The HCR-20 Version 3: A Case Study in Risk Formulation

REFERENCES

• Ackley, C. N., Mack, S. M., Beyer, K., & Erdberg, P. (2011). Investigative and forensic interviewing: A personality-focused approach. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bieling, P. J., & Kuyken, W. (2003). Is cognitive case formulation science or science fiction? Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 10, 52–69. doi: 10.1093/clipsy.10.1.52
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vogel, V., de Ruiter, C., Bouman, Y., & de Vries Robbé, M. (2009). SAPROF: Guidelines for the assessment of protective factors for violence risk. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Forum Educatief.
   Google Scholar
• de Vogel, V., de Ruiter, C., Bouman, Y., & de Vries Robbé, M. (2012). SAPROF, Structured Assessment of PROtective Factors for violence risk. Utrecht, the Netherlands: Forum Educatief.
   Google Scholar
• de Vries Robbé, M., & de Vogel, V. (2013). Protective factors for violence risk: Bringing balance to risk assessment and management. In C. Logan & L. Johnstone (Eds.), Managing clinical risk: A guide to effective practice (pp. 293–310). Oxford, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, K. S., Blanchard, A.J.E., & Hendry, M. C. (2013). Violence risk assessment and management: Putting structured professional judgement into practice. In C. Logan & L. Johnstone (Eds.), Managing clinical risk: A guide to effective practice (pp. 29–55). Oxford, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, K. S., Hart, S. D., Webster, C. D., & Belfrage, H. (2013). HCR-20: Assessing Risk for Violence, third edition. Vancouver, Canada: Mental Health, Law and Policy Institute, Simon Fraser University.
   Google Scholar
• Drennan, G., & Alred, D. (2012). Secure recovery: approaches to recovery in forensic mental health settings. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Eells, T. D., Kendjelic, E. M., & Lucas, C. P. (1998). What is a case formulation? Development and use of a content coding manual. Journal of Psychotherapy Practice and Research, 7, 144–153.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hart, S. D., & Logan, C, (2011). Formulation of violence risk using evidence-based assessments: The structured professional judgment approach. In P. Sturmey and M. McMurran (Eds.) Forensic case formulation (pp. 83–106). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9781119977018.ch4
   Google Scholar
• Hart, S. D., Kropp, P. K., Laws, D. R. Klaver, J., Logan, C. & Watt, K. A. (2003). The Risk for Sexual Violence Protocol: Structured professional guidelines for assessing risk of sexual violence. Mental Health, Law and Policy Institute. Vancouver, Canada: Simon Fraser University.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, S. D., Sturmey, P., Logan, C., & McMurran, M. M. (2011). Forensic case formulation. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 10, 118–126. doi: 10.1080/14999013.2011.577137
   Google Scholar
• Johnstone, L. (2013). Working with complex cases: Mental disorder and violence. In C. Logan & L. Johnstone (Eds.), Managing clinical risk: A guide to effective practice (pp. 56–88). Oxford, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Logan, C. (2013). Risk assessment: Specialist interviewing skills for forensic practitioners. In C. Logan & L. Johnstone (Eds.), Managing clinical risk: A guide to effective practice (pp. 259–292). Oxford, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Logan, C., Nathan, R., & Brown, A. (2011). Formulation in clinical risk assessment and management. In R.W. Whittington & C. Logan (Eds.), Self-harm and Violence: Towards best practice in managing risk (pp. 187–204). Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9781119991175.ch10
   Google Scholar
• Meloy, J. R. (2005). The forensic interview. In R. J. Craig (Ed.), Clinical and diagnostic interviewing (pp. 422–443). Lanham, MD: Jason Aronson Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Minoudis, P., Craissati, J., Shaw, J., McMurran, M. M., Freestone, M., Chuan, S. J., & Leonard, A. (2013). An evaluation of case formulation training and consultation with probation officers. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 23, 252–262. doi: 10.1002/cbm.1890
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nezu, A. M., & Nezu, C. M. (Eds.) (1989). Clinical decision-making in behavior therapy: A problem-solving perspective. Champaign, IL: Research Press.
   Google Scholar
• Persons, J. B. (1989). Cognitive therapy in practice: A case formulation approach. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Reid, W. H. & Thorne, S. A. (2007). Personality disorders and violence potential. Journal of Psychiatric Practice, 13, 261–268. doi: 10.1097/01.pra.0000281488.19570.f8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shea, S. C. (2007). Clinical interviewing: Practical tips from master clinicians. Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 30, 145–315. doi: 10.1016/j.psc.2007.03.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarrier, N. (2006). Case formulation in cognitive behaviour therapy: The treatment of challenging and complex cases. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Webster, C. D., Douglas, K., Eaves, D. & Hart, S. (1997). HCR-20: Assessing Risk for Violence, second edition. Vancouver, Canada: Mental Health, Law and Policy Institute, Simon Fraser University and the British Columbia Forensic Psychiatric Services Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Weerasekera, P. (1996). Multiperspective case formulation: A step toward treatment integration. Malabar, FL: Krieger.
   Google Scholar