Fake News Should Be Regulated Because It Influences Both “Others” and “Me”: How and Why the Influence of Presumed Influence Model Should Be Extended

References

• Aisch, G., Huang, J., & Kang, C. (2016). Dissecting the #pizzagate conspiracy theories. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/12/10/business/media/pizzagate.html
   Google Scholar
• Balmas, M. (2014). When fake news becomes real: Combined exposure to multiple news sources and political attitudes of inefficacy, alienation, and cynicism. Communication Research, 41, 430–454. doi:10.1177/0093650212453600
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnidge, M., & Rojas, H. (2014). Hostile media perceptions, presumed media influence, and political talk: Expanding the corrective action hypothesis. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 26, 135–156. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edt032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barthel, M., Mitchell, A., & Holcomb, H. (2016). Many Americans believe fake news is sowing confusion. Retrieved from http://www.journalism.org/2016/12/15/many-americans-believe-fake-news-is-sowing-confusion/
   Google Scholar
• Bernhard, U., & Dohle, M. (2015). Corrective or confirmative actions? Political online participation as a consequence of presumed media influences in election campaigns. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 12(3), 285–302. doi:10.1080/19331681.2015.1048918
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer, P. R., Young, D. G., & Morreale, M. (2013). The impact of real news about “fake news”: Intertextual processes and political satire. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 25, 323–343. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edt015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, S., & Moon, S.-I. (2016). Is the third-person effect real? A critical examination of rationales, testing methods, and previous findings of the third-person effect on censorship attitudes. Human Communication Research, 42, 312–337. doi:10.1111/hcre.12078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral science (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J., & Tsfati, Y. (2009). The influence of presumed media influence on strategic voting. Communication Research, 36(3), 359–378. doi:10.1177/0093650209333026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corvero, A. (2017, February 23). The new Italian draft law on “Fake News”: A potential threat to online media? The Perception. Retrieved from https://www.the-perception.com/politics/the-new-italian-draft-law-on-fake-news-a-potential-threat-to-online-media
   Google Scholar
• Davison, W. P. (1983). The third-person effect in communication. Public Opinion Quarterly, 47(1), 1–15. doi:10.1086/268763
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delli Carpini, M. X., & Keeter, S. (2005). What Americans know about politics and why it matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• DiFonzo, N., & Bordia, P. (2007). Rumor psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Dilworth, M. (2017, May 30). Facebook claims Germany’s new law to tackle fake news will cause tech companies to delete legal content. Independent. Retrieved from http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/facebook-germany-fake-news-law-tech-companies-delete-legal-content-social-media-hate-speech-fine-a7763081.html
   Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Eordogh, F. (2016, December 7). With pizzagate, is cybersteria the new normal? Forbes. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/fruzsinaeordogh/2016/12/07/with-pizzagate-is-cybersteria-the-new-normal/#2213abf52b68
   Google Scholar
• Flynn, D. J., Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2017). The nature and origins of misperceptions: Understanding false and unsupported beliefs about politics. Political Psychology, 38, 127–150. doi:10.1111/pops.2017.38.issue-S1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunther, A. (1991). What we think others think. Communication Research, 18(3), 355–372. doi:10.1177/009365091018003004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunther, A., & Storey, J. D. (2003). The influence of presumed influence. Journal of Communication, 53(2), 199–215. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2003.tb02586.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holbert, R. L. (2005). A typology for the study of entertainment television and politics. American Behavioral Scientist, 49, 436–453. doi:10.1177/0002764205279419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, Y., & Kwon, O. (2017). A study on the conceptualization and regulation measures on fake news: Focused on self-regulation of internet service providers. Journal of Media Law, Ethics and Policy Research, 16, 53–101.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, S., & Kim, W. (2017). Checking the fact-checking. Media Issues, 3(7). Retrieved from https://www.kpf.or.kr/site/kpf/research/selectMediaPdsView.do?seq=574167
   Google Scholar
• Lim, J. S. (2017). The third-person effect of online advertising of cosmetic surgery: A path model for predicting restrictive versus corrective actions. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 94(4), 972–993. doi:10.1177/1077699016687722
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo, V. H, & Wei, R. (2002). Third-person effect, gender, and pornography on the lnternet. Journal Of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 46, 13-33. doi: 10.1207/s15506878jobem4601_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuire, W. J. (1968). Personality and attitude change: An information-processing theory. In A. G. Greenwald, T. C. Brock, & T. M. Ostrom (Eds.), Psychological foundations of attitudes (pp. 171–196). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• McLeod, D. M., Eveland, W. P., & Nathanson, A. I. (1997). Support for censorship of violent and misogynic rap lyrics. Communication Research, 24, 153–174. doi:10.1177/009365097024002003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosseri, A. (2016). News feed FYI: Addressing hoaxes and fake news. Retrieved from https://newsroom.fb.com/news/2016/12/news-feed-fyi-addressing-hoaxes-and-fake-news/
   Google Scholar
• Neuwirth, K., & Frederick, E. (2002). Extending the framework of third-, first-, and second-person effects. Mass Communication and Society, 5(2), 113–140. doi:10.1207/S15327825MCS0502_2
   Google Scholar
• Paul, B., Salwen, M. B., & Dupagne, M. (2000). The third-person effect: A meta-analysis of the perceptual hypothesis. Mass Communication and Society, 3(1), 57–85. doi:10.1207/S15327825MCS0301_04
   Google Scholar
• Perloff, R. M. (2009). Mass media, social perception, and the third-person effect. In J. Bryant & M. B. Oliver (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 252–268). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Prior, M. (2009). The immensely inflated news audience: Assessing bias in self-reported news exposure. Public Opinion Quarterly, 73(1), 130–143. doi:10.1093/poq/nfp002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rojas, H., Barnidge, M., & Abril, E. P. (2016). Egocentric publics and corrective action. Communication and the Public, 1, 27–38. doi:10.1177/2057047315619421
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, V., Chen, Y., & Conroy, N. J. (2015). Deception detection for news: Three types of fakes. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 52, 1–4. doi:10.1002/pra2.2015.145052010083
   Google Scholar
• Salwen, M. B. (1998). Perceptions of media influence and support for censorship. Communication Research, 25(3), 259–285. doi:10.1177/009365098025003001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salwen, M. B., & Dupagne, M. (1999). The third-person effect. Communication Research, 26(5), 523–549. doi:10.1177/009365099026005001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmierbach, M., Boyle, M. P., & McLeod, D. M. (2008). Understanding person perceptions: Comparing four common statistical approaches to third-person research. Mass Communication and Society, 11, 492–513. doi:10.1080/15205430802375311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmierbach, M., Boyle, M. P., Xu, Q., & McLeod, D. M. (2011). Exploring third-person differences between gamers and nongamers. Journal of Communication, 61, 307–327. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01541.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shu, K., Sliva, A., Wang, S., Tang, J., & Liu, H. (2017). Fake news detection on social media: A data mining perspective. ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter, 19, 22–36. doi:10.1145/3137597
   Google Scholar
• Sun, Y., Pan, Z., & Shen, L. (2008). Understanding the third-person perception: Evidence from a meta-analysis. Journal of Communication, 58(2), 280–300. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00385.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tacchini, E., Ballarin, G., Della Vedova, M. L., Moret, S., & de Alfaro, L. (2017). Some like it hoax: Automated fake news detection in social networks. arXiv preprintarXiv:1704.07506
   Google Scholar
• Tal-Or, N., & Tsfati, Y. (2018). Does the co-viewing of sexual material affect rape myth acceptance? The role of the co-viewer’s reactions and gender. Communication Research, 45(4), 577–602. doi:10.1177/0093650215595073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tambini, D. (2017). Fake news: Public policy responses. London, UK: The London School of Economics and Political Science.
   Google Scholar
• Tsfati, Y., & Cohen, J. (2005). The influence of presumed media influence on democratic legitimacy. Communication Research, 32(6), 794–821. doi:10.1177/0093650205281057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verba, S., & Nie, N. H. (1972). Participation in America: Political democracy and social equality. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, J., & Gonzenbach, W. J. (2008). Does a perceptual discrepancy lead to action? A meta-analysis of the behavioral component of the third-person effect. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 20(3), 375–385. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edn031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar