Advanced search
Publication Cover
Mass Communication and Society Latest Articles
Submit an article Journal homepage
1,034
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Political Opinion Leaders in High-Choice Information Environments: Are They More Informed Than Others?

Jesper Strömbäcka Department of Journalism, Media and Communication, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, SwedenCorrespondence[email protected]
View further author information
,
Elina Lindgrena Department of Journalism, Media and Communication, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, SwedenORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-9032-1347View further author information
ORCID Icon,
Yariv Tsfatib Department of Communication, University of Haifa, Haifa, IsraelView further author information
,
Alyt Damstrac Amsterdam School of Communication Research, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The NetherlandsView further author information
,
Rens Vliegenthartd Strategic Communication Group, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The NetherlandsORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2401-2914View further author information
ORCID Icon,
Hajo Boomgaardene Department of Communication, University of Vienna, Vienna, AustriaView further author information
,
Elena Brodaa Department of Journalism, Media and Communication, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, SwedenView further author information
,
Noelle Lebernegge Department of Communication, University of Vienna, Vienna, AustriaView further author information
&
Sebastian Galygae Department of Communication, University of Vienna, Vienna, AustriaView further author information
 show all
Published online: 14 Dec 2023

References

  • Aalberg, T., & Curran, J. (2012). How media inform democracy: A comparative approach. Routledge.
  • Benkler, Y., Faris, R., & Roberts, H. (2018). Network propaganda. Manipulation, disinformation, and radicalization in American politics. Oxford University Press.
  • Bode, L. (2016). Political news in the news feed: Learning politics from social media. Mass Communication & Society, 19(1), 24–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2015.1045149
  • Bro, P., & Wallberg, F. (2015). Gatekeeping in a digital era. Principles, practices and technological platforms. Journalism Practice, 9(1), 92–105. https://doi.org/10/1080/17512786.2014.928468
  • Childers, T. L. (1986). Assessment of the psychometric properties of an opinion leadership scale. Journal of Marketing Research, 23(2), 184–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378602300211
  • Damstra, A., Vliegenthart, R., Boomgaarden, H., Glüer, K., Lindgren, E., Strömbäck, J., & Tsfati, Y. (2023). Knowledge and the news: An investigation of the relation between news use, news avoidance, and the presence of (mis)beliefs. The International Journal of Press/politics, 28(1), 29–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612211031457
  • Delli Carpini, M. X., & Keeter, S. (1996). What Americans know about politics and why it matters. Yale University Press.
  • Flynn, D. (2016). The scope and correlates of political misperceptions in the mass public. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American political science association.
  • Flynn, D. J., Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2017). The nature and origins of misperceptions: Understanding false and unsupported beliefs about politics. Advances in Political Psychology, 38(suppl. 1.), 127–150. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12394
  • Gaines, B. J., Kuklinski, J. H., Quirk, P. J., Peyton, B., & Verkuilen, J. (2007). Same facts, different interpretations: Partisan motivation and opinion on Iraq. The Journal of Politics, 69(4), 957–974. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2007.00601.x
  • Garrett, R. K. (2009). Echo chambers online? Politically motivated selective exposure among Internet news users. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(2), 265–285. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01440.x
  • Glüer, K., & Wikforss, Å. (2022). What is knowledge resistance? In J. Strömbäck, Å. Wikforss, K. Glüer, T. Lindholm, & H. Oscarsson (Eds.), Knowledge resistance in high-choice information environments (pp. 29–48). Routledge.
  • Gnambs, T. (2019). Opinion leadership types or continuous opinion leadership traits? International Journal of Psychology, 54(1), 88–92. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12442
  • Gnambs, T., & Batinic, B. (2011). Convergent and discriminant validity of opinion leadership. Multitrait-multimethod analysis across measurement occasion and informant type. Journal of Individual Differences, 32(2), 94–102. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000040
  • Graham, M. (2022). Measuring misperceptions? American Political Science Review, 117(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000305542200038
  • Hallin, D. C., & Mancini, P. (2004). Comparing media systems. Three models of media and politics. Cambridge University Press.
  • Hameleers, M. (2021). Populist disinformation in fragmented information settings. Understanding the nature and persuasiveness of populist and post-factual communication. Routledge.
  • Hindman, M. (2009). The myth of digital democracy. Princeton University Press.
  • Hochschild, J. L., & Einstein, K. L. (2015). Do facts matter? Information and misinformation in American politics. Oklahoma University Press.
  • IPSOS. (2018). Perils of perception 2018. Ipsos.
  • Jerit, J., & Barabas, J. (2012). Partisan perceptual bias and the information environment. The Journal of Politics, 74(3), 672–684. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381612000187
  • Jungnickel, K. (2018). New methods of measuring opinion leadership: A systematic, interdisciplinary literature analysis. International Journal of Communication, 12, 2702–2724.
  • Kahan, D. M. (2016). The politically motivated reasoning paradigm, part 1: What politically motivated reasoning is and how to measure it. In R. Scott & S. Kosslyn (Eds.), Emerging trends in the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 1–16). Wiley & Sons.
  • Kahan, D. M., Jenkins-Smith, H., & Braman, D. (2011). Cultural cognition of scientific consensus. Journal of Risk Research, 14(2), 147–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2010.511246
  • Karlsen, R. (2015). Followers are opinion leaders: The role of people in the flow of political communication on and beyond social networking sites. European Journal of Communication, 30(3), 301–318. https://doi.org/10.1177/02673231155773
  • Katz, E. (1957). The two-step flow of communication: An up-to-date report on an hypothesis. Public Opinion Quarterly, 21(1), 61–78. https://doi.org/10.1086/266687
  • Katz, E., & Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1955). Personal influence. The part played by people in the flow of mass communication. Free Press.
  • Kavanagh, J., & Rich, M. D. (2018). Truth decay. An initial exploration of the diminishing role of facts and analysis in American public life. Rand.
  • Klintman, M. (2019). Knowledge resistance: How we avoid insight from others. Manchester University Press.
  • Knobloch-Westerwick, S., & Meng, J. (2009). Looking the other way: Selective exposure to attitude-consistent and counterattitudinal political information. Communication Research, 36(3), 426–448. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650209333030
  • Kraft, P. W., Lodge, M., & Taber, C. S. (2015). Why people “don´t trust the evidence”: Motivated reasoning and scientific beliefs. Annals of the American Academy, 658(1), 121–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716214554758
  • Kuklinski, J. H., Quirt, P. J., Jerit, J., & Rich, R. F. (2000). Misinformation and the currency of democratic citizenship. The Journal of Politics, 62(3), 790–816. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-3816.00033
  • Kümpel, A. S. (2020). The Matthew Effect in social media news use: Assessing inequalities in news exposure and news engagement on social network sites (SNS). Journalism, 21(8), 1083–1098. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884920915374
  • Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108(3), 480–498. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480
  • Lazarsfeld, P. F., Berelson, B., & Gaudet, H. (1948). The people’s choice: How the voter makes up his mind in a presidential campaign. Columbia University Press.
  • Lindgren, E., Damstra, A., Strömbäck, J., Tsfati, Y., Vliegenthart, R., & Boomgaarden, H. (2022). Uninformed or misinformed? A review of the conceptual-operational gap between (lack of) knowledge and (mis)perceptions. In J. Strömbäck, Å. Wikforss, K. Glüer, T. Lindholm, & H. Oscarsson (Eds.), Knowledge resistance in high-choice information environments (pp. 187–206). Routledge.
  • Lodge, M., & Taber, C. S. (2013). The rationalizing voter. Cambridge University Press.
  • Luskin, R. C. (1990). Explaining political sophistication. Political Behavior, 12(4), 331–361. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992793
  • Luskin, R., & Bullock, J. (2011). “Don’t know” means “don’t know”: DK responses and the public’s level of political knowledge. The Journal of Politics, 73(2), 547–557. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381611000132
  • Mangold, F., & Bachl, M. (2018). New news media, new opinion leaders? How political opinion leaders navigate the modern high-choice media environment. Journal of Communication, 68(5), 896–919. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqy033
  • Messing, S., & Westwood, S. J. (2014). Selective exposure in the age of social media: Endorsements trump partisan source affiliation when selecting news online. Communication Research, 41(8), 1042–1063. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650212466406
  • Miller, J. M., Saunders, K. L., & Farhart, C. E. (2016). Conspiracy endorsement as motivated reasoning: The moderating roles of political knowledge and trust. American Journal of Political Science, 60(4), 824–844. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12234
  • Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Robertson, C. T., Eddy, K., & Nielsen, R. K. (2022). Reuters Institute digital news report 2022. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.
  • Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Schulz, A., Andi, S., Robertson, C. T., & Nielsen, R. K. (2021). Reuters digital news report 2021. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.
  • Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2(2), 175–220. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175
  • Nisbet, E. C. (2006). The engagement model of opinion leadership: Testing validity within a European context. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 18(1), 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edh100
  • Noelle-Neumann, E. (1985, September 1–5). Die Identifizierung der Meinungsführer [ Paper presented at the Esomar-conference]. Wiesbaden, Germany.
  • Nord, L., & Grusell, M. (2021). Media and politics in Sweden. In E. Skogerbø, Ø. Ihlen, N. N. Kristensen, & L. Nord (Eds.), Power, communication, and politics in the Nordic countries (pp. 113–132). Nordicom.
  • Ognyanova, K. (2017). Multistep flow of communication: Network effects. In P. Roessler, C. Hoffner, & L. van Zoonen (Eds.), International encyclopedia of media effects (pp. 1–10). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118783764.wbieme0056
  • Prior, M. (2007). Post-broadcast democracy: How media choice increases inequality in political involvement and polarizes elections. Cambridge University Press.
  • Schäfer, M. S., & Taddicken, M. (2015). Mediatized opinion leaders: New patterns of opinion leadership in new media environments? International Journal of Communication, 9, 960–981.
  • Schenk, M., & Rössler, P. (1997). The rediscovery of opinion leaders. An application of the personality strength scale. Communications, 22(1), 5–30. https://doi.org/10.1515/comm.1997.22.1.5
  • Shehata, A., & Strömbäck, J. (2021). Learning political news from social media: Network media logic and current affairs news learning in a high-choice media environment. Communication Research, 48(1), 125–147. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650217749
  • Shoemaker, P. J., & Vos, T. P. (2009). Gatekeeping theory. Routledge.
  • Sides, J., & Citrin, J. (2007). European opinion about immigration: The role of identities, interests, and information. British Journal of Political Science, 37(3), 477–504. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123407000257
  • Skovsgaard, M., & Andersen, K. (2020). Conceptualizing news avoidance: Towards a shared understanding of different causes and potential solutions. Journalism Studies, 21(4), –476. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2019.1686410
  • Soffer, O. (2021). Algorithmic personalization and the two-step flow of communication. Communication Theory, 31(3), 297–315. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtz008
  • Strömbäck, J., Boomgaarden, H., Broda, E., Damstra, A., Lindgren, E., Tsfati, Y., & Vliegenthart, R. (2022). From low-choice to high-choice media environments: Implications for knowledge resistance. In J. Strömbäck, Å. Wikforss, K. Glüer, T. Lindholm, & H. Oscarsson (Eds.), Knowledge resistance in high-choice information environments (pp. 49–68). Routledge.
  • Strömbäck, J., Djerf-Pierre, M., & Shehata, A. (2013). The dynamics of political interest and news media consumption: A longitudinal perspective. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 25(4), 414–435. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/eds018
  • Strömbäck, J., Wikforss, Å., Glüer, K., Lindholm, T., & Oscarsson, H. (2022). Knowledge resistance in high-choice information environments. Routledge.
  • Stroud, N. J. (2011). Niche news. The politics of news choice. Oxford University Press.
  • Syvertsen, T., Enli, G., Mjøs, O. J., & Moe, H. (2014). The media welfare state. Nordic media in the digital era. University of Michigan Press.
  • Thorson, K., & Wells, C. (2016). Curated flows: A framework for mapping media exposure in the digital age. Communication Theory, 26(3), 309–329. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12087
  • Trepte, S., & Scherer, H. (2010). Opinion leaders – do they know more than others about their area of interest? Communications, 35(2), 119–140. https://doi.org/10.1515/comm.2010.007
  • Van Aelst, P., Strömbäck, J., Aalberg, T., Esser, F., de Vreese, C., Matthes, J., Hopmann, D., Salgado, S., Hubé, N., Stepinska, A., Papathanassopoulos, S., Berganza, R., Legnante, G., Reinemann, C., Sheafer, T., & Stanyer, J. (2017). Political communication in a high-choice media environment: A challenge for democracy? Annals of the International Communication Association, 41(1), 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2017.1288551
  • van der Linden, W. J. (2010). Item response theory. In P. Peterson, E. Baker, & B. McGaw (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (3rd ed., pp. 81–88). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-044894-7.00250-5
  • Vos, T. P., & Heinderyckx, F. (Eds.). (2015). Gatekeeping in transition. Routledge.
  • Walker, M., & Matsa, K. E. (2021). News consumption across social media in 2021. Pew Research Center.
  • Weeks, B. E., Ardèvol-Abreu, A., & de Zúniga, H. G. (2017). Online influence? Social media use, opinion leadership, and political persuasion. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 29(2), 214–239. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edv050
  • Weimann, G. (1991). The influentials: Back to the concept of opinion leaders? Public Opinion Quarterly, 55(2), 267–279. https://doi.org/10.1086/269257
  • Weimann, G. (1994). The influentials. People who influences people. State University of New York Press.
  • Winter, S., & Neubaum, G. (2016). Examining characteristics of opinion leaders in social media: A motivational approach. Social Media + Society, 2(3), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305116665858
  • Zaller, J. R. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge University Press.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.