Media Literacy Messages and Hostile Media Perceptions: Processing of Nonpartisan Versus Partisan Political Information

REFERENCES

• Ashley, S., Maksl, A. & Craft, S. (2013). Developing a news media literacy scale. Journalism and Mass Communication Educator, 68, 7–21.
   Google Scholar
• Baek, T. H., Kim, J. & Martin, H. J. (2010). Dimensions of news media brand personality. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 87, 119–136.
   Google Scholar
• Baym, G. (2010). From Cronkite to Colbert: The evolution of broadcast news. London, England: Paradigm.
   Google Scholar
• Bucy, E. P. (2003). Media credibility reconsidered: Synergy effects between on-air and online news. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 80, 247–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burroughs, S., Brocato, K., Hopper, P. F. & Sanders, A. (2009). Media literacy: A central component of democratic citizenship. The Educational Forum, 73, 154–167.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, D. J., Barnidge, M., Rogers, A., Wise, D. & Vraga, E. K. (2011). With Me or Against Me: Hostile Media and Third Person Effect in Partisan Media. Paper presented to the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, St. Louis, Mo.
   Google Scholar
• Chan-Olmsted, S. M. & Cha, J. (2008). Exploring the antecedents and effects of brand images for television news: An application of the brand personality construct in a multichannel news environment. The International Journal on Media Management, 10, 32–45.
   Google Scholar
• Coe, K., Tewksbury, D., Bond, B. J., Drogos, K. L., Potter, R. W., Yahn, A. & Zhang, Y. (2008). Hostile news: Partisan use and perceptions of cable news programming. Journal of Communication, 58, 201–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu, D. & Lee, A. Y. L. (2014). Media educators initiatives by media organizations: The uses of media literacy in Hong Kong media. Journalism and Mass Communication Educator, 69, 127–145.
   Google Scholar
• Craft, S., Maksl, A. & Ashley, S. (2013). Measuring news media literacy: How knowledge and motivations combine to create news-literate teens. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10355/34713
   Google Scholar
• De Pelsmacke, P., Geuens, M. & Anckaert, P. (2002). Media context and advertising effectiveness: The role of context appreciation and context/ad similarity. Journal of Advertising, 31(2), 49–61.
   Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H. & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, K. & Smith, E. E. (1996). A disconfirmation bias in the evaluation of arguments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 7, 5–24.
   Google Scholar
• Eveland, W. P & Shah, D. V. (2003). The impact of individual and interpersonal factors on perceived news media bias. Political Psychology, 24, 101–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, L. (2011). Partisan differences in opinionated news perceptions: A test of the hostile media effect. Political Behavior, 33, 407–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fico, F., Richardson, J. D. & Edwards, S. M. (2004). Influence of story structure on perceived story bias and news organization credibility. Mass Communication & Society, 7, 301–318.
   Google Scholar
• Flanagin, A. J. & Metzger, M. J. (2007). The role of site features, user attributes, and information verification behaviors on the perceived credibility of web-based information. New Media & Society, 9, 319–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrett, R. K. (2009). Politically motivated reinforcement seeking: Reframing the selective exposure debate. Journal of Communication, 59, 676–699.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunther, A. (1988). Attitude extremity and trust in media. Journalism Quarterly, 65, 279–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunther, A. (1992). Biased press or biased public? Attitudes toward media coverage of social groups. Public Opinion Quarterly, 56, 147–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunther, A., Christen, C. T., Liebhart, J. L. & Chia, S. C. (2001). Congenial public, contrary press, and biased estimates of the climate of opinion. Public Opinion Quarterly, 65, 295–320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunther, A. C., Edgerly, S., Akin, H. & Broesch, J. A. (2012). Partisan evaluation of partisan information. Communication Research, 39, 439–457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunther, A. & Liebhart, J. L. (2006). Broad reach or biased source? Decomposing the hostile media effect. Journal of Communication, 56, 449–466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haugtvedt, C. P., Petty, R. E. & Cacioppo, J. T. (1992). Need for cognition and advertising: Understanding the role of personality variables in consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 1, 239–260.
   Google Scholar
• Ho, S. S., Binder, A. R., Becker, A. B., Moy, P., Scheufele, D. A., Brossard, D. & Gunther, A. C. (2011). The Role of Perceptions of Media Bias in General and Issue-Specific Political Participation. Mass Communication and Society, 14, 343–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobbs, R. (2010). Digital and Media Literacy: A Plan of Action. Washington, DC: The Aspen Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Hobbs, R. & Jensen, A. (2009). The past, present, and the future of media literacy education. Journal of Media Literacy Education, 1, 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Holcomb, J., Gottfried, J. & Mitchell, A. (2013). News use across social media platforms. Pew Research Center's Journalism Project. Retrieved from http://www.journalism.org/2013/11/14/news-use-across-social-media-platforms/
   Google Scholar
• Iyengar, S. & Hahn, K. S. (2009). Red media, blue media: Evidence of ideological selectivity in media use. Journal of Communication, 59, 19–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, T. J. & Kaye, B. K. (1998). Cruising is believing?: Comparing Internet and traditional sources on media credibility measures. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 75, 325–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W. & Sulloway, F. J. (2003). Political Conservativsm as Motivated Social Cognition. Psychological Bulletin 129, 339–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y., Chen, H. & gil de Zuniga, H. (2013). Stumbling upon news on the Internet: Effects of incidental news exposure and relative entertainment use on political engagement. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 2607–2614.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knobloch-Westerwick, S. & Meng, J. (2009). Looking the other way: Selective exposure to attitude-consistent and counterattitudinal political information. Communication Research, 36, 426–448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovach, B. & Rosensteil, T. (2007). The elements of journalism: What newspeople should know and the public should expect. New York, NY: Crown.
   Google Scholar
• Kroh, M. & Selb, P. (2009). Inheritance and the dynamics of party identification. Political Behavior, 31, 559–574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lord, C. G., Ross, L. & Lepper, M. (1979). Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 2098–2109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDowell, W. S. (2004). Exploring a free association methodology to capture and differentiate abstract media brand associations: A study of three cable networks. Journal of Media Economics, 17, 309–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, P. (1988). Defining and measuring credibility of newspapers: Developing an index. Journalism Quarterly, 65, 567–588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mindich, D. T. Z. (2005). Tuned out. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, J. S. (2007). Slanted objectivity? Perceived media bias, cable news exposure, and political attitudes. Social Science Quarterly, 88, 707–728.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mussweiler, T. (2003). Comparison processes in social judgment: Mechanisms and consequences. Psychological Review, 110, 472–489.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niven, D. (2002). Tilt? The search for media bias. Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Perloff, R. (1989). Ego involvement and the third-person effect of televised news coverage. Communication Research, 16, 236–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, C. (2010). No-spin zones: The rise of the American cable news magazine and Bill O'Reilly. Journalism Studies, 11, 832–851.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. (2013a). Amid criticism, support for media's watchdog role stands out. Retrieved from http://www.people-press.org/files/legacy-pdf/8-8-2013%20Media%20Attitudes%20Release.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. (2013b). Most say illegal immigrants should be allowed to stay, but citizenship is more divisive. Retrieved from http://www.people-press.org/files/legacy-pdf/3-28-13%20Immigration%20Release.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. (2014). Deficit reduction declines as policy priority: Just half of Democrats rate deficit as ‘top priority.’ Retrieved from http://www.people-press.org/2014/01/27/deficit-reduction-declines-as-policy-priority/
   Google Scholar
• Pfau, M., Compton, J., Parker, K. A., An, C., Wittenberg, E. M., Ferguson, M., … Malyshev, Y. (2006). The conundrum of the timing of counterarguing effects in resistance: Strategies to boost the persistence of counterarguing output. Communication Quarterly, 54, 143–156.
   Google Scholar
• Pfau, M., Kenski, H. C., Nitz, M. & Sorenson, J. (1990). Efficacy of inoculation strategies in promoting resistance to political attack messages: Application to direct mail. Communication Monographs, 57, 25–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potter, W. J. (2011). Potter's response to Hobbs. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 55, 596–600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potter, J. W. (2012). The state of media literacy. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 54, 675–696.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prior, M. (2007). Post-broadcast democracy: How media choice increases inequality in political involvement and polarizes elections. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt, K. M., Gunther, A. C. & Liebhart, J. L. (2004). Why partisans see mass media as biased. Communication Research, 31, 623–641.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherif, M. & Hovland, C. I. (1961). Social judgment: Assimilation and contrast effects in communication and attitude change. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stroud, N. J. (2011). Niche news: The politics of news choice. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taber, C. S. & Lodge, M. (2006). Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50, 755–769.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsfati, Y. & Cappella, J. N. (2003). Do people watch what they do not trust? Exploring the association between news media skepticism and exposure. Communication Research, 30, 504–529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallone, R. P., Ross, L. & Lepper, M. R. (1985). The hostile media phenomena: Biased perception and perceptions of media bias in coverage of the Beirut massacre. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 577–585.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vraga, E. K., Edgerly, S. E., Bode, L., Carr, D. J., Bard, M., Johnson, C. N., … Shah, D. V. (2012). The correspondent, the comic, and the combatant: The consequences of host style in political talk shows. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 89, 5–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vraga, E. K., Tully, M., Akin, H. & Rojas, H. (2012b). Modifying perceptions of hostility and credibility of news coverage of an environmental controversy through media literacy. Journalism: Theory, Practice, & Criticism, 13, 942–959.
   Google Scholar
• Vraga, E. K., Tully, M. & Rojas, H. (2009). Media literacy training reduces perceptions of bias. Newspaper Research Journal, 30, 68–81.
   Google Scholar
• Watts, M. D., Domke, D., Shah, D. V. & Fan, D. P. (1999). Elite cues and media bias in presidential campaigns. Communication Research, 26, 144–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar