Partisan Media Selectivity and Partisan Identity Threat: The Role of Social and Geographic Context

References

• Abramowitz, A. I., & Saunders, K. L. (2008). Is polarization a myth? The Journal of Politics, 70, 542–555. doi:10.1017/s0022381608080493
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arceneaux, K., Johnson, M., & Murphy, C. (2012). Polarized political communication, oppositional media hostility, and selective exposure. The Journal of Politics, 74, 174–186. doi:10.1017/S002238161100123X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartels, B. L., Box-Steffensmeier, J. M., Smidt, C. D., & Smith, R. M. (2011). The dynamic properties of individual-level party identification in the United States. Electoral Studies, 30, 210–222. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2010.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartels, L. M. (2000). Partisanship and voting behavior, 1952-1996. American Journal of Political Science, 44, 35–50. doi:10.2307/2669291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry, J. M., & Sobieraj, S. (2014). The outrage industry: Political opinion media and the new incivility. Oxford; NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bimber, B. A. (2003). Information and American democracy: Technology in the evolution of political power. Cambridge, UK; New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bollen, K. A., Biemer, P. P., Karr, A. F., Tueller, S., & Berzofsky, M. E. (2016). Are survey weights needed? A review of diagnostic tests in regression analysis. Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application, 3, 375–392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E., & Stokes, D. E. (1960). The American voter. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Cho, W. K. T., Gimpel, J. G., & Hui, I. S. (2013). Voter migration and the geographic sorting of the American electorate. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 103, 856–870. doi:10.1080/00045608.2012.720229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dilliplane, S. (2011). All the news you want to hear: The impact of partisan news exposure on political participation. Public Opinion Quarterly, 75, 287–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dilliplane, S., Goldman, S. K., & Mutz, D. C. (2013). Televised exposure to politics: New measures for a fragmented media environment. American Journal of Political Science, 57, 236–248. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2012.00600.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DuMouchel, W. H., & Duncan, G. J. (1983). Using sample survey weights in multiple regression analyses of stratified samples. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 78, 535–543. doi:10.2307/2288115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ethier, K. A., & Deaux, K. (1994). Negotiating social identity when contexts change: Maintaining identification and responding to threat. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 243–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eveland, W. P., Jr., & Hutchens, M. J. (2013). The role of conversation in developing accurate political perceptions: A multilevel social network approach. Human Communication Research, 39, 422–444. doi:10.1111/hcre.12011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eveland, W. P., Jr., Hutchens, M. J., & Morey, A. C. (2013). Political network size and its antecedents and consequences. Political Communication, 30, 371–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eveland, W. P., Jr., & Kleinman, S. B. (2013). Comparing general and political discussion networks within voluntary organizations using social network analysis. Political Behavior, 35, 65–87. doi:10.1007/s11109-011-9187-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, S., & Johnston, C. (2014). Understanding the determinants of political ideology: Implications of structural complexity. Political Psychology, 35, 337–358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson, and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Freedman, J. L., & Sears, D. O. (1965). Selective exposure. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 59–98). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gallego, A., Buscha, F., Sturgis, P., & Oberski, D. (2016). Places and preferences: A longitudinal analysis of self-selection and contextual effects. British Journal of Political Science, 46, 529–550. doi:10.1017/S0007123414000337
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, W., Mulvey, E. P., & Shaw, E. C. (1995). Regression analyses of counts and rates: Poisson, overdispersed Poisson, and negative binomial models. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 392–404. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.118.3.392
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrett, R. K., Gvirsman, S. D., Johnson, B. K., Tsfati, Y., Neo, R., & Dal, A. (2014). Implications of pro- and counterattitudinal information exposure for affective polarization. Human Communication Research, 40, 309–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrett, R. K., & Stroud, N. J. (2014). Partisan paths to exposure diversity: Differences in pro- and counterattitudinal news consumption. Journal of Communication, 64, 680–701.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelman, A. (2008). Scaling regression inputs by dividing by two standard deviations. Statistics in Medicine, 27, 2865–2873. doi:10.1002/sim.3107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gervais, B. T. (2014). Following the news? Reception of uncivil partisan media and the use of incivility in political expression. Political Communication, 31, 564–583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gimpel, J. G., Dyck, J. J., & Shaw, D. R. (2004). Registrants, voters, and turnout variability across neighborhoods. Political Behavior, 26, 343–375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, D. P., Palmquist, B., & Schickler, E. (2004). Partisan hearts and minds: Political parties and the social identities of voters. New Haven, Conn.; London: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, S. (1999). Understanding party identification: A social identity approach. Political Psychology, 20, 393–403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horton, D., & Wohl, R. R. (1956). Mass communication and para-social interaction: Observations on intimacy at a distance. Psychiatry, 19, 215–229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huckfeldt, R. R., Johnson, P. E., & Sprague, J. D. (2004). Political disagreement: The survival of diverse opinions within communication networks. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huddy, L. (2001). From social to political identity: A critical examination of social identity theory. Political Psychology, 22, 127–156. doi:10.1111/0162-895X.00230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huddy, L., Mason, L., & Aarøe, L. (2015). Expressive partisanship: Campaign involvement, political emotion, and partisan identity. American Political Science Review, 109, 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyengar, S., & Hahn, K. S. (2009). Red media, blue media: Evidence of ideological selectivity in media use. Journal of Communication, 59, 19–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyengar, S., Sood, G., & Lelkes, Y. (2012). Affect, not ideology: A social identity perspective on polarization. Public Opinion Quarterly, 76, 405–431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyengar, S., & Westwood, S. J. (2015). Fear and loathing across party lines: New evidence on group polarization. American Journal of Political Science, 59, 690–707.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John, N. A., & Dvir-Gvirsman, S. (2015). “I don’t like you any more”: Facebook unfriending by Israelis during the Israel-Gaza conflict of 2014. Journal of Communication, 65, 953–974.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keith, B. E., Magleby, D. B., Nelson, C. J., Orr, E., Westlye, M. C., & Wolfinger, R. E. (1992). The myth of the independent voter. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klar, S. (2014). Identity and engagement among political independents in America. Political Psychology, 35, 577–591. doi:10.1111/pops.12036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klofstad, C. A., Sokhey, A. E., & McClurg, S. D. (2013). Disagreeing about disagreement: How conflict in social networks affects political behavior. American Journal of Political Science, 57, 120–134. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2012.00620.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knobloch-Westerwick, S., Johnson, B. K., & Westerwick, A. (2015). Confirmation bias in online searches: Impacts of selective exposure before an election on political attitude strength and shifts. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 20, 171–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazarsfeld, P. F., Berelson, B., & Gaudet, H. (1948). The people’s choice: How the voter makes up his mind in a presidential campaign. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lea, M., Spears, R., & Watt, S. E. (2007). Visibility and anonymity effects on attraction and group cohesiveness. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 761–773.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levendusky, M. S. (2013). Why do partisan media polarize viewers? American Journal of Political Science, 57, 611–623.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makse, T., & Sokhey, A. E. (2012). Yard sign displays and the enthusiasm gap in the 2008 and 2010 elections. PS: Political Science & Politics, 45, 694–699. doi:10.1017/S1049096512000777
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, W. E. (1991). Party identification, realignment, and party voting: Back to the basics. The American Political Science Review, 85, 557–568. doi:10.2307/1963175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mutz, D. C. (2002). The consequences of cross-cutting networks for political participation. American Journal of Political Science, 46, 838. doi:10.2307/3088437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mutz, D. C. (2006). Hearing the other side: Deliberative versus participatory democracy. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, M. T., & Isbell, L. M. (2010). How I vote depends on how I feel: The differential impact of anger and fear on political information processing. Psychological Science, 21, 548–550. doi:10.1177/0956797610364006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrocik, J. R. (1974). An analysis of intransitivities in the index of party identification. Political Methodology, 1, 31–47.
   Google Scholar
• Petrocik, J. R. (2009). Measuring party support: Leaners are not independents. Electoral Studies, 28, 562–572. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2009.05.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfeffermann, D., & Sverchkov, M. (1999). Parametric and semi-parametric estimation of regression models fitted to survey data. Sankhyā: the Indian Journal of Statistics, 61, 166–186.
   Google Scholar
• Prior, M. (2009). The immensely inflated news audience: Assessing bias in self-reported news exposure. Public Opinion Quarterly, 73, 130–143. doi:10.1093/poq/nfp002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivers, D. (2007). Sampling for web surveys. Presented at the Joint Statistical Meetings, Salt Lake City, Utah.
   Google Scholar
• Slater, M. D. (2007). Reinforcing spirals: The mutual influence of media selectivity and media effects and their impact on individual behavior and social identity. Communication Theory, 17, 281–303. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2007.00296.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slater, M. D. (2015). Reinforcing spirals model: Conceptualizing the relationship between media content exposure and the development and maintenance of attitudes. Media Psychology, 18, 370–395. doi:10.1080/15213269.2014.897236
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sokhey, A. E., Baker, A., & Djupe, P. A. (2015). The dynamics of socially supplied information: Examining discussion network stability over time. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 27, 565–587. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edv028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, H. (2015). Uncovering the structural underpinnings of political discussion networks: Evidence from an exponential random graph model. Journal of Communication, 65, 146–169. doi: 10.1111/jcom.12140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, H. (2017). Why do people (sometimes) become selective about news? The role of emotions and partisan differences in selective approach and avoidance. Mass Communication and Society, 20, 47–67. doi:10.1080/15205436.2016.1187755
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroud, N. J. (2008). Media use and political predispositions: Revisiting the concept of selective exposure. Political Behavior, 30, 341–366. doi:10.1007/s11109-007-9050-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroud, N. J. (2010). Polarization and partisan selective exposure. Journal of Communication, 60, 556–576. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01497.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunstein, C. R. (2001). Republic.com. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. (2006). Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50, 755–769.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worschel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–48). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
   Google Scholar
• Theodoridis, A. G. (2017). Me, myself, and (I), (D), or (R)? Partisanship and political cognition through the lens of implicit identity. The Journal of Politics, Advance online publication. doi: 10.1086/692738
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (Eds.). (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Valentino, N. A., Banks, A. J., Hutchings, V. L., & Davis, A. K. (2009). Selective exposure in the Internet age: The interaction between anxiety and information utility. Political Psychology, 30, 591–613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wann, D. L., & Branscombe, N. R. (1990). Die-hard and fair-weather fans: Effects of identification on BIRGing and CORFing tendencies. Journal of Sport & Social Issues, 14, 103–117.
   Google Scholar
• Weeks, B. E. (2015). Emotions, partisanship, and misperceptions: How anger and anxiety moderate the effect of partisan bias on susceptibility to political misinformation. Journal of Communication, 65, 699–719. doi:10.1111/jcom.12164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkelmann, R. (2008). Econometric analysis of count data. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wojcieszak, M., Bimber, B., Feldman, L., & Stroud, N. J. (2016). Partisan news and political participation: Exploring mediated relationships. Political Communication, 33, 241–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar