Stimulus relatedness in equivalence classes, perceptual categories, and semantic memory networks

References

• Adams, B. J., Fields, L., & Verhave, T. (1993). The effects of test order on the establishment and expansion of equivalence classes. The Psychological Record, 43, 85–105.
   Google Scholar
• Belanich, J., & Fields, L. (1999). Tactual equivalence classes and cross modal transfer. The Psychological Record, 49, 75–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bortoloti, R., & de Rose, J. C. (2009). Assessment of the relatedness of equivalent stimuli through a semantic differential. The Psychological Record, 59, 563–590.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, A. M., & Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82, 407–428. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.82.6.407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, A. M., & Quillian, M. R. (1969). Retrieval time from semantic memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 8, 240–247. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(69)80069-1
   Google Scholar
• Doran, E., & Fields, L. (2012). All stimuli are equal, but some are more equal than others: Measuring relational preferences within an equivalence class. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 98, 243–256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebbinghaus, H. (1913). On memory: A contribution to experimental psychology: 1885 ( H. A. Ruger & C. E. Bussinius, Trans.). New York, NY: Teachers College, Columbia University.
   Google Scholar
• Fields, L., Landon-Jimenez, D. V., Buffington, D. M., & Adams, B. J. (1995). Maintained nodal distance effects in equivalence classes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 64, 129–145. doi:10.1901/jeab.1995.64-129
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fields, L., & Moss, P. (2007). Effects of contingency and nodal structure on stimulus relatedness in equivalence classes: History and integration. European Journal of Behavior Analysis, 8, 141–160.
   Google Scholar
• Fields, L., & Moss, P. (2008). Formation of partially and fully elaborated generalized equivalence classes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 90, 135–168. doi:10.1901/jeab.2008.90-135
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fields, L., & Reeve, K. F. (2000). Equivalence classes and natural categories from the generalization of perceptual and relational classes. In J. C. Leslie & D. Blackman (Eds.), Issues in experimental and applied analyses of human behavior (pp. 59–83). Reno, NV: Context Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fields, L., & Reeve, K. F. (2001). A methodological integration of generalized equivalence classes, natural categories, and cross modal perception. The Psychological Record, 51, 67–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fields, L., Reeve, K. F., Matneja, P., Varelas, A., Belanich, J., Fitzer, A., & Shamoun, K. (2002). The formation of a generalized categorization repertoire: Effect of training with multiple domains, samples, and comparisons. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 78, 291–313. doi:10.1901/jeab.2002.78-291
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fields, L., & Verhave, T. (1987). The structure of equivalence classes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 48, 317–332. doi:10.1901/jeab.1987.48-317
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fields, L., & Watanabe, M. (2008). Nodal structure and the partitioning of equivalence classes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 89, 359–381. doi:10.1901/jeab.2008-89-359
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galizio, M., Stewart, K. L., & Pilgrim, C. (2004). Typicality effects in contingency-shaped generalized equivalence classes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 82, 253–273. doi:10.1901/jeab.2004.82-253
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrnstein, R. J. (1990). Levels of stimulus control: A functional approach. Cognition, 37, 133–166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jitsumori, M. (1993). Category discrimination of artificial polymorphous stimuli based on feature learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 3, 244–254.
   Google Scholar
• Jitsumori, M. (1996). A prototype effect and categorization of polymorphous stimuli in pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 22, 405–419.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller, F. S., & Schoenfeld, W. N. (1950). The principles of psychology. New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
   Google Scholar
• Labov, W. (1973). The boundaries of words and their meanings. In C. J. N. Bailey & R. W. Shuy (Eds.), New ways of analyzing variation in English. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lea, S. E. G., & Harrison, S. N. (1978). Discrimination of polymorphous stimulus sets by pigeons. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 30, 521–537. doi:10.1080/00335557843000106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McIlvane, W. J. & Dube, W. V. (2003). Stimulus control topography coherence theory: Foundations and extensions. The Behavior Analyst, 26, 195–213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McIlvane, W. J., Serna, R. W., Dube, W. V., & Stromer, R. (2000). Stimulus control topography and stimulus equivalence: Reconciling test outcomes with theory. In J. C. Leslie & D. Blackman (Eds.), Experimental and applied analysis of human behavior (pp. 85–110). Reno, NV: Context Press.
   Google Scholar
• McNamara, T. P., & Altarriba, J. (1988). Depth of spreading activation revisited: Semantic mediated priming occurs in lexical decisions. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 545–559. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(88)90025-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamara, T. P., & Healy, A. F. (1988). Semantic, phonological, and mediated priming in reading and lexical decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 398–409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moss-Lourenco, P., & Fields, L. (2011). Nodal structure and stimulus relatedness in equivalence classes: Post class formation preference tests. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 95, 343–368. doi:10.1901/jeab.2011.95-343
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posner, M., & Keele, S. W. (1968). On the genesis of abstract ideas. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 77, 353–363. doi:10.1037/h0025953
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rosch, E. H., & Mervis, C. B. (1975). Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 573–605. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(75)90024-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders, R. R., & Green, G. (1999). A discrimination analysis of training–structure effects on stimulus equivalence outcomes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 72, 117–137. doi:10.1901/jeab.1999.72-117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidman, M. (1994). Equivalence relations and behavior: A research story. Boston, MA: Author’s Cooperative.
   Google Scholar
• Sidman, M. (2000). Equivalence relations and the reinforcement contingency. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 74, 127–146. doi:10.1901/jeab.2000.74-127
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidman, M., & Tailby, W. (1982). Conditional discrimination vs matching to sample: an expansion of the testing paradigm. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 5–22. doi:10.1901/jeab.1982.37-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wasserman, E. A., Kiedinger, R. E., & Bhatt, R. S. (1988). Conceptual behavior in pigeons: Categorization of both familiar and novel examples from four classes of natural and artificial stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 3, 235–246.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, A. A., Cook, R. G., Rivera, J. J., Sands, S. F., & Delius, J. D. (1988). Concept learning by pigeons: Matching-to-sample with trial-unique video picture stimuli. Animal Learning & Behavior, 16, 436–444. doi:10.3758/BF03209384
   Google Scholar