2,250
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Focusing on positive listening experiences improves hearing aid outcomes in experienced hearing aid users

ORCID Icon, , , &
Pages 420-430 | Received 02 Sep 2022, Accepted 03 Mar 2023, Published online: 02 Apr 2023

References

  • Bentler, R. A., D. P. Niebuhr, T. A. Johnson, and G. A. Flamme. 2003. “Impact of digital labeling on outcome measures.” Ear and Hearing, 24 (3): 215–224. doi:10.1097/01.AUD.0000069228.46916.92.
  • British Society of Audiology. 2018. Guidance on the verification of hearing devices using probe microphone measurements. http://www.thebsa.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Procedure-for-Processing-Documents.pdf
  • Cox, R., M. Hyde, S. Gatehouse, W. Noble, H. Dillon, R. Bentler, D. Stephens, S. Arlinger, L. Beck, D. Wilkerson, et al. 2000. “Optimal outcome measures, research priorities, and international cooperation.” Ear and Hearing 21 (4 Suppl):106S–115S. doi:10.1097/00003446-200008001-00014.
  • Dawes, P., R. Hopkins, and K. J. Munro. 2013. “Placebo effects in hearing-aid trials are reliable.” International Journal of Audiology 52 (7): 472–477. doi:10.3109/14992027.2013.783718.
  • Dawes, P., S. Powell, and K. J. Munro. 2011. “The placebo effect and the influence of participant expectation on hearing aid trials.” Ear and Hearing 32 (6): 767–774. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e3182251a0e.
  • Dillon, H., J. Day, S. Bant, and K. J. Munro. 2020. “Adoption, use and non-use of hearing aids: a robust estimate based on Welsh national survey statistics.” International Journal of Audiology 59 (8): 567–573. doi:10.1080/14992027.2020.1773550.
  • Dillon, H., A. James, and J. Ginis. 1997. “Client oriented scale of improvement (COSI) and its relationship to several other measures of benefit and satisfaction provided by hearing aids.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 8 (1): 27–43.
  • EHIMA 2018-2022. EuroTrak Country Market Surveys. https://www.ehima.com/surveys/
  • Ferguson, M., A. Woolley, and K. J. Munro. 2016. “The impact of self-efficacy, expectations, and readiness on hearing aid outcomes.” International Journal of Audiology 55: S34–S41. doi:10.1080/14992027.2016.1177214.
  • Gatehouse, S. 1994. “Components and determinants of hearing aid benefit.” Ear and Hearing 15 (1): 30–49. doi: 10.1097/00003446-199402000-00005.
  • Goy, H., M. K. Pichora-Fuller, G. Singh, and F. A. Russo. 2018. “Hearing aids benefit recognition of words in emotional speech but not emotion identification.” Trends in Hearing 22: 2331216518801736. doi:10.1177/2331216518801736.
  • Hanson, R., S. Shapiro, E. Hutton-Thamm, M. R. Hagerty, and S. K.p. 2021. “Learning to learn from positive experiences.” The Journal of Positive Psychology 18 (1): 142–153. doi:10.1080/17439760.2021.2006759.
  • Jerram, J. C., and S. C. Purdy. 2001. “Technology, expectations, and adjustment to hearing loss: predictors of hearing aid outcome.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 12 (2): 64–79.
  • Jespersen, C. T., M. Bille, and J. V. Legarth. 2014. “Psychometric properties of a revised Danish translation of the international outcome inventory for hearing aids (IOI-HA).” International Journal of Audiology 53 (5): 302–308. doi:10.3109/14992027.2013.874049.
  • John, O. P., E. M. Donahue, and R. L. Kentle. 1991. The Big Five Inventory–Versions 4a and 54. Berkeley, CA: University of California, Berkeley, Institute of Personality and Social Research.
  • John, O. P., L. P. Naumann, and C. J. Soto. 2008. “Paradigm shift to the integrative Big Five trait taxonomy: history, measurement, and conceptual issues.” In O. P.John, R. W. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 114–158). New York: Guildford Press.
  • Kim, G., Y. S. Cho, H. M. Byun, H. Y. Seol, J. Lim, J. G. Park, and I. J. Moon. 2022. “Factors influencing hearing aid satisfaction in South Korea.” Yonsei Medical Journal, 63 (6): 570–577. doi:10.3349/ymj.2022.63.6.570.
  • Kirkwood, D. H. 2005. “Dispenser surveyed on what leads to patient satisfaction.” The Hearing Journal 58 (4): 19–26. doi:10.1097/01.HJ.0000286603.76729.a2.
  • Kochkin, S. 2010. “MarkeTrak VIII: consumer satisfaction with hearing aids is slowly increasing.” The Hearing Journal 63 (1): 19–32. doi:10.1097/01.HJ.0000366912.40173.76.
  • Kuk, F. 2012. “In-situ thresholds for hearing aid fittings.” Hearing Review 19 (11): 26–30.
  • Lambert, N. M., A. M. Gwinn, R. F. Baumeister, A. Strachman, I. J. Washburn, S. L. Gable, and F. D. Fincham. 2012. “A boost of positive affect: the perks of sharing positive experiences.” Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 30 (1): 24–43. doi:10.1177/0265407512449400.
  • Leijon, A., H. Dillon, L. Hickson, M. Kinkel, S. E. Kramer, and P. Nordqvist. 2021. “Analysis of data from the international outcome inventory for hearing aids (IOI-HA) using Bayesian item response theory.” International Journal of Audiology 60 (2): 81–88. doi:10.1080/14992027.2020.1813338.
  • Lelic, D., F. Wolters, P. Herrlin, and K. Smeds. 2022. “Assessment of hearing-related lifestyle based on the common sound scenarios framework.” American Journal of Audiology, 31 (4): 1299–1311. doi:10.1044/2022_AJA-22-00079.
  • Meyer, C., L. Hickson, A. Khan, and D. Walker. 2014. “What is important for hearing aid satisfaction? Application of the expectancy-disconfirmation model.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 25 (7): 644–655. doi:10.3766/jaaa.25.7.3.
  • Neeman, R. K., C. Muchnik, M. Hildesheimer, and Y. Henkin. 2012. “Hearing aid satisfaction and use in the advanced digital era.” The Laryngoscope 122 (9): 2029–2036. doi:10.1002/lary.23404.
  • Rakita, L., H. Goy, and G. Singh. 2022. “Descriptions of hearing aids influence the experience of listening to hearing aids.” Ear and Hearing 43 (3): 785–793. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000001130.
  • Rammstedt, B., and O. P. John. 2007. “Measuring personality in one minute or less: a 10-item short version of the big five inventory in English and German.” Journal of Research in Personality 41 (1): 203–212. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2006.02.001.
  • Ross, F. 2020. “Hearing aid accompanying smartphone apps in hearing healthcare. A systematic review.” Applied Medical Informatics 42 (4): 189–199.
  • Rozin, P., and E. B. Royzman. 2001. “Negativity bias, negativity dominance, and ontagion.” Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5 (4): 296–320. doi:10.1207/S15327957PSPR0504_2.
  • Saunders, G. H., L. K. Dillard, M. T. Frederick, and S. C. Silverman. 2019. “Examining the utility of photovoice as an audiological counseling tool.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 30 (5): 406–416. doi:10.3766/jaaa.18034.
  • Saunders, G. H., M. T. Frederick, S. C. Silverman, C. Nielsen, and A. Laplante-Levesque. 2016. “Health behavior theories as predictors of hearing-aid uptake and outcomes.” International Journal of Audiology 55 (Suppl 3): S59–S68. doi:10.3109/14992027.2016.1144240.
  • Wolters, F., K. Smeds, E. Schmidt, E. K. Christensen, and C. Norup. 2016. “Common Sound Scenarios: a context-driven categorization of everyday sound environments for application in hearing-device research.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 27 (7): 527–540. doi:10.3766/jaaa.15105.
  • Wong, L. L., L. Hickson, and B. McPherson. 2003. Hearing aid satisfaction: what does research from the past 20 years say? Trends in Hearing 7 (4): 117–161. doi:10.1177/108471380300700402.
  • Wong, L. L. N., L. Hickson, and B. McPherson. 2009. “Satisfaction with hearing aids: a consumer research perspective.” International Journal of Audiology 48 (7): 405–427. doi:10.1080/14992020802716760.
  • Wu, Y. H., H. C. Ho, S. H. Hsiao, R. B. Brummet, and O. Chipara. 2016. Predicting three-month and 12-month post-fitting real-world hearing-aid outcome using pre-fitting acceptable noise level (ANL). International Journal of Audiology 55 (5): 285–294. doi:10.3109/14992027.2015.1120892.