Extrovert and Lonely Individuals’ Social TV Viewing Experiences: A Mediating and Moderating Role of Social Presence

REFERENCES

• Amichai-Hamburger, Y., Kaplan, H., & Dorpatcheon, N. (2008). Click to the past: The impact of extroversion by users of nostalgic websites on the use of Internet social services. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 1907–1912. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2008.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amichai-Hamburger, Y., & Vintizky, G. (2010). Social network use and personality. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 1289–1295. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amiel, T., & Sargent, S. L. (2004). Individual differences in Internet usage motives. Computers in Human Behavior, 20, 711–726. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2004.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biocca, F., Harms, C., & Burgoon, J. K. (2003). Towards a more robust theory and measure of social presence: Review and suggested criteria. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 12, 456–480. doi:10.1162/105474603322761270
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd, D. (2007). Why youth (heart) social network sites: The role of networked publics in teenage social life. In D. Buckingham (Eds.), MacArthur foundation series on digital learning–youth, identity, and digital media volume (pp. 119–142). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bulkeley, W. (2010, April 20). Social TV: Relying on relationships to rebuild TV audiences. MIT Technology Review. Retrieved from http://www2.technologyreview.com/article/418541/tr10-social-tv/
   Google Scholar
• Chorianopoulos, K. (2007). Content-enriched communication-supporting the social uses of TV. Journal of Communications Network, 6, 23–30.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, E. L., & Lancaster, A. L. (2014). Individual differences in in-person and social media television coviewing: The role of emotional contagion, need to belong, and coviewing orientation. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 17, 512–518. doi:10.1089/cyber.2013.0484
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Correa, T., Hinsley, A. W., & Zúñiga, H. G. (2010). Who interacts on the Web? The intersection of users’ personality and social media use. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 247–253. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2009.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doughty, M., Rowland, D., & Lawson, S. (2011). Co-viewing live TV with digital backchannel streams. Proceedings of EuroITV 2011, 141–144. doi: 10.1145/2000119.2000147
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, C., Edwards, A., Spence, P. R., & Westerman, D. (2015). Initial interaction expectations with robots: Testing the human-to-human interaction script. Communication Studies, 1–12. doi:10.1080/10510974.2015.1121899
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleming, M. J., Wood, R., & Debra, J. (2001). Effects of violent versus nonviolent video games on children’s arousal, aggressive mood, and positive mood. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31, 2047–2071. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2001.tb00163.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frison, E., & Eggermont, S. (2015). Toward an integrated and differential approach to the relationships between loneliness, different types of Facebook use, and adolescents’ depressed mood. Communication Research. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0093650215617506
   Google Scholar
• Han, E., & Lee, S.-W. (2014). Motivations for the complementary use of text-based media during linear TV viewing: An exploratory study. Computers in Human Behavior, 32, 235–243. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.12.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, J. Y., Kim, J. H., Yoon, H. J., Shim, M., McTavish, F. M., & Gustafson, D. H. (2012). Social and psychological determinants of levels of engagement with an online breast cancer support group: Posters, lurkers, and nonusers. Journal of Health Communication, 17, 356–371. doi:10.1080/10810730.2011.585696
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassanein, K., & Head, M. (2005). The impact of infusing social presence in the web interface: An investigation across product types. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 10(2), 31–55. doi:10.2753/JEC1086-4415100202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huijnen, C. A., IJsselsteijn, W. A., Markopoulos, P., & De Ruyter, B. (2004). Social presence and group attraction: Exploring the effects of awareness systems in the home. Cognition, Technology & Work, 6, 41–44. doi:10.1007/s10111-003-0141-z
   Google Scholar
• John, O. P., Naumann, L. P., & Soto, C. J. (2008). Paradigm shift to the integrative big five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues. In O. John, R. W. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 114–158). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J., LaRose, R., & Peng, W. (2009). Loneliness as the cause and the effect of problematic Internet use: The relationship between Internet use and psychological well-being. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 12, 451–455. doi:10.1089/cpb.2008.0327
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kim, J., & Song, H. (2016). Celebrity’s self-disclosure on Twitter and parasocial relationships: A mediating role of social presence. Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 570–577. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.083
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J., Song, H., & Luo, W. (2016). Broadening the understanding of social presence: Implications and contributions to the mediated communication and online education. Computers in Human Behavior, 64, 672–679. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J., & Timmerman, C. E. (2016). Effects of supportive feedback messages on exergame experiences: A mediating role of social presence. Journal of Media Psychology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1027/1864-1105/a000175
   Google Scholar
• Krämer, N. C., Winter, S., Benninghoff, B., & Gallus, C. (2015). How “social” is Social TV? The influence of social motives and expected outcomes on the usage of Social TV applications. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 255–262. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraut, R., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J. N., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, A. M. (2002). Internet paradox revisited. Journal of Social Issues, 58, 49–74. doi:10.1111/1540-4560.00248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krcmar, M., & Kean, L. G. (2005). Uses and gratifications of media violence: Personality correlates of viewing and liking violent genres. Media Psychology, 7, 399–420. doi:10.1207/S1532785XMEP0704_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, E. J. (2013). Effectiveness of politicians’ soft campaign on Twitter versus TV: Cognitive and experiential routes. Journal of Communication, 63, 953–974. doi:10.1111/jcom.12049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, E. J., & Shin, S. Y. (2012). Are they talking to me? Cognitive and affective effects of interactivity in politicians’ Twitter communication. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15, 515–520. doi:10.1089/cyber.2012.0228
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, K. M., & Nass, C. (2004). The multiple source effect and synthesized speech: Doubly-disembodied language as a conceptual framework. Human Communication Research, 30, 182–207. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2004.tb00730.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, K. M. (2004). Presence, explicated. Communication Theory, 14, 27–50. doi:10.1093/ct/14.1.27
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, K. M., & Nass, C. (2005). Social-psychological origins of feelings of presence: Creating social presence with machine-generated voices. Media Psychology, 7, 31–45. doi:10.1207/S1532785XMEP0701_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, K. M., Park, N., & Song, H. (2005). Can a robot be perceived as a developing creature? Effects of a robot’s long-term cognitive developments on its social presence and people’s social responses toward it. Human Communication Research, 31, 538–563. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2005.tb00882.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, K. M., Peng, W., Jin, S. A., & Yan, C. (2006). Can robots manifest personality? An empirical test of personality recognition, social responses, and social presence in human–robot interaction. Journal of Communication, 56, 754–772. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00318.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lull, J. (1980). The social uses of television. Human Communication Research, 6, 197–209. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1980.tb00140.x
   Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, D. P., Warsi, G., & Dwyer, J. H. (1995). A simulation study of mediated effect measures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 30, 41–62. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr3001_3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marwick, A. E., & Boyd, D. (2011). I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media and Society, 13, 114–133. doi:10.1177/1461444810365313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenna, K. Y. A., & Bargh, J. A. (1998). Coming out in the age of the Internet: Identity “demarginalization” through virtual group participation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 681–694. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.75.3.681
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montpetit, M. J., & Médard, M. (2012). Social television: Enabling technologies and architectures. Proceedings of the IEEE, 100, 1395–1399. doi:10.1109/JPROC.2012.2189804
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, K., & McElroy, J. C. (2012). The influence of personality on Facebook usage, wall postings, and regret. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 267–274. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2011.09.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (2005). Distance education: A systems view. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Murry, J. P., Lastovicka, J. L., & Singh, S. N. (1992). Feeling and liking responses to television programs: An examination of two explanations for media-context effects. Journal of Consumer Research. 18, 441–451. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2489257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nabi, R. L., & Krcmar, M. (2004). Conceptualizing media enjoyment as attitude: Implications for mass media effects research. Communication Theory, 14, 288–310. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2004.tb00316.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nathan, M., Harrison, C., Yarosh, S., Terveen, L., Stead, L., & Amento, B. (2008). CollaboraTV: Making television viewing social again. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Designing Interactive User Experiences for TV and Video, 85–94. doi: 10.1145/1453805.1453824
   Google Scholar
• Nowak, K., & Biocca, F. (2003). The effect of the agency and anthropomorphism on users’ sense of telepresence, copresence, and social presence in virtual environments. Presence, 12, 481–494. doi:10.1162/105474603322761289
   Google Scholar
• Oehlberg, L., Ducheneaut, N., Thornton, J. D., Moore, R. J., & Nickell, E. (2006). Social TV: Designing for distributed, sociable television viewing. Proceedings of EuroITV 2006. Athens, Greece: University of Economics and Business.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, M. B., & Krakowiak, K. M. (2009). Individual differences in media effects. In J. Bryant, & M. B. Oliver (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 517–531). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 717–731.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891. doi:10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pynta, P., Seixas, S. A., Nield, G. E., Hier, J., & Millward, E. (2014). The power of social television: Can social media build viewer engagement? A new approach to brain imaging of viewer immersion. Journal of Advertising Research, 54(1), 71–80. doi:10.2501/JAR-54-1-071-080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raney, A. A., & Depalma, A. J. (2006). The effect of viewing varying levels and contexts of violent sports programming on enjoyment, mood, and perceived violence. Mass Communication & Society, 9, 321–338. doi:10.1207/s15327825mcs0903_4
   Google Scholar
• Ross, C., Orr, E. S., Sisic, M., Areseneault, J. M., Simmering, M. G., & Orr, R. R. (2009). Personality and motivations associated with Facebook use. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 579–586. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2008.12.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, A. M. (1984). Ritualized and instrumental television viewing. Journal of Communication, 34, 67–77. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1984.tb02174.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, D., Peplau, L. A., & Cutrona, C. E. (1980). The revised UCLA loneliness scale: Concurrent and discriminate validity evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 472–480.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherry, J. L. (2004). Flow and media enjoyment. Communication Theory, 14, 328–347. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2004.tb00318.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. London, UK: Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Song, H., Kim, J., & Lee, K. M. (2014). Virtual body vs. real body in exergames: Reducing social physique anxiety in exercise experiences. Computers in Human Behavior, 36, 282–285. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.03.059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, H., Kim, J., Tenzek, K. E., & Lee, K. (2013). The effects of competition and competitiveness upon intrinsic motivation in exergames. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 1702–1708. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.01.042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, H., Zmyslinski-Seelig, A., Kim, J., Drent, A., Victor, A., Omori, K., & Allen, M. (2014). Does Facebook make you lonely? A meta analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 36, 446–452. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.04.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spence, P. R., Westerman, D., Edwards, C., & Edwards, A. (2014). Welcoming our robot overlords: Initial expectations about interaction with a robot. Communication Research Reports, 31, 272–280. doi:10.1080/08824096.2014.924337
   Google Scholar
• Tamborini, R., Bowman, N. D., Eden, A., Grizzard, M., & Organ, A. (2010). Defining media enjoyment as the satisfaction of intrinsic needs. Journal of Communication, 60, 758–777. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01513.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tichi, C. (1991). Electronic hearth: Creating an American television culture. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Torrez-Riley, J. (2011). The social TV phenomenon: New technologies look to enhance television’s role as an enabler of social interaction. Elon, NC: Elon University.
   Google Scholar
• Vettehen, P. H., Nuijten, K., & Peeters, A. (2008). Explaining effects of sensationalism on liking of television news stories: The role of emotional arousal. Communication Research. doi:10.1177/0093650208315960
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weaver, A. J., & Wilson, B. J. (2009). The role of graphic and sanitized violence in the enjoyment of television dramas. Human Communication Research, 35, 442–463. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2009.01358.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westerman, D., Spence, P. R., & Lin, X. (2015). Telepresence and exemplification in health messages: The relationships among spatial and social presence and exemplars and exemplification effects. Communication Reports, 28(2), 92–102. doi:10.1080/08934215.2014.971838
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wohn, D. Y., & Na, E. K. (2011). Tweeting about TV: Sharing television viewing experiences via social media message streams. First Monday, 16, 3. doi:10.5210/fm.v16i3.3368
   Google Scholar