Improving Accuracy of Risk Prediction for Violence: Does Changing the Outcome Matter?

REFERENCES

• Coid, J. W., Yang, M., Ullrich, S., Zhang, T., Roberts, A., Roberts, C., …, Farrington, D. P. (2007). Predicting and understanding risk of re-offending: the Prisoner Cohort Study. (6). London, UK: Ministry of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Coid, J. W., Yang, M., Ullrich, S., Zhang, T., Sizmur, S., Roberts, C., …, Rogers, R. D. (2009). Gender differences in structured risk assessment: Comparing the accuracy of five instruments.. Journal of Consulting and Criminal Psychology, 77(2), 337–348. doi: 10.1037/a0015155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Copas, J. B., & Marshall, P. (1998). The Offender Group Reconviction Scale: the statistical reconviction score for use by probation officers. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 47, 159–171. doi: 10.1111/1467-9876.00104.
   Google Scholar
• de Vogel, V., de Vries Robbé, M., van Kalmthout, W., & Place, C. (2010). Female additional manual: Additional guidelines to the HCR-20 for assessing risk for violence in women. Utrecht, Netherlands: van der Hoeven Kliniek.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, K. S., Ogloff, J. R., Nicholls, T. L., & Grant, I. (1999). Assessing risk for violence among psychiatric patients: the HCR-20 Violence Risk Assessment Scheme and the Psychopathy Checklist: Screening Version. Journal of Consulting and Criminal Psychology, 67(6), 917–930. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.67.6.917.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, K. S., & Skeem, J. L. (2005). Violence risk assessment: Getting specific about being dynamic. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 11(3), 347–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, K. S., Yeomans, M., & Boer, D. (2005). Comparative validity of multiple measures of violence risk in a sample of criminal offenders. Criminal Justice and Behaviour, 32, 479–510. doi: 10.1177/0093854805278411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle, M., Dolan, M., & McGovern, J. (2002). The validity of North American risk assessment tools in predicting inpatient violent behaviour in England. Legal & Crimininological Psychology, 7, 141–154. doi: 10.1348/135532502760274756.
   Google Scholar
• Farrington, D. P. (1991). Childhood aggression and adult violence: early precursors and later life outcomes. In P. D.J. & K. H. Rubin (Eds.), The development and treatment of childhood aggression (pp. 5–29). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Farrington, D. P., Piquero, A. R., & Jennings, W. G. (2013). Offending from childhood to late middle age. London, UK: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Forouzan, E., & Cooke, D. J. (2005). Figuring out la femme fatale: Conceptual and assessment issues concerning psychopathy in females. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 23, 765–778. doi: 10.1002/bsl.669.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friendship, C., Thornton, D., Erikson, M., & Beech, A. (2001). Reconviction: A critique and comparison of two main data sources in England and Wales. Legal & Criminological Psychology, 6(1), 121–129. doi: 10.1348/135532501168235.
   Google Scholar
• Gendreau, P., Goggin, C., & Smith, P. (2002). Is the PCL-R really the ‘unparalleled’ measure of offender risk? A lesson in Knowledge accumulation. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 29, 397–426. doi: 10.1177/0093854802029004004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glover, A., Nicholson, D., Hemmati, T., Bernfeld, G., & Quinsey, V. (2002). A comparison of predictors of general and violent recidivism among high risk federal offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 29, 235–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grove, W. M., & Meehl, P. E. (1996). Comparative efficiency of informal (subjective, impressionistic) and formal (mechanical, algorithmic) prediction procedures: The clinical-statistical controversy. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 2, 293–323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grunfeld, B., & Noreik, K. (1986). Recidivism among Sex offenders: A follow-up study of 541 Norwegian sex offenders. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 9(1), 95–102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanson, R. K., & Harris, A. J. R. (2000). Where should we intervene? Dynamic predictors of sexual offense recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 27(1), 6–35. doi: 10.1177/0093854800027001002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hare, R. D. (2003). The Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (2nd Ed.) (PCL-R).Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Multi-Health Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, S. D., Michie, C., & Cooke, D. J. (2007). Precision of actuarial risk assessment instruments: Evaluating the `margins of error’ of group v. individual predictions of violence. British Journal of Psychiatry, 140(Suppl. 39), 139–170. doi: 10.1192/bjp.190.5.s60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemphill, J. F., Hare, R. D., & Wong, S. (1998). Psychopathy and recidivism: A review. Legal & Criminological Psychology, 3, 139–170.
   Google Scholar
• Hennekens, C. H., & Buring, J. F. (1987). Epidemiology in medicine. Boston, MA/Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Little Brown & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Hilterman, E. L., Nicholls, T. L., & van Nieuwenhuizen, C. (2013). Predictive validity of risk assessments in juvenile offenders: Comparing the SAVRY, PCL:YV, and YLS/CMI with unstructured clinical assessments. Assessment. doi: 10.1177/1073191113498113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, P., & Kershaw, C. (2000). Using criminal career data in evaluation. Paper presented at the British Criminology Conference. http://www.lboro.ac.uk/departments/ss/bsc/bccsp/vol03/howard.html.
   Google Scholar
• Klassen, D., & O’Connor, W. (1987). Demographic and case history variables in risk assessment. In J. Monahan & H. J. Steadman (Eds.), Violence and mental disorder. Developments in risk assessment (pp. 229–258). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kroner, D. G., & Mills, J. F. (2001). The accuracy of five risk appraisal instruments in predicting institutional misconduct and new convictions. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 28, 471–489. doi: 10.1177/009385480102800405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leistico, A. M., Salekin, R. T., DeCoster, J., & Rogers, R. (2008). A large-scale meta-analysis relating the hare measures of psychopathy to antisocial conduct. Law and Human Behaviour, 32(1), 28–45. doi: 10.1007/s10979-007-9096-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monahan, J., & Steadman, H. J. (1994). Toward a rejuvenation of risk assessment research. In J. Monahan & H. J. Steadman (Eds.), Violence and mental disorder. Developments in risk assessment (pp. 1–17). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Monahan, J., Steadman, H. J., Silver, E., Applebaum, P., Robbins, P., Mulvey, E., …, Banks, S. (2001). Rethinking risk assessment: The MacArthur Study of Mental Disorder and Violence. New York, NY: Oxford Univeristy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Quinsey, V., Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., & Cormier, C. A. (1998). Violent offenders: Appraising and managing risk. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Salekin, R., Rogers, R., & Sewell, K. (1996). A review and meta-analysis of the Psychopathy Checklist and Psychopathy Checklist—Revised: Predictive validity of dangerousness. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 3, 202–215. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2850.1996.tb00071.x.
   Google Scholar
• Serin, R. C. (1996). Violent recidivism in criminal psychopathy. Law and Human Behaviour, 20, 207–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, J. P., Grann, M., & Fazel, S. (2011). A comparative study of violence risk assessment tools: a systematic review and metaregression analysis of 68 studies involving 25,980 participants. Clinical Psychology Review, 31(3), 499–513. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2010.11.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, R. (1999). Predicting reconvictions for sexual and violent offences using the Revised Offender Group Reconviction Scale Home Office Research Findings (Vol. 104). London, UK: Home Office.
   Google Scholar
• Vincent, G. M., Guy, L. S., Fusco, S. L., & Gershenson, B. G. (2011). Field Reliability of the SAVRY with Juvenile Probation Officers: Implications for Training. Law and Human Behaviour. doi: 10.1007/s10979-011-9284-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster, C. D., Douglas, K. S., Eaves, D., & Hart, S. D. (1997). HCR-20: Assessing risk of violence ( 2nd ed.). Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada: Mental Health Law & Policy Institute, Simon Fraser University.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, M., Wong, S., & Coid, J. W. (2010). The efficacy of violence prediction: A meta-analytic comparison of risk assessment instruments using multilevel models. Psychological Bulletin, 136(5), 740–767. doi: 10.1037/a0020473.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar