“Meta-Talk” as a Composition Tool: Promoting Reflective Dialogue During the Drafting Process

References

• Achugar, M., Schleppegrell, M., & Oteiza, T. (2007). Engaging teachers in language analysis: A functional linguistics approach to reflective literacy. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 6(2), 8–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartholomae, D., & Elbow, P. (1995). Interchanges: Responses to Bartholomae and Elbow. College Composition and Communication, 46(1), 84–92.
   Google Scholar
• Borg, S. (2010). Talking about grammar in the foreign language classroom. Language Awareness, 7(4), 159–175.
   Google Scholar
• Cadwell, J., & Quinn, J. (Eds.). (2015). A classroom revolution: Reflections on Harkness learning and teaching. Exeter, NH: Phillips Exeter Academy.
   Google Scholar
• Common Core State Standards. (2016). College and career readiness anchor standards for language. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/ELA-Literacy/CCRA/L/
   Google Scholar
• Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2000). Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Delpit, L. D. (2006). Other people's children: Cultural conflict in the classroom. New York, NY: The New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Derrida, J. (1976). Of grammatology. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Færch, C. (1985). Meta talk in FL classroom discourse. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 7(2), 184–199.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (2001). Language and power. London, UK: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York, NY: Seabury Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freire, P., & Macedo, D. (1998). The Paulo Freire reader. New York, NY: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Gebhard, M., & Martin, J. (2010). Grammar and literacy learning. In D. Fisher & D. Lapp (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching the English language arts. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum/Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. (2000). The new literacy studies: From ‘socially situated’ to the work. In D. Barton, M. Hamilton, & R. Ivanic (Eds.), Situated literacies: Reading and writing in context (pp. 180–196). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. (2008). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. (2011). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gombert, J. E. (1992). Metalinguistic development. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 465–491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayher, J. S. (1990). Uncommon sense: Theoretical practice in language education. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann Educational Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Moll, L. C., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & Gonzalez, N. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory Into Practice, 31(2), 132–141.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, J., & Schleppegrell, M. (2014). Using a functional linguistics metalanguage to support academic language development in the English language arts. Linguistics and Education, 26, 92–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nippold, M., Ward-Lonergan, J., & Fanning, J. (2005). Persuasive writing in children, adolescents, and adults: A study of syntactic, semantic, and pragmatic development. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 36, 125–138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nixon, A. (2013). Engaging urban youth in meaningful dialogue through digital storytelling. In C. Lankshear & M. Knobel (Eds.), A new literacies reader: Educational perspectives (pp. 123–138). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Paris, D. (2012). Culturally sustaining pedagogy: A needed change in stance, terminology, and practice. Educational Researcher, 41(3), 93–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenblatt, L. M. (1988). Writing and reading: The transactional theory. Technical Report No. 13, Center for the Study of Writing. Berkeley, CA: University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Shor, I. (2012). Empowering education: Critical teaching for social change. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smitherman, G. (1996). African-American English: From the hood to the amen corner. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota.
   Google Scholar
• Sperling, M., & Freedman, S. W. (1987). A good girl writes like a good girl: Written response and clues to the teaching/learning process. Written Communication, 4(4), 343–369.
   Google Scholar
• Street, B. V. (1984). Literacy in theory and practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Street, B. V. (2003). What's “new” in new literacy studies? Critical approaches to literacy in theory and practice. Current Issues in Comparative Education, 5(2), 77–91.
   Google Scholar