854–64. doi:10.1121/1.412980.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, R. M., and G. C. Alexander. 1995. “The Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit.” Ear and Hearing 16 (2): 176–186. doi:10.1097/00003446-199504000-00005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, R. M., and G. C. Alexander. 2002. “The International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA): Psychometric Properties of the English Version.” International Journal of Audiology 41 (1): 30–35. doi:10.3109/14992020209101309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillon, H. (ed.) 2001. Hearing Aids. New York: Thieme.
   Google Scholar
• Dillon, H., G. Birtles, and R. Lovegrove. 1999. “Measuring the Outcomes of a National Rehabilitation Program: Normative Data for the Client Oriented Scale of Improvement (COSI) and the Hearing Aid User’s Questionnaire (HAUQ).” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 10 (2): 67–79.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, M., D. Maidment, N. Russell, M. Gregory, and R. Nicholson. 2016. “Motivational Engagement in First-Time Hearing Aid Users: A Feasibility Study.” International Journal of Audiology 55 (sup3): S23–S33. doi:10.3109/14992027.2015.1133935.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatehouse, S., and I. Noble. 2004. “The Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ).” International Journal of Audiology 43 (2): 85–99. doi:10.1080/14992020400050014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirotugu, A. 1974. “A New Look at the Statistical Model Identification.” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 19 (6): 716–723. Available at: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=1100705.
   Google Scholar
• Hocking, R. R. 1976. “A Biometrics Invited Paper. The Analysis and Selection of Variables in Linear Regression.” Biometrics 32 (1): 1. doi:10.2307/2529336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holube, I., S. Fredelake, M. Vlaming, and B. Kollmeier. 2010. “Development and Analysis of an International Speech Test Signal (ISTS).” International Journal of Audiology 49 (12): 891–903. doi:10.3109/14992027.2010.506889.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houmøller, S. S., A. Wolff, S. Möller, V. K. Narne, S. K. Narayanan, et al. 2021. “Prediction of Successful Hearing Aid Treatment in First-Time and Experienced Hearing Aid Users: Using the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids.” International Journal of Audiology 61 (2): 119–129. doi:10.1080/14992027.2021.1916632.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jespersen, C., M. Bille, and J. V. Legarth. 2014. “Psychometric Properties of a Revised Danish Translation of the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA).” International Journal of Audiology 53 (5): 302–308. doi:10.3109/14992027.2013.874049.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keidser, G., H. R. Dillon, M. Flax, T. Ching, and S. Brewer. 2011. “The NAL-NL2 Prescription Procedure.” Audiology Research 1 (1): 88–90. doi: 10.4081/audiores.2011.e24
   Google Scholar
• Knudsen, V. O., and I. H. Jones. 1935. “Artificial Aids to Hearing.” Laryngoscope 45: 48–69.
   Google Scholar
• Kochkin, S. 1997. “Subjective Measures of Satisfaction and Benefit: Establishing Norms.” Seminars in Hearing 18 (1): 37–48. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1083008.
   Google Scholar
• Kochkin, S. 2009. “MarkeTrak VIII: 25-Year Trends in the Hearing Health Market.” Hearing Review 16 (11): 12.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Cheng-Yung, Juen-Haur Hwang, Szu-Jen Hou, and Tien-Chen Liu. 2010. “Using Cluster Analysis to Classify Audiogram Shapes.” International Journal of Audiology 49 (9): 628–633. doi:10.3109/14992021003796887.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leijon, Arne, Harvey Dillon, Louise Hickson, Martin Kinkel, Sophia E Kramer, and Peter Nordqvist. 2021. “Analysis of Data from the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA) Using Bayesian Item Response Theory.” International Journal of Audiology 60 (2): 81–88. doi:10.1080/14992027.2020.1813338.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Libby, E. R. 1986. “The 1/3-2/3 Insertion Gain Hearing Aid Selection Guide.” Hear. Instruments 3: 27–28.
   Google Scholar
• McCandless, G., and P. Lyregaard. 1983. “Prescription of Gain/Output (POGO) for Hearing Aids.” Hearing Instruments 34: 16–20.
   Google Scholar
• Moulin, Annie, and, Celine Richard. 2016. “Sources of Variability of Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) Scores in Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Populations.” International Journal of Audiology 55 (2): 101–109. doi:10.3109/14992027.2015.1104734.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munro, K. J., R. Puri, J. Bird, and M. Smith. 2016. “Using Probe-Microphone Measurements to Improve the Match to Target Gain and Frequency Response Slope, as a Function of Earmould Style, Frequency, and Input Level.” International Journal of Audiology 55 (4): 215–223. doi:10.3109/14992027.2015.1104736.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, C. W., G. P. Jacobson, and J. B. Spitzer. 1996. “Development of the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory.” Archives of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery 122 (2): 143–148. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1996.01890140029007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noble, W., N. S. Jensen, G. Naylor, N. Bhullar, and M. A. Akeroyd. 2013. “A Short Form of the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale Suitable for Clinical Use: The SSQ12.” International Journal of Audiology 52 (6): 409–412. doi:10.3109/14992027.2013.781278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanchez-Lopez, R., M. Fereczkowski, S. Santurette, T. Dau, and T. Neher. 2021. “Towards Auditory Profile-Based Hearing-Aid Fitting: Fitting Rationale and Pilot Evaluation.” Audiology Research 11 (1): 10–21. doi:10.3390/audiolres11010002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders, J., T. M. Stoody, J. E. Weber, and G. H. Mueller. 2015. “Manufacturers’ NAL-NL2 Fittings Fail Real-Ear Verification One More Reason Why Probe-Mic Verification is Crucial in Any Best Practice Protocol.” Hearing Reviews 22 (3): 24.
   Google Scholar
• Scollie, S.,. R. Seewald, L. Cornelisse, S. Moodie, M. Bagatto, et al. 2005. “The Desired Sensation Level Multistage Input/Output Algorithm.” Trends in Amplification 9 (4): 159–197. doi:10.1177/108471380500900403
   Google Scholar
• Smeds, K., M. Dahlquist, Carsten Paludan-Müller, J. Larsson, S. Hertzman, and S. Båsjö. 2015. “Proprietary Hearing Aid Gain Prescriptions: Changes over Time.” Hearing Review 22 (5): 16.
   Google Scholar
• Valente, M., K. Oeding, A. Brockmeyer, S. Smith, and D. Kallogjeri. 2018. “Differences in Word and Phoneme Recognition in Quiet, Sentence Recognition in Noise, and Subjective Outcomes between Manufacturer First-Fit and Hearing Aids Programmed to NAL-NL2 Using Real-Ear Measures.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 29 (08): 706–721. doi:10.3766/jaaa.17005.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wolff, A. 2019. Health-Related Quality of Life following Hearing Aid Treatment: A Large Cohort Study. Aalborg, Denmark: Aalborg Universitetsforlag.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, L. L. N., L. Hickson, and B. McPherson. 2003. “Hearing Aid Satisfaction: What Does Research from the past 20 Years Say?” Trends in Amplification 7 (4): 117–161. doi:10.1177/108471380300700402.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar