Effects of a policy mix of uniform or unilateral environmental tax and trade liberalization on economic welfare

References

• Acar, S., Ac, A. A., & Yeldan, A. E. (2022). Potential effects of the EU’s carbon border adjustment mechanism on the Turkish economy. Environment, Development, and Sustainability, 24(6), 8162–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01779-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen, D. C. (2018). Accounting for loss of variety and factor reallocation in the welfare cost of regulations. Journal of Environmental Economics & Management, 88, 69–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2017.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anouliès, L. (2017). Heterogeneous firms and the environment: A cap-and-trade program. Journal of Environmental Economics & Management, 84, 84–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2017.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balistreri, E. J., & Rutherford, T. F. (2012). Subglobal carbon policy and the competitive selection of heterogeneous firms. Energy Economics, 34, S190–S197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2012.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Böhringer, C., Lange, A., & Rutherford, T. F. (2014). Optimal emission pricing in the presence of international spillovers: Decomposing leakage and terms-of-trade motives. Journal of Public Economics, 110, 101–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2013.11.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Böhringer, C., Rosendahl, K. E., & Storrøsten, H. B. (2017). Robust policies to mitigate carbon leakage. Journal of Public Economics, 149, 35–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2017.03.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, J., Qiu, L. D., & Zhou, M. (2016). Who invests more in advanced abatement technology: Theory and evidence. Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue Canadienne D’économique, 49(2), 637–662. https://doi.org/10.1111/caje.12208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, G. (2023). Impact of carbon border adjustment mechanism on China’s manufacturing sector: A dynamic recursive CGE model based on an evolutionary game. Journal of Environmental Management, 347, 119029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherniwchan, J., Copeland, B. R., & Taylor, M. S. (2017). Trade and the environment: New methods, measurements, and results. Annual Review of Economics, 9(1), 59–85. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-063016-103756
   Google Scholar
• Cherniwchan, J., & Najjar, N. (2022). Do environmental regulations affect the decision to export? American Economic Journal, Economic Policy, 14(2), 125–160. https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.20200290
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Copeland, B., & Taylor, M. S. (1994). North-South trade and the environment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109(3), 755–787. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Copeland, B., & Taylor, M. S. (2004). Trade, growth, and the environment. Journal of Economic Literature, 42(1), 7–71. https://doi.org/10.1257/.42.1.7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coria, J., & Kyriakopoulou, E. (2018). Environmental policy, technology adoption and the size distribution of firms. Energy Economics, 72, 470–485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.04.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cosbey, A., Droege, S., Fischer, C., & Munnings, C. (2019). Developing guidance for implementing border carbon adjustments: Lessons, cautions, and research needs from the literature. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 13(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/rey020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui, J. (2017). Induced clean technology adoption and international trade with heterogeneous firms. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 26(8), 924–954. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638199.2017.1320579
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dardati, E., & Sayagili, M. (2020). Aggregate impacts of cap-and-trade programs with heterogeneous firms. Energy Economics, 92, 104924. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104924
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dechezleprêtre, A., & Sato, M. (2017). The impacts of environmental regulations on competitiveness. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 11(2), 183–206. https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/rex013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixit, A. K., & Stiglitz, E. (1977). Monopolistic competition and optimum product diversity. The American Economic Review, 67, 297–308. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1831401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eichner, T., & Pethig, R. (2015). Unilateral consumption-based carbon taxes and negative leakage. Resource and Energy Economics, 40, 127–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2015.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eicke, L., Weko, S., Apergi, M., & Marian, A. (2021). Pulling up the carbon ladder? Decarbonization, dependence, and third-country risks from the European carbon border adjustment mechanism. Energy Research & Social Science, 80, 102240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, C., & Fox, A. K. (2012). Comparing policies to combat emissions leakage: Border carbon adjustments versus rebates. Journal of Environmental Economics & Management, 64(2), 199–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2012.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forslid, R., Okubo, T., & Ulltveit-Moe, K. H. (2018). Why are firms that export cleaner? International trade, abatement and environmental emissions. Journal of Environmental Economics & Management, 91, 166–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2018.07.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerlagh, R., & Kuik, O. (2014). Spill or leak? Carbon leakage with international technology spillovers: A CGE analysis. Energy Economics, 45, 381–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2014.07.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossman, G., & Krueger, A. B. (1993). Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement. In P. M. Garber (Ed.), The U.S.-Mexico free trade agreement (pp. 13–56). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grubb, M., Jordan, N. D., Hertwich, E., Neuhoff, K., Das, K., Bandyopadhyay, K. R., van Asselt, H., Sato, M., Wang, R., Pizer, W. A., & Oh, H. (2022). Carbon leakage, consumption, and trade. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 47(1), 753–795. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-120820-053625
   Google Scholar
• Gustafsson, P., & Segerstrom, P. (2010). Trade liberalization and productivity growth. Review of International Economics, 18(2), 207–228. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9396.2010.00878.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamaguchi, Y. (2023). Environmental tax evasion as a determinant of the porter and pollution haven hypotheses in a corrupt political system. Economic Analysis & Policy, 79, 610–633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2023.06.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamaguchi, Y. (2024). Whether to abolish or introduce dual regulation as trade and environmental policy? China & World Economy, 32(1), 57–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/cwe.12516
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helm, C., & Schmidt, R. C. (2015). Climate cooperation with technology investments and border carbon adjustment. European Economic Review, 75, 112–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2015.01.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, L., Liu, X., Liu, B., Cao, K., & Xia, Q. (2024). The impact of reducing trade barriers on enterprises’ pollution emissions: Evidence from China, managerial and decision economics. Managerial and Decision Economics. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.4087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakob, M., Marschinski, R., & Hübler, M. (2013). Between a rock and a hard place: A trade-theory analysis of leakage under production- and consumption-based policies. Environmental & Resource Economics, 56(1), 47–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-013-9638-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, Y., Tang, L., & Huang, C. (2023). Does environmental regulation improve firms’ export product quality? Empirical evidence based on China’s key regional air pollution and control policy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 433, 139822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139822
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, C. I. (1995). Time series tests of endogenous growth models. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(2), 495–525. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118448
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keen, M., & Kotsogiannis, C. (2014). Coordinating climate and trade policies: Pareto efficiency and the role of border tax adjustments. Journal of International Economics, 94(1), 119–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2014.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konishi, Y., & Tarui, N. (2015). Emissions trading, firm heterogeneity, and intra-industry reallocations in the long run. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 2(1), 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1086/679905
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreickemeier, U., & Richter, P. M. (2014). Trade and the environment: The role of firm heterogeneity. Review of International Economics, 22(2), 209–225. https://doi.org/10.1111/roie.12092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruse-Andersen, P. K. (2023). Testing R&D based endogenous growth models. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 85(5), 1083–1110. https://doi.org/10.1111/obes.12552
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaPlue, L. D. (2019). The environmental effects of trade and environmental policy within and across sectors. Journal of Environmental Economics & Management, 94, 118–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2019.01.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy, T., & Dinopoulos, E. (2016). Global environmental standards with heterogeneous polluters. International Review of Economics & Finance, 43, 482–498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2016.01.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melitz, M. J. (2003). The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocation and aggregate industry productivity. Econometrica, 71(6), 1695–1725. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0262.00467
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richter, U., Kreickemeier, P. M., & Richter, P. M. (2021). Environmental policy and firm selection in the open economy. Journal of the Association of Environmental Economics and Resource Economists, 8(4), 655–690. https://doi.org/10.1086/713040
   Google Scholar
• Rubashkina, Y., Galeotti, M., & Verdolini, E. (2015). Environmental regulation and competitiveness: Empirical evidence on the porter hypothesis from European manufacturing sectors. Energy Policy, 83, 288–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.02.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuelson, P. (1954). The transfer problem and transport costs, II: Analysis of effects of trade impediments. The Economic Journal, 64(254), 264–289. https://doi.org/10.2307/2226834
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanctuary, M. (2018). Border carbon adjustments and unilateral incentives to regulate the climate. Review of International Economics, 26(4), 826–851. https://doi.org/10.1111/roie.12344
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, J. S., & Walker, R. (2018). Why is pollution from US manufacturing declining? The roles of environmental regulation, productivity, and trade. The American Economic Review, 108(12), 3814–3854. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20151272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, E., Liu, F., Zhang, J., & Yu, J. (2014). A model to analyze the environmental policy of resource reallocation and pollution control based on firms’ heterogeneity. Resources Policy, 39, 88–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2013.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, E., Zhang, J., & Haider, Z. (2015). Firm productivity, pollution, and output: Theory and empirical evidence from China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 22(22), 18040–18046. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-5020-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsakiris, N., Hatzipanayotou, P., & Michael, M. S. (2019). Border tax adjustments and tariff-tax reforms with consumption pollution. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 21(6), 1107–1125. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpet.12407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wettestad, J. (2024). The EU’s carbon border adjustment mechanism: Shaped and saved by shifting multi–level reinforcement? The Review of Policy Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, M., Yuan, Y., Yang, F., & Patino-Echeverri, D. (2021). Effects of environmental regulation on firm entry and exit and China’s industrial productivity: A new perspective on the porter hypothesis. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, 23(4), 915–944. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10018-021-00310-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yomogida, M., & Tarui, N. (2013). Emission taxes and border tax adjustments or oligopolistic industries. Pacific Economic Review, 18(5), 644–673. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0106.12045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng, D. Z., & Zhao, L. (2009). Pollution havens and industrial agglomeration. Journal of Environmental Economics & Management, 58(2), 141–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2008.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar