An easy method to determine crucial AMEI performance parameters from clinical routine data in individuals - Part 1: maximum output

References

• Baumgartner, W. D., K. Böheim, R. Hagen, et al. 2010. “The Vibrant Soundbridge for Conductive and Mixed Hearing Losses: European Multicenter Study Results.” Advances in Oto-Rhino-Laryngology (Basel) 69: 38–50. https://doi.org/10.1159/issn.0065-3071.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beltrame, A. M., A. Martini, S. Prosser, N. Giarbini, and C. Streitberger. 2009. “Coupling the Vibrant Soundbridge to cochlea round window: auditory results in patients with mixed hearing loss.” Otology & Neurotology: official Publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology 30 (2): 194–201. https://doi.org/10.1097/mao.0b013e318180a495.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busch, S., T. Lenarz, and H. Maier. 2024. “An Easy Method to Determine Crucial AMEI Performance Parameters from Clinical Routine Data in Individuals - Part 2: Dynamic Range.” International Journal of Audiology. under review.
   Google Scholar
• Carlsson, P. U., and B. E. Håkansson. 1997. “The Bone-Anchored Hearing Aid: Reference Quantities and Functional Gain.” Ear and Hearing 18 (1): 34–41. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003446-199702000-00004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillon, H., and L. Storey. 1998. “The National Acoustic Laboratories’ Procedure for Selecting the Saturation Sound Pressure Level of Hearing Aids: Theoretical Derivation.” Ear and Hearing 19 (4): 255–266. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003446-199808000-00001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Union. 2017. “European_Parliament_and_the_Council_of_the_European_Union'. Regulation (EU) 2017/745 of the European Parliament and of the the Council of 5 April 2017 on medical devices.” Official Journal of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Ghoncheh, M., S. Busch, T. Lenarz, and H. Maier. 2024. “A Novel Method to Determine the Maximum Output of Individual Patients for an Active Transcutaneous Bone Conduction Implant Using Clinical Routine Data.” Ear and Hearing 45 (1): 219–226. https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000001415.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodgetts, W. E., and S. D. Scollie. 2017. “DSL Prescriptive Targets for Bone Conduction Devices: Adaptation and Comparison to Clinical Fittings.” International Journal of Audiology 56 (7): 521–530. https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2017.1302605.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodgetts, W., D. Scott, P. Maas, and L. Westover. 2018. “Development of a Novel Bone Conduction Verification Tool Using a Surface Microphone: Validation With Percutaneous Bone Conduction Users.” Ear and Hearing 39 (6): 1157–1164. https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000000572.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knölke, N., D. Murawski, N. Wardenga, S. Busch, H. Maier, and T. Lenarz. 2022. “The Hannover Coupler V2: Audiological outcomes of a round window coupler for the Vibrant Soundbridge.” Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology 7 (3): 840–846. https://doi.org/10.1002/lio2.812.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahomed, F., D. W. Swanepoel, R. H. Eikelboom, and M. Soer. 2013. “Validity of Automated Threshold Audiometry: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.” Ear and Hearing 34 (6): 745–752. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aud.0000436255.53747.a4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mertens, G., J. Desmet, A. F. M. Snik, and P. Van de Heyning. 2014. “An Experimental Objective Method to Determine Maximum Output and Dynamic Range of an Active Bone Conduction Implant: The Bonebridge.” Otology & Neurotology: official Publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology 35 (7): 1126–1130. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000000347.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, M., R. Salcher, N. Prenzler, T. Lenarz, and H. Maier. 2018. “Redesign of the Hannover Coupler: Optimized Vibration Transfer from Floating Mass Transducer to Round Window.” BioMed Research International 2018: 3701954–3701958. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3701954.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persson, A.-C., B. Håkansson, M. Caveramma Mechanda, W. Bill Hodgetts, K.-J. Fredén Jansson, M. Eeg-Olofsson, and S. Reinfeldt. 2022. “A Novel Method for Objective In-Situ Measurement of Audibility in Bone Conduction Hearing Devices - A Pilot Study Using a Skin Drive BCD.” International Journal of Audiology 62 (4): 357–361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahne, T., and S. K. Plontke. 2022. “Systematic and Audiological Indication Criteria for Bone Conduction Devices and Active Middle Ear Implants.” Hearing Research 421: 108424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2021.108424.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajan, G. P., P. Lampacher, R. Ambett, G. Dittrich, J. Kuthubutheen, B. Wood, A. McArthur, and R. Marino. 2011. “Impact of Floating Mass Transducer Coupling and Positioning in Round Window Vibroplasty.” Otology & Neurotology: Official Publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology 32 (2): 271–277. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0b013e318206fda1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinfeldt, S., C. Rigato, B. Håkansson, K.-J. Fredén Jansson, and M. Eeg-Olofsson. 2019. “Nasal Sound Pressure as Objective Verification of Implant in Active Transcutaneous Bone Conduction Devices.” Medical Devices (Auckland, NZ) 12: 193–202. https://doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S197919.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schmuziger, N., R. Probst, and J. Smurzynski. 2004. “Test-Retest Reliability of Pure-Tone Thresholds from 0.5 to 16 kHz Using Sennheiser HDA 200 and Etymotic Research ER-2 Earphones.” Ear and Hearing 25 (2): 127–132. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aud.0000120361.87401.c8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snik, A. F. M., J. Noten, and C. Cremers. 2004. “Gain and Maximum Output of Two Electromagnetic Middle Ear Implants: Are Real Ear Measurements Helpful?” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 15 (3): 249–257. https://doi.org/10.3766/jaaa.15.3.7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wardenga, N., V. Diedrich, B. Waldmann, T. Lenarz, and H. Maier. 2020. “Hearing Aid Treatment in Patients with Mixed Hearing Loss. Part I: Expected Benefit and Limitations after Stapes Surgery.” Audiology & Neuro-Otology 25 (3): 125–132. https://doi.org/10.1159/000502994.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winter, M., B. P. Weber, and T. Lenarz. 2002. “Measurement Method for the Assessment of Transmission Properties of Implantable Hearing Aids.” Biomedizinische Technik. Biomedical Engineering 47 Suppl 1 Pt 2: 726–727. https://doi.org/10.1515/bmte.2002.47.s1b.726.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zahnert, T., H. Löwenheim, D. Beutner, R. Hagen, A. Ernst, H.-W. Pau, T. Zehlicke, H. Kühne, N. Friese, A. Tropitzsch, et al. 2016. “Multicenter Clinical Trial of Vibroplasty Couplers to Treat Mixed/Conductive Hearing Loss: First Results.” Audiology & Neuro-Otology 21 (4): 212–222. https://doi.org/10.1159/000444616.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwartenkot, J. W., A. F. M. Snik, E. A. M. Mylanus, and J. J. S. Mulder. 2014. “Amplification Options for Patients With Mixed Hearing Loss.” Otology & Neurotology: Official Publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology 35 (2): 221–226. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000000258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwartenkot, J., A. Snik, M. Kompis, and C. Stieger. 2012. “Gain and Maximum Output of Implantable Hearing Devices in Patients with Moderate to Severe Sensorineural Hearing Loss.” Journal of Hearing Science 2 (3): 35–40. https://doi.org/10.17430/883511.
   Google Scholar