Predictive Validity of the J-SOAP-II: Does Accuracy Differ Across Settings?

REFERENCES

• Aebi, M., Plattner, B., Steinhausen, H. C., & Bessler, C. (2011). Predicting sexual and non-sexual recidivism in a consecutive sample of juveniles convicted of sexual offences. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 23, 456–473. doi:10.1177/1079063210384634
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caldwell, M. F. (2010). Study characteristics and recidivism base rates in juvenile sex offender recidivism. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 54, 197–221. doi: 10.1177/0306624×08330016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caldwell, M. F., & Dickinson, C. (2009). Sex offender registration and recidivism risk in juvenile sexual offenders. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 27, 941–956. doi: 10.1002/bsl.907
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caldwell, M., Ziemke, M., & Vitacco, M. (2008). An examination of the sex offender registration and notification act as applied to juveniles: Evaluating the ability to predict sexual recidivism. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 14 (2), 89–114. doi: 10.1037/a0013241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu, C. M., Ng, K., Fong, J., Teoh, J. (2012). Assessing youth who sexually offended: the predictive validity of the ERASOR, J-SOAP-II, and YLS/CMI in a Western context. Sexual Abuse 24(2), 153–174. doi: 10.1177/1079063211404250
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2010). Crime in the United States, 2009. United States Department of Justice, Retrieved January 15, 2010 from http://www2.fbi.gov/ucr/cius2009/data/table_38.html
   Google Scholar
• Hanley, J. A., & McNeil, B. J. (1982). The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology, 143, 29–36. doi: 10.1148/radiology.143.1.7063747
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hempel, I., Buck, N., Cima, M., & van Marle, H. (2013). Review of risk assessment instruments for juvenile sex offenders: what is next? International Journal of Offender Therapy Comparative Criminology, 57, 208–228. doi: 10.1177/0306624×11428315
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez, R., Flores, J., & Rosenfeld, B. (2007). Validity of the Juvenile Sex Offender Assessment Protocol—II (J‑SOAP‑II) in a sample of urban minority youth. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 1284–1295. doi: 10.1177/0093854807301791
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miranda, A. O., & Corcoran, C. L. (2000). Comparison of perpetration characteristics between male juvenile and adult sexual offenders: Preliminary results. Sex Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 12, 179–188. doi: 10.1177/107906320001200302
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mossman, D. (1994). Assessing predictions of violence: Being accurate about accuracy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62, 783–792. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.62.4.783
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parks, G. A., & Bard, D. E. (2006). Risk factors for adolescent sex offender recidivism: Evaluation of predictive factors and comparison of three groups based upon victim type. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 18, 319–342. doi:10.1177/107906320601800402
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, J. (2010). Validation of the Juvenile Sex Offender Assessment Protocol (JSOAP-II) for predicting sexual and non-sexual crime (Master's thesis). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 1485587)
   Google Scholar
• Powers-Sawyers, A. B. & Minor, M. H. (2009). Actuarial prediction of juvenile recidivism: The static variables of the Juvenile Sex Offender Assessment Protocol-II (J-SOAP-II). Sexual Offender Treatment, 4 (2).
   Google Scholar
• Prentky, R. A., Li, N. C., Righthand, S., Schuler, A., Cavanaugh, D., & Lee, A. F. (2010). Assessing risk of sexually abusive behavior among youth in a child welfare sample. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 28, 24–45. doi: 10.1002/bsl.920
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prentky, R., & Righthand, S. (2003). Juvenile Sex Offender Assessment Protocol-II (J‑SOAP‑II) manual. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
   Google Scholar
• Rajlic, G., & Gretton, H. M. (2010). An examination of two sexual recidivism risk measures in adolescent offenders: The moderating effect of offender type. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37, 1066–1085. doi: 10.1177/0093854810376354
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rice, M. E., & Harris, G. T. (2005). Comparing effect sizes in follow-up studies: ROC Area, Cohen's d, and r. Law and Human Behavior, 29, 615–620.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snyder, H. N. (2000). Sexual assault of young children as reported to law enforcement: Victim, incident, and offender characteristics. Washington, DC: United States Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Viljoen, J., Mordell, S., & Beneteau, J. (2012). Prediction of adolescent sexual reoffending: a meta-analysis of the J-SOAP-II, ERASOR, J-SORRAT-II, and Static-99. Law and Human Behavior, 36(5), 423–438. doi: 10.1037/h0093938
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viljoen, J. L., Scalora, M., Cuadra, L., Bader, S., Chavez, V., Ullman, D., & Lawrence, L. (2008). Assessing risk for violence in adolescents who have sexually offended: A comparison of the J‑SOAP‑II, J-SORRAT-II, and SAVRY. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37, 732–743. doi: 10.1177/0093854807307521
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zolondek, S. C., Abel, G. G., Northey, W. F., & Jordan, A. D. (2001). The self-reported behaviors of juvenile sexual offenders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 16, 73–85. doi: 10.1177/088626001016001005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar