The Use of Media in Media Psychology

REFERENCES

• Brashers, D. E., & Jackson, S. (1999). Changing conceptions of “message effects”: A 24-year overview. Human Communication Research, 25, 457–477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cappella, J. N. (2006). Integrating message effects and behavior change theories: Organizing comments and unanswered questions. Journal of Communication, 56(Suppl. 1), S265–S279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, H. H. (1973). The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 335–359.
   Google Scholar
• Dillard, J. P., & Peck, E. (2000). Affect and persuasion emotional responses to public service announcements. Communication Research, 27, 461–495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forster, K., & Dickinson, R. (1976). More on the language-as-fixed effect fallacy: Monte Carlo estimates of error rates for F1, F2, F′, and min F′. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 15, 135–142.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. (1960). The concept of the stimulus in psychology. American Psychologist, 15, 694–703.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holbert, R. L., Hansen, G. J., Caplan, S. E., & Mortensen, S. (2007). Presidential debate viewing and Michael Moore's Fahrenheit 9–11: A study of affect-as-transfer and passionate reasoning. Media Psychology, 9, 673–694.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, S., & Jacobs, S. (1983). Generalizing about messages: Suggestions for design and analysis of experiments. Human Communication Research, 9, 169–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, S., O'Keefe, D. J., Jacobs, S., & Brashers, D. E. (1989). Messages as replications: Toward a message-centered design strategy. Communications Monographs, 56, 364–384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Judd, C. M., Westfall, J., & Kenny, D. A. (2012). Treating stimuli as a random factor in social psychology: A new and comprehensive solution to a pervasive but largely ignored problem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 54–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., Tversky, A. (Eds.). (1982). Judgments under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kanazawa, M. T., & Funk, J. P. (2001). Racial discrimination in professional basketball: Evidence from Nielsen ratings. Economic Inquiry, 39, 599–608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molenaar, P. C., & Campbell, C. G. (2009). The new person-specific paradigm in psychology. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 112–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nass, C. I., & Reeves, B. (1991). Combining, distinguishing, and generating theories in communication: A domains of analysis framework. Communication Research, 18, 240–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Keefe, D. J. (2014, April). Evidence-based persuasive message design: Specifying the evidentiary requirements. Paper presented at the annual Kentucky Conference of Health Communication, Lexington, KY.
   Google Scholar
• Raaijmakers, J. G., Schrijnemakers, J., & Gremmen, F. (1999). How to deal with “the language-as-fixed-effect fallacy”: Common misconceptions and alternative solutions. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 416–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ram, N., Gerstorf, D., Lindenberger, U., & Smith, J. (2011). Developmental change and intraindividual variability: Relating cognitive aging to cognitive plasticity, cardiovascular lability, and emotional diversity. Psychology and Aging, 26, 363–371.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeves, B. (1989). Theories about news and theories about cognition. American Behavioral Scientist, 33, 191–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeves, B., & Geiger, S. (1994). Designing experiments that assess psychological responses to media messages. In A. Lang (Ed.), Measuring psychological responses to media messages (pp. 165–180). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rietveld, T., & van Hout, R. (2007). Analysis of variance for repeated measures designs with word materials as a nested random or fixed factor. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 735–747.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22, 1359–1366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slater, M. D., Peter, J., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2015). Message variability and heterogeneity: A core challenge for communication research. In E. L. Cohen (Ed.), Communication Yearbook (pp. 3–32). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Thorson, E., Wicks, R., & Leshner, G. (2012). Experimental methodology in journalism and mass communication research. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 89, 112–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1971). Belief in the law of small numbers. Psychological Bulletin, 76, 105–110.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, J. B. (1924). Behaviorism. New York, NY: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Webster, J. G., Phalen, P. F., & Lichty, L. W. (2006). Ratings analysis: The theory and practice of audience research (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Westfall, J., Kenny, D. A., & Judd, C. M. (2014). Statistical power and optimal design in experiments in which samples of participants respond to samples of stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 2020–2045.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickens, T. D., & Keppel, G. (1983). On the choice of design and of test statistic in the analysis of experiments with sampled materials. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 296–309.
   Google Scholar
• Yeykelis, L., Cummings, J. J., & Reeves, B. (2014). Multitasking on a single device: Arousal and the frequency, anticipation, and prediction of switching between media content on a computer. Journal of Communication, 64, 167–192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar