References
- Allen, J. J., & Anderson, C. A. (2017). Aggression and violence: Definitions and distinctions. In P. Sturmey (Ed.), The Wiley handbook of violence and aggression. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119057574.whbva001
- Bowers, L., Stewart, D., Papadopoulos, C., Dack, C., Ross, J., Khanom, H., & Jeffery, D. (2011). Inpatient violence and aggression: A literature review. Institute of Psychiatry, Kings College London.
- Bradfield, R., Wright, G., Burt, G., Cairns, G., & Van Der Heijden, K. (2005). The origins and evolution of scenario techniques in long range business planning. Futures, 37(8), 795–812. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2005.01.003
- Chaimowitz, G., & Mamak, M. (2011). Companion guide to the Aggressive Incidents Scale and the Hamilton anatomy of risk management. St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton.
- Cicchetti, D. V., & Sparrow, S. A. (1981). Developing criteria for establishing interrater reliability of specific items: Applications to assessment of adaptive behavior. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 86(2), 127–137.
- Coates, J. (2016). Scenario planning. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 113, 99–102. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.10.043
- Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
- Conroy, M. A., & Murrie, D. C. (2007). Forensic assessment of violence risk: A guide for risk assessment and risk management. John Wiley & Sons.
- Cook, A. N., Moulden, H. M., Mamak, M., Lalani, S., Messina, K., & Chaimowitz, G. (2018). Validating the Hamilton anatomy of risk management-forensic version and the Aggressive Incidents Scale. Assessment, 25(4), 432–445. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191116653828
- Cornaggia, C. M., Beghi, M., Pavone, F., & Barale, F. (2011). Aggression in psychiatry wards: A systematic review. Psychiatry Research, 189(1), 10–20. https:/doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2010.12.024
- de Ruiter, C., & Nicholls, T. L. (2011). Protective factors in forensic mental health: A new frontier. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 10(3), 160–170. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2011.600602
- de Vogel, V., de Ruiter, C., Bouman, Y., & de Vries Robbé, M. (2012). SAPROF. Guidelines for the assessment of protective factors for violence risk (2nd ed.). Forum Educatief.
- de Vries Robbé, M., de Vogel, V., & de Spa, E. (2011). Protective factors for violence risk in forensic psychiatric patients: A retrospective validation study of the SAPROF. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 10(3), 178–186. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2011.600232
- Douglas, K. S. (2014). Version 3 of the Historical-Clinical-Risk Management-20 (HCR-20V3): Relevance to violence risk assessment and management in forensic conditional release contexts. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 32(5), 557–576. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2134
- Douglas, K. S., Hart, S. D., Webster, C. D., & Belfrage, H. (2013). HCR-20V3: Assessing risk for violence–User guide. Mental Health, Law, and Policy Institute, Simon Fraser University.
- Douglas, K. S., & Ogloff, J. R. (2003). Violence by psychiatric patients: The impact of archival measurement source on violence base rates and risk assessment accuracy. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry. Revue Canadienne de Psychiatrie, 48(11), 734–740. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/070674370304801105
- Fazel, S., Singh, J. P., Doll, H., & Grann, M. (2012). Use of risk assessment instruments to predict violence and antisocial behaviour in 73 samples involving 24 827 people: Systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ, 345, e4692. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e4692
- Guy, L. S., Douglas, K. S., & Hart, S. D. (2015). Risk assessment and communication (pp. 35–86). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/14461-003
- Hare, R. D. (2003). The Hare Psychopathy Checklist—Revised: Technical manual (2nd ed.). Multi-Health Systems.
- Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., & Cormier, C. A. (2013). Research and clinical scoring of the Psychopathy Checklist can show good agreement. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 40(11), 1349–1362. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854813492959
- Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., & Quinsey, V. L. (2016). Violence risk appraisal guide-revised, 2013: User guide. Data Services, Queen’s University Library.
- Hart, S. D. (1998). The role of psychopathy in assessing risk for violence: Conceptual and methodological issues. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 3(1), 121–137. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8333.1998.tb00354.x
- Hart, S. D. (2008). Preventing violence: The role of risk assessment and management. In A. C. Baldry & F. W. Winkel (Eds.), Intimate partner violence prevention and intervention: The risk assessment and management approach (pp. 7–18). Nova Scotia Publishers, Inc.
- Hart, S. D., Kropp, P. R., Laws, D. R., Klaver, J., Logan, C., & Watt, K. A. (2003). The Risk for Sexual Violence Protocol (RSVP): Structured professional guidelines for assessing risk of sexual violence. Mental Health, Law, and Policy Institute, Simon Fraser University.
- Hart, S. D., & Logan, C. (2011). Formulation of violence risk using evidence-based assessments: The structured professional judgment approach. In P. Sturmey & M. McMurran (Eds.) Forensic case formulation (pp. 83–106). Wiley-Blackwell. https:/doi.org/10.1002/9781119977018.ch4
- Hart, S., Sturmey, P., Logan, C., & McMurran, M. (2011). Forensic case formulation. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 10(2), 118–126. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2011.577137
- Heilbrun, K., Yasuhara, K., & Shah, S. (2010). Violence risk assessment tools. In R. K. Otto & K. S. Douglas (Eds.), Handbook of violence risk assessment (pp. 1–17). Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
- Heugens, P. M. A. R., & van Oosterhout, J. (2001). To boldly go where no man has gone before: Integrating cognitive and physical features in scenario studies. Futures, 33(10), 861–872. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-3287(01)00023-4
- Hildebrand, M., & de Ruiter, C. (2004). PCL-R psychopathy and its relation to DSM-IV Axis I and II disorders in a sample of male forensic psychiatric patients in The Netherlands. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 27(3), 233–248. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2004.03.005
- Hogan, N. R., & Olver, M. E. (2016). Assessing risk for aggression in forensic psychiatric inpatients: An examination of five measures. Law and Human Behavior, 40(3), 233–243. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000179
- Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus & Giroux.
- Kelly, E. L., Fenwick, K., Brekke, J. S., & Novaco, R. W. (2016). Well-being and safety among inpatient psychiatric staff: The impact of conflict, assault, and stress reactivity. Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 43(5), 703–716. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-015-0683-4
- Kropp, P. R., & Hart, S. D. (2015). The Spousal Assault Risk Assessment Guide Version 3 (SARA-V3). ProActive ReSolutions Inc.
- Logan, C. (2014). The HCR-20 Version 3: A case study in risk formulation. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 13(2), 172–180. https:/doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2014.906516
- Lord, C. G., Lepper, M. R., & Preston, E. (1984). Considering the opposite: A corrective strategy for social judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47(6), 1231–1243. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.47.6.123
- Melton, G. B., Petrila, J., Poythress, N. G., Slobogin, C., Otto, R. K., Mossman, D., & Condie, L. O. (2018). Psychological evaluations for the courts, fourth edition: A handbook for mental health professionals and lawyers. Guilford Press.
- Mills, J. F. (2017). Violence risk assessment: A brief review, current issues, and future directions. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 58(1), 40–49. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/cap0000100
- Monahan, J. (1995). The clinical prediction of violent behavior (Master work series). J. Aronson.
- Neal, T. M. S., & Grisso, T. (2014). The cognitive underpinnings of bias in forensic mental health evaluations. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 20(2), 200–211. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035824
- Nicholls, T., Petersen, K., & Pritchard, M. (2016). Comparing preferences for actuarial versus structured professional judgment violence risk assessment measures across five continents: To what extent is practice keeping pace with science? In J. P. Singh, S. Bjørkly, & S. Fazel (Eds.), International perspectives on violence risk assessment. Oxford University Press. https:/doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199386291.001.0001
- Ramesh, T., Igoumenou, A., Vazquez Montes, M., & Fazel, S. (2018). Use of risk assessment instruments to predict violence in forensic psychiatric hospitals: A systematic review and meta-analysis. European Psychiatry : The Journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists, 52, 47–53. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2018.02.007
- Slovic, P., Finucane, M. L., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2002). The affect heuristic. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 397–420). Cambridge University Press.
- Slovic, P., & Peters, E. (2006). Risk perception and affect. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15(6), 322–325. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2006.00461.x
- Strub, D. S., Douglas, K. S., & Nicholls, T. L. (2014). The validity of Version 3 of the HCR-20 violence risk assessment scheme amongst offenders and civil psychiatric patients. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 13(2), 148–159. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2014.911785
- Sturmey, P., & McMurran, M. (2011). Forensic case formulation. John Wiley & Sons.
- Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124–1131. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124
- Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211(4481), 453–458.
- Webster, C. D., Douglas, K. S., Eaves, D., & Hart, S. D. (1997). HCR-20 Scheme: Assessing risk for violence (version 2). Mental Health, Law, and Policy Institute, Simon Fraser University.
- Wheable, V., & Davies, J. (2020). Examining the evidence base for forensic case formulation: An integrative review of recent research. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 19(3), 315–328. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2019.1707331
- Zapf, P. A., & Dror, I. E. (2017). Understanding and mitigating bias in forensic evaluation: Lessons from forensic science. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 16(3), 227–238. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2017.1317302