A Three-Decade Retrospective on the Hostile Media Effect

REFERENCES

• Abramowitz, A. L., & Saunders, K. L. (2008). Is polarization a myth? The Journal of Politics, 70, 542–555. doi:10.1017/S0022381608080493
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Press Institute. (2014, March 17). The personal news cycle: How Americans choose to get their news. Retrieved from http://www.americanpressinstitute.org/publications/reports/survey-research/personal-news-cycle/single-page/.
   Google Scholar
• Arceneaux, K., & Johnson, M. (2013). Changing minds or changing channels? Partisan news in an age of choice. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arceneaux, K., Johnson, M., & Murphy, C. (2012). Polarized political communication, oppositional media hostility, and selective exposure. The Journal of Politics, 74, 174–186. doi:10.1017/S002238161100123X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ariyanto, A., Hornsey, M. J., & Gallois, C. (2007). Group allegiances and perceptions of media bias: Taking into account both the perceiver and the source. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 10, 266–279. doi:10.1177/1368430207074733
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arpan, L. M., & Nabi, R. L. (2011). Exploring anger in the hostile media process: Effects on news preferences and source evaluation. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 88, 5–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arpan, L. M., & Raney, A. A. (2003). An experimental investigation of news source and the hostile media effect. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 80, 265–281. doi:10.1177/107769900308000203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnidge, M., & Rojas, H. (2014). Hostile media perceptions, presumed media influence, and political talk: Expanding the corrective action hypothesis. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 26, 135–156. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edt032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilton, N. (2014, August 7). Don't fight flames with flames. The New York Times, p. E2.
   Google Scholar
• Bolsen, T., Druckman, J. N., & Cook, F. L. (2014). The influence of partisan motivated reasoning on public opinion. Political Behavior, 36, 235–262. doi:10.1007/s11109-013-9238-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brock, D., Rabin-Havt, A. & Media Matters for America. (2012). The Fox effect: How Roger Ailes turned a network into a propaganda machine. New York, NY: Anchor Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bryant, J., Thompson, S., & Finklea, B. W. (2013). Fundamentals of media effects (2nd ed.). Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.
   Google Scholar
• Casetti, F., & Sampietro, S. (2012). With eyes, with hands: The relocation of cinema into the iphone. In P. Snickars & P. Vonderau (Eds.), Moving data: The iphone and the future of media (pp. 19–32). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chia, S. C., Yong, S. Y. J., Wong, Z. W. D., & Koh, W. L. (2007). Personal bias or government bias? Testing the hostile media effect in a regulated press system. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 19, 313–330. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edm011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, J., Park, H. S., & Chang, J. J. C. (2011). Hostile media perception, involvement types, and advocacy behaviors. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 88, 23–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, J., Yang, M., & Chang, J. J. C. (2009). Elaboration of the hostile media phenomenon: The roles of involvement, media skepticism, congruency of perceived media influence, and perceived opinion climate. Communication Research, 36, 54–75. doi:10.1177/0093650208326462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chomsky, N. (1983). The fateful triangle: The United States, Israel & the Palestinians. Boston, MA: South End Press.
   Google Scholar
• Christen, C. T., Kannaovakun, P., & Gunther, A. C. (2002). Hostile media perceptions: Partisan assessments of press and public during the 1997 United Parcel Service strike. Political Communication, 19, 423–436. doi:10.1080/10584600290109988
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coe, K., Tewksbury, D., Bond, B. J., Drogos, K. L., Porter, R. W., Yahn, A., & Zhang, Y. (2008). Hostile news: Partisan use and perceptions of cable news programming. Journal of Communication, 58, 201–219. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00381.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, G. L. (2003). Party over policy: The dominating impact of group influence on political beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 808–822.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, G. L., & Sherman, D. K. (2014). The psychology of change: Self-affirmation and social psychological intervention. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 333–371. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115137
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coulter, A. (2008). Guilty: Liberal “victims” and their assaults on America. New York, NY: Crown Forum.
   Google Scholar
• D'Alessio, D. (2003). An experimental examination of readers’ perceptions of media bias. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 80, 282–294. doi:10.1177/107769900308000204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davison, W. P. (1983). The third-person effect in communication. Public Opinion Quarterly, 47, 1–15. doi:10.1086/268763
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duck, J. M., Terry, D. J., & Hogg, M. A. (1998). Perceptions of a media campaign: The role of social identity and the changing intergroup context. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 3–16. doi:10.1177/0146167298241001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
   Google Scholar
• Eveland, W. P., Jr., & Shah, D. V. (2003). The impact of individual and interpersonal factors on perceived news media bias. Political Psychology, 24, 101–117. doi:10.1111/0162-895X.00318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, L. (2011). Partisan differences in opinionated news perceptions: A test of the hostile media effect. Political Behavior, 33, 407–432. doi:10.1007/s11109-010-9139-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, L. (2014). The hostile media effect. In K. Kenski & K. H. Jamieson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political communication. Retreived from www.oxfordhandbooks.com/search?siteToSearch=aup&q=kenski&searchBtN. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199793471.013.011
   Google Scholar
• Fisk, R. (1990). Pity the nation: The abduction of Lebanon. New York, NY: Atheneum.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, T. L. (1989). From Beirut to Jerusalem. New York, NY: Farrar Straus Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Friel, H., & Falk, R. (2007). Israel-Palestine on record: How the New York Times misreports conflict in the Middle East. London, UK: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Garrett, R. K., Gvirsman, S. D., Johnson, B. K., Tsfati, Y., Neo, R., & Dal, A. (2014). Implications of pro- and counterattitudinal information exposure for affective polarization. Human Communication Research, 40, 309–332. doi:10.1111/hcre.12028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gastil, J. (2008). Political communication and deliberation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Giner-Sorolla, R., & Chaiken, S. (1994). The causes of hostile media judgments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 165–180. doi:10.1006/jesp.1994.1008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman, S. K., & Mutz, D. C. (2011). The friendly media phenomenon: A cross-national analysis of cross-cutting exposure. Political Communication, 28, 42–66. doi:10.1080/10584609.2010.544280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunther, A. C., & Chia, S. C.-Y. (2001). Predicting pluralistic ignorance: The hostile media perception and its consequences. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 78, 688–701. doi:10.1177/107769900107800405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunther, A. C., & Christen, C. T. (2002). Projection or persuasive press? Contrary effects of personal opinion and perceived news coverage on estimates of public opinion. Journal of Communication, 52, 177–195. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2002.tb02538.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunther, A. C., Christen, C. T., Liebhart, J. L., & Chia, S. C.-Y. (2001). Congenial public, contrary press, and biased estimates of the climate of opinion. Public Opinion Quarterly, 65, 295–320. doi:10.1086/322846
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunther, A. C., Edgerly, S., Akin, H., & Broesch, J. A. (2012). Partisan evaluation of partisan information. Communication Research, 39, 439–457. doi:10.1177/0093650212441794
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunther, A. C., & Liebhart, J. L. (2006). Broad reach or biased source? Decomposing the hostile media effect. Journal of Communication, 56, 449–466. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00295.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunther, A. C., Miller, N., & Liebhart, J. L. (2009). Assimilation and contrast in a test of the hostile media effect. Communication Research, 36, 747–764. doi:10.1177/0093650209346804
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunther, A. C., Perloff, R. M., & Tsfati, Y. (2008). Public opinion and the third-person effect. In W. Donsbach & M. W. Traugott (Eds.), The Sage handbook of public opinion research (pp. 184–191). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gunther, A. C., & Schmitt, K. (2004). Mapping boundaries of the hostile media effect. Journal of Communication, 54, 55–70. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2004.tb02613.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunther, A. C., & Storey, J. D. (2003). The influence of presumed influence. Journal of Communication, 53, 199–215. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2003.tb02586.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutmann, A., & Thompson, D. (2012). The spirit of compromise: Why governing demands it and campaigning undermines it. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, G. J., & Kim, H. (2011). Is the media biased against me? A meta-analysis of the hostile media effect research. Communication Research Reports, 28, 169–179. doi:10.1080/08824096.2011.565280
   Google Scholar
• Hartmann, T., & Tanis, M. (2013). Examining the hostile media effect as an intergroup phenomenon: The role of ingroup identification and status. Journal of Communication, 63, 535–555. doi:10.1111/jcom.12031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hastorf, A. H., & Cantril, H. (1954). They saw a game: A case study. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 49, 129–134. doi:10.1037/h0057880
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Held, D. (2006). Models of democracy (3rd ed.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hovland, C. I., Harvey, O. J., & Sherif, M. (1957). Assimilation and contrast effects in reactions to communication and attitude change. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 55, 244–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubbard, B. (2014, July 30). Loss of shelter and electricity worsens a crisis for fleeing Gazans. The New York Times, p. A6.
   Google Scholar
• Huge, M., & Glynn, C. J. (2010). Hostile media and the campaign trail: Perceived media bias in the race for governor. Journal of Communication, 60, 165–181. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01473.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphreys, L., Gill, P., Krishnamurthy, B., & Newbury, E. (2013). Historicizing new media: A content analysis of Twitter. Journal of Communication, 63, 413–431. doi:10.1111/jcom.12030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, H., Pan, Z., & Sun, Y. (2008). Influence of hostile media perception on willingness to engage in discursive activities: An examination of mediating role of media indignation. Media Psychology, 11, 76–97. doi:10.1080/15213260701813454
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyengar, S., & Hahn, K. S. (2009). Red media, blue media: Evidence of ideological sensitivity in media use. Journal of Communication, 59, 19–39. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01402.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyengar, S., Sood, G., & Lelkes, Y. (2012). Affect, not ideology: A social identity perspective on polarization. Public Opinion Quarterly, 76, 405–431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, B. T., & Eagly, A. H. (1989). Effects of involvement on persuasion: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 290–314. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.106.2.290
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, K. S., & Pasadeos, Y. (2007). Study of partisan news readers reveals hostile media perceptions of balanced stories. Newspaper Research Journal, 28, 99–106.
   Google Scholar
• Kressel, N. J. (1987). Biased judgments of media bias: A case study of the Arab-Israeli dispute. Political Psychology, 8, 211–227. doi:10.2307/3791301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladd, J. M. (2012). Why Americans hate the media and how it matters. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, T.-T. (2005). The liberal media myth revisited: An examination of factors influencing perceptions of media bias. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 49, 43–64. doi:10.1207/s15506878jobem4901_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levendusky, M. (2013). How partisan media polarize America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lord, C. G., Ross, L., & Lepper, M. R. (1979). Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 2098–2109. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.11.2098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahler, J. (2014, August 13). On Twitter, mourning is collective. The New York Times, pp. C1, C4.
   Google Scholar
• Mahler, J. (2015, March 9). Who spewed that abuse? Yik Yak isn't telling. The New York Times, pp. A1, B4.
   Google Scholar
• Maoz, Z. (2009). Defending the holy land: A critical analysis of Israel's security & foreign policy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Matheson, K., & Dursun, S. (2001). Social identity precursors to the hostile media phenomenon: Partisan perceptions of coverage of the Bosnian conflict. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 4, 116–125. doi:10.1177/1368430201004002003
   Google Scholar
• Matthes, J. (2013). The affective underpinnings of hostile media perceptions: Exploring the distinct effects of affective and cognitive involvement. Communication Research, 40, 360–387. doi:10.1177/0093650211420255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muravchik, J. (1983, January). Misreporting Lebanon. Policy Review, 23, 11–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Gorman, H. J. (1975). Pluralistic ignorance and white estimates of white support for racial segregation. Public Opinion Quarterly, 39, 313–330. doi:10.1086/268231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Keefe, D. J. (1990). Persuasion: Theory and research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Olmstead, K., Jurkowitz, M., Mitchell, A., & Enda, J. (2013). How Americans get TV news at home. Retrieved from http://www.journalism.org/2013/10/11/how-americans-get tv-news-at-home/.
   Google Scholar
• Peretz, M. (1982, August 2). Lebanon eyewitness. The New Republic, 187(5), 15–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perloff, R. M. (1989). Ego-involvement and the third person effect of televised news coverage. Communication Research, 16, 236–262. doi:10.1177/009365089016002004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perloff, R. M. (2009). Mass media, social perception, and the third-person effect. In J. Bryant & M. B. Oliver (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 252–268). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., Briñol, P., & Tormala, Z. L. (2002). Thought confidence as a determinant of persuasion: The self-validation hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 722–741. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.5.722
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., & Wegener, D. T. (1999). The elaboration likelihood model: Current status and controversies. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 41–72). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Internet Project. (2014). Social networking fact sheet. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/fact-sheets/social-networking-fact-sheet/.
   Google Scholar
• Podhoretz, N. (1982). J'accuse. Commentary, 74(3), 21–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pronin, E., Lin, D. Y., & Ross, L. (2002). The bias blind spot: Perceptions of bias in self versus others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 369–381. doi:10.1177/0146167202286008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radway, J. A. (1984). Reading the romance: Women, patriarchy, and popular literature. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reid, S. A. (2012). A self-categorization explanation for the hostile media effect. Journal of Communication, 62, 381–399. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01647.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rich, F. (2014, August 3). A distant mirror. The New York Times Book Review, 1, 16–17.
   Google Scholar
• Rojas, H. (2010). “Corrective” actions in the public sphere: How perceptions of media and media effects shape political behaviors. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 22, 343–363. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edq018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudoren, J. (2014a, July 29). Tunnels lead right to heart of Israeli fear. The New York Times, A1, A6.
   Google Scholar
• Rudoren, J. (2014b, August 6). Civilian or not? New fight in tallying the dead. The New York Times, pp. A1, A8.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt, K. M., Gunther, A. C., & Liebhart, J. L. (2004). Why partisans see mass media as biased. Communication Research, 31, 623–641. doi:10.1177/0093650204269390
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweisberger, V., Billinson, J., & Chock, T. M. (2014). Facebook, the third-person effect, and the differential impact hypothesis. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19, 403–413. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherif, C. W., & Sherif, M. (Eds.). (1967). Attitude, ego-involvement, and change. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Stroud, N. J. (2008). Media use and political predispositions: Revisiting the concept of selective exposure. Political Behavior, 30, 341–366. doi:10.1007/s11109-007-9050-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroud, N. J. (2011). Niche news: The politics of news choice. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sundar, S. S., Oh, J., Kang, H., & Sreenivasan, A. (2013). How does technology persuade? Theoretical mechanisms for persuasive technologies. In J. P. Dillard & L. Shen (Eds.), The Sage handbook of persuasion: Developments in theory and practice (2nd ed., pp. 388–404). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
   Google Scholar
• Tal-Or, N., Cohen, J, Tsfati, Y., & Gunther, A. C. (2010). Testing causal direction in the influence of presumed media influence. Communication Research, 37, 801–824. doi:10.1177/0093650210362684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsfati, Y. (2007). Hostile media perceptions, presumed media influence, and minority alienation: The case of Arabs in Israel. Journal of Communication, 57, 632–651. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2007.00361.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsfati, Y., & Cohen, J. (2003). On the effect of the “third-person effect”: Perceived influence of media coverage and residential mobility intentions. Journal of Communication, 53, 711–727. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2003.tb02919.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsfati, Y., & Cohen, J. (2005a). Democratic consequences of hostile media perceptions: The case of Gaza settlers. The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 10, 28–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsfati, Y., & Cohen, J. (2005b). The influence of presumed media influence on democratic legitimacy: The case of Gaza settlers. Communication Research, 32, 794–821. doi:10.1177/0093650205281057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2013). The differential susceptibility to media effects model. Journal of Communication, 63, 221–243. doi:10.1111/jcom.12024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallone, R. P., Ross, L., & Lepper, M. R. (1985). The hostile media phenomenon: Biased perception and perceptions of media bias in coverage of the Beirut massacre. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 577–585. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.49.3.577
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, B. R., & Riffe, D. (2013). Perceived threat, immigration policy support, and media coverage: Hostile media and presumed influence. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 25, 459–479. doi:10.1093/ijpor/eds032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei, R., Chia, S. C., & Lo, V.-H. (2011). Third-person effect and hostile media perception influences on voter attitudes toward polls in the 2008 U.S. presidential election. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 23, 169–190. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edq044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar