Beyond the Notion of Accessibility Bias: Message Content as the Common Source of Agenda-Setting and Priming Effects

References

• Althaus, S. L., & Kim, Y. M. (2006). Priming effects in complex information environments: Reassessing the impact of news discourse on presidential approval. The Journal of Politics, 68(4), 960–976. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00483.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berman, M. (2017, September 25). Violent crimes and murders increased in 2016 for a second consecutive year, FBI says. The Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-nation/wp/2017/09/25/violent-crime-increased-in-2016-for-a-second-consecutive-year-fbi-says/
   Google Scholar
• Carpentier, F. D. (2014). Agenda setting and priming effects based on information presentation: Revisiting accessibility as a mechanism explaining agenda setting and priming. Mass Communication & Society, 17(4), 531–552. doi:10.1080/15205436.2013.816744
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2007a). A theory of framing and opinion formation in competitive elite environments. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 99–118. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00331_2.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2007b). Framing theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 10(1), 103–126. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.072805.103054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobb, M. D. (2005). Framing effects on public opinion about nanotechnology. Science Communication, 27(2), 221–239. doi:10.1177/1075547005281473
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, A. M., & Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82(6), 407–428. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.82.6.407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entman, R. M. (2007). Framing bias: Media in the distribution of power. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 163–173. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00336.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faris, R., Roberts, H., Etling, B., Bourassa, N., Zuckerman, E., & Benkler, Y. (2017). Partisanship, propaganda, and disinformation: Online media and the 2016 U.S. Presidential election. Retrieved from https://cyber.harvard.edu/publications/2017/08/mediacloud
   Google Scholar
• Fazio, R. H. (1990). A practical guide to the use of response latency in social psychological research. In C. Hendrick & M. S. Clark (Eds.), Review of personality and social psychology (pp. 74–97). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Geer, J. G. (1991). Do open-ended questions measure “salient” issues? Public Opinion Quarterly, 55(3), 360–370. doi:10.1086/269268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halpern, D. F., Blackman, S., & Salzman, B. (1989). Using statistical risk information to assess oral contraceptive safety. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 3(3), 251–260. doi:10.1002/acp.2350030305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, E. T. (1996). Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability, and salience. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 133–168). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, E. T., & Brendl, C. M. (1995). Accessibility and applicability: Some “activation rules” influencing judgment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31(3), 218–243. doi:10.1006/jesp.1995.1011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoenig, J. M., & Heisey, D. M. (2001). The abuse of power: The pervasive fallacy of power calculations for data analysis. The American Statistician, 55(1), 19–24. doi:10.1198/000313001300339897
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holbrook, A. R., & Hill, T. G. (2005). Agenda-setting and priming in prime time television: Crime dramas as political cues. Political Communication, 22(3), 277–295. doi:10.1080/10584600591006519
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horowitz, M. C., & Saunders, E. N. (2018, May 24). Why nuclear war with North Korea is less likely than you think. The Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2018/01/03/why-nuclear-war-with-north-korea-is-less-likely-than-you-think/?utm_term=.87a636a1d7b0
   Google Scholar
• Hosmer, D. W., Lemeshow, S., & Sturdivant, R. X. (2013). Applied logistic regression (3rd ed.). Holboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Iyengar, S. (1991). Is anyone responsible?: How television frames political issues. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Iyengar, S., & Kinder, D. R. (1987). News that matters. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Iyengar, S., & Simon, A. (1993). News coverage of the Gulf crisis and public opinion. Communication Research, 20(3), 365–383. doi:10.1177/009365093020003002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, J. M. (2017, November 15). Mentions of economic issues as top problem lowest since 1999. Retrieved from https://news.gallup.com/poll/222299/mentions-economic-issues-top-problem-lowest-1999.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Kearney, M. W. (2017). Trusting news project report 2017. Retrieved from https://www.rjionline.org/reporthtml.html
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y. M. (2005). Use and disuse of contextual primes in dynamic news environments. Journal of Communication, 55(4), 737–755. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2005.tb03020.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krosnick, J. A., & Kinder, D. R. (1990). Altering the foundations of support for the president through priming. The American Political Science Review, 84(2), 497–512. doi:10.2307/1963531
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaMotte, S. (2017, November 29). How to cope with fears of a nuclear disaster. CNN. Retrieved from https://www.cnn.com/2017/11/29/health/nuclear-disaster-fears-coping/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Lee, B., Kim, J., & Scheufele, D. A. (2016). Agenda setting in the Internet age: The reciprocity between online searches and issue salience. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 28(3), 440–455. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edv026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenz, G. S. (2009). Learning and opinion change, not priming: Reconsidering the priming hypothesis. American Journal of Political Science, 53(4), 821–837. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00403.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerner, M. (2017, August 24). We won’t go to war with North Korea on purpose. But we might by accident. The Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/made-by-history/wp/2017/08/24/we-wont-go-to-war-with-north-korea-on-purpose-but-we-might-by-accident/
   Google Scholar
• Leyens, J.-P., Yzerbyt, V., & Corneille, O. (1996). The role of applicability in the emergence of the overattribution bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(2), 219–229. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.2.219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthes, J. (2008). Need for orientation as a predictor of agenda-setting effects: Causal evidence from a two-wave panel study. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 20(4), 440–453. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edn042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy, J. (2017). Americans viewed N. Korea warily long before Trump’s warning. Retrieved from https://news.gallup.com/opinion/polling-matters/216413/americans-viewed-korea-warily-long-trump-warning.aspx?g_source=link_newsv9&g_campaign=item_224717&g_medium=copy
   Google Scholar
• McCombs, M. E. (2004). Setting the agenda: The mass media and public opinion. Malden, MA: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176–187. doi:10.1086/267990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLeod, D. M., & Shah, D. V. (2015). News frames and national security: Covering big brother. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, J. M. (2007). Examining the mediators of agenda setting: A new experimental paradigm reveals the role of emotions. Political Psychology, 28(6), 689–717. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2007.00600.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, J. M., & Krosnick, J. A. (2000). News media impact on the ingredients of presidential evaluations: Politically knowledgeable citizens are guided by a trusted source. American Journal of Political Science, 44(2), 301–315. doi:10.2307/2669312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “Most Important Problem”. (n.d.). Most important problem. Retrieved from https://news.gallup.com/poll/1675/most-important-problem.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, T. E., Clawson, R. A., & Oxley, Z. M. (1997). Media framing of a civil liberties conflict and its effect on tolerance. American Political Science Review, 91(3), 567–583. doi:10.2307/2952075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, T. E., Oxley, Z. M., & Clawson, R. A. (1997). Toward a psychology of framing effects. Political Behavior, 19(3), 221–246. doi:10.1023/A:1024834831093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “North Korea Profile.” (2019, April 26). North Korea profile—Timeline. Retrieved from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-pacific-15278612
   Google Scholar
• Price, V., & Tewksbury, D. (1997). News values and public opinion: A theoretical account of media priming and framing. In G. Barnett & F. Boster (Eds.), Progress in communication sciences (Vol. 13, pp. 173–212). Greenwich, CT: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Roessler, P., & Eichhorn, W. (1999). Agenda setting. In H.-B. Brosius & C. Holtz-Bacha (Eds.), The German communication yearbook (pp. 277–304). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roskos-Ewoldsen, D. R., Roskos-Ewoldsen, B., & Carpentier, F. R. D. (2009). Media priming: An updated synthesis. In J. Bryant & M. B. Oliver (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 74–93). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Scheufele, D. A. (2000). Agenda-setting, priming, and framing revisited: Another look at cognitive effects of political communication. Mass Communication and Society, 3(2), 297–316. doi:10.1207/S15327825MCS0323_07
   Google Scholar
• Scheufele, D. A., & Tewksbury, D. (2007). Framing, agenda setting, and priming: The evolution of three media effects models. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 9–20. doi:10.1111/j.0021-9916.2007.00326.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, F. (2004). Chronic accessibility and individual cognitions: Examining the effects of message frames in political advertisements. Journal of Communication, 54(1), 123–137. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2004.tb02617.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, M., & Saad, L. (2016, December 19). Economy top problem in a crowded field. Retrieved from https://news.gallup.com/poll/200105/economy-top-problem-crowded-field.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Takeshita, T. (2006). Current critical problems in agenda-setting research. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 18(3), 275–296. doi:10.1111/j.0021-9916.2007.00326.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valentino, N. A., Hutchings, V. L., & White, I. K. (2002). Cues that matter: How political ads prime racial attitudes during campaigns. American Political Science Review, 96(1), 75–90. doi:10.1017/S0003055402004240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viscusi, W. K., & Zeckhauser, R. J. (2004). The denominator blindness effect: Accident frequencies and the misjudgment of recklessness. American Law and Economics Review, 6(1), 72–94. doi:10.1093/aler/ahg012
   Google Scholar
• Vittinghoff, E., Glidden, D. V., Shiboski, S. C., & McCulloch, C. E. (2012). Regression methods in biostatistics: Linear, logistic, survival, and repeated measures models (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, X. T., & Johnston, V. S. (1995). Perceived social context and risk preference: A re‐examination of framing effects in a life‐death decision problem. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 8(4), 279–293. doi:10.1002/bdm.3960080405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wanta, W., & Hu, Y.-W. (1993). The agenda-setting effects of international news coverage: An examination of differing news frames. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 5(3), 250–264. doi:10.1093/ijpor/5.3.250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yioutas, J., & Segvic, I. (2003). Revisiting the Clinton/Lewinsky scandal: The convergence of agenda Setting and framing. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 80(3), 567–582. doi:10.1177/107769900308000306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, M. L. (1992). Dictionary of polling: The languages of contemporary opinion research. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
   Google Scholar