Staff Perceptions on the Implementation of Structured Risk Assessment with the START:AV: Identifying Barriers and Facilitators in a Residential Youth Care Setting

References

• Bhanwer, A., Shaffer, C., & Viljoen, J. L. (2016). Short-term Assessment of Risk and Treatability: Annotated Bibliography. British Columbia University, https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.36232.67845
   Google Scholar
• Boeije, H. (2010). Analysis in qualitative research. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Bonta, J., & Andrews, D. A. (2017). The psychology of criminal conduct (6th ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Borum, R., Bartel, P., & Forth, A. (2006). Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth. (Lodewijks, H., Doreleijers, T., de Ruiter, C., & de Wit-Grouls, H., Trans.). Psychological Assessment Resources. (Original work published 2006)
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Chenail, R. J. (2011). Interviewing the Investigator: Strategies for addressing instrumentation and researcher bias concerns in qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 16(1), 255–262. https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol16/iss1/16
   Google Scholar
• Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (n.d.). CFIR codebook. https://cfirguide.org/tools/tools-and-templates/
   Google Scholar
• Crocker, A. G., Garcia, A., Israël, M., Hindle, Y., Gagnon, D., Venegas, C., Braithwaite, E., Rot, M.-E. (2008). Implementing and using a systematic risk assessment scheme to increase patient safety on a risk management unit for individuals with severe mental illness: A demonstration project. Canadian Safety Patient Institute. http://crocker.mcgill.ca/docpdf/final_report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Damschroder, L. J., Aron, D. C., Keith, R. E., Kirsh, S. R., Alexander, J. A., & Lowery, J. C. (2009). Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: A consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implementation Science, 4(1), 50–66. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Beuf, T. L. F., de Vogel, V., & de Ruiter, C. (2019). Implementing the START:AV in a Dutch residential youth facility: Outcomes of success. Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 5(2), 193–205. https://doi.org/10.1037/tps0000193
   Google Scholar
• Desmarais, S. L. (2017). Commentary: Risk assessment in the age of evidence-based practice and policy. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 16(1), 18–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2016.1266422
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galdas, P. (2017). Revisiting bias in qualitative research: Reflections on its relationship with funding and impact [Editorial. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 160940691774899. ]. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917748992
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haque, Q. (2016). Implementation of violence risk assessment instruments in mental healthcare settings. In J. P. Singh, S. Bjorkly, & S. Fazel (Eds.), International perspectives on violence risk assessment. (pp. 40–52). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199386291.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Hilverdink, P., Daamen, W., Vink, C. (2015). Children and youth support and care in the Netherlands. Nederlands Jeugdinstituut. http://www.youthpolicy.nl/en/Download-NJi/Publicatie-NJi/Children-and-youth-support-and-care-in-The-Netherlands.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kirk, M. A., Kelley, C., Yankey, N., Birken, S. A., Abadie, B., & Damschroder, L. (2015). A systematic review of the use of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Implementation Science, 11(1), 72–84. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-016-0437-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koehler, J. A., Lösel, F., Akoensi, T. D., & Humphreys, D. K. (2013). A systematic review and meta-analysis on the effects of young offender treatment programs in Europe. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 9(1), 19–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-012-9159-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2014). Focus Groups. A practical guide for applied research (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Krueger, R. A. (2002). Designing and Conducting focus group interviews. Eastern Illinois University. http://www.eiu.edu/ihec/Krueger-FocusGroupInterviews.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Langan, J. (2010). Challenging assumptions about risk factors and the role of screening for violence risk in the field of mental health. Health, Risk & Society, 12(2), 85–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698571003632429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, S. K., Nilsen, P., Bendtsen, P., & Bulow, P. (2016). Structured risk assessment instruments: A systematic review of implementation determinants. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 23(4), 602–628. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2015.1084661
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masadeh, M. A. (2012). Focus group: reviews and practices. International Journal of Applied Science and Technology, 2(10), 63–69. http://ijastnet.com/journals/Vol_2_No_10_December_2012/9.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Müller-Isberner, R., Born, P., Eucker, S., & Eusterschulte, B. (2017). Implementation of evidence-based practices in forensic mental health services. In R. Roesch & A. N. Cook (Eds.), Handbook of forensic mental health services. (pp. 443–469). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nonstad, K., & Webster, C. D. (2011). How to fail the implementation of a risk assessment scheme or any other new procedure in your organization. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 81(1), 94–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-0025.2010.01076.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q., Cochran, M. (2002). A guide to using qualitative research methodology. MSF Intersectional Evaluation Group. http://evaluation.msf.org/sites/evaluation/files/a_guide_to_using_qualitative_research_methodology.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Peterson-Badali, M., Skilling, T., & Haqanee, Z. (2015). Implementation of risk assessment in case management for youth in the justice system. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 42(3), 304–320. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854814549595
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, B. J., Waltz, T. J., Chinman, M. J., Damschroder, L. J., Smith, J. L., Matthieu, M. M., Proctor, E. K., & Kirchner, J. E. (2015). A refined compilation of implementation strategies: results from the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) project. Implementation Science, 10(1), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-015-0209-1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schlager, M. D. (2009). The organizational politics of implementing risk assessment instruments in community corrections. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 25(4), 412–423. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043986209344555
   Google Scholar
• Schutt, R. K. (2004). Investigating the social world. The process and practice of research (7th ed.). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Sher, M. A., & Gralton, E. (2014). Implementation of the START:AV in a secure adolescent service. The Journal of Forensic Practice, 16(3), 184–193. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFP-04-2013-0021
   Google Scholar
• Software, N. C. H. (2016). Express Scribe Transcription software (Version 5.84) [Computer Software]. NCH Software. https://www.nch.com.au/scribe/versions.html
   Google Scholar
• Tran, N. (2019, September 16). State of the field: Implementation research panel. [Scientific Panel]. Global Implementation Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Vaismoradi, M., Turunen, H., & Bondas, T. (2013). Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nursing & Health Sciences, 15(3), 398–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12048
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermaes, I., Konijn, C., Jambroes, T., & Nijhof, K. (2014). Statische en dynamische kenmerken van jeugdigen in JeugdzorgPlus: Een systematische review [Static and dynamic characteristics of youth in secured residential care: A systematic review. Orthopedagogiek: Onderzoek en Praktijk, 53(6), 278–292. ].
   Google Scholar
• Viljoen, J. L., Beneteau, J. L., Gulbransen, E., Brodersen, E., Desmarais, S. L., Nicholls, T. L., & Cruise, K. R. (2012). Assessment of multiple risk outcomes, strengths, and change with the START:AV: A short-term prospective study with adolescent offenders. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 11(3), 165–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2012.737407
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viljoen, J. L., Cochrane, D. M., & Jonnson, M. R. (2018). Do risk assessment tools help manage and reduce risk of reoffending? A systematic review. Law and Human Behavior, 42(3), 181–214. https://doi.org/10.1037%2Flhb0000280 https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000280
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viljoen, J. L., Nicholls, T. L., Cruise, K. R., Desmarais, S. L., & Webster, C. D. (2016). Short-Term Assessment of Risk and Treatability: Adolescent Version (START:AV) – User Guide. (T. L. F. De Beuf, C. de Ruiter, & V. de Vogel, trans.). Mental Health, Law, and Policy Institute, Simon Fraser University. (Original work published 2014)
   Google Scholar
• Vincent, G. M., Guy, L. S., & Grisso, T. (2012). Risk Assessment in juvenile justice: A guidebook for implementation. John D. & Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation. http://modelsforchange.net/publications/346
   Google Scholar
• Vincent, G. M., Guy, L. S., Perrault, R. T., & Gershenson, B. (2016). Risk assessment matters, but only when implemented well: A multisite study in juvenile probation. Law and Human Behavior, 40(6), 683–696. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000214
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vincent, G. A., Paiva-Salisbury, M. L., Cook, N. E., Guy, L. S., & Perrault, R. T. (2012). Impact of risk/need assessment on juvenile probation officers’ decision-making: Importance of implementation. Psychology, Public Policy & the Law, 18(4), 549–576. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster, C. D., Nicholls, T. L., Martin, M.-L., Desmarais, S. L., & Brink, J. H. (2006). Short-Term Assessment of Risk and Treatability (START): the case of a new structured professional judgement scheme. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 24(6), 747–766. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.737
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar