References
- Aarøe, L. (2011). Investigating frame strength: The case of episodic and thematic frames. Political Communication, 28(2), 207–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2011.568041
- Aizenman, N. (2018, November 9). Deaths from gun violence: How the U.S. compares with the rest of the world. NPR. https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2018/11/09/666209430/deaths-from-gun-violence-how-the-u-s-compares-with-the-rest-of-the-world
- Bas, O., & Grabe, M. E. (2015). Emotion-provoking personalization of news: Informing citizens and closing the knowledge gap? Communication Research, 42(2), 159–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650213514602
- Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2007). A theory of framing and opinion formation in competitive elite environments. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 99–118. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00331_3.x
- D’Angelo, P., & Kuypers, J. A. (2010). Doing news framing analysis: Empirical and theoretical perspectives. Routledge.
- Dam, A. V. (2018, May 31). The surprising way gun violence is dividing America. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2018/05/31/the-surprising-way-gun-violence-is-dividing-america/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.cd6836599471
- Davlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2018). Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. arXiv Preprint arXiv, 1810, 04805. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1810.04805.pdf&usg=ALkJrhhzxlCL6yTht2BRmH9atgvKFxHsxQ
- DeFoster, R., & Swalve, N. (2018). Guns, culture or mental health? Framing mass shootings as a public health crisis. Health Communication, 33(10), 1211–1222. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2017.1350907
- Edy, J., & Meirick, P. C. (2019). A nation fragmented: The public agenda in the information age. Temple University Press.
- Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
- Entman, R. M. (2003). Cascading activation: Contesting the White House’s frame after 9/11. Political Communication, 20(4), 415–432. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600390244176
- Festinger, L. (1962). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press.
- Garrett, R. K. (2009). Politically motivated reinforcement seeking: Reframing the selective exposure debate. Journal of Communication, 59(4), 676–699. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01452.x
- Garrett, R. K., Weeks, B. E., & Neo, R. L. (2016). Driving a wedge between evidence and beliefs: How online ideological news exposure promotes political misperceptions. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 21(5), 331–348. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12164
- Ghanem, S. (1997). Filling in the tapestry: The second level of agenda setting. In M. McCombs, D. Shaw, & D. Weaver (Eds.), Communication and democracy: Exploring the intellectual frontiers in agenda-setting theory (pp. 3–14). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Gil De Zúñiga, H., Molyneux, L., & Zheng, P. (2014). Social media, political expression, and political participation: Panel analysis of lagged and concurrent relationships. Journal of Communication, 64(4), 612–634. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12103
- Gross, K. (2008). Framing persuasive appeals: Episodic and thematic framing, emotional response, and policy opinion. Political Psychology, 29(2), 169–192. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00622.x
- Gruszczynski, M., & Wagner, M. W. (2017). Information flow in the 21st century: The dynamics of agenda-uptake. Mass Communication and Society, 20(3), 378–402. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2016.1255757
- Guo, L., & McCombs, M. (2015). The power of information networks: New directions for agenda setting. Routledge.
- Hart, P. S. (2011). One or many? The influence of episodic and thematic climate change frames on policy preferences and individual behavior change. Science Communication, 33(1), 28–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547010366400
- Hassell, H. J., Holbein, J. B., & Baldwin, M. (2020). Mobilize for our lives? School shootings and democratic accountability in US elections. American Political Science Review, 114(4), 1375–1385. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055420000635
- Hasson, Y., Tamir, M., Brahms, K. S., Cohrs, J. C., & Halperin, E. (2018). Are liberals and conservatives equally motivated to feel empathy toward others? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44(10), 1449–1459. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167218769867
- Holody, K. J., & Daniel, E. S. (2017). Attributes and frames of the Aurora shootings: National and local news coverage differences. Journalism Practice, 11(1), 80–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2015.1121786
- Hyun, K. D., & Moon, S. J. (2016). Agenda setting in the partisan TV news context: Attribute agenda setting and polarized evaluation of presidential candidates among viewers of NBC, CNN, and Fox News. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 93(3), 509–529. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699016628820
- Iyengar, S. (1991). Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues. University of Chicago Press.
- Iyengar, S. (1996). Framing responsibility for political issues. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 546(1), 59–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716296546001006
- Jones, J. M. (2018, March 14). U.S. preference for stricter gun laws highest since 1993. Gallup. https://news.gallup.com/poll/229562/preference-stricter-gun-laws-highest-1993.aspx?g_source=link_newsv9&g_campaign=item_232487&g_medium=copy
- Kiousis, S. (2005). Compelling arguments and attitude strength: Exploring the impact of second-level agenda setting on public opinion of presidential candidate images. The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 10(3), 27. https://doi.org/10.1177/1081180X05276095
- Lecheler, S., De Vreese, C., & Slothuus, R. (2009). Issue importance as a moderator of framing effects. Communication Research, 36(3), 400–425. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650209333028
- Levendusky, M. (2013). Partisan media exposure and attitudes toward the opposition. Political Communication, 30(4), 565–581. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2012.737435
- McCombs, M., & Ghanem, S. I. (2001). The convergence of agenda setting and framing. In S. D. Reese, O. H. Gandy, & A. E. Grant (Eds.), Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world (pp. 67–81). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- McCombs, M. (2014). Setting the agenda (2nd ed.). Polity Press.
- Muddiman, A., Stroud, N. J., & McCombs, M. (2014). Media fragmentation, attribute agenda setting, and political opinions about Iraq. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 58(2), 215–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2014.906433
- Pew Research Center. (2018). Gun policy remains divisive, but several proposals still draw bipartisan support. http://www.people-press.org/2018/10/18/gun-policy-remains-divisive-but-several-proposals-still-draw-bipartisan-support/
- Reese, S. D. (2001). Prologue: Framing public life: A bridging model for media research. In S. D. Reese, O. H. Gandy, & A. E. Grant (Eds.), Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world (pp. 7–31). Erlbaum.
- Rössler, P. (1999). The individual agenda-designing process: How interpersonal communication, egocentric networks, and mass media shape the perception of political issues by individuals. Communication Research, 26(6), 666–700. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365099026006002
- Saldaña, M., & Ardèvol-Abreu, A. (2015). From compelling arguments to compelling associations at the third level of agenda setting. In L. Guo & M. McCombs (Eds.), The power of information networks: New directions for agenda setting (pp. 104–118). Routledge.
- Scheufele, D. A., & Tewksbury, D. (2007). Framing, agenda setting, and priming: The evolution of three media effects models. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 9–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-9916.2007.00326.x
- Schmitt, K. M., Gunther, A. C., & Liebhart, J. L. (2004). Why partisans see mass media as biased. Communication Research, 31(6), 623–641. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650204269390
- Schoenbach, K., & Semetko, H. A. (1992). Agenda-setting, agenda reinforcing or agenda-deflating? A study of the 1990 German national election. Journalism Quarterly, 69(4), 837–846. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769909206900404
- Sheafer, T. (2007). How to evaluate it: The role of story-evaluative tone in agenda setting and priming. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 21–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00327_4.x
- Shehata, A., & Strömbäck, J. (2013). Not (yet) a new era of minimal effects: A study of agenda setting at the aggregate and individual levels. International Journal of Press/Politics, 18(2), 234–255. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161212473831
- Son, Y. J., & Weaver, D. H. (2006). Another look at what moves public opinion: Media agenda setting and polls in the 2000 US election. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 18(2), 174–197. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edh090
- Springer, S. A., & Harwood, J. (2015). The influence of episodic and thematic frames on policy and group attitudes: Mediational analysis. Human Communication Research, 41(2), 226–244. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12045
- Stroud, N. J. (2011). Niche news: The politics of news choice. Oxford University Press.
- Tankard, J., Hendrickson, L., Silberman, J. J., Bliss, K., & Ghanem, S. (1991). Media frames: Approaches to conceptualisation and measurement [Paper presentation]. Association for education in Journalism and mass communication, Boston, MA.
- Tankard, J. W. (2001). The empirical approach to the study of media framing. In S. D. Reese, O. H. Gandy, & A. E. Grant (Eds.), Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world (pp. 95–105). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- United States Census Bureau. (2017). American community survey: Demographic and housing estimates. https://factfinder.census.gov/faces/nav/jsf/pages/community_facts.xhtml
- Wagner, M. W., & Gruszczynski, M. (2016). When framing matters: How partisan and journalistic frames affect individual opinions and party identification. Journalism & Communication Monographs, 18(1), 5–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/1522637915623965
- Walgrave, S., Lefevere, J., & Tresch, A. (2012). The associative dimension of issue ownership. Public Opinion Quarterly, 76(4), 771–782. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfs023
- Weaver, D. (1980). Audience need for orientation and media effects. Communication Research, 7(3), 361–376. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365028000700305
- Weeks, B. E. (2015). Emotions, partisanship, and misperceptions: How anger and anxiety moderate the effect of partisan bias on susceptibility to political misinformation. Journal of Communication, 65(4), 699–719. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12164
- Weeks, B. E., Ksiazek, T. B., & Holbert, R. L. (2016). Partisan enclaves or shared media experiences? A network approach to understanding citizens’ political news environments. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 60(2), 248–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2016.1164170
- Wicks, R. H., Wicks, J. L., & Morimoto, S. A. (2014). Partisan media selective exposure during the 2012 presidential election. American Behavioral Scientist, 58(9), 1131–1143. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764213506208
- Yioutas, J., & Segvic, I. (2003). Revisiting the Clinton/Lewinsky scandal: The convergence of agenda setting and framing. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 80(3), 567–582. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900308000306
- Zhang, Y., Shah, D., Foley, J., Abhishek, A., Lukito, J., Suk, J., Kim, S. J., Sun, Z., Pevehouse, J., & Garlough, C. (2019). Whose lives matter? Mass shootings and social media discourses of sympathy and policy, 2012–2014. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 24(4), 182–202. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmz009
- Zillman, D., & Brosius, H. B. (2000). Exemplification in communication: The influence of case reports on issue perception. Lawrence Erlbaum.