A comparison of parametric and nonparametric estimation methods for cost frontiers and economic measures

References

• Afriat, S. N. (1972). Efficiency estimation of production functions. International Economic Review, 13(3), 568–598.
   Google Scholar
• Aigner, D. J., Lovell, C. A. K., & Schmidt, P. (1977). Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production models. Journal of Econometrics, 6, 21–37.
   Google Scholar
• Andor, M., & Hesse, F. (2013). The StoNED age: The departure into a new era of efficiency analysis? A Monte Carlo comparison of StoNED and the “Oldies” (SFA and DEA). Journal of Productivity Analysis, 41, 85–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Assaf, A., & Matawie, K. M. (2010). Improving the accuracy of DEA efficiency analysis: A bootstrap application to the health care foodservice industry. Applied Economics, 42(1), 3547–3558.
   Google Scholar
• Badunenko, O., Henderson, D. J., & Kumbhakar, S. C. (2012). When, where, and how to perform efficiency estimation. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 175(4), 863–892.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battese, G., & Coelli, T. (1988). Prediction of firm-level technical efficiencies with a generalized frontier production function and panel data. Journal of Econometrics, 38, 387–399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battese, G., & Coelli, T. (1992). Frontier production functions, technical efficiency and panel data. With application to paddy farmers in India. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 3, 153–169.
   Google Scholar
• Bojani, A. N., Caudill, S. B., & Ford, J. M. (1998). Small-sample properties of ML, COLS, and DEA estimators of frontier models in the presence of heteroscedasticity. European Journal of Operational Research, 108(1), 140–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 9, 181–185.
   Google Scholar
• Chavas, J.-P., & Aliber, M. (1993). An analysis of economic efficiency in agriculture: A nonparametric approach. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 18, 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, L. R., Jorgenson, D. W., & Lau, L. J. (1973). Transcendental logarithmic production frontiers. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 55(1), 28–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coelli, T. (1991). Maximum likelihood estimation of stochastic frontier Production functions with time varying technical efficiency using the computer program FRONTIER version 2.0. Armidale, Australia: Department of Economics, University of New England.
   Google Scholar
• Diewert, W. E., & Wales, T. J. (1988). A normalized quadratic semiflexible functional form. Journal of Econometrics, 37(3), 327–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Färe, R., Groskopf, S., & Lovell, C. A. K. (1985). The measurement of efficiency of production. Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff.
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, M. J. (1957). The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 120(3), 253–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell, M. J., & Fieldhouse, M. (1962). Estimating efficient production under increasing returns to scale. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 125(2), 252–267.
   Google Scholar
• Featherstone, A. M., & Moss, C. B. (1994). Measuring economies of scale and scope in agricultural banking. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 76(3), 655–661.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fried, H. O., Knox Lovell, C. A., & Schmidt, S. S. (2008). The measurement of productive efficiency and productivity growth. Chapter 8 (William H. Greene) (pp. 94–249). New York, NY: Oxford University Press, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Gao, Z., & Featherstone, A. M. (2008). Estimating economies of scope using the profit function: A dual approach for the normalized quadratic profit function. Economic Letters, 100, 418–421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong, B.-H., & Sickles, R. (1992). Finite sample evidence on the performance of stochastic frontiers and data envelopment analysis using panel data. Journal of Econometrics, 51(1–2), 259–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, W. (1997). Handbook of applied econometrics: Microeconomics vol 2, Blackwell handbooks in economics. Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, W. (2005). Efficiency of public spending in developing countries: A stochastic frontier approach. Stern School of Business, New York University. 44 West 4th Street, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Hjalmarsson, L., Kumbhakar, S. C., & Heshmati, A. (1996). DEA, DFA and SFA: A comparison. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 7(2–3), 303–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuosmanen, T., & Kortelainen, M. (2012). Stochastic non-smooth envelopment of data: Semi-parametric frontier estimation subject to shape constraints. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 38(1), 11–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuosmanen, T., Saastamoinen, A., & Sipiläinen, T. (2013). What is the best practice for benchmark regulation of electricity distribution? Comparison of DEA, SFA and StoNED methods. Energy Policy, 61, 740–750.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S., & Lee, Y. H. (2014). Stochastic frontier models with threshold efficiency. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 42, 45–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Q. (1996). Estimating a stochastic production frontier when the adjusted error is symmetric. Economic Letters, 52(3), 221–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lusk, J. L., Featherstone, A. M., T. L., & Abdulkadri, A. O. (2002). The empirical properties of duality theory. The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 46, 45–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mas-Colell, A., Whinston, M. D., & Green, J. R. (1995). Microeconomic theory. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meesters, A. (2014). A note on the assumed distributions in stochastic frontier models. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 42(2), 171–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meeusen, W., & Van Den Broeck, J. (1977). Efficiency estimation from Cobb-Douglas production functions with composed error. International Economic Review, 18, 435–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odeh, O. O., Featherstone, A. M., & Bergtold, J. S. (1992). Reliability of statistical software. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 5, 1472–1489.
   Google Scholar
• Parman, B. J., Featherstone, A. M., & Coffey, B. K. (2017). Estimating product-specific and multiproduct economies of scale with data envelopment analysis? Journal of Agricultural Economics, 48, 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Parmeter, C. F., & Kumbhakar, S. C. (2014). Efficiency analysis: A primer on recent advances. Foundations and Trends in Econometrics, 7(3–4), 191–385.
   Google Scholar
• Paul, C. M., Nehring, R., Banker, D., & Somwaru, A. (2004). Scale economies and efficiency in U.S. agriculture: Are traditional farms history? Journal of Productivity Analysis, 22, 185–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richmond, J. (1974). Estimating the efficiency of production. International Economic Review, 15, 167–182.
   Google Scholar
• Ruggiero, J. (1999). Efficiency estimation and error decomposition in the stochastic frontier model: A Monte Carlo analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 129, 434–442.
   Google Scholar
• Ruggiero, J. (2007). A comparison of DEA and the stochastic frontier model using panel data. International Transactions in Operational Research, 14, 259–266.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, P., & Lovell, C. (1979). Estimating technical and allocative inefficiency relative to stochastic production and cost frontiers. Journal of Econometrics, 9(3), 343–366.
   Google Scholar
• Simar, L., & Wilson, P. W. (1998). Sensitivity analysis of efficiency scores: How to bootstrap in nonparametric frontier models. Management Science, 44(1), 49–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simar, L., & Wilson, P. W. (2013). Estimation and inference in nonparametric frontier models: Recent developments and perspectives. Foundations and Trends in Econometrics, 5(3–4), 183–337.
   Google Scholar
• Thanassoulis, E. (1993). A comparison of regression analysis and data envelopment analysis as alternative methods for performance assessments. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 44(11), 1129–1144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar