Populist Hyperpartisans?: The Interaction Between Partisan Media Exposure and Populism in the 2020 US Presidential Election

References

• Ad Fontes. (2023). Interactive media bias chart. https://adfontesmedia.com/interactive-media-bias-chart/
   Google Scholar
• Akkerman, A., Mudde, C., & Zaslove, A. (2014). How populist are the people? Measuring populist attitudes in voters. Comparative Political Studies, 47(9), 1324–1353. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414013512600
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avery, J. M. (2009). Videomalaise or virtuous circle? The influence of the news media on political trust. The International Journal of Press/politics, 14(4), 410–433. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161209336224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Axelrod, R. (1967). The structure of public opinion on policy issues. Public Opinion Quarterly, 31(1), 51. https://doi.org/10.1086/267481
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnidge, M., & Peacock, C. (2019). A third wave of selective exposure research? The challenges posed by hyperpartisan news on social media. Media and Communication, 7(3), 4–7. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v7i3.2257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartlett, J., Birdwell, J., & Littler, M. (2012). The new face of digital populism. Demos.
   Google Scholar
• Benkler, Y., Farris, R., & Roberts, H. (2018). Network propaganda: Manipulation, disinformation, and radicalization in American politics (Vol. 1). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190923624.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Brenan, M. (2021). Americans’ trust in media dips to second lowest on record. Gallup. https://news.gallup.com/poll/355526/americans-trust-media-dips-second-lowest-record.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Cappella, J. N., & Jamieson, K. H. (1997). Spiral of cynicism: The press and the public good. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Castanho Silva, B., Andreadis, I., Anduiza, E., Blanuša, N., Morlet Corti, Y., Delfino, G., Rico, G., Ruth-Lovell, S. P., Spruyt, B., Steenbergen, M., & Littvay, L. (2018). Public opinion surveys: A new scale. In K. Hawkins, R. Carlin, L. Littvay, & C. R. Kaltwasser (Eds.), An ideational approach to populism: Concept, theory, and analysis (1st ed., pp. 150–171). Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315196923-8
   Google Scholar
• Castro, L., Strömbäck, J., Esser, F., Van Aelst, P., de Vreese, C., Aalberg, T., Aalberg, T., Cardenal, A. S., Corbu, N., Hopmann, D. N., & Theocharis, Y. (2021). Navigating high-choice European political information environments: A comparative analysis of news user profiles and political knowledge. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 27(4), 827–859. https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612211012572
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chua, A. (2018). How billionaires learned to love populism. Politico. https://www.politico.eu/article/how-wealthy-elite-billionaires-donald-trump-learned-to-love-populism-politics/
   Google Scholar
• Davis, R. (1997). Understanding broadcast political talk. Political Communication, 14(3), 323–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/105846097199353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fawzi, N. (2019). Untrustworthy news and the media as “Enemy of the people?” How a populist worldview shapes recipients’ attitudes toward the media. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 24(2), 146–164. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161218811981
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fawzi, N., & Mothes, C. (2020). Perceptions of media performance: Expectation-evaluation discrepancies and their relationship with media-related and populist attitudes. Media and Communication, 8(3), 335–347. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v8i3.3142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrett, R. K., & Stroud, N. J. (2014). Partisan paths to exposure diversity: Differences in pro- and counterattitudinal news consumption. Journal of Communication, 64(4), 680–701. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gentzkow, M., & Shapiro, J. M. (2011). Ideological segregation online and offline. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126(4), 1799–1839. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjr044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gidron, N., & Bonikowski, B. (2013). Varieties of populism: Literature review and research agenda. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2459387
   Google Scholar
• Hameleers, M. (2018). A typology of populism: Toward a revised theoretical framework on the sender side and receiver side of communication. International Journal of Communication, 12, 2171–2191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hameleers, M., Bos, L., & de Vreese, C. H. (2017). The appeal of media populism: The media preferences of citizens with populist attitudes. Mass Communication and Society, 20(4), 481–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2017.1291817
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hameleers, M., & de Vreese, C. (2021). Perceived mis- and disinformation in a post-factual information setting: A conceptualization and evidence from ten European countries. In H. Tumber & S. Waisbord (Eds.), The Routledge companion to media disinformation and populism (1st ed., pp. 366–375). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003004431-39
   Google Scholar
• Hanitzsch, T., Van Dalen, A., & Steindl, N. (2018). Caught in the nexus: A comparative and longitudinal analysis of public trust in the press. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 23(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161217740695
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins, K. A. (2010). Venezuela’s Chavismo and populism in comparative perspective. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511730245
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins, K. A., Riding, S., & Mudde, C. (2012). Measuring populist attitudes. Political Concepts Committee on Concepts and Methods Working Paper Series, 55, 1–35.
   Google Scholar
• Hoewe, J., & Peacock, C. (2020). The power of media in shaping political attitudes. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 34, 19–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2019.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchens, M. J., Romanova, E., & Shaughnessy, B. (2023). The good, the bad, and the evil media: Influence of online comments on media trust. Journalism Studies, 24(11), 1440–1457. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2023.2216811
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jagers, J., & Walgrave, S. (2007). Populism as political communication style: An empirical study of political parties’ discourse in Belgium. European Journal of Political Research, 46(3), 319–345. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00690.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazin, M. (1998). The populist persuasion: An American history. Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krämer, B. (2014). Media populism: A conceptual clarification and some theses on its effects. Communication Theory, 24(1), 42–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lacatus, C. (2019). Populism and the 2016 American election: Evidence from official press releases and Twitter. PS: Political Science & Politics, 52(2), 223–228. https://doi.org/10.1017/S104909651800183X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladd, J. M. (2012). Why Americans hate the media and how it matters. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400840359
   Google Scholar
• Lazarsfeld, P. F., Berelson, B., & Gaudet, H. (1948). The people’s choice: How the voter makes up his mind in a presidential election. Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, T.-T. (2010). Why they don’t trust the media: An examination of factors predicting trust. American Behavioral Scientist, 54(1), 8–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764210376308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levendusky, M. (2013). How partisan media polarize America. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, M.-C., & Haridakis, P. M. (2021). The impact of political identity and outgroup partisan media contact on intergroup bias and unwillingness to compromise with the opposing party: An intergroup threat approach. Mass Communication & Society, 25(5), 698–720. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2021.1996608
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lippmann, W. (1957). Public opinion. MacMillan Co. https://doi.org/10.1037/14847-000
   Google Scholar
• Long, J. A., Eveland, W. P., & Slater, M. D. (2019). Partisan media selectivity and partisan identity threat: The role of social and geographic context. Mass Communication and Society, 22(2), 145–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2018.1504302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manucci, L. (2017). Populism and the media. In C. R. Kaltwasser, P. Taggart, P. O. Espejo, & P. Ostiguy (Eds.), Oxford handbook of populism (Vol. 1). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198803560.013.17
   Google Scholar
• Mazzoleni, G., Stewart, J., & Horsfield, B. (Eds.). (2003). The media and neo-populism: A contemporary comparative analysis. Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Metzger, M. J., Hartsell, E. H., & Flanagin, A. J. (2020). Cognitive dissonance or credibility? A comparison of two theoretical explanations for selective exposure to partisan news. Communication Research, 47(1), 3–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650215613136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mourão, R. R., Thorson, E., Chen, W., & Tham, S. M. (2018). Media repertoires and news trust during the early Trump administration. Journalism Studies, 19(13), 1945–1956. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2018.1500492
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudde, C. (2004). The populist zeitgeist. Government and Opposition, 39(4), 541–563. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00135.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudde, C., & Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (2017). Populism: A very short introduction. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780190234874.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Müller, J. W. (2017). Populism and constitutionalism. In C. R. Kaltwasser, P. Taggart, & P. O. Espejo (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of populism Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198803560.013.28
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, J. L., & Webster, J. G. (2017). The myth of partisan selective exposure: A portrait of the online political news audience. Social Media + Society, 3(3), 205630511772931. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305117729314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuman, W. R., & Guggenheim, L. (2011). The evolution of media effects theory: A six-stage model of cumulative research. Communication Theory, 21(2), 169–196. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2011.01381.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ognyanova, K., Lazer, D., Robertson, R. E., & Wilson, C. (2020). Misinformation in action: Fake news exposure is linked to lower trust in media, higher trust in government when your side is in power. The Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review, 1(4), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-024
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, J. E., & Rahn, W. M. (2016). Rise of the Trumpenvolk: Populism in the 2016 election. The Annals of the American Academy of Political & Social Sciences, 667(1), 189–206. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716216662639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer, R., & Toff, B. (2022, online). Neither absent nor ambient: Incidental news exposure from the perspective of news avoiders in the UK, United States, and Spain. The International Journal of Press/politics. https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612221103144
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peacock, C., Hoewe, J., Panek, E., & Willis, G. P. (2021). Hyperpartisan news use: Relationships with partisanship and cognitive and affective involvement. Mass Communication and Society, 24(2), 210–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2020.1844902
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peck, R. (2021). Listen to your gut:” How Fox News’s populist style changed the American public sphere and journalistic truth in the process. In H. Tumber & S. Waisbord (Eds.), The Routledge companion to media disinformation and populism (1st ed., pp. 160–168). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003004431-18
   Google Scholar
• Peng, Y., & Yang, T. (2021). Anatomy of audience duplication networks: How individual characteristics differentially contribute to fragmentation in news consumption and trust. New Media & Society, 24(10), 2270–2290. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444821991559
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2019). Fighting misinformation on social media using crowdsourced judgments of news source quality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(7), 2521–2526. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1806781116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, E., Goel, S., & Iyengar, S. (2021). Partisan selective exposure in online news consumption: Evidence from the 2016 presidential campaign. Political Science Research and Methods, 9(2), 242–258. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2019.55
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. (2020). U.S. Media polarization and the 2020 election: A nation divided. https://www.pewresearch.org/journalism/2020/01/24/u-s-media-polarization-and-the-2020-election-a-nation-divided/
   Google Scholar
• Potthast, M., Kiesel, J., Reinartz, K., Bevendorff, J., & Stein, B. (2017). A stylometric inquiry into hyperpartisan and fake news. Conference Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 1(Long Papers). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/P18-1022
   Google Scholar
• Rae, M. (2021). Hyperpartisan news: Rethinking the media for populist politics. New Media & Society, 23(5), 1117–1132. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820910416
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinemann, C., Haas, A., & Rieger, D. (2020). “I don’t care, ‘Cause I don’t trust them!” The impact of information sources, institutional trust, and populist attitudes on the perception of the COVID-19 pandemic during the first lockdown in Germany (White Paper). Deparment of Media and Communication. shorturl.at/jnuFH
   Google Scholar
• Ruzza, C., & Fella, S. (2011). Populism and the Italian right. Acta Politica, 46(2), 158–179. https://doi.org/10.1057/ap.2011.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulz, A. (2019). Where populist citizens get the news: An investigation of news audience polarization along populist attitudes in 11 countries. Communication Monographs, 86(1), 88–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2018.1508876
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulz, A., Müller, P., Schemer, C., Wirz, D. S., Wettstein, M., & Wirth, W. (2018). Measuring populist attitudes on three dimensions. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 30(2), 316–326. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edw037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulze, H. (2020). Who uses right-wing alternative online media? An exploration of audience characteristics. Politics & Governance, 8(3), 6–18. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i3.2925
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shearer, E., & Mitchell, A. (2021). Broad agreement in U.S. – Even among partisans – On which news outlets are part of the ‘Mainstream media’. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2021/05/07/broad-agreement-in-u-s-even-among-partisans-on-which-news-outlets-are-part-of-the-mainstream-media/
   Google Scholar
• Slater, M. D. (2007). Reinforcing spirals: The mutual influence of media selectivity and media effects and their impact on individual behavior and social identity. Communication Theory, 17(3), 281–303. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2007.00296.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staufer, S. J. (2021). Donald Trump, Bernie Sanders, and the question of populism. Journal of Political Ideologies, 26(2), 220–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569317.2020.1855777
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stavrakakis, Y., Andreadis, I., & Katsambekis, G. (2017). A new populism index at work: Identifying populist candidates and parties in the contemporary Greek context. European Politics and Society, 18(4), 446–464. https://doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2016.1261434
   Google Scholar
• Stecula, D. A., & Pickup, M. (2021). How populism and conservative media fuel conspiracy beliefs about COVID-19 and what it means for COVID-19 behaviors. Research & Politics, 8(1), 205316802199397. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168021993979
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stier, S., Kirkizh, N., Froio, C., & Schroeder, R. (2020). Populist attitudes and selective exposure to online news: A cross-country analysis combining web tracking and surveys. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 25(3), 426–446. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161220907018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strömbäck, J., Boomgaarden, H., Broda, E., Damstra, A., Lindgren, E., Tsfati, Y., & Vliegenthart, R. (2022). From low-choice to high-choice media environments. In J. Strömbäck, Å. Wikforss, K. Glüer, T. Lindholm, & H. Ocarsson (Eds.), Knowledge resistance in high-choice information environments (1st ed., pp. 49–68). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003111474-3
   Google Scholar
• Stroud, N. J. (2011). Niche news: The politics of news choice. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stroud, N. J. (2018). Selective exposure theories. In K. Kenski & K. H. Jamieson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political communication (1st ed., pp. 1–19). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199793471.013.009
   Google Scholar
• Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. (2006). Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 755–769. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00214.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taggart, P. A. (2000). Populism. Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tsfati, Y., & Ariely, G. (2014). Individual and contextual correlates of trust in media across 44 countries. Communication Research, 41(6), 760–782. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650213485972
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uscinski, J. E., Enders, A. M., Seelig, M. I., Klofstad, C. A., Funchion, J. R., Everett, C., Wuchty, S., Premaratne, K., & Murthi, M. N. (2021). American politics in two dimensions: Partisan and ideological identities versus anti-establishment orientations. American Journal of Political Science, 65(4), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12616
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar