What Do Juvenile Probation Officers Think of Using the SAVRY and YLS/CMI for Case Management, and Do They Use the Instruments Properly?

REFERENCES

• Allen, N. E., Watt, K. A., & Hess, J. Z. (2008). A qualitative study of the activities and outcomes of domestic violence coordinating councils. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41, 63–73. doi:10.1007/s10464-007-9149-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, D. A. & Bonta, J. (1995). LSI-R: The Level of Service Inventory-Revised. Toronto, ON, Canada: Multi-Health Systems, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Arkes, H. R. (1981). Impediments to accurate clinical judgment and possible ways to minimize their impact. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 49, 323–330. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.49.3.323
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aspel, A. D., Willis, W. G., & Faust, D. (1998). School psychologists’ diagnostic decision-making processes: Objective-subjective discrepancies. Journal of School Psychology, 36, 137–149. doi:10.1016/S0022-4405(98)00002-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baird, C. ( February 2009). A question of evidence: A critique of risk assessment models used in the justice system. Special Report. National Council on Crime and Delinquency.
   Google Scholar
• Berg, B. L. (2004). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Bilchik, S. (1999). Juvenile Justice: A Century of Change (Report). Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile and Delinquency Prevention. Available online at: http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/ojjdp/178995.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Blanchard, A., & Douglas, K. S. (2011, March). APLS Undergraduate Paper Award (First Place): The Historical-Clinical-Risk Management-Version 3: The inclusion of idiographic relevance ratings in violence risk assessment. Invited poster presented at the annual convention of the American-Psychology Law Society, Miami, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Bornstein, R. F. (1989). Exposure and affect: overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968–1987. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 265–289. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.106.2.265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borum, R., Bartel, P., & Forth, A. (2006). Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth (SAVRY). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Crocker, A. G., Braithwaite, E., Laferrière, D., Gagnon, D., Venegas, C., & Jenkins, T. (2011). START changing practice: Implementing a risk assessment and management instrument in a civil psychiatric setting. The International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 10, 13–28. doi: 10.1080/14999013.2011.553146
   Google Scholar
• Desmarais, S. L., Sellers, B. G., Viljoen, J. L., Cruise, K. R., Nicholls, T. L., & Dvoskin, J. A. (2012). Pilot implementation and preliminary evaluation of START:AV assessments in secure juvenile correctional facilities. The International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 11(3), 150–164. doi:10.1080/14999013.2012.737405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desmarais, S. L., Van Dorn, R. A., Telford, R. P., Petrila, J., & Coffey, T. (2012). Characteristics of START assessments completed in mental health jail diversion programs. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 30, 448–469. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, K. S., & Kropp, P. R. (2002). A prevention-based paradigm for violence risk assessment: Clinical and research applications. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 29(5), 617–658. doi: 10.1177/009385402236735
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, K. S., Hart, S. D., Groscup, J. L., & Litwack, T. R. (2014). Assessing violence risk. In I. B. Weiner & R. K. Otto (Eds.), The Handbook of Forensic Psychology, 4th Edition (pp. 385–441). New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, K. S., Hart, S. D., Webster, C. D., & Belfrage, H. (2013). HCR-20 V3: Assessing risk of violence – User guide. Burnaby, Canada: Mental Health, Law, and Policy Institute, Simon Fraser University.
   Google Scholar
• Doyle, M., Lewis, G., & Brisbane, M. (2008). Implementing the Short-term Assessment of Risk and Treatability in a forensic mental health service. Psychiatric Bulletin, 32, 406–408. doi:10.1192/pb.bp.108.019.794
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, J., Young, D. W., & Taxman, F. S. (2011). Effects of organizational factors on use of juvenile supervision practices. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38, 565v583. doi:10.1177/0093854811401786
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fixsen, D. L., Naoom, S. F., Blase, K. A., Friedman, R. M. & Wallace, F. (2005). Implementation research: A synthesis of the literature. Tampa, FL: University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, The National Implementation Research Network (FMHI Publication #231).
   Google Scholar
• Flores, A. W., Lowenkamp, C. T., Holsinger, A. M., & Latessa, E. J. (2006). Predicting outcome with the Level of Service Inventory-Revised: The importance of implementation integrity. Journal of Criminal Justice, 34, 523–529. doi:10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2006.09.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gauron, E. F., & Dickinson, J. K. (1966). Diagnostic decision making in psychiatry. Archives of General Psychiatry, 14, 225–232. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1996.01730090001001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guy, L. S. (2008). Performance indicators of the structured professional judgement approach for assessing risk for violence to others: A meta-analytic survey. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Burnaby, BC, Canada: Simon Fraser University.
   Google Scholar
• Guy, L. S., Hart, S. D., & Douglas, K. S. (in press). Risk assessment and communication. In B. Cutler & P. Zapf (Eds.), APA handbook of forensic psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Hanson, R. K., & Morton-Bourgon, K. E. (2009). The accuracy of recidivism risk assessments for sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of 118 prediction studies. Psychological Assessment, 21, 1–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, S. D., Kropp, P. R., Laws, D. R., Klaver, J., Logan, C., & Watt, K. A. (2003). The risk for sexual violence protocol (RSVP): Structured professional guidelines for assessing risk of sexual violence. Vancouver, BC, Canada: The Mental Health, Law, and Policy Institute, Simon Fraser University, Pacific Psychological Assessment Corporation, British Columbia Institute Against Family Violence.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, S. D., Sturmey, P., Logan, C., & McMurran, M. (2011). Forensic case formulation. The International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 10, 118–126. doi:10.1080/14999013.2011.577137
   Google Scholar
• Hoge, R. D., & Andrews, D. A. (2002). Youth Level of Service/Case Management Inventory: User's manual, North Tonawanda, NY: Multi-Health Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Hoge, R. D., & Andrews, D. A. (2010). Youth Level of Service/Case Management Inventory: User's manual, Version 2.0. North Tonawanda, NY: Multi-Health Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Hoge, R. D., Vincent, G., & Guy, L. S. (2012). Prediction and risk/needs assessment. In R. Loeber & D. Farrington (Eds.), From juvenile delinquency to adult crime: Criminal careers, justice policy, and prevention (pp. 150–183). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Juvenile Accountability Incentive Block Grant, P.L. 105–109.
   Google Scholar
• Juvenile Justice Delinquency and Prevention Act (JJDPA). (2002). Public Law 107–273, 42.
   Google Scholar
• Kroppan, E., Nesset, M. B., Nonstad, K., Pedersen, T. W., Almvik, R., Palmstierna, T. (2011). Implementation of the Short Term Assessment of Risk and Treatability (START) in a forensic high secure unit. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 10, 7–12. doi:10.1080/14999013.2011.552368
   Google Scholar
• Lipsey, M. W. (2009). The primary factors that characterize effective interventions with juvenile offenders: A meta-analytic overview. Victim and Offenders, 4, 124–147. doi:10.1080/15564880802612573
   Google Scholar
• Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (1998). Effective intervention for serious juvenile offenders: A synthesis of research. In R. Loeber & D. P. Farrington (Eds.), Serious & violent juvenile offenders: Risk factors and successful interventions (p. 507). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Livsey, S. (2012). Juvenile delinquency probation caseload, 2009. OJJDP Factsheet (NCJ 239082). Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. Retrieved from http://www.ncjj.org/pdf/Livsey_JuvDelinquencyProbation09.pdf
   Google Scholar
• McNiel, D. E., Chamberlain, J. R., Weaver, C. M., Hall, S. E., Fordwood, S. R., & Binder, R. L. (2008). Impact of clinical training on violence risk assessment. American Journal of Psychiatry, 165, 195–200. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2007.06081396
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meehl, P. E. (1954). Clinical versus statistical prediction: A theoretical analysis and a review of the evidence. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mulvey, E. P., & Iselin, A. R. (2008). Improving professional judgments of risk and amenability in juvenile justice. The Future of Children, 18, 35–57. doi: 10.1353/foc.0.0012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholls, T., Petersen, K. L., Brink, J., & Webster, C. (2011). A clinical and risk profile of forensic psychiatric patients: Treatment team STARTs in a Canadian service. The International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 10(3), 187–199. doi:10.1080/14999013.2011.600234
   Google Scholar
• Nonstad, K., & Webster, C. D. (2011). How to fail in the implementation of a risk assessment scheme or any other new procedure in your organization. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 81, 94–99. doi:10.1111/j.1939-0025.2010.01076.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olver, M., Stockdale, K., & Wormith, J. (2009). Risk assessment with young offenders: A meta-analysis of three assessment measures. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36, 329–353. doi:10.1177/0093854809331457
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pope, C., Ziebland, S., & Mays, N. (2000). Qualitative research in health care: Analyzing qualitative data. British Medical Journal, 320, 114–116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, B. J., McMillen, J., Proctor, E. K., Carpenter, C. R., Griffey, R. T., Bunger, A. C., …, & York, J. L. (2012). A compilation of strategies for implementing clinical innovations in health and mental health. Medical Care Research And Review, 69(2), 123–157. doi:10.1177/1077558711430690
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proctor, E. K., Landsverk, J., Aarons, G., Chambers, D., Glisson, C., & Mittman, B. (2009). Implementation research in mental health services: An emerging science with conceptual, methodological, and training challenges. Administration And Policy In Mental Health And Mental Health Services Research, 36(1), 24–34. doi:10.1007/s10488-008-0197-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proctor, E. K., & Rosen, A. (2008). From knowledge production to implementation: Research challenges and imperatives. Research on Social Work Practice, 18(4), 285–291. doi:10.1177/1049731507302263
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proctor, E., Silmere, H., Raghavan, R., Hovmand, P., Aarons, G., Bunger, A., …, & Hensley, M. (2011). Outcomes for implementation research: Conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 38(2), 65–76. doi:10.1007/s10488-010-0319-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds, K., & Miles, H. L. (2009). The effect of training on the quality of HCR-20 violence risk assessments in forensic secure services. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 20, 473–480. doi:10.1080/14789940802638366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savaya, R., Monnickendam, M., & Waysman, M. (2000). An assessment of the utilization of a Computerized Decision Support System for youth probation officers. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 17, 1–14. doi:10.1300/J017v17n04_01
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, A. L., Ervin, L., & Snyder-Joy, Z. (1996). Further exploration of the flight from discretion: The role of risk/needs instruments in probation supervision decisions. Journal of Criminal Justice, 24, 109–121. doi:10.1016/0047-2352(95)00059-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shook, J. J., & Sarri, R. C. (2007). Structured decision making in juvenile justice: Judges’ and probation officers’ perceptions and use. Children and Youth Services Review, 29, 1335–1351. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2007.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storey, J. E., Gibas, A. L., Reeves, K. A., & Hart, S. D. (2011). Evaluation of a violence risk (threat) assessment program for police and other criminal justice professionals. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38, 554–564. doi:10.1177/0093854811403123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Towberman, D. B. (1992). A national survey of juvenile risk assessment. Juvenile & Family Court Journal, 43, 61–67. doi:10.1111/j.1755-6988.1992.tb00720.x
   Google Scholar
• Vaswani, N., & Merone, L. (2013). Are there risks with risk assessment? A study of the predictive accuracy of the Youth Level of Service–Case Management Inventory with young offenders in Scotland. British Journal of Social Work, 1–19. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bct059
   Google Scholar
• Vieira, T. A., Skilling, T. A., & Peterson-Badali, M. (2009). Matching court-ordered services with treatment needs. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36, 385–401. doi:10.1177/0093854808331249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vincent, G. M., Guy, L. S., & Grisso, T. (2012). Risk assessment in juvenile justice: A guidebook for implementation. John D. & Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation. Available online at: http://www.nysap.us/Risk%20Guidebook.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Vincent, G. M., Guy, L. S., Fusco, S. L., & Gershenson, B. G. (2012). Field reliability of the SAVRY with probation officers: Implications for training. Law and Human Behavior, 36, 225–236. doi:10.1007/s10979-011-9284-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vincent, G. M., Guy, L. S., & Gershenson, B. G., & McCabe, P. (2012). Does risk assessment make a difference? Results of implementing the SAVRY in juvenile probation. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 30, 384–405. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vincent, G. M., Paiva-Salisbury, M., Cook, N. E., Guy, L. S., & Perrault, R. T. (2012). Impact of risk/needs assessment on juvenile probation officers’ decision-making: Importance of implementation. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 18, 549–576. doi:10.1037/a0027186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vincent, G. M., Terry, A., & Maney, S. (2009). Risk/needs tools for antisocial behavior and violence among youthful populations. In J. Andrade (Ed.), Handbook of violence risk assessment and treatment for forensic mental health practitioners (pp. 337–424). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Webster, C. D., Douglas, K., Eaves, D. & Hart, S. (1997). HCR-20: Assessing risk for violence, Version 2. Burnaby, BC, Canada: Simon Fraser University.
   Google Scholar
• Webster, C. D., Martin, M., Brink, J., Nicholls, T. L., & Desmarais S. L. (2009). Manual for the Short-Term Assessment of Risk and Treatability (START) (Version 1.1). Coquitlam, Canada: Forensic Psychiatric Services Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Zajonc, R. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 1–27. doi:10.1037/h0025848. ISSN 1939-1315.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar