721
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Perceptions of the Media and the Public and their Effects on Political Participation in Colombia

, &

REFERENCES

  • Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Ariyanto, A., Hornsey, M. J., & Gallois, C. (2007). Group allegiances and perceptions of media bias taking into account both the perceiver and the source. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 10, 266–279. doi:10.1177/1368430207074733
  • Bakker, T. P., & de Vreese, C. H. (2011). Good news for the future? Young people, Internet use, and political participation. Communication Research, 38, 451–470. doi:10.1177/0093650210381738
  • Barnidge, M., & Rojas, H. (2014). Hostile media perceptions, presumed media influence, and political talk: Expanding the corrective action hypothesis. International Journal of Public Opinion Research. Advance online access. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edt032
  • Bennett, W. L. (2008). Changing citizenship in the digital age. In W. L. Bennett (Ed.), Civic life online: Learning how digital media can engage youth (pp. 1–24). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. doi:10.1162/dmal.9780262524827.001
  • Brady, H., & McNulty, J. (2011). Turning out to vote: The costs of finding and getting to the polling place. American Political Science Review, 105, 115–134. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0003055410000596
  • Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E., & Stokes, D. E. (1980). The American voter (Unabridged ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1960)
  • Campbell, D. T. (1967). Stereotypes and the perception of group differences. American Psychologist, 22, 817–829.
  • Chia, S. C., & Lee, W. (2008). Pluralistic ignorance about sex: The direct and the indirect effects of media consumption on college students’ misperception of sex-related peer norms. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 20, 52–73. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edn005
  • Christen, C. T., & Gunther, A. C. (2003). The influence of mass media and other culprits on the projection of personal opinion. Communication Research, 30, 414–431. doi:10.1177/0093650203253366
  • Cho, J., Shah, D. V., McLeod, J. M., McLeod, D. M., Scholl, R. M., & Gotlieb, M. R. (2009). Campaigns, reflection, and deliberation: Advancing an O-S-R-O-R model of communication effects. Communication Theory, 19, 66–88. doi:10.1111/j.1468–2885.2008.01333.x
  • Coe, K., Tewksbury, D., Bond, B. J., Drogos, K. L., Porter, R. W., Yahn, A., & Zhang, Y. (2008). Hostile news: Partisan use and perceptions of cable news programming. Journal of Communication, 58, 201–219. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00381.x
  • Conover, P. J., & Feldman, S. (1982). Projection and the perception of candidates’ issue positions. The Western Political Quarterly, 35, 228–244. doi: http://www.jstor.org/stable/448017
  • Conover, P. J., & Feldman, S. (1989). Candidate perception in an ambiguous world: Campaigns, cues, and inference processes. American Journal of Political Science, 33, 912–940. doi: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2111115
  • Conover, P. J., Searing, D. D., & Crewe, I. M. (2002). The deliberative potential of political discussion. British Journal of Political Science, 32, 21–62. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0007123402000029
  • Dalton, R. J. (2008). Citizenship norms and the expansion of political participation. Political Studies, 56, 76–98. doi:10.1111/j.1467–9248.2007.00718.x
  • Eveland, W. P. (2001). The cognitive mediation model of learning from the news evidence from nonelection, off-year election, and presidential election contexts. Communication Research, 28, 571–601. doi:10.1177/009365001028005001
  • Eveland, W. P. Jr. (2004). The effect of political discussion in producing informed citizens: The roles of information, motivation, and elaboration. Political Communication, 21, 177–193. doi:10.1080/10584600490443877
  • Eveland, W. P., Morey, A. C., & Hutchens, M. J. (2011). Beyond deliberation: New directions for the study of informal political conversation from a communication perspective. Journal of Communication, 61, 1082–1103. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01598.x
  • Eveland, W. P., & Shah, D. V. (2003). The impact of individual and interpersonal factors on perceived news media bias. Political Psychology, 24, 101–117. doi:10.1111/0162–895X.00318
  • Fabrigar, L. R., & Krosnick, J. A. (1995). Attitude importance and the false consensus effect. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 468–479. doi:10.1177/0146167295215–005
  • Gil de Zúñiga, H., Veenstra, A., Vraga, E., & Shah, D. (2010). Digital democracy: Reimagining pathways to political participation. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 7, 36–51. doi:10.1080/19331680903316742
  • Giner-Sorolla, R., & Chaiken, S. (1994). The causes of hostile media judgment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 165–180. doi:10.1006/jesp.1994.1008
  • Goldman, S. K., & Mutz, D. C. (2011). The friendly media phenomenon: A cross-national analysis of cross-cutting exposure. Political Communication, 28, 42–66. doi:10.1080/10584609.2010.544280
  • Green, M. C., Visser, P. S., & Tetlock, P. E. (2000). Coping with accountability cross-pressures: Low-effort evasive tactics and high-effort quests for complex compromises. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1380–1391. doi:10.1177/0146167200263006
  • Gunther, A. C. (1998). The persuasive press inference effects of mass media on perceived public opinion. Communication Research, 25, 486–504. doi:10.1177/009365098025005002
  • Gunther, A. C., & Chia, S. C-Y. (2001). Predicting pluralistic ignorance: The hostile media perception and its consequences. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 78, 688–701. doi:10.1177/107769900107800405
  • Gunther, A. C., & Christen, C. T. (2002). Projection or persuasive press? Contrary effects of personal opinion and perceived news coverage on estimates of public opinion. Journal of Communication, 52, 177–195. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2002.tb02538.x
  • Gunther, A. C., Christen, C. T., Liebhart, J. L., & Chia, S. C.-Y. (2001). Congenial public, contrary press and biased estimates of the climate of opinion. Public Opinion Quarterly, 65, 295–320. doi:10.1086/322846
  • Gunther, A. C., Miller, N., & Liebhart, J. L. (2009). Assimilation and contrast in a test of the hostile media effect. Communication Research, 36, 747–764. doi:10.1177/0093650209346804
  • Gunther, A. C., & Schmitt, K. M. (2004). Mapping boundaries of the hostile media effect. Journal of Communication, 54, 55–70. doi:10.1177/0093650204269390
  • Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere (T. Burger, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Ho, S. S., Binder, A. R., Becker, A. B., Moy, P., Scheufele, D. A., Brossard, D., & Gunther, A. C. (2011). The role of perceptions of media bias in general and issue-specific political participation. Mass Communication and Society, 14, 343–374. doi:10.1080/15205436.2010.491933
  • Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
  • Huckfeldt, R., & Sprague, J. (1987). Networks in context: The social flow of political information. American Political Science Review, 81, 1197–1215. doi:10.2307/1962585
  • Huckfeldt, R., & Sprague, J. (1992). Political parties and electoral mobilization: Political structure, social structure, and the party canvass. The American Political Science Review, 86, 70–86. doi: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1964016
  • Hwang, H., Pan, Z., & Sun, Y. (2008). Influence of hostile media perception on willingness to engage in discursive activities: An examination of the mediating role of media indignation. Media Psychology, 11, 76–97. doi:10.1080/15213260701813454
  • Hwang, H., Schmierbach, M., Paek, H., Gil de Zúñiga, H., & Shah, D. V. (2006). Media dissociation, internet use, and antiwar political participation: A case study of political dissent and action against the war in Iraq. Mass Communication & Society, 9, 461–483. doi:10.1207/s15327825mcs0904_5
  • Ikeda, K. I., & Boase, J. (2011). Multiple discussion networks and their consequence for political participation. Communication Research, 38, 660–683. doi:10.1177/0093650210395063
  • Kenski, K., & Stroud, N. J. (2006). Connections between Internet use and political efficacy, knowledge, and participation. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 50, 173–192. doi:10.1207/s15506878jobem5002_1
  • Krosnick, J. A. (1989). Attitude importance and attitude accessibility. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15, 297–308. doi:10.1177/0146167289153002
  • Krosnick, J. A. (1990). Americans’ perceptions of presidential candidates: A test of the projection hypothesis. Journal of Social Issues, 46, 159–182. doi:10.1111/j.1540–4560.1990.tb01928.x
  • Ladd, J. M. (2012). Why Americans hate the media and how it matters. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Lim, M. (2012). Clicks, cabs, and coffee houses: Social media and oppositional movements in Egypt, 2004–2011. Journal of Communication, 62, 231–248. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01628.x
  • Lord, C. G., Ross, L., & Lepper, M. R. (1979). Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 2098–2109. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.37.11.2098
  • Marks, G., & Miller, N. (1982). Target attractiveness as a mediator of assumed attitude similarity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 8, 728–735. doi:10.1177/0146167282084020
  • Marks, G., & Miller, N. (1987). Ten years of research on the false-consensus effect: An empirical and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 102, 72–90. doi:10.1037/0033–2909.102.1.72
  • Marks, G., Miller, N., & Maruyama, G. (1981). Effect of targets’ physical attractiveness on assumptions of similarity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 198–206. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.41.1.198
  • Martinez, M. D. (1988). Political involvement and the projection process. Political Behavior, 10, 151–167. doi:10.1007/BF00991411
  • McAdam, D. (1986). Recruitment to high-risk activism: The case of freedom summer. American Journal of Sociology, 92, 64–90. doi: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2779717
  • McAllister, I., & Studlar, D. T. (1991). Bandwagon, underdog, or projection?: Opinion polls and electoral choice in Britain, 1979–1987. Journal of Politics, 53, 720–741.
  • McClurg, S. D. (2006). Political disagreement in context: The conditional effect of neighborhood context, disagreement and political talk on electoral participation. Political Behavior, 28, 349–366. doi:10.1007/s11109-006-9015-4
  • McLeod, J. M., Scheufele, D. A., & Moy, P. (1999). Community, communication, & participation: The role of mass media and interpersonal discussion in local political participation. Political Communication, 16, 315–336. doi:10.1080/105846099198659
  • Mettler, S. (2002). Bringing the state back in to civic engagement: Policy feedback effects of the GI Bill for World War II veterans. American Political Science Review, 96, 351–365. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0003055402000217
  • Mullen, B., & Hu, L.-T. (1988). Social projection as a function of cognitive mechanisms: Two meta-analytic integrations. British Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 333–356. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.1988.tb00836.x
  • Mutz, D. C. (1998). Impersonal influence: How perceptions of mass collectives affect political attitudes. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Mutz, D. (2006). Hearing the other side: Deliberative versus participatory democracy. Cambridge, UK: University of Cambridge Press.
  • Nisbett, R., & Ross, L. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Noelle-Neumann, E. (1974). The spiral of silence: A theory of public opinion. Journal of Communication, 24(2), 43–51. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1974.tb00367.x
  • Papacharissi, Z., & de Fatima Oliveira, M. (2012). Affective news and networked publics: The rhythms of news storytelling on# Egypt. Journal of Communication, 62, 266–282. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01630.x
  • Perloff, R. M. (1989). Ego-involvement and the third person effect of televised news coverage. Communication Research, 16, 236–262. doi:10.1177/009365089016002004
  • Plutzer, E. (2002). Becoming a habitual voter: Inertia, resources, and growth in young adulthood. American Political Science Review, 96, 41–56. doi:http: dx.doi.org 10.1017/S0003055402004227
  • Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
  • Reid, S. A. (2012). A self-categorization explanation for the hostile media effect. Journal of Communication, 62, 381–399. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01647.x
  • Rojas, H. (2008). Strategy versus understanding: How orientations towards political conversation influence political engagement. Communication Research, 35, 452–480. doi:10.1177/0093650208315977
  • Rojas, H. (2010). “Corrective” actions in the public sphere: How perceptions of media and media effects shape political behaviors. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 22, 343–363. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edq018
  • Rojas, H., & Puig-i-Abril, E. (2009). Mobilizers mobilized: Information, expression, mobilization and participation in the digital age. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication 14, 902–927. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01475.x
  • Rojas, H., Shah, D. V., Cho, J., Schmierbach, M., Keum, H., & Gil de Zúñiga, H. G. (2005). Media dialogue: Perceiving and addressing community problems. Mass Communication & Society, 8, 93–110. doi:10.1207/s15327825mcs0802_2
  • Ross, L., Green, D., & House, P. (1977). The false consensus effect: An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 279–301. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(77)90049-X
  • Ross, L., & Lepper, M. R. (1980). The perseverance of beliefs: Empirical and normative considerations. In R. A. Shweder & D. Fiske (Eds.), New directions for methodology of behavioral science: Fallible judgment in behavioral research (pp. 17–36). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Schmitt, K. M., Gunther, A. C., & Liebhart, J. L. (2004). Why partisans see mass media asbiased. Communication Research, 31, 623–641. doi:10.1177/0093650204269390
  • Sears, D. O., & Valentino, N. A. (1997). Politics matters: Political events as catalysts for preadult socialization. The American Political Science Review, 91(1), 45–65. doi:10.2307/2952258
  • Shah, D. V., Cho, J., Nah, S., Gotlieb, M. R., Hwang, H., Lee, N. J., … McLeod, D. M. (2007). Campaign ads, online messaging, and participation: Extending the communication mediation model. Journal of Communication, 57, 676–703. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2007.00363.x
  • Soss, J. (1999). Lessons of welfare: Policy design, political learning, and political action. American Political Science Review, 93, 363–380. doi:10.1111/1468-2508.t01-2-00006
  • Stroud, N. J. (2011). Niche news: The politics of news choice. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Sun, Y., Shen, L., & Pan, Z. (2008). On the behavioral component of the third-person effect. Communication Research, 35, 257–278. doi:10.1177/0093650207313167
  • Tsfati, Y. (2007). Hostile media perceptions, presumed media influence, and minority alienation: The case of Arabs in Israel. Journal of Communication, 57, 632–651. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2007.00361.x
  • Tsfati, Y., & Cohen, J. (2005). The influence of presumed media influence on democratic legitimacy: The case of Gaza settlers. Communication Research, 32, 794–821. doi:10.1177/0093650205281057
  • Vallone, R. P., Ross, L., & Lepper, M. R. (1985). The hostile media phenomenon: Biased perceptions of media bias in coverage of the Beirut massacre. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 577–585. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.49.3.577
  • Verba, S., Burns, N., & Schlozman, K. L. (1997). Knowing and caring about politics: Gender and political engagement. Journal of Politics, 59, 1051–1072. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10. 2307/2998592
  • Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., & Brady, H. E. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Walsh, K. C. (2004). Talking about politics: Informal groups and social identity in American life. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Wei, R., Chia, S. C., & Lo, V. H. (2011). Third-person effect and hostile media perception influences on voter attitudes toward polls in the 2008 US presidential election. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 23, 169–190. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edq044
  • Wei, R., & Lo, V. H. (2013). Perceived poll bias and inference of biased poll impact in the 2010 U.S. midterm elections: Media performance in the eyes of the beholder. The Open Communication Journal, 7, 12–22. doi:10.2174/1874916X20130509002
  • Wojcieszak, M. (2008). False consensus goes online impact of ideologically homogeneous groups on false consensus. Public Opinion Quarterly, 72, 781–791. doi:10.1093/poq/nfn056
  • Wojcieszak, M. (2009). Medios hostiles, públicos hostiles: Factores que influyen en las percepciones sobre los medios [Hostile media, hostile public: Factors that influence perceptions of the media]. In H. Rojas I. Pérez & H. Gil de Zúniga (Eds.). Comunicación y Comunidad. Bogotá, Colombia: Publicaciones Universidad Externado de Colombia.
  • Wojcieszak, M., & Price, V. (2009). What underlies the false consensus effect?: How personal opinion and disagreement affect perception of public opinion. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 21, 25–46. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edp001
  • Wojcieszak, M., & Rojas, H. (2011). Hostile public effect: Communication diversity and the projection of personal opinion onto others. Journal of Broadcast and Electronic Media, 55, 543–562. doi:10.1080/08838151.2011.620665
  • Xenos, M., & Moy, P. (2007). Direct and differential effects of the Internet on political and civic engagement. Journal of Communication, 57, 704–718. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2007.00364.x

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.